{"id":214473,"date":"2009-10-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009"},"modified":"2015-06-03T12:41:30","modified_gmt":"2015-06-03T07:11:30","slug":"shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>     CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n  Room No. 308, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066\n\n\n                      File No.CIC\/LS\/A\/2009\/000669\n\nAppellant             :       Shri K.K. Kurian\n\nPublic Authority      :       Delhi Development Authority\n                              (through Shri S.N. Sharma, Asstt. Director\n                              (LAB) (H))\n\nDate of Hearing       :       26.10.2009\n\nDate of Decision :            26.10.2009\n\nFACTS<\/pre>\n<p> :\n<\/p>\n<p>       The matter, in short, is that DDA had allotted a Janta Flat<br \/>\nbearing No. 233A, Gazipur to Shri Ashok Kumar in 1986. The flat<br \/>\nchanged hands quickly and the appellant is its present owner since<br \/>\n1990. He had requested for conversion of this flat from lease hold to<br \/>\nfree hold in 2008. While considering this issue, DDA came to realise<br \/>\nthat the original allottee had made a short payment of Rs. 1500\/-.<br \/>\nHence the DDA calculated interest on the above amount and<br \/>\ninformed the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs 12534\/- vide their letter<br \/>\ndated 19.6.2008. The appellant deposited the above amount on<br \/>\n18.8.2008 whereupon the DDA converted the flat to free hold.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.     It is in this context that vide RTI application dated 22.1.2009,<br \/>\nthe appellant had sought information on 02 paras. It appears that<br \/>\nCPIO did not give him any response. However, Shri O.P. Gupta,<br \/>\nDirector (H)-I\/(AA) vide letter dated 31.3.2009 had directed to Shri<br \/>\nV.B. Bansal to provide requisite information to the appellant. Shri<br \/>\nV.B. Bansal, Dy. Director (LAB) (H) had sent a reply to the appellant<br \/>\nvide letter dated 22.4.2009 which is extracted below :-\n<\/p>\n<p>       &#8220;Please refer to your appeal application dated 9.3.2009<br \/>\nreceived in this office vide Dy. J-907\/DD dated 2.4.2009 from Shri<br \/>\nO.P. Gupta, AA(H)-I.D(H)-I, DDA vide his order No.<br \/>\n65\/RTI\/AA(H)-I\/ID-378\/D(H)-I\/09\/108 dated 31.3.2009 on the above<br \/>\nnoted subject. In this regard, it is intimated that information sought in<br \/>\nyour RTI application ID No. 378 dated 22.1.2009 does not pertain to<br \/>\nthis office. The same has already been forwared to Dy. Director<br \/>\n(Janta)-H and Sr. AO(EZ) for furnishing a suitable reply in the matter.<br \/>\nThe concerned PIO&#8217;s have again been advised to furnish a suitable<br \/>\nreply to your RTI application dated 22.1.2009. Since, information<br \/>\n sought by you total pertains to Finance Wing, therefore, your appeal<br \/>\napplication is forwarded to FA(H) for furnishing a suitable reply to<br \/>\nyou directly. As far as, payment demanded of Rs. 12,534\/-0 is<br \/>\nconcerned, in this regard, it is intimated that in the above said amount<br \/>\nRs. 1500\/- is towards less demanded amount from the registrant<br \/>\nbelonging to SC\/ST and Rs. 11,034\/0- is intereret thereon.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>      He had also marked a copy of his letter to FA(H) (AA).\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     Dissatisfied with the decision of Shri Bansal, the appellant has<br \/>\nfiled the present appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.     Heard on 26.10.2009. Appellant present. The public authority<br \/>\nis represented by the officer named above. It is the forceful<br \/>\nsubmission of the appellant that raising a demand of Rs. 1500\/- from<br \/>\nthe original allottee, that is, Shri Ashok Kumar was an after-thought<br \/>\non the part of DDA and it reflects adversely on its functioning. If<br \/>\nDDA had charged the correct amount from Shri Ashok Kumar, then<br \/>\nhe would not have been required to pay an amount of Rs. 12,534\/-<br \/>\nafter all these years. It is also his say that a concession of Rs. 1500\/-<br \/>\nwas given to original allottee as he belonged to SC\/ST category. If<br \/>\nthe flat had continued with Shri Ashok Kumar, neither the amount of<br \/>\n1500\/- nor any interest thereon would have been charged from him.<br \/>\nHence, the additional charge raised by DDA is totally unjustifiable.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.    