{"id":216049,"date":"2010-08-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010"},"modified":"2014-10-19T04:20:07","modified_gmt":"2014-10-18T22:50:07","slug":"sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Mahadeva S\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed &#8230; on 6 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Mahadeva S\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed &#8230; on 6 August, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, \n\nDATED THIS TI-IE cam DAY or AUGUs'1\"'2'a'1-\u00a7)_%\"1'  \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICES. :ABDi:L.:  \n\nMISCELLANEOUS FIRST  No. 199]2c09{1\u00a7aVj  *\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSR1. MAHADEVA\ns\/0. SOMA \nAGEDABOUR29 YEARS,  . ._   \nR\/AT. KM. DoDD:.{BHARATH1'1'\u00a2zaQHAR_} '  '\nMADDURTALUKV  '      \nMANDYA  \"     \nNOW R\/AT LAKSI%\u00a7MAM}V'2AfS*}iQUS'E, \n8T\" CROSS, %.QANpH'I:gA.GA_R,V.__ ' \nMADYA CITY.   . \n\n  .    ' ..... ..APPELLANT\n[BY SRI:K.i'*\/I. SANATHKL}I\\JL!;RA ='ADV.,)\n\nAND:\n\n \" E  _sR:;__ sygap MUKEEI\\ri\"i{'HAN @\n VASYEZD MUKEEMULLA KHAN\n'  3\/ O --LA\"1f.E;' S HAFIULLA.\n\"#.6*;?'2,\/A;V EDGA 'MOHALLA,\n\nMALAvALL:L.'r0WN,\nMAIAVALLE. \n\n1 WORKING AS POLICE CONSTABLE\n\n   \"(}?Q }N0.'-349)\n\n\n\nHALAGUR POLICE STATION\nMALAVALLI TALUK\nMANDYA DISTRICT\n\n2. THE MANAGER\nNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. L'1'D.,   ._\nNO. I576. 18? FLOOR, V\nv.v. ROAD\nI&gt;.I3. NO. 54.\n\nMANDYA CITY.  I    \n ._ , RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>{BY SR1:  II\/IAI)I&#8211;IUSIIDAI_\\I. AIJV.,&#8221;FOF{&#8220;R._I, SR1: &#8216;MAKAIVI<br \/>\nNAGARAJA GUPTA. AID\\\/.. &#8216;FOR R2} Q&#8217; I  <\/p>\n<p>THIS MFA IS FILED L1;&lt;S_ &#039;1.73( I I OF ACT AGAINST THE<br \/>\nJUDGMENT AND_ AWARD;DATI;:.D:-.&#039;V27;_Q5.2O08 PASSED IN MVC<br \/>\nNO.-48\/2007 ON TIIIIE If\u00ab&#039;I&#039;I,E:- OF _ ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE<br \/>\n(SR.DN.} &amp; M\u00a3j3NIB\u00a3iR;-~KriAC3&quot;If;&#8211;\u00ab.__MI4\\NIT)Y&#039;A. PARTLY ALLOWING THE<br \/>\nCLAIM IvETITIOI\\\ufb01_I_  FOR  &#039;GDM&#039;PENSAI&#039;ION AND SEEKING<br \/>\nENIAIAI\\IGE:xIIE,I\\IT OF C::O.MIIEI&#039;I.SATI&#039;OI\\I..v &quot;<\/p>\n<p>TI\u00bbIIS_APPEAL&#039;\u00abi;&#039;O:IvII,I$I&#039;G__:O&#8211;I\\I&#039; FOR ORDERS THIS DAY. THE<br \/>\nCOURT DELIVEI{ED_&quot;f&#039;H,E. E&#039;OI,I;O&#039;wING:<\/p>\n<p>A&#039;\u00a7fII5GMENT<\/p>\n<p> A &quot;1&#039;-hCis?~.&quot;Gapp.(;:aI ISV&quot;&quot;IdIrectec1 against the judgnmnt and<\/p>\n<p>aim-&#039;cIIIIIn~ :I&#039;I\/I&#039;I.(&#039;.(Z4VIN&#039;c,I&#039;..1418\/2007 CIATED 27.5.2008 On the file Of<\/p>\n<p> &quot;the Ad.\u00a7IitiOrI3I}&#039;Civil Judge (Sr. D11.) and MACT, Mandya.<\/p>\n<p> AA21ppe1iv2&#8211;.fn: was the claimelnt and the reSpDI1deIItS were<\/p>\n<p>u<\/p>\n<p>the owlier and insurer of the offeriding veliicle. &#039;i&#039;heiie&quot;,i_s no<\/p>\n<p>dispute as to the occurrence of the accident: an_dm&#039;f.&#039;1&#039;I&#039;\u20ac&quot;V.&#039;<\/p>\n<p>of the second respondent ~ Insurance  to pays&quot;<\/p>\n<p>Compensation. &#039;1&#039; he appellant has:=.,:i&#039;i1e_cithise,;ip;oe21l&quot;Vseeiiiieng<\/p>\n<p>enhancement. of compensation;\n<\/p>\n<p>2. I have heardvthef learned  the parties.<\/p>\n<p>3. I.ea.i&#8217;i1ediiieouinselHi\ufb01qr t_11eL&#8217;app&#8217;ei1ani. would contend<br \/>\nthat having_v{regs;f&#8217;d:\u00ab1.;\u00a7pVV the _r:Vne&#8217;di.Cei1.\u00bbvevidenee on record, the<br \/>\ncompenseition&#8217;  pain and suffering and<\/p>\n<p>towards ame&#8217;nj_ties Eire Von&#8221;a_1ower side. The claimant was an<\/p>\n<p>4._inpatie.ri:i: &#8220;for 47  was doing Ioading and unloading<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217;work1&#8243;si,VNlvigirxedf\/ie\u00a3&#8217;.vHe was earning more that RS200\/&#8211; per<\/p>\n<p> ought: to have taken his income<\/p>\n<p> e1r:cordiiig1y&#8217;Awhile assessing the loss of future income. It is<\/p>\n<p>wev4i&#8217;u..i&#8217;thei*&#8221;contended that he was aged 28 years at the time of<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Ci<\/p>\n<p>r<\/p>\n<p>vi<\/p>\n<p>the accxiderit- Therefore, the &#8216;i&#8217;ribunal ought to have adopted<\/p>\n<p>the multiplier of 17 for assessment of loss of future ih&#8217;me.