{"id":214562,"date":"2009-10-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009"},"modified":"2015-07-14T01:01:38","modified_gmt":"2015-07-13T19:31:38","slug":"sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar Swamy<\/div>\n<pre> \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT 0;? KARNTAKA AT \nDATED THIS THE 26\"' mw or ocmaER%2oa9  Q  \nPRESEW A   k x '  J\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE   %\n\nTHE H()N'BLE MR.JUsT1(%EL.NARm%fANA3wAMY\nORIGH\\IAI4:--.SI'\u00a3)AE}XB}4E;,2%.L'322008\n %  % A: Misc. ;CVL';'v8 1\u20ac4.0!2Q(3\u00e99\n .  %    \nV og:a'3n~:A.11 S'i{3E':APPE;AL No.13\/2003\n  \nBE'1\"WEEN :    %' %\n\n1, '\u00a7 S;IZ1S RSHANKAR\n\n&amp;  S5353 S'.N RAM2's;'REE)DY\n 3 AGEIJVABOUT 42 YEARS\n\n    N03,\n\n- X  k%As\u00a7mKT1TL%FARM ROAD,\n B'3\u20ac'P\u00bb'KSANDRA\u00a2\n\nBANGALORE W 360 0941\n\n'   :2; ' s1\\\u00a7z'iT KESHWAMMA\n\n% L &amp;%%w;0 NARAYANA REDDY\nAGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,\nRESIDING AT OOLAVADI VILLAQ,\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\nCHINTAMANI TALUK,\n\nKOLAR DISTRICT.   %\n\n[By Sri H S Ramammhy andsri RBhaar;na1\u00a7@.g\u00a2v%;  2 J g E\n\nAND\n\nSRISNRAMAREDDY  '.\n\nS,\/0 LATE NARAYANAPPA  \n\nAGED ABOUT 70      _ \n\nRESIDING AT NO.291Z}A_z'2, L  1 k '\n\n5'?\" CROSS, UAS LAYOIff,V.VV  1 ~   \n\nBANGALORE +\u00abj:'~50 094.   %   RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>       Adv]<\/p>\n<p>TH&#8217;1S- Af.PPEA;L IS&#8217;~FII,E{)_&#8221;LTNDER SECTION 4 OF THE<br \/>\nHIGH7.CGL*R.T ,mT,%%%2J9%e1&#8243;%AGA1NsT THE JUDGEMENT AND<br \/>\nDEGREE DA&#8217;r\u00a7D &#8216;j_24;\u20ac}&#8211;3\u00a72\u20ac}E}8 PASSED BY THE SINGLE<br \/>\nJUDGE, INIQS :s:%:);2;2o:)%:? AND ETCW<\/p>\n<p>_:_:_ misc; mm] &#8216;3:40si2&#8242;:909<\/p>\n<p> k%    nsI&#8221;0\u00a75;;:ar0&#8243;. ,1.3;2oo8<\/p>\n<p>&amp;&gt; \u00a7;N0&#8217;1fH?;;\u00a7&#8217;  APPLICMTS<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;i3rti H S Ramanxurthy and Sri R Bha\u00e9rinath, Adv]<\/p>\n<p> \u00ab[*<br \/>\n   SR1 S N RAMA REDDY  RES?QN{)EN&#8217;I&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>{By Sri G Papi Re\u00e9dy, Adv]<\/p>\n<p>3. Submission is gated. Permitted,  ~is<\/p>\n<p>perxnitted to carry out the correction to the cause.   4.<\/p>\n<p>4. The Testamentary Origigala<br \/>\nnunlbered after the reSp0nde:3Vt&#8221;svL:&#8217;EV<br \/>\nhave been executed by   to be<br \/>\nthe paternal unclg&#8217; of   %\u00a7\u00a3\\vV..\u00e9ra\u00a7d\u00bbihther of the<br \/>\nfirst appellal\ufb02: faiheffsiw VV\ufb011&#8217;e:Afaiher of the second<br \/>\nappellant?&#8221;   respondent &#8211; the person<\/p>\n<p>seeking_f0r_ prabaiing &#8220;ih \u00e9 &#8216;wili&#8217;;._ &#8216; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>_ 5a. LTht\u00e9&#8221;1&#8217;:::$&#8217;p0z\u00a7&#8221;de1.\ufb01  mught ii}: probating the wiil dated<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; V.  &#8216;3Q&amp;&#8221;L&#8217;E\\;iaf\u00e9i1(  S\ufb01i\u00e9fo have been executed by Thippa Raddy,<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;ti\ufb01Ap:\u00a7\u00a5\u00a7e;jj&#8217;aZV.&#8217;V;2z\u00a7eie cf the respondenfg which was opposed by<\/p>\n<p>V VV _ ihe firesefzi a\ufb01pellants and the testator ixxci\u00e9entaily being to be<\/p>\n<p>ggjaxzv\u00e9&#8217;-fa\ufb01iaf ef the first appe\ufb02ant 0;} his father&#8217;s side and<\/p>\n<p>   _  \ufb01fths second appellant<\/p>\n<p>6. It was due to the opposition to the gram<br \/>\nproceedings had been ccmveried \u00a30 a testam::nt\u00e9;\u00a7&#8217;f;\u00a3VVC};A?i:gi.11al[&#8216; s&#8217;uit<br \/>\nand the matter went to trial and u]&#8217;ti13;a.