{"id":215794,"date":"2008-06-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008"},"modified":"2017-10-22T13:47:31","modified_gmt":"2017-10-22T08:17:31","slug":"mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mattancherry Sarvajanic &#8230; vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mattancherry Sarvajanic &#8230; vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWA.No. 1173 of 2008()\n\n\n1. MATTANCHERRY SARVAJANIC CO-OPERATIVE\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. B.S.SANJEEV, APPRAISER, MATTANCHERRY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.MATHAI M PAIKADAY(SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN\n\n Dated :19\/06\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n           J.B.KOSHY &amp; P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ.\n                  -------------------------------\n                 W.A.NO.1173 OF 2008 ()\n                -----------------------------------\n         Dated this the 19th day of June, 2008\n\n                      J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>KOSHY,J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>     Writ petitioner in this case was working in the appellant<\/p>\n<p>Co-operative Bank as an Appraiser from 19.12.1990 on<\/p>\n<p>Commission basis.      He had full time work. This Court in<\/p>\n<p>W.A.No.1765\/2003, noticed that Joint Registrar recommended<\/p>\n<p>the regularisation of the appointment of the petitioner and<\/p>\n<p>considered all other facts and directed by Ext.A1 judgment to<\/p>\n<p>regularsie the services of the petitioner. At paragraph 4 of the<\/p>\n<p>judgment it is stated as follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             &#8220;4. Circumstances do indicate that the<br \/>\n       Bank requires assistance of an Appraiser and<br \/>\n       they are prepared to fill up the post on a<br \/>\n       regular basis.      When there is need for<br \/>\n       permanent employee sanction need not be<br \/>\n       withheld, on the plea that the Act and Rules<br \/>\n       did to lay down qualifications in respect of<br \/>\n       the Appraiser to be appointed in the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.A.1173\/08                      2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>          Co-operative Institution.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>However, it was stated that regularisation should be at the<\/p>\n<p>discretion of the Bank and by appreciating the nature of the<\/p>\n<p>service he was rendering during the past years, they will be<\/p>\n<p>able to decide as to the method to compensate him. It is<\/p>\n<p>further stated that even if the Registrar did not approve the<\/p>\n<p>same, Bank can regularise his service on their own terms.<\/p>\n<p>Ext.A1 judgment was appealed against by the Joint Registrar<\/p>\n<p>as well as the Government.       Bank was the party to the writ<\/p>\n<p>appeals also.     Again petitioner approached this Court when<\/p>\n<p>two posts of Appraiser were notified during the pendency of<\/p>\n<p>the writ appeal against Annexure A1 judgment. At that time<\/p>\n<p>Registrar by order dated 23.6.2003 directed to regularise the<\/p>\n<p>service of the petitioner.         Recording the same, Ext.P2<\/p>\n<p>judgment was passed wherein, the order of the Registrar<\/p>\n<p>dated 23.6.2003 is quoted as follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>          &#8220;In obedience to the judgment of Hon&#8217;ble<br \/>\n          High Court of Kerala in O.P.No.220\/2003 A<br \/>\n          dated 23.5.2003, the bank is permitted to<br \/>\n          regularise the petitioner Sri.B.S.Sanjeev as<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.A.1173\/08                       3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>          Appraisor in the service of the Bank<br \/>\n          immediately.     The confirmation will be<br \/>\n          subject to the decisions of the Hon&#8217;ble High<br \/>\n          Court on an appeal filed by Registrar of Co-<br \/>\n          operative Societies before the Hon&#8217;ble High<br \/>\n          Court. The action taken by the bank should<br \/>\n          be reported to this office promptly.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The learned Judge thereafter directed to regularise the<\/p>\n<p>services of the petitioner as ordered by the Registrar and<\/p>\n<p>directed the Bank that only one post of Appraiser alone shall<\/p>\n<p>be notified.      In that appeal filed against Annexure A1<\/p>\n<p>judgment, a Division Bench of this Court in the common<\/p>\n<p>judgment      dated 14.6.2005, in       W.A.Nos.1765\/2003 and<\/p>\n<p>667\/2004 considered the matter in detail. In the judgment, at<\/p>\n<p>paragraph 3 it is observed as follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>               &#8220;3. It is seen that the Joint Registrar,<br \/>\n          who recommended the regularisation of<br \/>\n          appointment of the petitioner, as he was the<br \/>\n          only person who participated in the interview<br \/>\n          and was successful also, as can be seen from<br \/>\n          Ext.P8 communication, filed appeal against<br \/>\n          such appointment.      We see no ground to<br \/>\n          interfere with the judgment impugned in this<br \/>\n          writ appeal and therefore W.A.No.1785 of<br \/>\n          2003 is dismissed.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.A.1173\/08                     4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile,      this Court directed the bank that only one<\/p>\n<p>vacancy can be notified and in paragraph 5, further it is held<\/p>\n<p>as follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>               &#8220;5.   