{"id":213146,"date":"2010-03-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010"},"modified":"2016-10-07T14:38:37","modified_gmt":"2016-10-07T09:08:37","slug":"venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: H.K.Rathod,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCA\/8201\/2008\t 4\/ 6\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCIVIL\nAPPLICATION No. 8201 of 2008\n \n\nIn\n\n\n \n\nCIVIL\nAPPLICATION No. 14653 of 2007\n \n\nIn\nSPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 27416 of 2007\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nVENUS\nLAMINATIONS LTD. & 1 - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nAJIJKHAN\nV PATHAN & 1 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nJOSHI FOR M\/S TRIVEDI & GUPTA\nfor\nPetitioner(s) : 1 - 2. \nMR JS BRAHMBHATT for Respondent(s) :\n1, \nNone for Respondent(s) :\n2, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 19\/03\/2010 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n
1.\tHeard
\nlearned advocate Mr.Joshi for M\/s.Trivedi & Gupta on behalf of
\napplicants and learned advocate Mr.J.S.Brahmbhatt for respondent
\nNo.1.\n<\/p>\n
2.\tPresent
\napplication is preferred by application for clarification \/
\nmodification of the order dated 4.4.2008.\n<\/p>\n
3.\tThis
\nCourt has passed following order on 4.4.2008 in CA No.14653 of 2007 :\n<\/p>\n
  1.\tHeard learned advocate Mr.J.S.Brahmbhatt for the applicant and learned advocate Mr.Naik for M\/s.Trivedi & Gupta for opponent – original petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
2.\tIn main SCA, the petitioner has challenged the award passed by the Labour Court, Baroda dated 24.4.2007 in Reference No.822 of 1998 wherein the Labour Court, Baroda has granted reinstatement with continuity of service with 40% back wages of interim period.\n<\/p>\n
3.\tThis Court has issued notice to the respondent. Therefore, the respondent workman has filed application claiming the benefit under Section 17B of the I.D.Act,1947. The averments made in this application in Para.5 that workman is unemployed and not gainfully employed and also not receiving adequate remuneration from any establishment. No counter is filed against the present civil application by original petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
4.\tTherefore, according to my opinion, the workman is entitled the last drawn wages as required under Section 17B of the I.D.Act,1947 w.e.f. 24.4.2007 to 31.3.2008. Therefore, it is directed to the original petitioner to pay last drawn wages to the  workman for the aforesaid period within a period of one month from the date of receiving the copy of this order. Thereafter, the original petitioner shall have to pay regularly last drawn wages to the workman till the matter is finally decided by this Court.\n<\/p>\n
5.\tIn view of the above observations and directions, present civil application is disposed of.\n<\/p>\n
5.\tThereafter, on 14.5.2008, present application is made wherein following averments are made in Para.3,4 5 and 6 :\n<\/p>\n
 3.\tThe applicants humbly state and submit that, the applicant No.1 was closed down on 14.4.1998 and the closure was made effective from 15.1.1999. The applicants humbly state and submit that at the time of closure there were 70 workmen employed with the applicant No.1. The  applicants state and submit that closure of undertaking with effect from 15.1.1999 was intimated to the Deputy Commissioner of Labour vide letter dated 27.2.1999. A copy of letter dated 27.2.1999 is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure-II.\n<\/p>\n
4.\tThe  applicants  state and submit that while at the time of closure the applicant No.1 has paid legal dues to all its workmen including closure compensation, gratuity, leave encashment and PF. Further over and above such legally admissible dues, the applicant No.1 has also offered ex-gratia compensation to different classes of workmen according to their length of service. For workmen with more than 15 years of service ex-gratia compensation of 15 days’ salary for every completed year of service has been paid by the applicant No.1. A copy of the statement of full and final settlement with the 70 workmen is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure-III.\n<\/p>\n
5.\tThe  applicants humbly state and submit that since the applicant No.1 was closed down unfortunately the aforesaid facts could not be brought to the notice of the Labour Court in Reference No.822 of 1998 as well as before this Hon’ble Court in SCA No.27416 of 2007 at earlier stage. The applicants were able to trace the documents annexed with the captioned application during the pendency of the captioned writ petition and therefore the applicants beg to produce the said documents and bring to the notice of the Hon’ble Court such vital and important facts involved in the present case.\n<\/p>\n
6.\tIn the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the applicants humbly state and submit that the opponent No.1 would not  be entitled to the benefit u\/s.17B of I.D.Act,1947 as assuming without admitting that the applicant was continued in service he would only be entitled to the benefits upto the date of closure of applicant No.1. Therefore, the applicants have filed the present application praying to the Hon’ble Court to kindly recall and modify the said order dated 4.4.2008.\n<\/p>\n
6.\tIn view of above averments made in present application, more particularly in Para.4, one fact is admitted by applicant before this Court that applicant No.1 was closed down unfortunately. The aforesaid fact could not be brought to the notice of the Labour Court in Reference No.822 of 1998 as well as before this Court in SCA No.27416 of 2007 at earlier stage.\n<\/p>\n
