{"id":215849,"date":"2008-06-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008"},"modified":"2014-09-05T22:23:22","modified_gmt":"2014-09-05T16:53:22","slug":"h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre>-5\n\n3N THE HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE.\n\nDATED was THE 9*\" DAY 0:: JUNE 2898\n\nBEFORE (  _ k % R\nTHE HONBLE MRVJUSTECE sue:-may si\u00e9\u00e9bi  %  T  L\ncRw.mA:. Revision: pr.--:T1Ta0:v~m.22s;2e':3k:r%% \"L  \n\nBEYWEEN:\n\nH. E(aEEes\u00a7'2appa\nS20. Huchappa,\nAgeai aizsout 4?' years,\n\n$36.3, 2\"\" Floer, 13' Mam Ro\u00e9:d';x_ \n\nNehrunagar,\n3A\u00a5'~\u00a3GALGRE-588020.\n\n(83; M55. Mahesh \u00a7%'{\u00a7%#aLhesh;:'__Ad\u00a7*$\u00a7;\u00a7 \"  \n\nANE3:\n\nM1s.F'inex Savrvices, \" ''\nGround Fioor, ' 4\nMysugarBuiidEng.;_ ' ,\nJ.C.F_B.Q.E_B\n\nThough this matter was sailed tw\u00e9ce, none appearec\u00e9far the\n\npetitioner.\n\n2. This Revision is directed again$tA\u00bbthe juc&amp;:gzn\u00a7\u00a71f--';:f \u00a3:r:~;?3L_\\:.f\u00a7ct\u00e9\u00e9';n2 ' x\n\narid ardar af sentence in Ci.(2'i's\u00a3c&gt;.5318f2:l313\u00a21 ::':i_AaT':~23&lt;:\u00a5 \n\nconfirmed in Criminai Appeai No.4&#039;:\u00a7=\u20ac$$&#039;2$O6 am 9?? r&lt;\u00a3\u00a7%.;\u00e9i;;ntar me.  *\n\n3. Respondent \ufb01ied.--~ g cem-;3\u00a7.\u00a5:\u00a5i\ufb01:t- Eh\u00e9\u00a7faIi\u00ab&#039;a,  aileaivsisa that the<\/pre>\n<p>petit\u00e9crser had borrowed  &#8216;fesncndent 3&amp;3 9%&#8217;!<br \/>\n22.12.2903, he had_\u00a7s5_ued g\ufb01\u00e9q\ufb01\u00e9  when the cheque<br \/>\nwas presentegi.-V   re$:;;;o_\ufb01:11ci:w\u00a7nt.&#8217;_\u00ab&#8211;;-\u00e9f :\u00a7b\u00a7$&#8217;i\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9inant, the same was<br \/>\nfeturned Vgvithv&#8217;  funds&#8217;. Theiea\ufb01er, the<br \/>\nrespcnd\u00e9-{at _:Ei\u00e9g1a&#8221;\u00a7&#8217;\u00abv..:\u00a7:iati;a,.&#8221; Qespite service of notice. the<br \/>\npetitioner \ufb01eit\ufb01er  irzotice nor paid the amount. The<\/p>\n<p>re$p:3:*=;:ie&#8221;st:.fi!eci.5 a\u00bb\u00a2\u00a2m\u00a73%a\u00a7f&#8217;:t \u00e9nd examined himseif as PW-1 and aiso<\/p>\n<p> .Erociijiz\u00e9\u00e9di&#8221;EE\u00a7:s;PfE_to P1&#8242; wetitioner got himself exammed as 8W.,.<\/p>\n<p> aha &#8216;Vaf\u00a7?s\u00a7:&#8221;;;\u00bb:\u00a7&gt;t!;\u00a7:\u00a7:e=;\u00a7i.~ EXSD1 to 011 .\n<\/p>\n<p>  bi\u00e9eque belongs ta the petitioner and t\u00e9se signature on the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; &#8216; $a::&#8217;2wa.__Es &#8220;not disputed. \u00a7-however, the petitioner claimed tha\u00e9 the<\/p>\n<p> r\u00e9sb\u00e9niient has taken the signature of ihe petitiener an a blank gaper,<\/p>\n<p>VT  he has not signed any farm for 203:1. He a\u00e9so stated that, he had<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; V borrowed oniy Rs.50,0@0.f- and he has pa\u00e9d it.\n<\/p>\n<p>5, The triat mutt an appreciation of the evidence has found that<br \/>\nthe petittener is a doubie graduate and has net explained as t\u20ac&gt;&#8211;__!_&#8217;zaw he<\/p>\n<p>signs b\ufb01ank forms and biank cheque. The petitioner has a;\u00a7:mttte\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;vtt:at<\/p>\n<p>he has signed E:-(F13, the lean fem: and has admitt\u00e9dvttt\u00e9ttI&#8221;&#8216;tsta:&#8221;&#8216;t.\u00a7*s.,A<\/p>\n<p>signed the cheque, but M3 net pteduceci anything&#8217; t\u00e9&#8217;v\u00e9f;&#8217;t\u00a7\u00a76j\\;s* he &#8216;?}a\u00a7 \u00bb _ <\/p>\n<p>either paid the amount Or has made arty:&#8217;tv;o:t2,&#8217;;j:5ia%tat i:f_i\u00a2:-3%&#8221; afVVc:}tesg&#8217;E::=;{er<\/p>\n<p>has pto\u00e9uced any matetiat to st1i$v2&#8217;~.t\u00a7jat ttte &#8216;\u00e9hequ\u00e9v:&#8217;\u00a5;ti:\u00a7:;&#8230;:gta.