{"id":212973,"date":"2010-09-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010"},"modified":"2014-07-08T23:45:04","modified_gmt":"2014-07-08T18:15:04","slug":"pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 2626 of 2010()\n\n\n1. PIOUS THATTIL,S\/O.JOSEPH\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. JOJO ANTONY, S\/O. K.P.ANTONY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE REPRESENTED BY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.B.PRAJITH\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN\n\n Dated :03\/09\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                    V.K.MOHANAN, J.\n                  -----------------------------\n                Crl.R.P.No.2626 of 2010\n                ---------------------------------\n        Dated this the 3rd day of September 2010\n\n\n                         O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>     The accused in a prosecution for an offence u\/s.138 of<\/p>\n<p>the Negotiable Instruments Act is the revision petitioner, as<\/p>\n<p>he is aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence<\/p>\n<p>imposed by the courts below.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2.  The   case   of    the    complainant    is that the<\/p>\n<p>accused\/revision petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.60,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>from the complainant and towards the discharge of the debt<\/p>\n<p>due to the complainant, he issued a cheque dated 1.7.2005 for<\/p>\n<p>an amount of Rs.60,000\/-, which when presented for<\/p>\n<p>encashment dishonoured, as there was no sufficient fund in<\/p>\n<p>the account maintained by the accused and the cheque<\/p>\n<p>amount was not repaid inspite of a formal demand notice and<\/p>\n<p>thus the revision petitioner has committed the offence<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.2626 of 2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                             -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>punishable u\/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. With<\/p>\n<p>the said allegation, the complainant approached the Judicial<\/p>\n<p>First Class Magistrate No.II, Thrissur, by filing a formal<\/p>\n<p>complaint, upon which cognizance was taken u\/s.138 of the<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act and instituted S.T.No.4112\/2005.<\/p>\n<p>During the trial of the case, the complainant himself was<\/p>\n<p>examined as PW1 and Exts.P1 to P6 were marked.            No<\/p>\n<p>evidence was adduced from the side of the defence. On the<\/p>\n<p>basis of the available materials and evidence on record, the<\/p>\n<p>trial court has found that the cheque in question was issued<\/p>\n<p>by the revision petitioner\/accused for the purpose of<\/p>\n<p>discharging his debt due to the complainant.            Thus<\/p>\n<p>accordingly the court held that, the complainant has<\/p>\n<p>established the case against the accused\/ revision petitioner<\/p>\n<p>and consequently found that the accused is guilty and thus<\/p>\n<p>convicted him u\/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. On<\/p>\n<p>such conviction, the trial court sentenced the revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months and<\/p>\n<p>to pay a compensation of Rs.60,000\/- to the complainant<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.2626 of 2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                               -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>u\/s.357(3) of Cr.P.C. and the default sentence was fixed as<\/p>\n<p>three months simple imprisonment.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. Though an appeal was filed, at the instance of the<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner\/accused, by judgment dated 2.8.2010 in<\/p>\n<p>Crl.A.No.788\/2008, the Court of Ist Addl. Sessions Judge of<\/p>\n<p>Thrissur allowed the appeal only in part and thus while<\/p>\n<p>confirming the conviction imposed against the revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, the sentence is modified and reduced to till the<\/p>\n<p>rising of the court.     While maintaining the order of pay<\/p>\n<p>compensation, the default sentence is reduced to 11\/2 months.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly the revision petitioner is directed to appear<\/p>\n<p>before the trial court on 6.9.2010 to receive the sentence.<\/p>\n<p>      4. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner and also perused the judgments of the<\/p>\n<p>courts below.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5. As this court is not inclined to interfere with the order<\/p>\n<p>of conviction recorded by the courts below, the counsel for<\/p>\n<p>the revision petitioner submitted that, a breathing time may<\/p>\n<p>be granted to the revision petitioner to pay the compensation<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.2626 of 2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                               -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>amount and to receive the sentence. Having regard to the<\/p>\n<p>facts and circumstances involved in the case, I am of the view<\/p>\n<p>that the said submission can be considered favourably and<\/p>\n<p>some time can be granted to pay the compensation amount<\/p>\n<p>but subject to slight enhancement with respect to the<\/p>\n<p>compensation amount since the cheque in question is dated<\/p>\n<p>1.7.2005 and the amount is being with the revision petitioner<\/p>\n<p>for the last 5 years.\n<\/p>\n<p>            In the result, this revision petition is disposed of<\/p>\n<p>confirming the conviction against the revision petitioner<\/p>\n<p>u\/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as recorded by the<\/p>\n<p>courts below and accordingly, the sentence of imprisonment<\/p>\n<p>as modified and fixed by the appellate court is confirmed. The<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner is further directed to pay a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.67,500\/- to the complainant as compensation u\/s.357(3) of<\/p>\n<p>Cr.P.C. within three months from today and in case of any<\/p>\n<p>default in paying the amount within the stipulated time, the<\/p>\n<p>revision    petitioner   is   directed   to    undergo   simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for a period of three months. Accordingly, the<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.2626 of 2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                              -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner is directed to appear before the trial court<\/p>\n<p>on 3rd December, 2010 to receive the sentence of<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment and to pay the compensation amount, as fixed<\/p>\n<p>by this court. In case any failure on the part of the revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in appearing before the court below as directed<\/p>\n<p>above and in making the payment of compensation amount,<\/p>\n<p>the trial court is free to take coercive steps to secure the<\/p>\n<p>presence of the revision petitioner and to execute the<\/p>\n<p>sentence and compensation awarded against the revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner. The coercive steps, if any, pending against the<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner shall be deferred till 3.12.2010.<\/p>\n<p>            Criminal   Revision      Petition is   disposed  of<\/p>\n<p>accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                     V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nJvt<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2626 of 2010() 1. PIOUS THATTIL,S\/O.JOSEPH &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. JOJO ANTONY, S\/O. K.P.ANTONY &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE REPRESENTED BY For Petitioner :SRI.M.B.PRAJITH For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN Dated [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212973","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-08T18:15:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-08T18:15:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":797,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-08T18:15:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-08T18:15:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-08T18:15:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010"},"wordCount":797,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010","name":"Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-08T18:15:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pious-thattil-vs-jojo-antony-on-3-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pious Thattil vs Jojo Antony on 3 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212973","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212973"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212973\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212973"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212973"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}