{"id":214608,"date":"2010-07-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010"},"modified":"2017-12-19T11:08:13","modified_gmt":"2017-12-19T05:38:13","slug":"bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\/M.A.C.T. &#8230; on 3 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Allahabad High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\/M.A.C.T. &#8230; on 3 July, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                                                                                1\n\n                                                                    Court No.21\n\n\n\n\n                   Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.37917 of 2010\n\n\n                        Bharat Ram Mishra and another\n                                        Versus\n                       Additional District Judge\/ M.A.C.T.\n                       Room No.2, Alahabad and others\n\n\n\n\nHon'ble V.K. Shukla, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Present writ petition has been filed questioning the validity of order dated<br \/>\n03.04.2010 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, rejecting application<br \/>\nunder Section 5 of the Limitation Act, filed along with Restoration Application<br \/>\nunder Order IX Rule 13 C.P.C.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Brief background of the case, as mentioned in the writ petition, is that the<br \/>\nMotor Accident Claim Petition was filed by the claimants Deshraj and Pushpa<br \/>\nDevi in respect of accident, which had taken place on 29.05.1999, wherein<br \/>\ntheir two years&#8217; aged son had died. On the said claim petition being filed, the<br \/>\npetitioners entered appearance through their counsel and thereafter<br \/>\ndisappeared, as such the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal was constrained to<br \/>\npass order on 05.03.2006 to proceed exparte. Thereafter evidence was<br \/>\nadduced on behalf of the claimants and award was passed on 23.02.2007. For<br \/>\nrealizing the amount in question, the award was put for execution, and<br \/>\nthereafter an application was moved on 09.04.2009 by the petitioners<br \/>\ncontending therein that the award in question was exparte and the same<br \/>\nshould be set aside. To the said application objections were filed on<br \/>\n25.03.2010. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal considered the matter and<br \/>\nfound that the cause furnished in the delay condonation application was not at<br \/>\nall sufficient for non appearance, and in this background, the delay<br \/>\ncondonation application was dismissed and the effect of the same was that the<br \/>\napplication under Order IX Rule 13 C.P.C. stood dismissed. At this juncture,<br \/>\npresent wrti petition has been filed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Sri Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, contended with<br \/>\nvehemence that in the present case liberal view ought to have been taken, as<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                  2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the sufficiency of cause had been validly explained, as such delay condonation<br \/>\napplication ought to have been allowed and the matter ought to have been<br \/>\ndecided on merits.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Factual position in the present case is that the claim petition No.536 of<br \/>\n2000, Deshraj vs. Bharat Ram Mishra and another, was filed way back in the<br \/>\nyear 2000 by the claimants Deshraj and Pushpa Devi. On the said claim<br \/>\npetition being filed, both the petitioners have accepted that they had received<br \/>\nsummons, entered appearance before the Tribunal and got their vakalatnama<br \/>\nfiled. It has been mentioned in the application moved for restoration that after<br \/>\nfiling vakalatnama, applicant No.2 left for Mumbai and the son of applicant<br \/>\nNo.1 had fallen ill, on account of his treatment further appearance could not be<br \/>\nput in, and case could not be pursued. It has been stated that the petitioners<br \/>\nacquired knowledge of the proceedings on 01.04.2009 and they got examined<br \/>\nthe matter on 04.04.2009, thereafter, application in question was moved.<br \/>\nObjections to the said application was filed contending therein that totally<br \/>\nuntruthful and self contradictory statement of fact had been mentioned. The<br \/>\nMotor Accident Claims Tribunal perused the original file and found that from the<br \/>\nside of the petitioners time had been asked for filing written statement, and<br \/>\nwhen considerable period elapsed and no written statement could be filed,<br \/>\nthen orders were passed on 05.03.2006 to proceed exparte. The Motor<br \/>\nAccident Claims Tribunal has taken note of the fact that no details have been<br \/>\nfurnished as to whether son of the petitioner had fallen mentally ill prior to<br \/>\n05.03.2005 or not, as date mentioned in the first prescription of his son was<br \/>\n24.01.2006 and the order for proceeding exparte was passed passed on<br \/>\n05.03.2006. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has found that the grounds<br \/>\nmentioned in the application were not credible and they had been mentioned<br \/>\nonly for the purposes of the case. Once vague and evasive statement of fact<br \/>\nhas been mentioned in respect of illness of the son, then in such a situation,<br \/>\nsufficiency of cause as well as bona fides have been lacking and missing, as<br \/>\nsuch Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cannot be said to be in error in rejecting<br \/>\nthe application moved for condoning delay containing wholly vague and<br \/>\nevasive statements of fact in respect of the illness of the son of the petitioners,<br \/>\nspecially in the background when petitioners were aware of the proceedings<br \/>\nand had even put in appearance, but subsequently disappeared after taking<br \/>\ntime for filing written statements. In such a situation and in such a background,<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                              3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>discretion has been rightly exercised by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal<br \/>\nfinding the cause furnished to be insufficient, then this Court cannot act as<br \/>\nCourt of appeal or take a different or contrary view, as authority of judicial<br \/>\nreview is not akin to the power of appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Consequently, writ petition, as has been framed and drawn is dismissed.<br \/>\n03.07.2010<br \/>\nSRY\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\/M.A.C.T. &#8230; on 3 July, 2010 1 Court No.21 Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.37917 of 2010 Bharat Ram Mishra and another Versus Additional District Judge\/ M.A.C.T. Room No.2, Alahabad and others Hon&#8217;ble V.K. Shukla, J. Present writ petition has been filed questioning the validity [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-214608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allahabad-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\/M.A.C.T. ... on 3 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\/M.A.C.T. ... on 3 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-19T05:38:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\\\/M.A.C.T. &#8230; on 3 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-19T05:38:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":777,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\\\/M.A.C.T. ... on 3 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-19T05:38:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\\\/M.A.C.T. &#8230; on 3 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\/M.A.C.T. ... on 3 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\/M.A.C.T. ... on 3 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-19T05:38:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\/M.A.C.T. &#8230; on 3 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-19T05:38:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010"},"wordCount":777,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Allahabad High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010","name":"Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\/M.A.C.T. ... on 3 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-19T05:38:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharat-ram-mishra-another-vs-addl-district-judgem-a-c-t-on-3-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bharat Ram Mishra &amp; Another vs Addl. District Judge\/M.A.C.T. &#8230; on 3 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214608"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214608\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}