\u00a73ne\u00a7ii <\/p>\n<p>the comptainant even after the di5ct_1 _a}g\u00a7_ tat, toanf&#8217; \u00ab.  1&#8242; I<\/p>\n<p>8. The trtat court 9:: at\u00a7p_tecta\u00abtt&#8217;\u00a75n&#8217; e\u00a7.&#8217;ttts\u00a7&#8217;_\u00bbs\u00bb?\u00e9a:*;.ence has cottvtcted<br \/>\nthe acctsse\u00e9, T11}? -Eqaweggr a\u00bb;&#8217;:%p&#8221;g=.:\u00a3ia\u20act4\u00e9&#8217;~.&#8217;t%&#8217;r.;&#8211;~::a_t:rt *c:;r\u00a3 re-appreciation has.<br \/>\ncon\ufb01tr:1edt\u00a51\u00a2;&#8217;$;a&#8217;f%_&#8217;\u00ab\u00a7f &#8221; Q   <\/p>\n<p> \u00a7f%&#8217;tttet.1;\u00a7&#8217;::ztiti&lt;$::tfi;\u00bb:&#039;2&#039;*  to t\u00e9_ke&quot;c1V:etence that he has di$\u00a33?&#039;\u00a7at&#039;\u00a7&amp;d<\/p>\n<p>the i\u00e9ab\u00e9iiity, tag sit-::::\u00bbi:t:&#039;i,&quot;~ttav\u00e9V_fp{t\u00a7\u00e9t;._\u00a7c\u00e9d the nacetsary materiai. But no<\/p>\n<p>mater\u00e9ai is u&#039;ptt9{iu.ceV:d._&#039;t\u00e9t.s&#039;h\u00a7;% that he has discharged the ioan, no<\/p>\n<p> ma:;:s\u00a7az ;fs grod\u00a5.i\u00a2ed&#8230;_*_.&#8217;9_3how that the cheque is test. Qnae the<br \/>\n \u00a7;{:mpiain\u00bb:a&#8217;t;t  that the cheque is tamed by the petttitmet and the<br \/>\ndtshonaured and moves that the tiabiiity is not<\/p>\n<p>V -V \u00e9\u00a7s\u00e9t\u00a7&#8217;a;g\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7; t\u00e9t\u00e9n tstesumption arises Lsndet Section 139 of tt.E.Act ara\u00e9<br \/>\nthg gs\u00e9ttttoner fa\u00e9is to pmve his case by rebutabfe ezsidencei than<br \/>\n  gcst\u00e9suttmtion astses under $ect\u00a7en 138 of N.l.A&lt;:t eraLsre$ :9 the benefit\n<\/p>\n<p>  -~t;t}the comptainazztx in this case, there is no matertai ts shew that the<\/p>\n<p>V petittonat has diacharged the tiab\u00e9tity rm there is anything to shew that<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner hats paid the amount. Merely because he al\u00e9eges that he<\/p>\n<p>has signed the blank forms. it is not a ground to new that them&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>liability. &#8216;    %  <\/p>\n<p>Accerdirzaiy. the Revision ?etit\u00a7sn faiis and\u00a7$4disrr\u00a7i\u00e9$:\u00e9c1:;&#8217;;V.    <\/p>\n<p>KN\u00a5v\u00a7!- H   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi -5 3N THE HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. DATED was THE 9*&#8221; DAY 0:: JUNE 2898 BEFORE ( _ k % R THE HONBLE MRVJUSTECE sue:-may si\u00e9\u00e9bi % T L cRw.mA:. Revision: pr.&#8211;:T1Ta0:v~m.22s;2e&#8217;:3k:r%% &#8220;L BEYWEEN: H. E(aEEes\u00a7&#8217;2appa S20. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-215849","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-05T16:53:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-05T16:53:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":573,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008\",\"name\":\"H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-05T16:53:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-05T16:53:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-05T16:53:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008"},"wordCount":573,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008","name":"H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-05T16:53:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-kalleshappa-vs-ms-finex-services-on-9-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"H Kalleshappa vs M\/S Finex Services on 9 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215849","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215849"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215849\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215849"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215849"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215849"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}