He also draws Commission&#8217;s attention to the judgment of<br \/>\nNational Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission dated 7.4.2006 in<br \/>\nHUDA Vs Kaur Singh [(III) (2006) CPJ372NC] wherein it has been<br \/>\nheld that compound interest can not be charged from the allottee.<br \/>\nPara 7 of the judgment is extracted below :-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8220;7. This Commission also has occasion to deal with the<br \/>\n      same issue more than once and have consistently held that rate<br \/>\n      of interest chargeable from the allottees would be on simple<br \/>\n      interest basis and not on compound interest basis. In fact, it is<br \/>\n      two-way traffic-whenever the Commissions or the Courts have<br \/>\n      awarded interest against HUDA they have also been given<br \/>\n      interest on simple interest basis and not on compound interest<br \/>\n      basis.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                        INTERIM DECISION\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>6.    From the above, it would be seen that the appellant has<br \/>\nessentially raised two issues :-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> (i)    whether raising a demand of Rs. 1500\/- is justified at all in the<br \/>\n       facts and circumstances of the case, particularly when the<br \/>\n       original allottes happens to be of SC\/ST category; &amp;\n<\/p>\n<p>(ii)   if at all this demand is justified, whether the interest charged on<br \/>\n       this amount should be &#8216;compound interest&#8217; or &#8216;simple interest&#8217;.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.    I would like to hear Financial Advisor (H) on this issue before<br \/>\ndeciding the matter. Hence, notices may be issued to Shri Pawan<br \/>\nKumar, Financial Advisor (H) &amp; Shri O.P. Gupta, Director (H)-I to<br \/>\nappear before the Commission on 18.11.2009 at 1230 hrs.<br \/>\n                                                                 Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                      (M.L. Sharma)<br \/>\n                                  Central Information Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>      Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be<br \/>\nsupplied against application and payment of the charges, prescribed<br \/>\nunder the Act, to the CPIO of this Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>(K.L. Das)<br \/>\nAssistant Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Address of parties :-\n<\/p>\n<p>1.   Shri Pawan Kumar<br \/>\n     Financial Advisor,<br \/>\n     Delhi Development Authority,<br \/>\n     Vikas Sadan, INA,<br \/>\n     New Delhi-110023<\/p>\n<p>2.     Shri O.P. Gupta<br \/>\n       Director (H)-I,<br \/>\n       Delhi Development Authority,<br \/>\n       Vikas Sadan, INA,<br \/>\n       New Delhi-110023<\/p>\n<p>3.     Shri S.N. Sharma<br \/>\n       Asstt. Director (LAB) (H),<br \/>\n       Delhi Development Authority,<br \/>\n       Vikas Sadan, INA,<br \/>\n       New Delhi-110023\n<\/p>\n<p>4.     Shri K.K. Kurian<br \/>\n       A-87, Nehru Gali,<br \/>\n       Mandawali Extn,<br \/>\n       Delhi-110092\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Room No. 308, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 File No.CIC\/LS\/A\/2009\/000669 Appellant : Shri K.K. Kurian Public Authority : Delhi Development Authority (through Shri S.N. Sharma, Asstt. Director (LAB) (H)) Date of Hearing : 26.10.2009 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-214473","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-03T07:11:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-03T07:11:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":883,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-03T07:11:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-03T07:11:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-03T07:11:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009"},"wordCount":883,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009","name":"Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-03T07:11:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-k-kurian-vs-delhi-development-authority-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri K.K. Kurian vs Delhi Development Authority on 26 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214473"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214473\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}