<\/p>\n<p>it is further argued that the award of Rs.5,00..(),\/attoti%jard.s<\/p>\n<p>attendant charges, conveyance, transport, ete._&#8217;;&#8217;~-is&#8217;al&#8217;so on*aV <\/p>\n<p>lower side. So also loss of ineozne dtii&#8217;1ng\u00ab_T1aid\u00bb.__upperiod.<\/p>\n<p>The learned Counsel has tal&lt;er:_4n&quot;1e throtigh the .eVide&#039;i&#039;;1e&#039;ei oi:<\/p>\n<p>the parties. The documents lvlvlprloduced  &#039;the&#039;; claimant<br \/>\nbefore the Tribunal and&#039;t:he.. in1.&#039;_ot1_g&#8211;n&#039;e:d_ jindgmentl and award.<\/p>\n<p>4. On thsJo&#8217;ther{A&#8217;  advocate appearing<\/p>\n<p>for the seeond respondent_:\u00a5v&#8212;-i_1&#8217;1&#8217;surance company has sought<br \/>\nto justify the irnptignedalttidgn\ufb01ent and award.<br \/>\nA    carefully considered the arguments of the<\/p>\n<p>lealrnecl,&#8217;eoVulri_sel&#8217;,rn.ade at the Bar and perused the material<\/p>\n<p> placed on &#8220;record.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>6. it is clear from the evidence of the Doctor that<\/p>\n<p>the claimant had suffered serious injuries. The asse_ssn1ent.<\/p>\n<p>of 15% permanent disability to the whole  <\/p>\n<p>reasonable. The accident had occurred  of <\/p>\n<p>December, 2006. in my view. the Cfourtrbieluow&#8217; olu&#8217;ghtito_ hai\/e<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01xed his income per day .at-..__.Rs.VlE&gt;_O&#8217;\/&#8217;~V  <\/p>\n<p>month}. Since the claimant  yearsvnat the time of<br \/>\nthe accident, the multiplier&#8217;  17. If that is so,<br \/>\nthe claimant is entitlecl_.a\u00ab1&#8217;Gr.:a lt.ata1&#8243;1_5i&#8217; Rs. 1,:-37,700\/-<\/p>\n<p>towards loss ~inc_onjie.  The  of Rs.3E3,000\/~<br \/>\ntowards bairi isjust and reasonable. Further,<\/p>\n<p>the award oi7.__Rs,v8.xOO(J,\/ to&#8217;wards loss of amenities is on a<\/p>\n<p>_ .. lower side.&#8217; In my&#8221;opin_ion, it is just and reasonable to award<\/p>\n<p>Av&#8217;2iV  of  under this head. As noticed above, he<\/p>\n<p>was&#8221;hospital.i&#8217;s:ed&#8217;ufoi&#8217; about 47 days. Therefore, I award a<\/p>\n<p> sum of l&#8221;2s&#8217;}10,000\/&#8211; towards conveyance, attendant charges<\/p>\n<p> 4Aand.Votl3er incidental expenses. The claimant, should have<\/p>\n<p>i<\/p>\n<p>t&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>been awarded 3 months income towards loss oufificome<\/p>\n<p>during the treatment period which comes to  in<\/p>\n<p>the light of the above discuesion. the Clai1&#8242;}&#8221;l.11&#8217;i&#8221;&#8221;~;\u00a7E?0i&#8221;1iif.&#8211;1C(}_:fOi&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>compensation as under:\n<\/p>\n<p>(1) Loss of future in(:oh1&#8217;e_._<\/p>\n<p>(2) Pain and sufferings  0<\/p>\n<p>(3) Medical expeiiae-s&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>(4) At:tend.ant;ch:aI*ge\u00e9:;&#8217; V<\/p>\n<p>com\/.eyari_&#8217;ee charges &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>and &#8216;.:)th5\u20ac3_&#8221;_&#8211;.ir1&#8217;Cid_\u20acI2f{.al   .<\/p>\n<p>eyofpeiises &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>(5)  0 00I00;ossf&#8217;o_i&#8217; <\/p>\n<p> &#8216;ITh_e.iai(}&#8217;:&#8221;L.1piperiod &#8216; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>(6) 1:053 oi&#8221;0ame:1i&#8217;t.i_e_e3<\/p>\n<p>  Rs,1 .3c;7\u00a7?_00;0(\u00a7;:\n<\/p>\n<p> R:-3&#8230;&#8217; 0 ~ 3_\u00a7,00f0&#8211;00<\/p>\n<p>00 &#8221; % 5.00000<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Rs. 10.00000<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 13,500&#8211;00<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 25,000&#8211;00<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 2,26,200&#8211;00<\/p>\n<p> 0&#8217;1&#8217;-he f&#8221;I&#8217;i&#8217;ibLmai has awarded a total sum of<\/p>\n<p>ii<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; R,.VS.1,5i0,QOO&#8217;\/.