{"id":215774,"date":"2008-06-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008"},"modified":"2014-12-25T00:47:27","modified_gmt":"2014-12-24T19:17:27","slug":"bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Bijapur Urban Development &#8230; vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bijapur Urban Development &#8230; vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V.G.Sabhahit &amp; S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n<pre> . '_ 1 ~ '-:.S Rf'SI{)D}\\FPA...GU'IAPPA SHATAGAR\n\n  --V 2 \"%%%\"TH!\u00a7s*:*ATE 0? ICARHATAKA\n ~ : 4_ aousme Arm uaam mavammsm\n\nnu THE men mum' on KARNATAKA AT ee\\NGAL(\u00a7R E :~\nmama TRIS THE 2078 my 0? JUNE  5;:   \nPRESENT  \"   V \"\nms i-IOWBLE MR. Jusricrs,  \nTHE HOENPBLE MR.JUsric'E=;\u00e9;w.sATYA:\u00a7A1\u00e9AY;\u00a7NA\n H H\n\nBETWEEN  _      M\n\nBEJARIR URBAN '\u00a3?\u00a5':vE\u00a7:40P\u00bb.\u00a3Enf? \"\"7T\" \u00bb \nAUTHORF1'Y_...E5!,}A'_PU.R ~D:s1*i\u00a7;c:_*,   %\nBIJAPUR       \nBY rrs CQMMI\u00a7SS\u00a7{)NER_.\"' _  '-\n\n(By sRi';TA1\u00a7AxAR:\u00a3!se;V sg ma SRi.G.S.PATIL)\n% &amp; V. AG'9En'\"A3cm 73 YEARS\n* \u00bb k Vor:&lt;3.A\u00a7*'[j'-r1*1\u00ab;s;~'\n\nKARNATAKA HIGH mum AC3' mmzzrm TQ%\".sfE'r \"As;1i:)E  _\nTHE 039312 PASSED ::%~:.%V%MLj'_.h,1E \" %..wang; '&lt;;oE&#039;;*mou &#039;\n\nN(}.22842\/2005 mrrEn__u7\/01\n\nTHIS wan&#039;   FG_\u00a3\u00a7--&#039;*&#039;PRELlh\ufb02NARY\nHEARING &#039;rH;s 33_AY, saa\ufb02nnfr &#039;gm:-:uvERED THE\n\nmLLowi%m\u00a7:.V&#039;_L&quot;;;+p.%   \nL  &quot;w JUQQMENT\n    1 is for preliminary hearing and\n\n it   hearirg with the consent d&#039; the\n\nV.   &#039;&amp;  for the parties.\n\n  is \ufb01led by me 23*&#039; Iwndmt\n\nV Vv .V  4&#039; by its Commissioner in\n\n&#039;x.\\\u00a7~Q--\n\n \n\n\n\nW.P.No.22842\/2005 being mievea by the \n\n7.1.2008 declining to appmvc the layout  \nallowed the Writ peti\ufb01on 61%     &#039; V\napprove the layout plan. The   &#039;:_ \n\nthe proceedings for  \u00a359  * V L&#039;\n\nwrit petitioner   17\nthe sitelm   pnznmanmy\n     secmrs 4(1)\nand 6(  Act: were issued.\nBeing  {he W of the W (the\nwrit p\u00a2:ti\ufb01V\u00a7V$ri1exf)&#039;A\\&#039;\u00a7_l:.&#039;F:&#039;;&#039;i?\\To.22027\/2000. nu:-mg \n\n .    petition, the owner ofthe land\n\n T]  land for nan-~a@&#039;icuitm~a1 purm by\n\n a.  Rs.3,98,000\/-~. The said writ pcti\ufb01on\n\n  of an 11.1.2001 by quashing the\n    \ufb01ving libaty to tlm au\ufb01mzity ta\n  with the acquisi\ufb01on \ufb01nm the 31% of hcarmg\n\n\\3L\\\u00a7&#039;\n\n\n\nobjections. &#039;Ihemafter, an appacmon was ras-\n\napproval of the layeut plm before the  \nBevelogment Authority.    &#039; \nDevelopment Authority 113%    .\n17.6.2005. Being    \n\npetitioner prd&#039;e;rrec_1   V:A&quot;:wi*it__  kn\nW.P.No.19216\/2005     ww\ndismissed as    a \ufb02esh writ\nPetition    V {Je   I\\. ;     &#039;MW\nW.?.No.228\u00a72%26a5. mgeam in the said writ\n  to the rwpon\u00e9enm, the\nmmea skixngie   this Court mgr tmuing we\n\nzgyo;1\u00a3w;;s%s;;s;b1e to be quashed and further held that\n\n  writ petitim had mid a sum of\n_ 1 &#039;    and if the hyout pm is withheld, it wm\n%%  the petitioner ta mmvoidable hardship and also\n\n\\,e\u00bb9~\n\n \n\n\n\nSingle Judge (1% the Bgmpur Urmn \n-    \n<\/pre>\n<p>layout plan by imposing    &#8216;<br \/>\navaiiable to it in law.   i %<\/p>\n<p>this appeal is mefcfred   Urbm<br \/>\nDevelopment Azjth\ufb01sg-ity&#8217;._L   by its<br \/>\nCommissionm&#8217;-..  7 &#8216;  <\/p>\n<p>   the learned Senior<br \/>\n   I-t mspondcm and the<br \/>\nlwxjmd   Advocate appwing for<\/p>\n<p>~   &#8216; .fIfh<\/p>\n<p>from the High&#8211;r-&#8216;-owemd Committee. If it can,<br \/>\nthe High-Pawered commmee win xmive<br \/>\ndispute. If the dispute is not resohred   M<br \/>\nOommittee would undoubtedly  \u00bb&#8217;<br \/>\nHome.-var, there could    :<br \/>\nlitigation proposed by  of5tif;..