{"id":215225,"date":"2008-11-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008"},"modified":"2016-09-13T22:58:49","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T17:28:49","slug":"state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008<\/div>\n
RFA No.315 of 1995                    1\n\nIn the Punjab and Haryana High Court,at Chandigarh.\n\n\n\n\n            RFA No. 315 of 1995\n            Decided on November 17,2008.\n\n\n\n\nState of Haryana and another                 -- Appellants\n\n\n            vs.\n\n\nSmt.Phuli and another                       --Respondents.\n\n\n\n\nPresent:     Mr.H.S.Hooda,Advocate General,Haryana, with\n             Mr.Rajiv Kawatra, Sr.D.A.G,Haryana, for the appellants\n\n             None for the respondents.\n\n\n\nRakesh Kumar Jain,J:\n\n\n\n             This order shall dispose of fifty appeals filed by both the State\n\nof Haryana as well as the claimants\/landowners i.e. RFA Nos. 315, 316,\n\n317,318,319,320,321,322,323,324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332,\n\n333,334,335,336,337,338,339,340,341of1995,2162 of 1996, 2881, 2882,\n\n2883, 2884, 2885, 2886, 2889, 2890, 2892, 2893, 2894, 2895, 2896, 2897,\n\n2898, 2899,2900, 2901,2902,2967 of 1994, 17 and 18 of 1995, as common\n\nquestions of law and facts are involved therein.\n\n            Land situated in the revenue estate of village Khukhrana,\n\nHadbast No.24, Tehsil and District Panipat, was notified under Section 4 of\n\nthe Land Acquisition Act 1894 (for short,'the Act') dated 25.7.1989\n RFA No.315 of 1995                            2\n\npublished on 21.8.1989, partly at public expenses and partly at the expenses\n\nof Haryana State Electricity Board for a public purposes namely for the\n\nextension of Ash Disposal of area for Stage-IV of Panipat Thermal Project\n\nand notification for declaration under Section 6 of the Act, was issued on\n\n14.3.1993.\n\n             The Land Acquisition Collector classified the land into\n\nfollowing categories:-\n\n  1.                 Nehri                             971K-10M\n\n  2.                 Banjar Qadim Thur                  23K-17 M\n\n  3.                 GairMumkin Tubewell 1 K-01M\n\n  4.                 Gair Mumkin Chab                  0K-16M\n\n  5.                 Gair Mumkin Khadan                4 K-08M\n\n  6.                 Gair Mumkin Rasta                 21K07M\n\n  7.                 Gair Mumkin Khand                 5K-05M.\n\n                             -----------------------------------------\n<\/pre>\n
                             Total:                 1028K-04M\n<\/p>\n
                             ————————————————<\/p>\n
                             and awarded the compensation as under:-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Nehri,GairMumkin Tubewell                              Rs.50,000\/- per acre\nGair Mumkin Khand\n\nGairMumkin Chah Rasta:                                 Rs.40,000\/- per acre\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
             Not being contended with the award of the Collector, the matter<\/p>\n
was taken to the Civil Court by the landowners by way of filing objections<\/p>\n
under Section 18 of the Act in which it was alleged that the market value of<\/p>\n
the acquired land is not less than Rs. 200\/- per square yard. It was alleged<\/p>\n
that the land in question is situated at a distance of 4 kilometer from the
\n RFA No.315 of 1995                      3<\/span><\/p>\n
Industrial Town of Panipat and the area in the locality of the acquired land<\/p>\n
was fast coming up as an Industrial area and number of factories and<\/p>\n
commercial establishments were in existence near the acquired land; that the<\/p>\n
colony of thermal power project was also situated just adjacent to the<\/p>\n
acquired land and it was most suitable for residential,commercial and<\/p>\n
industrial purposes. While contesting the claim of the landowners\/claimants,<\/p>\n
the State of Haryana controverted the allegations and alleged that adequate<\/p>\n
and fair compensation has already been granted to the landowners.<\/p>\n
             The landowners examined PW-1 Dharam Singh, PW-2 Ant<\/p>\n
Ram, PW-3 Dalip Singh DRA, D.C Office, PW-4 Ved Parkash son of Hari<\/p>\n
Singh, PW-5 Raj pal Draftsman. Copy of the notification Ex.P-6 and copy<\/p>\n
of the sale deed Ex.P7 were also tendered in evidence. State of Haryana<\/p>\n
examined RW1 Jagmal Singh Patwari, RW-2 Balraj Kumar, RW-3<\/p>\n
K.G.Aggarwal, Assistant Engineer and RW-4 Mohan Lal. The petitioners<\/p>\n
by way of additional evidence tendered Ex.P-8 copy of award dated<\/p>\n
1.8.1991, Ex.P-9 copy f the sale deed dated 27.3.1989 and Ex.P-10 copy of<\/p>\n
the sale deed dated 27.3.1989 and Ex.P-10 copy of notification dated<\/p>\n
25.7.1989.\n<\/p>\n
             After considering the entire evidence in detail, the learned<\/p>\n