&#8221;V0\\NhiC11 has to be deducted from the aforesaid<\/p>\n<p> :a.,rjjr)Vurii;..cA Thus. the claimant is entitleci to additional<\/p>\n<p>_ .. such c&#8217;.epos~i.t.. Ndeosts. V<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.&#8221;\/&#8221;&#8216;5.200\/M. The aforesaid sum shall<br \/>\ncarry interest at the rate of 6% pa. from the date of<\/p>\n<p>appiieatmn till the date of deposit.\n<\/p>\n<p>8. In the result, the appealm&#8221;st.IieCi.eed\u00abs::V&#8217;and&#8217;Wit his &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>accordiiigly aliowed in part. : The&#8217;.__se.e0nd di*_esp0&#8217;nttefi~t.:VF\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>insurance Company is direct&#8217;ed&#8221;i.t0 de.pOsit_= as sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.75,200\/~ with ir1teres~t_  date of<br \/>\napplication. till the date of  to what has<\/p>\n<p>been awarded by \u00e9ttighTribtiria&#8217;i&#8217;:wi&#8217;i:l&#8217;iin.&#8221;&#8216;a._pei&#8221;iod of eight weeks<\/p>\n<p>from t11e:*{_:iatte*  i&#8217;i*e*eii&#8217;pt &#8216;i3if.&#8217;:.'(;v:)p*3r-dot&#8217; this order. The Tribunal<br \/>\nis directed tddisbuifs\u00e9ediithe&#8221;:-said amount to the claimant 011<\/p>\n<p>gal t<br \/>\nNDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Mahadeva S\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed &#8230; on 6 August, 2010 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DATED THIS TI-IE cam DAY or AUGUs&#8217;1&#8243;&#8216;2&#8217;a&#8217;1-\u00a7)_%&#8221;1&#8217; BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICES. :ABDi:L.: MISCELLANEOUS FIRST No. 199]2c09{1\u00a7aVj * BETWEEN: SR1. MAHADEVA s\/0. SOMA AGEDABOUR29 YEARS, . ._ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-216049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Mahadeva S\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed ... on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Mahadeva S\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed ... on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-10-18T22:50:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Mahadeva S\\\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed &#8230; on 6 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-18T22:50:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":946,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Mahadeva S\\\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed ... on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-18T22:50:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Mahadeva S\\\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed &#8230; on 6 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Mahadeva S\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed ... on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Mahadeva S\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed ... on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-10-18T22:50:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Mahadeva S\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed &#8230; on 6 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-18T22:50:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010"},"wordCount":946,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010","name":"Sri Mahadeva S\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed ... on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-18T22:50:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahadeva-so-soma-vs-sri-syed-mukeem-khan-syed-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Mahadeva S\/O Soma vs Sri Syed Mukeem Khan @ Syed &#8230; on 6 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216049"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216049\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}