{"id":214100,"date":"2008-08-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008"},"modified":"2017-07-16T15:33:42","modified_gmt":"2017-07-16T10:03:42","slug":"the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"The New India Assurance Company &#8230; vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The New India Assurance Company &#8230; vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH comm 0;? KARNATAKA CIRCUIT 1j8i:;s*;\u00a7:z,a:\nAT DHARWAD 1.  \n\nDATED THIS THE 25TH DAY 09' Auc\u00a7Us*:\u00a7, '2o_{:V$AF-'%   A'\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE: HOWBLE MRS. JUSFEE.$EA\u20ac\u00a7A.I\u00a7AT\u00a5iN'2i\"._: 'i ._\n\nM.P'.A.N(}.'    \nBETWEEN: ' M\n\n'mg NEW INDIA 'A33U'R5;Nvc:E'c:j0M\u00bb9AN\u00a5 LIMITED\nDAVANGERE DQ1,1':'S,VR\u00a7\u00ab:G\u00a70Nm,' f\u00a7}i3fPICE,\nN02-B;,,L:jmf1fY E?-UILIf}i1'~\u00a7(} A N.NEX\u00a7}., \n\n1:&gt;m&lt;;AL11&lt;::;GA RAG =3R{&#039;}A\u00a3i&#039;,i3\ufb01NGALORE-2&#039;?,\nRE\u00a7&quot;;&#039;f3Y..__I&#039;i&#039;-S\u00e9fDEl?1IT\u00a5..3&#039;V\u00a7ANAGER,\nSRLC.:&lt;;1.\u00a731UBmMzx;tzY;;...\u00bb-- &quot; &quot;\n\n.&quot;APPELLANT\n\n(By S33; ?{.R.K\u00a7fF;{fEL&#039;\u00a3fR&#039;;\u00bb.RSV. FOR SR}. 13 &lt;2 SEETHARAMA\n\nRA0,Amf.) _  , \n\n_ SR1 LENGARAJU\n_ ;  PSIAGAPPA BUSHETTY\n Ae\ufb01zmgzzi YEARS,\n_RjA&#039;_?&quot;CHIKKERUR,\n HEREKERUR TALUK,\n~. HAVERI DIS\u00a5&#039;RiC&#039;\u00a5&#039;.\n\nn.RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p> ;(By S\ufb01 PiiCHAPPARADAHALUE\u00a7\ufb02?L ABVL FGR<br \/>\nT SRLNiViHREMATH,ADVJ<\/p>\n<p>..g..\n<\/p>\n<p>THIS IVIFA FILED U\/S 39(1) OF W13. ACT A-GAiNS'&#8221;\u00a3&#8217; mt:<br \/>\nJUDGMENT DATED 17.012007 PASSED IN<br \/>\nwCA:NF;E30\/2005 ON THE F&#8217;\u00a7L\u00a3E 01:&#8217; THE LABOUR OFFICER<br \/>\nArm COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN COMPENSATION,<br \/>\nHAVERI nlsmicr, HAVERI, AWARDING A COMPEE*3_SATiON<br \/>\nop f~?S.:,G1,349\/~ WITH INTERESF  12% RA.  <\/p>\n<p>This MFA coming cm for ADMESSION c_s.A11:&#8211;.<\/p>\n<p>court tielivczred the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>JUnGM\u00aeKi jc V<\/p>\n<p>Though this matter   admi\u00e9si\ufb01vng <\/p>\n<p>consent of boih the  is  \u00e9isposeci of<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01nally.\n<\/p>\n<p>2,    &#8216;by tha Insurance Compaxly<br \/>\nchallengmg\u00e9\u00e9 .   passsd by the Workmenk<\/p>\n<p> satiori  . vfilommisaioner, Haveri District in<\/p>\n<p>\u00bb VjV&#8217;av;:rx.;,f4\u00a73:5.iQ&#8217;;2_006 dated 1?&#8217;.7.200?.<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;\u00e9xndisputed facts of the case am that on 2.7.2605<\/p>\n<p>V\u00bb * :;\u00a5_:&#8217; aii\u00e9ut 9.30 3.111 the respondent herein working as a<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216;._ c&#8217;:&#8217;:&#8217;ie&#8217;\u00e9_ner in respect of iorry bearing No.KA&#8211;14\/5346 S\u00a51SfiaiI3.{td<\/p>\n<p> injuxtiss on account of the accidezixt that occurred during the<\/p>\n<p>course of employment when he was travelling in the said<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>.3-\n<\/p>\n<p>19113? fmm Belgaum to Dhazwad by caryging mi\ufb01g<\/p>\n<p>instxuction of the \ufb01xst respondent and when fi\ufb01:  ~<\/p>\n<p>approached near Hulikatti cross m_&#8217;3.