{"id":214232,"date":"2010-05-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6"},"modified":"2015-08-01T05:57:48","modified_gmt":"2015-08-01T00:27:48","slug":"haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6","title":{"rendered":"Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H.B.Antani,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCR.MA\/3180\/2010\t 3\/ 5\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nMISC.APPLICATION No. 3180 of 2010\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nHAJI\nAYUB KEVAR - Applicant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR EE\nSAIYED for MISS\nTABASSUM SAIYED for\nApplicant(s) : 1, \nMR PK JANI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s)\n: 1, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 11\/05\/2010 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>1.\tThis<br \/>\napplication is preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal<br \/>\nProcedure, 1973 seeking regular bail by the applicant, who came to be<br \/>\narrested in connection with FIR registered as M. Case No. 36  of<br \/>\n2007  before learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gandhidham for<br \/>\nthe offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420  of the Indian<br \/>\nPenal Code.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tLearned<br \/>\nadvocate Mr. Saiyed submitted that the applicant is an innocent<br \/>\nperson and he has been falsely implicated in the commission of the<br \/>\nalleged offence. He further submitted that the applicant is a victim<br \/>\nof circumstances and at best it can be stated that the applicant<br \/>\nfailed in fulfilling the promise made by him, but the same has not<br \/>\nbeen done with any ulterior motive or pre-determination. He submitted<br \/>\nthat though the applicant started a scheme, it went beyond his<br \/>\ncontrol for various reasons.  Learned advocate for the applicant,<br \/>\nhowever, submitted that the applicant is willing to repay the entire<br \/>\namount to the complainant and he will deposit 1\/3rd amount<br \/>\ndue to the complainant before the trial Court and the remaining<br \/>\namount will also be deposited before the trial Court within one month<br \/>\nfrom the date of release and since the accused is willing to deposit<br \/>\nthe amount, his case may be considered sympathetically.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tLearned<br \/>\nPublic Prosecutor Mr. Jani, while opposing bail application submitted<br \/>\nthat the applicant has cheated large number of persons coming from<br \/>\nthe lower strata of the Society. He submitted that considering the<br \/>\nrole attributed to the applicant and the manner in which the offence<br \/>\nis committed, discretionary relief may not be exercised in favour of<br \/>\nthe applicant, and the application deserves to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\tHeard<br \/>\nlearned counsel appearing for the applicant and learned APP at length<br \/>\nand in great detail. I have also perused the averments made in the<br \/>\napplication, submissions canvassed by learned advocate before me as<br \/>\nwell as the FIR produced on record. I have also considered the<br \/>\nprovisions of Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, gravity<br \/>\nof the offence and quantum of punishment which can be imposed in the<br \/>\nevent of conviction of the applicant.  Though the applicant has<br \/>\ncollected huge amount from persons belonging to the lower strata of<br \/>\nthe Society with the promise of providing accommodation and later on<br \/>\ndid not do so, considering the fact that the applicant has<br \/>\nvolunteered and shown willingness to deposit 1\/3rd amount<br \/>\nimmediately and the remaining amount within one month of his release<br \/>\non bail,  I am of the view that taking into consideration the<br \/>\ninterest of the complainant in the peculiar facts and circumstances<br \/>\nof the case and without making it as a precedent, the  applicant is<br \/>\nrequired to be enlarged on regular bail at this stage, without<br \/>\nentering into the merits of the case and without discussing the<br \/>\nevidence in detail.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\tThe<br \/>\nparties do not press for further reasoned order.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\tIn<br \/>\nthe facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed.<br \/>\nThe applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail in connection with M.<br \/>\nCase No. 36  of  2007  registered before Gandhidham &#8216;A&#8217; Division<br \/>\nPolice Station, subject also to the conditions that he shall:\n<\/p>\n<p>[i].\tDeposit<br \/>\n1\/3rd amount due to the complainant before the learned<br \/>\nJMFC Gandhidham before being enlarged on bail, as volunteered by the<br \/>\napplicant.\n<\/p>\n<p>[ii].\tBefore<br \/>\nbeing enlarged on bail, file an undertaking before this Court in the<br \/>\npresent proceedings and produce a copy thereof to the learned JMFC,<br \/>\nGandhidham to the effect that he volunteers to deposit 1\/3rd<br \/>\namount due to the complainant before being enlarged on bail and the<br \/>\nremaining amount within a period of one month from the date of his<br \/>\nrelease.\n<\/p>\n<p>[iii].\tExecute<br \/>\na bond of Rs.5,000\/- [Rupees five thousand only] before the trial<br \/>\nCourt with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the<br \/>\ntrial court.\n<\/p>\n<p>[iv]\tNot<br \/>\ntake undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;\n<\/p>\n<p>[v].\tNot<br \/>\nact in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;\n<\/p>\n<p>[vi].\tSurrender<br \/>\nhis passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;\n<\/p>\n<p>[vii].\tNot<br \/>\nleave the State of Gujarat without the prior permission of the<br \/>\nSessions court concerned;\n<\/p>\n<p>[viii].\tMark<br \/>\nhis presence at Gandhidham &#8216;A&#8217; Division Police Station twice in a<br \/>\nmonth, i.e. on 1st and 15th of every English<br \/>\ncalendar month between 9.00 AM and 2.00 PM. till the trial is over;\n<\/p>\n<p>[ix].\tFurnish<br \/>\nthe present address of his residence to the I.O. and also to the<br \/>\nCourt at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change his<br \/>\nresidence without prior permission of this Court;\n<\/p>\n<p>[x].\tMaintain<br \/>\nlaw and order.\n<\/p>\n<p>[xi].\tIf<br \/>\n1\/3rd amount due to the complainant is not deposited as<br \/>\nvolunteered, and if undertaking to pay 1\/3rd amount<br \/>\ninitially and the remaining amount within a month from the date of<br \/>\nhis release as volunteered by the applicant is not filed, the<br \/>\napplicant shall not be released.\n<\/p>\n<p>[xii]\tIf<br \/>\nthe remaining amount is not deposited within one month from the date<br \/>\nof his release as per the undertaking, bail granted by this Court<br \/>\nshall stand automatically cancelled.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\tIf<br \/>\nbreach of any of the above conditions is committed, then also the<br \/>\nlearned Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or to take<br \/>\nappropriate action in the matter.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\tBail<br \/>\nbond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try<br \/>\nthe case.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.\tAt<br \/>\nthe trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the<br \/>\nobservations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage,<br \/>\nmade by this Court while enlarging the  applicant on bail.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.\tRule<br \/>\nis made absolute to the aforesaid extent.\n<\/p>\n<p>11.\tDirect<br \/>\nService is permitted.\n<\/p>\n<pre>mathew\t\t\t\t\t\t[H.B.ANTANI,\nJ.]\n\n    \n\n \n\t   \n      \n      \n\t    \n\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\t   \n      \n\t  \t    \n\t\t   Top\n\t   \n      \n\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010 Author: H.B.Antani,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CR.MA\/3180\/2010 3\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 3180 of 2010 ========================================================= HAJI AYUB KEVAR &#8211; Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT &#8211; Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR EE SAIYED [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-214232","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-01T00:27:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-01T00:27:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6\"},\"wordCount\":942,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6\",\"name\":\"Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-01T00:27:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-01T00:27:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-01T00:27:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6"},"wordCount":942,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6","name":"Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-01T00:27:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/haji-vs-state-on-11-may-2010-6#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Haji vs State on 11 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214232","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214232"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214232\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214232"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214232"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214232"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}