{\u00e9;I\u00a7;,&#8217;4&#8217;-:h.\u00a7\u00a7_ st2\u00a3t&#8217;~~h:s@..1\u00bb-gain &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>decreed.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. Aggrieved  the  de&lt;.:V19\u00e9Se, v the present<\/p>\n<p>appeai by the defendants H:&#039;_:f; &#039;tlFA1_\u00a7   <\/p>\n<p>8. HaV\u00a7\u00a73_gV   farn\u00e9iy relationship existing<br \/>\na1120ng~&#8217;i;h\u00e9&#8217;p\u00a7\u00a7iies,\u00e9V&#8217;}f: wa;&lt;;&#039;.s\u00e9\ufb01ggcA$i;\u00e9Ci&#039;  this court, that the parties<br \/>\ninsteadV \u20ac&#039;:f&#039;}itigati\u00a71g&#039;V&#039;:_a1fiG:*fg&#039;st: illemseives 3.136 pariiciiiarly, after<\/p>\n<p>having. n01:i\u00e9\u20ac;d  that \u00e9ert\u00e9izz eriminai proceedings, had aiscs<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; .&#8211;&#8230;,;;;;*&#8217;\u00a7p;\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7&#8211;f&#8217;;;p&#8221; agzzijngvvi\ufb01\u00e9 parties, the parties wage advised and<\/p>\n<p>A&#8221;-*;\u00a7;):.11;:&#8217;e\u00e9\u00a7ic.\u00e9\u00e9i;.,Vf0f.T&#8221;VV&#8217;$\u00a2ttling 1:133 matter amicabiy father than is keep<\/p>\n<p>}itig \ufb01:ting&#8217;:bef&lt;3re the ccnzrt and for such purpase, wherz a request<\/p>\n<p> K  ..\u00a711a{3\u00e9 to them by this court initiaiiy 033 11.9.2009 and again<\/p>\n<p>   sgggsgqaanrgy an 21.10.2009 and on 23.10.2009. the parties mg<\/p>\n<p>&#039;4 iime an\u00e9 with the aid arid advice of the respective counsel, is.<\/p>\n<p>Mfg H.S.Rama Marthy and R.Bad;inath, app\u00a2ariln&#039;gl:&#039;~;he<\/p>\n<p>appellants and Sri G.Papi Raddy appearing _fc23flV_lt:l;\u00a2; &quot;;\u00a7g\u00a7\ufb01s3a:iai1t,V l\u00bb_<br \/>\nwe are very pleased to note that the  l&#039;<\/p>\n<p>satisfactory settlement of all djspuies Vlamozzg\u00e9\ufb01i &#039;tag g\ufb01ariies; &quot;<\/p>\n<p>inclading the present appeal-\n<\/p>\n<p>9, A Joint MemQVV_raadia&#8217;g_llafa u&#8217;r1d2eaV..&#8217;isl-Vplacad before this<\/p>\n<p>COLIITI<\/p>\n<p>:&#8217;1_&#8217;he,  ..\ufb01&#8217;lati this appeal 1:0 set aside the<br \/>\nJudgmeraaad (lea:&#8217;la\u00e9.:dal\u00e9d:&#8217;4233,2008 in T.().S.Ne.2f2{)07 and<\/p>\n<p>sucl1:0*-\u00a3h_er faliafa.&#8217; &#8220;;i&#8221;}3alV&#8217;saa0nd appellant is formal party to these<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217;  ..prc.a\u00e9ad.ings~-and Shela aid aged and not in position is man&#8217;: and<\/p>\n<p>  aad.  be dispensed to appear before this l~I0n&#8217;b}e<\/p>\n<p>Caart pazfaiijgalljl} and :0 file this joint memo. After the \ufb01ling of<br \/>\nthe &#8220;aljljpeai the matter befween the parties sat\ufb02e\u00e9 aa\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>   apgyaiiaht &#8220;is hereby with draw tha above appeal an\u00e9 respoadant is\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8211;a_g:\u00a3&#8217;a\u00e9\u00e9 is with draw all the c\u00e9vilfcriminal cases pendiag bafare<\/p>\n<p>    c&lt;:vn.cemad aaurts wit}: eat any terms and conditi\u00e9ms.