~N,_H.4,   <\/p>\n<p>said lorry drove the same in a rash am&#8217; n\u00e9giigciit <\/p>\n<p>that it hit against another 10rf\u00a7f&#8221;$3:;aIi1;\u00a7\u00a7gv- N0.  V1.23&#8242;-&#8217;13 as   V<\/p>\n<p>result of which the ms\ufb01ponden: \u00a7:;;\u00a7:ai;;e\u00e9&#8217;iuj:u;\u00a5;es his left<br \/>\nhanc} and a portion  &#8216;\ufb01nger was cut OE<br \/>\nContending that he    &lt;\u00ab:$f   capacity on<br \/>\naccount sf  &quot;-:;*a.1:f\u00abi?::1&#039;e\u00a2:1 by him as 21<br \/>\nresult &#039;Qf 1t1?x\u00a7:.   the course of the<br \/>\nemp}@C.:i.s &#8216;I_<\/p>\n<p>6. The respondent; claimant \u00a2%&gt;{\u00e9\ufb011in,ed*   \u00e9s3?&#8217;W;\u00bb1. V<\/p>\n<p>and Drlfmanath as PW.:2 and   <\/p>\n<p>while the respondents didV\u00bb\u00a3::\u00a7L5i:V.. V_le-1: ii; .__az13{ Ve:\u00a7ri&#8217;d~.\u00e9:V1&#8217;i{:t*:.  Th\u20ac:&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>Workmetnfs Compansgtion   on the<br \/>\nmateriais on meant},   Rs. 1,01,349\/ ~<br \/>\nwith interast afg.  1 dais of one<br \/>\nmenth afggr   \u00a7 \u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:&#8217;:%;\u00a5ec1 on 2.7.2035 mi}:<br \/>\n   s\u00e9iitriw award \ufb02it&#8221;: insurance<\/p>\n<p>comp3\u00a2:n}*_ T&#8217;}:31\u00a2c1_ \ufb021is&#8217;  f<\/p>\n<p>7. 5&#8242; I _h3,\\?&#8221;{i.V2 tx\ufb01at\ufb01 S1;i.N:R;Kuppclur for S~}:&#8217;i.B.C.S_6\u20ac:th8;t&#8217;aIIl8.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> Ego!&#8217;   for the appellant] ixxszxmnce company<\/p>\n<p>    for Sri.M.V,HiI*ama\u00a3h for<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02y; respontieiit.\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8221; It is submit1;ed- on behalf ef fhe appellamz that the<\/p>\n<p>Workme\ufb02s Cammissioner erred in awaxding comyensation<\/p>\n<p>to an extent of Rs.1,,,G 1,349] &#8211; by taking the percentage of<\/p>\n<p>XV<br \/>\n\/, .\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216;  . Co&#8217;mij1iis3io1a.\u00a2r.\n<\/p>\n<p>.. 5-\n<\/p>\n<p>loss of ear11i:1g capacity to be 25% Without rm\ufb01cixzg E116: fact<br \/>\nthat 13:15 :in\u00a7ury sustained by the ciajmant was a schedule\u00e9<br \/>\ninjury, and tkervzfom, the Workme:r1&#8217;s Compengga\ufb01on<\/p>\n<p>Commimioner ought is have determined the 33ercc:3i:ag\u20ac~V.of<\/p>\n<p>103$ 03&#8242;? earning Capacity s1:r*i&lt;&#039;:tiy in farms of th_e&#8211;   .<\/p>\n<p>the Wc;3rkme11&#039;s Compensation Act  ermd   upe\ufb01 &quot; &quot;<\/p>\n<p>the: evidence of PW,2&#8211;I)r.Umanath.:=__V  <\/p>\n<p>awarding :31&#039; infxzrest at 12% with \u20ac\ufb01.\u20ac{i?_f)C&#039;k)111 011$&#039;  L.<\/p>\n<p>the date of accident is  ft: \ufb02x\ufb01&#039;-j1_Vi\u00e9\u00a7m\u00a7:;t of the<br \/>\nSupreme Court in tbs&#039; gj\u00e9gs\ufb01 o&#039;fVC0mpa11y<\/p>\n<p>Limiter} Vs.&quot;AM=;.5_=;:~.ag\u00a3\u00a3.  