7.\tTherefore, first time this fact has been disclosed by applicant before this Court which cannot be taken into account by this Court, because same was not raised before the Labour Court and also not raised in main SCA filed by applicant. Therefore, the order passed by this Court on 4.4.2008 cannot be modified or clarified because of subsequent facts which were not on record at all at the time when this Court has passed the order on 4.4.2008. Therefore, only on that ground, prayer made in this application cannot be granted. Accordingly,  without expressing any opinion on merits, present application is rejected.\n<\/p>\n
8.\tHowever, apart from that, even in case of factory or company is closed or manufacturing activities of employer company have come to an halt, even though provisions of Section 17B of the I.D.Act,1947 made applicable and it required to be implemented by petitioner company as stay against reinstatement is granted by this Court. This aspect has been considered by this Court in the case of Jayantilal Shanubhai Tailor v. Ralchem Ltd., Ankleshwar<\/a> reported in 2005 (2) GLR 1218. Relevant observations are in Para.4 and 5 which is quoted as under :\n<\/p>\n
 4.\tMr.Hasmukh  Thakker,  learned  Advocate appearing  for the opponent, original petitioner, submitted that  it   is  the  case  of  the  petitioner-Company  that  it is a   `transferree  company’  and  that  the  services  of  the   applicant-workman  were  terminated  by  the  `transferor  company’ and, therefore, when  the  matter  is  subjudice       before  this  Court, the opponent-Company be not directed      to pay the benefits accruing under Section-17(B)  of  the Act.    Mr.Thakker   submitted  that  besides  this,  the manufacturing activities  of  the  opponent-Company  have      also  come  to  a halt and taking into consideration that      aspect  also,  the  order  for   making  payment   under      Section-17(B) be  not  passed. Mr.Thakker  relied upon      Order dated 19th August, 2003 of the  Division  Bench  of      this  Court  (Coram:R.K.Abichandani  & K.M.Mehta, JJ.) in      the matter of Akbarkhan M.Pathan vs.  General Manager in  Civil  Application  No.5486  of  2003  in  Letters Patent Appeal No.933 of 1999, wherein  the  Division  Bench  has  observed in paragraph-5 as under:<\/p>\n
\n       \n\n\n 5.\tIn\n our  opinion, in the present case, in view of the Undertaking having\nbeen declared sick   and hereafter having been closed down, there  is\nno  scope  for making any order under Section 17B of the  Act.    The\n application  is,  therefore, rejected,  without  prejudice  to the\napplicant s other rights and remedies  in  respect  of  their\ndues. \n  \n5.\tIn the considered opinion of this Court, none  of       the submissions  made  by  the  learned Advocate for the opponent, original petitioner-Company, can be  the  basis for not  passing an order for complying Section-17(B) of the Act. The underlying concept of Section-17(B)  is  to provide subsistence  allowance to a workman, who has the order of reinstatement in his favour,  and  against  that order  (award), an  appeal  is  filed  before the higher forum, in which such order is stayed.  From the  language of Section-17(B), it is very clear that the aforesaid two grounds cannot be the basis for denying the reliefs under Section-17(B).  For the ready reference, Section-17(B) is reproduced here under:\n\n<\/pre>\n
“Where  in  any  case a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal   by  its   award  directs reinstatement of  any workman  and the employer prefers any proceedings against any such award in   a High Court or the Supreme Court,  the employer   shall  be  liable to pay such workman, during the period of pendency of  such proceedings  in  the  High  Court or the Supreme Court, full wages last  drawn  by  him, inclusive  of  any   maintenance allowance admissible to him under any rule if the workman had   not   been   employed   in any  establishment during such period and an affidavit  for such workman had been filed to that effect in   such Court:”\n<\/p>\n
 \tThe  only  ground  on which the High Court or the Supreme Court can  deny  the  passing  of  an  order  for       payment  of benefits accrued under Section-17(B) is that,       if the High Court or the Supreme Court  is  satisfied  to      the fact that such a workman is employed and is receiving      adequate  remuneration  during  any  such  period or part       thereof.\n<\/p>\n
(H.K.RATHOD,J.)
\n(vipul)<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010 Author: H.K.Rathod,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CA\/8201\/2008 4\/ 6 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8201 of 2008 In CIVIL APPLICATION No. 14653 of 2007 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 27416 of 2007 ========================================================= VENUS LAMINATIONS […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-213146","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVenus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-07T09:08:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-07T09:08:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1246,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010\",\"name\":\"Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-07T09:08:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-07T09:08:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-07T09:08:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010"},"wordCount":1246,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010","name":"Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-07T09:08:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venus-vs-ajijkhan-on-19-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Venus vs Ajijkhan on 19 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213146","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213146"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213146\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}