\u00a2:4&#8242; &#8216;<br \/>\nGovtmxment or a pub\ufb01c   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>This could be prevcmpd <\/p>\n<p>Committee. In   u  is no<br \/>\nquestion of   _ ~&#8211;  The<br \/>\nCommittee  ha\u00e9. to  A  &#8216;cm to<br \/>\nlitigate.\n<\/p>\n<p> \u00a35:  such a case.\n<\/p>\n<p>The  nature must<br \/>\nnot be-,   To be xmemnemd<br \/>\nthat in   or the other pmty<\/p>\n<p> {git   the decision of the<\/p>\n<p> %  Committee. The aimum.-d<br \/>\n i\ufb01ways claim that its ri@1ts are<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;m rm, no right is afmcted.<\/p>\n<p>  is constituted ofhghly pla@<br \/>\n~.  of the Government, who do not have<br \/>\n \u00e9n&#8217;i.nteI&#8217;cst in the dispute, it is thus expected<\/p>\n<p>\\,\u00a3\/Q<\/p>\n<p>that their decision win be fair ma <\/p>\n<p>Even \ufb02&#8217; the dmrtment\/public v. . :    _<\/p>\n<p>undertaking \ufb01xds the decision <\/p>\n<p>discipline requires that      <\/p>\n<p>Otherwise the whole P11I*pos\u00e9&#8217;a\u00b0f %%ti2ss<br \/>\nwill be lost and may  against wmsgmzixe<br \/>\ndecision is given will<br \/>\nbeen wronged and<br \/>\naffected. This   to be<br \/>\ndom~,_=-  V  V &#8216;   ._<\/p>\n<p>6.   counsel further<br \/>\nsubmittgd  has passed the cmder<br \/>\nhaving   the applicant as<\/p>\n<p>    \ufb01led against the Commimioner<\/p>\n<p>   writ petitionm&#8217; and the Commis\ufb01oner<\/p>\n<p>  cemplaint against the son of the writ<\/p>\n<p> the order is mt mw bonafide and he<\/p>\n<p> as the Commiwioner was frail}!<\/p>\n<p>M?&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>interested in dismissing the applimtion for <\/p>\n<p>approval for forming the layout.<\/p>\n<p>7. We have given anx1ou&#8217;     <\/p>\n<p>contention of the learned eodn sfE!V_for    <\/p>\n<p>3. It is   was<br \/>\nimpugned in the.w*I&#8217;itt  a on<br \/>\nfor    by the<br \/>\n te the writ peumn<br \/>\ndated  that are moduced by<br \/>\nthe writ  f*%%L i7;6.2oo5 in support of his<\/p>\n<p> , &#8216;_  weis   considered by the Gommiaioner<\/p>\n<p>   has omerved in the order \ufb01l<\/p>\n<p>  doctzment contained tmeai: to him and<\/p>\n<p> are net re1e\\ran- t and apart from stating<\/p>\n<p>  documents are net mic-vam, no ins are<\/p>\n<p>  \ufb01;ss}i\ufb011ed as to Why those dccumcn\ufb01 we not relevant<\/p>\n<p>ms<\/p>\n<p>and could not be cansidered by him and <\/p>\n<p>quasmng of the or\u00e9er pamed by the  <\/p>\n<p>dated 17.6.2905 impugned 1:; thg   &#8221; %<\/p>\n<p>unsustainable.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. The next questiazzgg tlm\ufb02atiis  <\/p>\n<p>considered is as to   Judge<br \/>\nwas justi\ufb01ed in    to za\ufb01rxvvc the<br \/>\nlayout plan without  to the<\/p>\n<p>Commissiorgeif   the \ufb01avplimtion<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01led by   vr\u00e9\ufb01 settled, mm an<br \/>\norder in1pug 1\u20ac1\u00a3_i in  is set aside on the<br \/>\ngrgund  the   by the appli%-<br \/>\n  in the impugned order,<\/p>\n<p>  has to be remanded to the<\/p>\n<p>    passed the order for \ufb02esh disposal<\/p>\n<p>  But, in the present (raw, havmg<\/p>\n<p> above said material on record on the<\/p>\n<p>\\s\u00abf&gt; ~<\/p>\n<p>V <\/p>\n<p>.-..e.,&#8230;&#8230;.u&#8230;e\u00bb\\k,,.w_)_&#8230;&#8230;.A  ._&#8230; ,. ..<\/p>\n<p>ground upon which the order is set aside, K  &#8216;1.  .<\/p>\n<p>ought to have been remitted \u00a7*.e&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;ti&#8217;1e\u00ab_ <\/p>\n<p>Bijapur Urban Deveiopment  .  ..