{"id":214607,"date":"1962-07-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1962-07-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962"},"modified":"2014-03-08T10:22:31","modified_gmt":"2014-03-08T04:52:31","slug":"s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962","title":{"rendered":"S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1963 Mad 449, (1963) 1 MLJ 160<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: G Pillai<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>1. The question for determination in this revision petition is whether a receiver appointed under Section 69-A of the Transfer of Property Act is bound by a contract entered into by the mortgagor  with the  tenant  In  possession of the mortgaged property subsequent to the creation of the mortgage and    subsequent to the   creation of the tenancy regarding the repayment of a loan taken by  the  landlord from  the tenant,  by  adjustment against the rent payable.   Both the single Judge of the  Small  Cause  Court  and the  Bench  of  that Court on a new trial took the view that the sum of Rs. 650-3-3 admittedly advanced by the tenant to the landlord did not amount to a premium or advance payment of rent and consequently was not hit by Section 65-A(2)(b) of the Transfer of Property Act and the receiver was therefore bound  by the agreement between the mortgagor and the tenant. All the three Judges overlooked the fact that the agreement about repayment of the advance made by the tenant to the landlord was not part of the lease  transaction     Admittedly,  this loan  and the agreement for repayment of it took place after the creation of the tenancy and has nothing to do with the tenancy itself as part of it.   It was an independent arrangement   or agreement regarding    repayment of the loan from out of the rent payable by the tenant.   It is not a term of the lease and it is not also  a covenant embodied  in the lease transaction.   Section 65-A(2)(b) deals with covenants and terms of a lease executed by a mortgagor. It does not deal with any subsequent arrangement entered into by the mortgagor with the tenant of the   mortgaged  property,   regarding  repayment   of any loan which is not charged upon the property or which  has  no  connection with the leasehold interest in the property.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. Counsel for the respondent contended that the receiver in this case was bound to honour the arrangement entered into between the mortgagor and his tenant, because the receiver is only an agent of the mortgagor, as provided in Section 69-A Clause (3) of the Transfer of Property Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;A receiver appointed under the powers conferred by this section shall be deemed to be the agent of the mortgagor and the mortgagor shall be solely responsible for the receiver&#8217;s acts or defaults, unless the mortgage deed otherwise provides or unless such acts or defaults are due to the improper intervention of the mortgagee.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. This clause creates a fiction in the relationship of agent and principal between the receiver and the mortgagor. It is an accepted principle of law that a fiction should be confined to the purposes for which it was created. The language &#8220;shall be deemed to be the agent&#8221; makes it clear that the receiver is only an agent by a fiction. The fiction is created for the specific purpose of holding the mortgagor liable for the acts and defaults of the receiver appointed under Section 69-A. Certainly it does not flow from this that the receiver is bound by every agreement entered into by the mortgagor with the tenant unconnected with the transaction of lease and admittedly independent of the transaction of lease of the property in question. Clause (4) of that section is pertinent in this connection. It reads thus:\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;The receiver shall have power to demand and recover all the income of which he is appointed receiver, by suit, execution or otherwise, in the name either of the mortgagor or of the mortgagee to the full extent of the interest which the mortgagor could dispose of&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. The rest of the section is not necessary for my present purpose.   The key words in the section are &#8220;to the full extent of the interest which the mortgagor could   dispose   of&#8221;.   Obviously,   these words refer to the interest in the property which the mortgagor could dispose of.    As an example one may conceive of a case where the mortgagor in this case after entering into an agreement with the tenant in question sells the property to a third party who has no notice of this agreement   Could it then be said that the agreement entered into by the vendor with the tenant in possession would be binding upon the vendee, the purchaser of the property?   It would not be so because the agreement in question did not diminish the extent of the interest which the mortgagor could dispose of in the property. In other words, the agreement in question never came near or affected the mortgagor&#8217;s interest in the property.   It remained all along in independent contract or arrangement for repayment of a loan and had nothing to do or had any connection with the mortgagor&#8217;s    interest in the    immoveable property, namely,    the house in    question.    The receiver is therefore not bound to honour such an agreement and   he is entitled under   Clause (4) of Section 69-A of the Act to sue for and recover all the income which the mortgagor was entitled to from the property.   The extent of the mortgagor&#8217;s right in the property is the only measure of the receiver&#8217;s power to gather the income.   In this view, all the three learned Judges of the Court of Small Causes were wrong in allowing the defence set up to the suit to prevail.   The revision is therefore allowed, and the suit is decreed in full as prayed for in the plaint, with costs throughout.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962 Equivalent citations: AIR 1963 Mad 449, (1963) 1 MLJ 160 Bench: G Pillai JUDGMENT 1. The question for determination in this revision petition is whether a receiver appointed under Section 69-A of the Transfer of Property Act is bound by a contract [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-214607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1962-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-08T04:52:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962\",\"datePublished\":\"1962-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-08T04:52:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962\"},\"wordCount\":940,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962\",\"name\":\"S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1962-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-08T04:52:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1962-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-08T04:52:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962","datePublished":"1962-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-08T04:52:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962"},"wordCount":940,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962","name":"S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1962-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-08T04:52:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-radhakrishna-naidu-vs-s-thiruvenkatiah-on-27-july-1962#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S. Radhakrishna Naidu vs S. Thiruvenkatiah on 27 July, 1962"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214607"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214607\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}