Since the petitioner has to be<br \/>\n          regularised in view of Ext.P3 representation<br \/>\n          and also of the direction in the impugned<br \/>\n          judgment in W.P.(C).No.20947 of 2003, the<br \/>\n          Bank shall make arrangements only to fill up<br \/>\n          the remaining vacancy of one post of<br \/>\n          appriaser.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is an inter party judgment and it is binding on the<\/p>\n<p>appellant and on the Joint Registrar.         After the above<\/p>\n<p>judgment, then the question to be considered was whether<\/p>\n<p>petitioner should be regularised from the date of initial<\/p>\n<p>engagement on commission basis from 19.12.1990 or on the<\/p>\n<p>date when regular post was sanctioned (9.6.1997) or on any<\/p>\n<p>subsequent days, and, by Ext.P4, Registrar has decided that<\/p>\n<p>the regularisation shall be effected from 9.6.1997, the date on<\/p>\n<p>which such a post was regularly sanctioned as per the<\/p>\n<p>approved staff strength of the Bank as he was performing the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.A.1173\/08                    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>work of the Appraiser even before the post was sanctioned.<\/p>\n<p>Considering these circumstances, the learned Single Judge<\/p>\n<p>held that there is a reasonable and identifiable yardstick for<\/p>\n<p>the fixation to 9.6.1997 as the date from which the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>is directed to be regularised. We are of the opinion that there<\/p>\n<p>is no ground to interfere with the impugned judgment. The<\/p>\n<p>inter party judgment has become final.     It is submitted that<\/p>\n<p>there was subsequent retrenchment of staff strength due to<\/p>\n<p>degradation of the Bank.      It is submitted that Bank has<\/p>\n<p>challenged that decision of reduction of staff strength.    We<\/p>\n<p>are not considering the question of retrenchment after the<\/p>\n<p>reduction of staff strength.   Only question to be decided in<\/p>\n<p>this case is regarding the date on which the petitioner is to be<\/p>\n<p>regularised.   He    was   not  regularised    earlier  despite<\/p>\n<p>requirement because of the absence of a sanctioned post and<\/p>\n<p>when the post of Appraiser was sanctioned, Court directed<\/p>\n<p>that one post alone can be notified as in one post, petitioner<\/p>\n<p>was already working.     That finding became final.   In these<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, the contention of the appellant that he can be<\/p>\n<p>regularised only with effect from 23.6.2003 and not from<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.A.1173\/08                 6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>9.6.1997 cannot be accepted. We see no ground to interfere<\/p>\n<p>in the impugned judgment, and hence, this appeal is<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                    J.B.KOSHY, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                             P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE<br \/>\nprp<\/p>\n<p>         J.B.KOSHY &amp; P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>                           M.F.A.NO. OF 2006 ()<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>                                   J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                                     26th May, 2008<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Mattancherry Sarvajanic &#8230; vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WA.No. 1173 of 2008() 1. MATTANCHERRY SARVAJANIC CO-OPERATIVE &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. B.S.SANJEEV, APPRAISER, MATTANCHERRY &#8230; Respondent 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE For Petitioner :SRI.MATHAI M PAIKADAY(SR.) For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-215794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mattancherry Sarvajanic ... vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mattancherry Sarvajanic ... vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-22T08:17:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mattancherry Sarvajanic &#8230; vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-22T08:17:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":938,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Mattancherry Sarvajanic ... vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-22T08:17:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mattancherry Sarvajanic &#8230; vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mattancherry Sarvajanic ... vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mattancherry Sarvajanic ... vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-22T08:17:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mattancherry Sarvajanic &#8230; vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-22T08:17:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008"},"wordCount":938,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008","name":"Mattancherry Sarvajanic ... vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-22T08:17:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mattancherry-sarvajanic-vs-b-s-sanjeev-on-19-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mattancherry Sarvajanic &#8230; vs B.S.Sanjeev on 19 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215794\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}