<\/p>\n<p>&amp;\/ aaaa <\/p>\n<p> suggest\u00e9d in the Joim; Memo,<\/p>\n<p>appea} zmd are \ufb01at standing on the iegai effect of decreeiz3~g_ zrfthe<\/p>\n<p>suit, but have eves; othemfise resolving the \u00a7iSputCS&#039;.._8\u00a7\u00a73}V\u00a73i}4\u00a32; \u00bb\ufb013f3&#039;iY1<\/p>\n<p>in the present appeal in an amicable manner am!&#039; thgmibre,-..in V&#039; <\/p>\n<p>substitution of the judgment and  <\/p>\n<p>ms 252007, the settlement in t\u00a7;s2n\u00e9V{3f&quot;\ufb011em0tV:r&#039;\u00a33;}t m;\u00bba\u00a2a-t &quot;<\/p>\n<p>and the appeal and suit disposed  Laiccgrdihgl\ufb01t I&#039; V}<\/p>\n<p>12. We also not\u00a7C\u00e9_t.&#8217;\ufb021\u00a7atV.\u00a7&#8217;tVlje  indicates that the<br \/>\nexisting\/other:.c\u00e9:}i:1\/\u00a7;2.riI1iina1tt\u00e9asestti\u00e9etweeig&#8217; the parties are also<br \/>\nbeing &#8216;sfesz)_l*;\u00e9:n{\u00a5&#8217; r;e,;}&#8211;si__: tem1\u00abi_\ufb013t\u00a2d. in terms of the settiement to the<br \/>\ns;atisfacti;0n4_0f th\u00e9&#8221;pzifties;&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;~..,. 4&#8217; V<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;I3, Wen&#8217; gi\u00e9ce cm recerd our apprcsciation 0f the very<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  respsinvsg by the father and son due and we overlook the<\/p>\n<p>gsz\ufb01s\u00e9ncvet eff V\u00e9eccnd appellant befere the court in perscm as is<\/p>\n<p>t\u00bb<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>If the Gperatinn of the provisions of Secticzz_ 6f}&#8221;-..$I1:::i31d<\/p>\n<p>result in 3. refund in favour of the appeHaz;is,_.A*1:Z:1e <\/p>\n<p>directed to draw a cheque in the nayrxe&#8217; cf the:  andk&#8217; &#8216; 1. a<\/p>\n<p>hand over the same through the c0u2: s\u00a2;__l.::&#8212;_TV A. 3<\/p>\n<p>in View of the disposa;~%g;1*%%%;he mm 1Va;\u00a7&#8217;;a\u00e9\u00e9;\u00a7;&#8221;M\u00a3\u00a7cACvI.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>8140\/2809 does not sur&#8217;fv-\ufb01fe 1Esfr&#8221;\u00a73\u00a7i1\u00e9:\u00e9i::iiV;\u00e9:ra,_ti0n  a\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9 si\u00e9ansequently<br \/>\nMisc\u00bbCv1. 8140,2009 is dVi\u00a7;\ufb01iA:s3c\u00a7dp   &#8216;  <\/p>\n<p>fizz <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar Swamy IN THE HIGH COURT 0;? KARNTAKA AT DATED THIS THE 26&#8243;&#8216; mw or ocmaER%2oa9 Q PRESEW A k x &#8216; J THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE % THE H()N&#8217;BLE MR.JUsT1(%EL.NARm%fANA3wAMY ORIGH\\IAI4:&#8211;.SI&#8217;\u00a3)AE}XB}4E;,2%.L&#8217;322008 % % A: Misc. ;CVL&#8217;;&#8217;v8 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-214562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-13T19:31:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-13T19:31:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":864,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-13T19:31:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-13T19:31:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-13T19:31:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009"},"wordCount":864,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009","name":"Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-13T19:31:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-r-shankar-vs-sri-s-n-rama-reddy-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri S R Shankar vs Sri S N Rama Reddy on 26 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214562"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214562\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}