as smother, 2007(2) T.A.C. 3 (SC)<br \/>\nand he&#039;Atheirtfore,_.fE\u00a3\u00a7&#039;a\u00a3:V$*$\u00a7&quot;this court to modify the quantum<\/p>\n<p>Elf cg-\u00a5v1pens:\u00e9i&#039;tig7\u00a7n&#039; &quot;by the Workmezfs Compensaticm<\/p>\n<p>  Pm&#039;. it is submitted an behalf cf the respondent,<\/p>\n<p> suppof\ufb01\ufb01g the award of the Workmezf\ufb02s Compensation<\/p>\n<p>&quot; Qzy\ufb01imissiener that the medical evidence in this case was<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01igzai them was 25% disability and t}.1erefore, the:<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner was right in Conside\ufb01ng the same as<\/p>\n<p>V<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>in the iI1sta11t.case is a schaduled injury mentionesi<\/p>\n<p>of Schedule E, entry No.27 where it says ttiizt V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>amputation to whoie sf lsff iI1\u20aciex;\ufb01:r3.gg3r,    \u00bb 1 <\/p>\n<p>loss 0f earning capacity. Ther\u00e9gfb-:&#8217;\u00e9,  _ &#8221; Wbf1:3\ufb01&#8217;\u20ac11&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>Compeitma\ufb01on C0mmissio1}\u00e9_:t&#8221;&#8211;~ ,ugi1t~- to vha\ufb01\u00e9 }:i23,1\u00a7)\u00a7vtx1  t};w.,\u00e9: *<\/p>\n<p>Schedule 13;} th&amp;   Act in<br \/>\ndetermining the 103$ &#8216;  instead of relying<br \/>\nupon the met:1ir:ai \u20acVi:df;:&#8217;.;&#8217;;\u20ac\u00a7:;~    \u00a7.t;i\ufb011es$ of \ufb01ngars<br \/>\nand tend\u00a7;:1i:q;as;{\u00a7::_'(\u00a7+;\u00a7erV::ig&#8217;1e\u20ac ua11::\u00abc:0ncerned, the same:<br \/>\nweal;  &#8216;j;&lt;;; :i\u00a7e\u00a3\u00a7x\ufb01\u00e9ihe\u00a7;tV disabi}ity for which 1:116<br \/>\n(3{)i3Li;v1#;\u00a5\u20acI].&quot;$&quot;~#,&#039;L33.A&#039;{.;VifV\u00a3):&quot;;V.E;.   he  as it is a tempormy<br \/>\ndisco\ufb01xf\ufb01f\ufb01s Q  circumstances, the Workmenfs<\/p>\n<p>Crgmpsns\u00e9itian&#039; &#039;\ufb01\u00e9cniini\u00e9sioner ought to have calculated the<\/p>\n<p> &quot; .V V&#039;\u00a3:&#039;:},{%.zi4ps rounded of to Rs.56,&#8221;?55\/&#8211; by taking the<\/p>\n<p>mo&#8221;:1m1y salary of the mspondcnt to be Rs.300Q\/- age to he:<\/p>\n<p> a _  years, aatzd approgriate factor at 225.22 (f&gt;&#8217;0\u00b0\/e X 3000 X<\/p>\n<p>225.22 x :4;1oo3.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>12. As far as awarding of interrzzst is cencemcd, it :i\u00a7;&#8217;&#8211;..Saen<\/p>\n<p>that intemsi; at the rate of 12\u00b0\/o p.a is awavdttd, <\/p>\n<p>fmm 2.8.2605 one month after the accicleut  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>on 237.2005 whereas the case was    <\/p>\n<p>interest has to be awarded with  <\/p>\n<p>the date of adjudication of   1&#8242;;h_\u00a2 * V L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>it fell due. However, the i\ufb02j11}C7}?.   being a<br \/>\nscheduled injury, no \u00e9\u00a7.dVju.:iicat1%_(&gt;:2&#8243; .\u00a7\u00a7ss\u00a2ssment &#8220;on the<br \/>\npercentage of lossv of    &#8216;fequircd as the<\/p>\n<p>same was pt.e~d\u00e9\u00a7fc:n1ihed:. uin _\u00a3i&#8221;3:c-:V scli\u00e9dule to Workmenfs<\/p>\n<p> s&#8217;i&#8217;]\u00a7\u20ac:&#8217;3*\u20ac;ffore,  has {(3 be with effect<br \/>\nfrom (:&gt;xj;:~;\u20ac&#8221;  date of the accident and the<br \/>\nW.C.Comm\u00a7$siGncVrv&#8211;,h\u00e9:s&#8221; \ufb01g\ufb01\ufb02y oxdemd so.<\/p>\n<p> V 1 3&#8243;.  _ I53Q:f&#8221;t1i&#8217;E:\u00e9if0I\u20ac$3\u00a7d reasons, the appeal is aiiowed in part<\/p>\n<p>Withbut dfder as to Costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;    this stage, it is submitted that the entire<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;AA&lt;;&lt;$:i;tiA;A)ensa1350n has been deposited before, this court. The<\/p>\n<p>x  \u00e9xf\ufb01ca is dirccted to reitrase the compensation due to the<\/p>\n<p>?\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-10-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>respondent along with praporfionattz intercst and <\/p>\n<p>balance amount to &#8216;\u00a31115: appellant.<\/p>\n<p>KMSI KVR*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The New India Assurance Company &#8230; vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008 Author: B.V.Nagarathna IN THE HIGH comm 0;? KARNATAKA CIRCUIT 1j8i:;s*;\u00a7:z,a: AT DHARWAD 1. DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY 09&#8242; Auc\u00a7Us*:\u00a7, &#8216;2o_{:V$AF-&#8216;% A&#8217; BEFORE THE: HOWBLE MRS. JUSFEE.$EA\u20ac\u00a7A.I\u00a7AT\u00a5iN&#8217;2i&#8221;._: &#8216;i ._ M.P&#8217;.A.N(}.&#8217; BETWEEN: &#8216; M &#8216;mg NEW INDIA &#8216;A33U&#8217;R5;Nvc:E&#8217;c:j0M\u00bb9AN\u00a5 LIMITED DAVANGERE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-214100","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The New India Assurance Company ... vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The New India Assurance Company ... vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-16T10:03:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The New India Assurance Company &#8230; vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-16T10:03:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":976,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008\",\"name\":\"The New India Assurance Company ... vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-16T10:03:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The New India Assurance Company &#8230; vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The New India Assurance Company ... vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The New India Assurance Company ... vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-16T10:03:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The New India Assurance Company &#8230; vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-16T10:03:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008"},"wordCount":976,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008","name":"The New India Assurance Company ... vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-16T10:03:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-company-vs-sri-lingaraju-on-25-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The New India Assurance Company &#8230; vs Sri Lingaraju on 25 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214100","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214100"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214100\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214100"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214100"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214100"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}