{"id":215521,"date":"2009-06-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009"},"modified":"2017-07-05T07:12:00","modified_gmt":"2017-07-05T01:42:00","slug":"gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development … on 10 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development … on 10 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
BANGALQRxE-\u00a76'V  \n\nIN THE HIGH CGURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALGRE\nDATED THIS THE 10\" BAY OF 3UNE, 2009\n\nBEFGRE\n\nTHE Homme MR; 3u7ST1-::E A.N.VEN\u00a3}G0?ALA .gc~;1@\"a%.%m;V'_T.'v.  H\n\nWRIT PETITIQN :x:o.1231sz:2'e'5t)s%{\u00ab3m>,$\u00ab   \n\nWRIT PETITION No.12316\/'\u00e9'{?i3LE3._f+'3sE2)1\u00a7{'}V_* '~ = \" \nwax? PET\"I'?\"I\u20ac)\u00a5\\3_,J\\.l.o.12;;\u00a7~;.*;,.~_;',V?':a%';\u00a7;_8'{3\u00bb.8. {B DA}~.. \nBETWEEN:  t     A'\n\nGANGADHARA R\ufb01;G MADD:_\u00a3VV'?A\"{'i  : \n\nS\/G VEERA [\u00a7A'{;E\u00a7'A\u00a72 :3,  %szc--T.TE--RaAcE\n\nRAT NO 2-3;', 69 F'EET..MAIN._ R-'SAD\nG BLGCK, SAH.AKARR._NAGAR};;\n\nH.;.';'\u00a55ETE'E\"IG\u00a5\\\u00e9ER :5: w.w:a.3.233;5;29es\n\n%g;-:,e;s KARA 3.521)\"-MguLLAPw1\n\nS11'-:OfVE?gAF'i,'3sif<RE:'3\u00a7~f\u00a3's\u00a3vz9_\u00a7. am\nAGED 49 ~r2Aas'; A\n\n  am?' we swag' '2, CLASSIC YERRACE\n\n?f'LAT NO 22-.E, :30 FEET MAIN ROA5;\n\n\u00ab  .\u00a7'\u00a3 -BLOCK", .$;aHAKARA NAGAR,\n % \u00a7:'\u00e9\u00a7sNGA..LfORE--96\n\n.,....PETETI{3\u00a7'\\\u00a3ER EN W.P.N0,12315;'20\ufb018\n\n\n\n..   VEB\/5=NGe\u20ac\\\u00a7--,QRE~26\n\n1 SMT PABMAVATHI\n\nW\/'C} $RI NAGARA3\n\nAGED 59 YEARS\n\nR\/AT FURT N9 503,\n\nKETHAN RESIDENCY\nVIGNANANAGAR\n\nBANGALORE   \n\n2 59.1 NAGARA3\ns\/0 LATE BHEEMAIAH\nAGED 54 YEARS   V ._  \nR;A'r FLAT NO 503, KETs~:AnsV\u00ab%\u00bbR_.E-srcezsscv M \n\nVIGNANANAGAR. \n3ANGALORE   M  \n.....PE"!"\u00a3TI'1}$*\u00e9E'R5$;,Ii'\u00a2 v\u00a2,'P.,jr\\so,1231?\/2902\n\n(av SR1 K E-{AmiM\ufb01NTHAR\ufb01\\Y*A:PP}\u20ack,..\u00a7a{}%\u00a7;'.I!\u00a7if\ufb01\u00a7Ei. THE\ni3E'"F'IT'EONS;)'"~ ."    'A j\n\n"mg sA\u00a7:GA:,IaE t3&ii9;\u00e9L \nK1.}M\ufb01xR\u00a7'-'s -PARK 'w.\u00a3s':*  \n\n RE? av zT\u00a5s'+\u00a3:,0:w1ssIoni%ER\n\n R\u00a3S?\u20ac:>$x\u00e9E3\u00a7\u00a7'\u00e9T\n(Common in aii the 3 aases}\n\nV {av S\u00e9gz  R:t{MAN3A:vE\u00a5A savsgazx, Aw.)\n\n '  \" VTWRIT PETITIGN \u00a7\\\u00a76.12315,\/2G\u00a78 ES FREE UNBER\n*.AR:\u00a7'\u00a7C_3..ES 226 AND 22? OF THE CC}NE'::TITUT\u00a7\u00a7N GF EKEDIA\n\n  TC) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT T\ufb01 ALLOT AN<\/pre>\n
  ALTERNATTVE SITES MEASURING EAST TO WEE”? ?6+5G,\/2
\n ‘<,FEVE"T AND NORTH TO SOUTH 96 FEET CR AN EQUAL
\nITJIMENSIGN IN AW! OTHER LAYOUT FORMEQ BY IT<\/p>\n
wzrwou"? CHARGENG ANY EXTRA AMGUNTV.\n<\/p>\n
{CONSIDERING THEIR REPRESENTATIONS  <\/p>\n
wars’ PETETION NO.12316\/2008 IS me:-i’f\u00a3>:?’ u%\u00a7:::j\u00a7%%2Ji[%%”‘\u00a7’%T
\nARTICLES 225 AM’) 227 as ‘ms CGNSTITUTIG–?\\I.._\u20ac\u00a7F E~\u00a7\ufb01Z*.IA  <\/p>\n
PRAYING TG mass? THE RES?GE%2\u00a7’E’?!7? “Eta _.Ai7_i-.v\u20ac2T A122;<\/p>\n
ALTERNATIVE SITE \u00a5’v?\u00a3ASURiNG EAST :’i’.’QfiW’E’ST 5-E3’F\u00a3EETa;;
