{"id":213022,"date":"2008-07-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008"},"modified":"2016-03-14T10:14:13","modified_gmt":"2016-03-14T04:44:13","slug":"smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 16047 of 2008(I)\n\n\n1. SMT.JAYASREE M.G., AGED 37 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE CENTRAL BOARDL OF SECONDARY\n\n3. THE SECRETARY & CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER\n\n4. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BOARD OF\n\n5. MATHA AMRUTHANANDAMAYI MATH,\n\n6. M\/S.AMRITA VIDYALAYAM, KUNNUMPURAM\n\n7. GENERAL MANAGER AND CO-ORDINATOR,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :08\/07\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.\n                  ............................................................................\n                   W.P.(C) No. 16047, 16048 & 16509 OF 2008\n                 ............................................................................\n                                   Dated this the 8th July, 2008\n\n\n\n                                         J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
       The petitioners in these Writ Petitions are                     teachers working in       Amrita<\/p>\n
Vidhyalayam, North Kunnumpuram, Edappally. As per Ext. P4 transfer order dated<\/p>\n
10.04.2008 issued by ‘Amrita Vidyalayam’, the petitioners in these Writ Petitions have<\/p>\n
been transferred          to other institutions run by the fifth respondent-Matha<\/p>\n
Amruthanandamayi         Math.      The contention of the petitioners is that there               is no<\/p>\n
corporate educational agency and that each school is affiliated separately. It is also<\/p>\n
contended that       a transfer order like Ext. P4 cannot be issued transferring the<\/p>\n
petitioners to different schools. The petitioners have also raised various grievances in<\/p>\n
Ext. P2 and P6 representations submitted by them before the Secretary and Chief<\/p>\n
Vigilance Officer, C.B.S.E., New Delhi.\n<\/p>\n
       2. The reliefs prayed for in the Writ Petitions are the following:<\/p>\n
               “(i)   Declare that Exts. P4 (transfer order) and P7 (rejection<\/p>\n
               order) (not received by the petitioner) issued by 5th and 6th<\/p>\n
               respondents through the hands of the newly formulated 7th<\/p>\n
               respondent        against      the    petitioner     is   illegal,   unjust    and<\/p>\n
               unsustainable and vitiated by bias and malafides and is the<\/p>\n
               result of victimisation and the same is contrary to Ext.P1 byelaw.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
               (ii) Declare that the running of the school, the 6th respondent by<\/p>\n
               the     5th respondent after obtaining               affiliation    from the 2nd<\/p>\n
               respondent is contrary to Ext. P1 byelaws and hence illegal and<\/p>\n
               further declare that the 5th respondent is not entitled to enjoy the<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No. 16047, 16048 & 16509 OF 2008
\n                                                2<\/span><\/p>\n
                privilage of affiliation from the 2nd respondent.\n<\/p>\n
                (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus,<\/p>\n
                or any other appropriate writ directing the respondent 2, 3 and 4<\/p>\n
                to immediately take effective and stern action against the 5th<\/p>\n
                and 6th respondent for having violated the terms of Ext. P1 and<\/p>\n
                communicate such decisions to the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
                (iv) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus<\/p>\n
                or any other appropriate writ directing respondents 2,3 and 4 to<\/p>\n
                take up Exts.P2 and P6 and declare that Exts. P4 and P7 orders<\/p>\n
                issued by the 5th and 6th respondents is illegal and is the result<\/p>\n
                of victimisation for having taken up the cause of exploitation.<\/p>\n
                (v) Pass such other and further reliefs, as may be prayed for<\/p>\n
                hereafter and which are deemed fit and proper on the facts and<\/p>\n
                circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. ”<\/p>\n
        3. On notice, respondents have entered appearance and counter affidavits have<\/p>\n
been filed.    The main contention put forward by the respondents is that the Writ<\/p>\n
Petitions are not maintainable for the reliefs claimed in the Writ Petitions.         The<\/p>\n
respondents rely on the decision reported in Sophiamma v. Council for Indian<\/p>\n
School Certificate Examination (2008 (2) KLT 589) in support of their contention.<\/p>\n
        5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are pressing<\/p>\n
for only relief No.(iv) and to that limited extent, the Writ Petitions are maintainable.<\/p>\n
Respondents have no dispute as regards the maintainability of a Writ Petition for the<\/p>\n
relief akin to relief No.(iv) prayed for in the Writ Petitions.<\/p>\n