Addl. District Judge, Panipat, vide his award dated 09.9.1994, determined<\/p>\n
the compensation of the acquired land at flat rate of Rs. 1,40,000\/- per acre,<\/p>\n
besides awarding statutory benefits in terms of provisions of amended Act.<\/p>\n
             No      one   has   put   in   appearance   on   behalf   of   the\n\nlandowners\/claimants.      However,     Mr.H.S.Hooda,    Advocate      General,\n\n<\/pre>\n
Haryana assisted by Mr.Rajiv Kawatra, Sr.D.A.G, Haryana has put in<\/p>\n
appearance on behalf of the State of Haryana in the appeals filed by it and
\n RFA No.315 of 1995                    4<\/span><\/p>\n
as respondents in the appeals filed by the landowners\/claimants.<\/p>\n
            Learned counsel appearing for the State has argued that the<\/p>\n
learned Reference Court has committed a palpable error in relying upon<\/p>\n
copy of sale deed Ex. P-9 and award contained in Exs. P-3 and P-8 while<\/p>\n
determining market value of the acquired land @ Rs.1,40,000\/- per acre at<\/p>\n
the time of issuance of notification under Section 4 of the Act. Copy of the<\/p>\n
award Ex.P-3 is dated 13.12.1993 pertaining to the land situated in village<\/p>\n
Jattal which was acquired through the same notification vide which the<\/p>\n
present land has been acquired.       In that acquisition, compensation @<\/p>\n
Rs.,1,40,000\/- per acre was determined. Thereafter, in LA Case No. 2 of<\/p>\n
1992 titled Satish and others v. State of Haryana of village Sutana,<\/p>\n
compensation @ Rs. 1,40,000\/- per acre was assessed. Copy of the sale<\/p>\n
deed Ex.P9 shows that the land measuring 2 Kanals of village Sutana was<\/p>\n
sold for Rs. 50,000\/- out of killa No. 17\/3 situated towards east, the price of<\/p>\n
which comes to Rs.2,00,000\/-per acre. It was found that village Khukhrana<\/p>\n
(present acquisition) and village Sutana adjoin each other. Rather, the land<\/p>\n
of village Sutana, Khukhrana and Jattal was acquired through the same<\/p>\n
notification and the learned Court below while considering the sale deed<\/p>\n
Ex.P-9 dated 27.3.1989 found that the land in question was acquired on<\/p>\n
25.7.1989 and notification was published on 21.8.1989 and after applying a<\/p>\n
cut of 1\/3rd to the amount of Rs.2,00,000\/- per acre, the market value comes<\/p>\n
to Rs1,33,334\/- per acre, but since the land of village Jattal, Khukhrana and<\/p>\n
Sutana, was acquired through the same notification and compensation for<\/p>\n
village Jattal and Sutana has already been determined @ Rs.1,40,000\/- per<\/p>\n
acre, the Reference court has not committed any error by applying the same<\/p>\n
yard-stick for determination of the compensation of village Khukshrana @
\n RFA No.315 of 1995                   5<\/span><\/p>\n
Rs,1,40,000\/- per acre. Thus, I do not agree with the contention of learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the State of Haryana that the learned Reference Court has<\/p>\n
committed an error in assessing the compensation on the basis of<\/p>\n
compensation determined for village Jattal, and Sutana.<\/p>\n
            No other point has been raised before me by the learned<\/p>\n
Counsel for the State.\n<\/p>\n
            In view of the above discussion, I do not find any merit in the<\/p>\n
present appeals both filed by the State of Haryana as well as the<\/p>\n
claimants\/landowners and dismiss the same without any order as to costs.<\/p>\n
November 17,2008                                 (Rakesh Kumar Jain)\nRR                                                         Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008 RFA No.315 of 1995 1 In the Punjab and Haryana High Court,at Chandigarh. RFA No. 315 of 1995 Decided on November 17,2008. State of Haryana and another — Appellants vs. Smt.Phuli and another –Respondents. Present: Mr.H.S.Hooda,Advocate General,Haryana, with Mr.Rajiv […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-215225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-13T17:28:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T17:28:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":786,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008\",\"name\":\"State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-13T17:28:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-13T17:28:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T17:28:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008"},"wordCount":786,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008","name":"State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-13T17:28:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-another-vs-smt-phuli-and-another-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Haryana And Another vs Smt.Phuli And Another on 17 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215225\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}