<\/p>\n<p>consideration of the     &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>However, the learned  \u00a7sseed&#8221;diiec\ufb01m1s<br \/>\non the gonna that   a. stm of<br \/>\nRs.3,98,000\/-i&#8221;   and aged 75<br \/>\nyears. The   itself be a gonad<br \/>\nto exefeiee&#8217; &#8216;    jurisd1ction to issue<br \/>\ndi1&#8217;ectio\u00a51&#8242;   Dcveiepment Authority to<br \/>\nsancr;cn    as it is for the competent<\/p>\n<p>   aut horitv&#8217; V.  his  applica\ufb01on in acoordmloe with<\/p>\n<p>  the applica\ufb01on and the d <\/p>\n<p>Z  _   eupport of the application and wherefore,<\/p>\n<p>  dimcxion issued to the Bijapur Urban<\/p>\n<p>  Authority to approve the layout plma<\/p>\n<p>  &#8221; -\u00bbwi\u00a7thou1: remitting the matter to the B\ufb01apur Urban<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  Development Authority is tmsustanable and to that<\/p>\n<p>\\,,\/x<\/p>\n<p>\u00a34!<\/p>\n<p>extent the order passed by the learncd Single is<\/p>\n<p>mquimd to be modi\ufb01ed.\n<\/p>\n<p>10. Aooardmty, we pass_tt1c_f9l1aw\ufb01\u00a31g:V{\u00a7ri{er\ufb01&#8217;_:.AV   A<\/p>\n<p>..r..).._.3__pE_&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.E:.<\/p>\n<p>The order pasm nyme Iwniad <\/p>\n<p>quashing the order dated 17 &#8220;as<br \/>\nto the writ pemon is    the<br \/>\nissued to the Bijapur  Authority to<\/p>\n<p>accord  TA  submitted by the<br \/>\npetitioner  as available to it<br \/>\nin law?     f;1atta&#8217; is remitted to the<br \/>\n  Development Amzhority<br \/>\nfor  of the applimtixm given far<\/p>\n<p>J %%%T%%L\u00a7ppmva1%%ar  zayout plan in aocomance with law.<\/p>\n<p>\\;.,9\u00bb,<\/p>\n<p>All the contentions of the pm\ufb01es are k&lt;:pt&#8211;&#039; %<\/p>\n<p>be urged before the Commissioner,  &#8211;\u00ab  <\/p>\n<p>Development Authority.<br \/>\nAccordingly, the writ  is  oi&#039;;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Bijapur Urban Development &#8230; vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008 Author: V.G.Sabhahit &amp; S.N.Satyanarayana . &#8216;_ 1 ~ &#8216;-:.S Rf&#8217;SI{)D}\\FPA&#8230;GU&#8217;IAPPA SHATAGAR &#8211;V 2 &#8220;%%%&#8221;TH!\u00a7s*:*ATE 0? ICARHATAKA ~ : 4_ aousme Arm uaam mavammsm nu THE men mum&#8217; on KARNATAKA AT ee\\NGAL(\u00a7R E :~ mama TRIS THE 2078 my 0? [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-215774","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bijapur Urban Development ... vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bijapur Urban Development ... vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-24T19:17:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bijapur Urban Development &#8230; vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-24T19:17:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":725,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Bijapur Urban Development ... vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-24T19:17:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bijapur Urban Development &#8230; vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bijapur Urban Development ... vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bijapur Urban Development ... vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-24T19:17:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bijapur Urban Development &#8230; vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-24T19:17:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008"},"wordCount":725,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008","name":"Bijapur Urban Development ... vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-24T19:17:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bijapur-urban-development-vs-sri-siddappa-gulappa-shatagar-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bijapur Urban Development &#8230; vs Sri Siddappa Gulappa Shatagar on 20 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215774","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215774"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215774\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215774"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215774"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215774"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}