\nAND NORTH T6 scum 90 FEET:-._<3R AN'~.vEQ\u00a3JA'L "
\nmmemszom IN ANY GTHERJHAYQUT 'F0RfVh%\u00a3}A,VBY :7'<\/p>\n
wm-:auT CHARGING ANY ..__ 'EXTRA  A-&f\u00a7C}L\u00a7\u00a7"r\u00ab…., av
\ncomsxnmzws THEIR Revaesamzzafzorgs gegmwxtga.<\/p>\n
WRIT PETITEON N<3;w:2317,{2,o%'z:,=8v.V;':~:;.% FELED Lsmssa
\nARTICLES 225 AND 227 o\u00a7="f:'HEic:'s:;:\u00ab:sTzf\u00a3*a;";'*z<:TRA~AM'aium*-av'=mr~ssIDER.ING THEER
\nREmEse?s3frATIL*2;<~:' F%:D,RTI~\u00a3WI.TH;\n<\/p>\n
Thes\u00e9=\u00a7:;\u00e9’titi\u00a7hs;,C;:\u00a7’s-nE’:\ufb01’gV”‘\ufb01n in prefiminary hear\u00e9ag ‘B’
\ngroup th\u00e9s ciay;~.th’e.Cf<[2urt_ma"de the fe\ufb02ewing:<\/p>\n
 ….. 4} R 3 E R<\/p>\n
  ivth\u00e9vsg writ petitions are poste\u00e9 $3 '8' graup,<\/p>\n
  with Ath\u00e9 ca.\u00e9*;'saLi:'i:t.T:'of iearned cozmsei cf bath the s\u00e9des, the<\/p>\n
\u00e9azgfit pet'Et.\u00a7<}ins are taken L233 fer \ufb01rm disposa\u00e9.<\/p>\n
A'  *2.. "The getitizmers centend that their preper\ufb01es ware<\/p>\n
"  _4aVcqu}ired for the scheme 'Periph-era? Ring Read'. The<\/p>\n
 "*pietitEoners' claim is that, they are enti\ufb01ed to be a\ufb01otted<\/p>\n
aiternate sites, since their vahsahie prafserty 133$ beer':<\/p>\n
acquired by the respondent. Having subm\u00a7tte_\u00a7\u00a7.. _?th=\u00e9.,_<\/p>\n
representat\ufb01ms far aimtment sf aitarrzate sites   _<\/p>\n
net received any reply from the re\u00a7;genden–t;*"t\u00a7%j\u00a73?;f'\ufb01aase '4  <\/p>\n
apgareached this Court, ta direct t\ufb01e r\u00a7'\u00bb,5,\u00ab:3;%;r{d,;e.:%:i:<\/p>\n
aiternate sites of equai dimensisg. in 3'r2y"'\u00a7ayo:.z\u00b0*:"t\u00a7f;at_Hm\u00a7;y V%<\/p>\n
be formed by the resp'ondentV:;"\ufb01fvithcuf"~\u00bb:.\u00a7faEg\u00a5:i\u00a7; any<\/p>\n
amount.\n<\/p>\n
3. The respo\ufb01\ufb01gnt f}}ed.:V\ufb01agizegrh\u00e9frsg of ebgect\u00e9zzns<\/p>\n
contersdisfgj’  \u00a7:a :k\u00a3_’\u00a7 wehr\u00e9not\u00e9\ufb01ed fer acqu\u00e9sitiar:
\nfor the fcfmatisn’ef \u00a7iVeE\u00a7p’%+\u00e9ra%”‘ri\ufb01\u00a7 mad and pre\u00e9\u00e9minary<\/p>\n
net\u00e9\ufb01cation w\u00e9\u00e9 ifssu\u00e9d tin 35.11.2096 wh\u00e9ch was fe\ufb01cwed<\/p>\n
 ;3i.<3tificat\u00a5on' d\u00e9"t\u00e9d 29.06.2801 Though the \ufb01nai<\/p>\n
\u00a7"\u00a3'\u00a2=_t\u00a7'f\u00e9V;;_a\u00a7t\u00a70:tf\u00a7'-\ufb01a\u00e9'ji\u00e9\u00e9en issued acqz\ufb01ring the proper\ufb01es, the<\/p>\n
  awardfzas vz'2.\u00e9_*.: y\u00e9':: been passed and possession sf acquired<\/p>\n
-4.7;-v44._l'<Tar1d has"s'2gAiE; been taken and handa\u00e9 ever t9 the EDA. It is<\/p>\n
 -.’:’\u00e9z’;~:\u00bb”a_I;::’e:_1_ 5333:, since he award is passed an\u00e9 gessesszisn has<\/p>\n
 …_}\u00a7a’t’_’\u00a53een taken, the question of aiiotting a\u00e9tamate sites t\u00a7<\/p>\n
 “\u00bb\u00bb.. $i%*:e petit\u00e9cners, does not arise at this stage. A :’esn\u00a7ui:\u00e9err<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
dated 17.11.2306 passee in subject P4e.i46f2C85 has been<\/p>\n
produced, with regard to the peiicy decision takee.  <\/p>\n
4, Having heard the iearneei ceense\u00a3   M<\/p>\n