        6. Adv. Shri Devan Ramachandran, learned Standing Counsel appearing for<\/p>\n
the C.B.S.E. contended that in respect of relief No.(iv), the petitioners cannot expect the<\/p>\n
C.B.S.E. to conduct inspection, take evidence and pass orders as is being done in the<\/p>\n
case of institutions working under the Kerala Educational Rules. In the peculiar set up<\/p>\n
of things under the C.B.S.E. , the working of educational institutions could not be<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No. 16047, 16048 & 16509 OF 2008
\n                                            3<\/span><\/p>\n
smoothly undertaken if every now and then teachers make representations and if the<\/p>\n
C.B.S.E. is expected to dispose of those representations, taking individual case and by<\/p>\n
deciding individual dispute., it is submitted.        At the same time, Shri Devan<\/p>\n
Ramachandran submitted that periodical inspections can be conducted by a team of<\/p>\n
inspectors in each school and that the group of teachers in each school can put forward<\/p>\n
their grievances before the inspection team. He further submits that in so far as Exts.<\/p>\n
P2 and P6 representations are concerned, such a course can be adopted and the<\/p>\n
grievance of the petitioners could be taken up for consideration and necessary steps<\/p>\n
taken, if they are found genuine. This submission is reasonable in the facts and<\/p>\n
circumstances of the case.\n<\/p>\n
        7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that leaving open the remedy of<\/p>\n
the petitioners for redressal of their grievances and to agitate the matter before the<\/p>\n
appropriate forum, the Writ Petitions can be disposed of confining their relief to relief<\/p>\n
No.(iv). Taking note of the submission made by Shri Devan Ramachandran, I am<\/p>\n
inclined to dispose of the Writ Petitions with a direction to the 4th respondent- the<\/p>\n
Regional Director, C.B.S.E. to look into the grievances voiced in Exts. P2 and P6<\/p>\n
representations and to consider the same during the periodical inspection to be made as<\/p>\n
usual by the C.B.S.E.   It is made clear that at that time, the petitioners will be heard by<\/p>\n
the 4th respondent.\n<\/p>\n
        8.    Adv. Shri K. Srikumar and Shri P.K. Suresh Kumar appearing for the<\/p>\n
contesting respondents submitted that the petitioners have entered into an agreement<\/p>\n
with the institution wherein they have agreed that they are liable to be transferred to<\/p>\n
other institutions run by Matha Amruthanandamayi Math and therefore they are not<\/p>\n
entitled to challenge the order of transfer either in a Writ Petition or before a civil court<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No. 16047, 16048 & 16509 OF 2008
\n                                             4<\/span><\/p>\n
or to make grievances before C.B.S.E. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted<\/p>\n
that the petitioners have not executed any such agreement and contended that the<\/p>\n
form of agreement relied on by the respondents is contrary to the terms of agreement<\/p>\n
appended to Ext. P1 affiliation byelaws. These are all matters to be considered by the<\/p>\n
C.B.S.E. at the time when the inspection is being made as mentioned above.<\/p>\n
       Learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri C. Varghese Kuriakose is right in his<\/p>\n
submission that since the Writ Petitions are not being pressed or entertained in so far<\/p>\n
as reliefs other than the relief No.(iv) are concerned, the rights of the petitioners to<\/p>\n
approach the appropriate forum, if any, shall be protected.          Leaving open the right<\/p>\n
of the petitioners to move the appropriate forum, if any, under law, the Writ Petitions<\/p>\n
are dismissed in so far as reliefs other than relief No.(iv) are concerned and relief No.(iv)<\/p>\n
is disposed of in the manner indicated above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                                 K.T. SANKARAN,
\n                                                                      JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
lk<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 16047 of 2008(I) 1. SMT.JAYASREE M.G., AGED 37 YEARS, … Petitioner Vs 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY … Respondent 2. THE CENTRAL BOARDL OF SECONDARY 3. THE SECRETARY & CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-213022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-14T04:44:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-14T04:44:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1101,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-14T04:44:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-14T04:44:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-14T04:44:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008"},"wordCount":1101,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008","name":"Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-14T04:44:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasree-m-g-vs-union-of-india-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt.Jayasree M.G. vs Union Of India on 8 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}