sides, in View of the undieputed fac;f:’tha~t, ‘a4aefaar:v\u00a3u*i;Ve_s:1–Aef (the”‘p.Aet%\u00a7ien\u00a7.fs~_,x T’i<\/p>\n
has not been taken ever, these w.f\u00a7t~..pet%tiens’\u00a5’9r”v_\u00a3s\u00a7–:\u00a7\u00a7”r’\u00e9g ef
\nd\u00e9rections for aliotment of..eitern-ateysifes, are ‘gsrerravjature.
\nHowever, if the award in 4fe”:~:_.pe\u00a3:t.v?3’f:VaeQ$\u00a3\u00a7ere\ufb01..Iands of the<\/p>\n
petitioners is pa.s:3e{i.._anz_i  p:es;\ufb01esf5i~ef’:’:.._is’ teiien over, the<\/p>\n
respoedeaet Se  _in.–vV\u00a3erms of its resoiut\u00e9ce
\ndated G?.1i,?.0Q5’pe$eieeV_\u00a5’2<2\u00a3 \u00a7s.sE.*\u00a7wje<:t 549.146\/2096 en\u00e9 ai\u00e9et<\/p>\n
aiternete..siL\u00a7es'uE"'r:  t\ufb01efe of 1:6 the \u00a73et\u00a7t\u00a7oners.<\/p>\n
  'v\u00ab.7\u00a7%he_v.\u00a7rit%:\u00a7etiticns stand diseased of accerding\u00e9y.<\/p>\n
'   <\/p>\n
Sd\/-~
\nledge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development … on 10 June, 2009 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda BANGALQRxE-\u00a76’V IN THE HIGH CGURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALGRE DATED THIS THE 10″ BAY OF 3UNE, 2009 BEFGRE THE Homme MR; 3u7ST1-::E A.N.VEN\u00a3}G0?ALA .gc~;1@”a%.%m;V’_T.’v. H WRIT PETITIQN :x:o.1231sz:2’e’5t)s%{\u00ab3m>,$\u00ab WRIT PETITION No.12316\/’\u00e9'{?i3LE3._f+’3sE2)1\u00a7{‘}V_* ‘~ = ” wax? PET”I’?”I\u20ac)\u00a5\\3_,J\\.l.o.12;;\u00a7~;.*;,.~_;’,V?’:a%’;\u00a7;_8′{3\u00bb.8. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-215521","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development ... on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development ... on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-05T01:42:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development … on 10 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-05T01:42:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":663,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development ... on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-05T01:42:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development … on 10 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development ... on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development ... on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-05T01:42:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development … on 10 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-05T01:42:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009"},"wordCount":663,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009","name":"Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development ... on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-05T01:42:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhara-rao-maddi-pati-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gangadhara Rao Maddi Pati vs The Bangalore Development … on 10 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215521"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215521\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215521"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}