{"id":216202,"date":"2010-07-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010"},"modified":"2016-05-27T12:06:05","modified_gmt":"2016-05-27T06:36:05","slug":"aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 14039 of 2010(D)\n\n\n1. ALEYAMMA CYRIL, W\/O. CYRIL PAAREKKATIL,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. ROSILY JOSEPH, W\/O. JOYICHAN,\n3. ALPHONSA AJI, W\/O. AJI JOSEPH,\n4. JOSE KURIAN, S\/O. P.A.JOSEPH,\n5. ANIL ABEY JOSE, S\/O. ABRAHAM MATHEW,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,\n\n3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,\n\n4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,\n\n5. ITTYAVIRA JOSEPH, S\/O. P.A.JOSEPH,\n\n6. P.A.ABRAHAM @ ITIYAVIRA, S\/O.\n\n7. PAULOSE K.A., S\/O. ALIAS,\n\n8. ERAYIL JOSEPH @ PAPPAN,\n\n9. BESSY, S\/O. UMMACHI,\n\n10. JACOB CHELAMATTOM,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.C.RATNAKARAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS\n\n Dated :01\/07\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                         K. M. JOSEPH &amp;\n                M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.\n             - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                W.P.(C).No. 14039 of 2010 D\n             - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n              Dated this the 1st day of July, 2010\n\n                            JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Joseph Francis, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>     This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the<\/p>\n<p>Constitution of India with the following prayers:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or other<\/p>\n<p>      appropriate      writ,       order       or      directions<\/p>\n<p>      commanding the respondents 2 to 4 to render<\/p>\n<p>      adequate and sufficient police protection to the<\/p>\n<p>      life and liberty of the petitioners and their near<\/p>\n<p>      ones in the hands of the respondents 5 to 10 and<\/p>\n<p>      their henchmen and political associates.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            (ii)   Issue a writ of mandamus or any<\/p>\n<p>      other appropriate direction to the respondents<\/p>\n<p>      commanding respondents 2 to 4 to abate all the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No. 14039 of 2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       obstructions and threats being offered and caused by<\/p>\n<p>       the respondents 5 to 10 and their henchmen by<\/p>\n<p>       adopting appropriate steps as per law.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>             iii) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or<\/p>\n<p>       any other appropriate writ, direction or order<\/p>\n<p>       commanding respondents 2 to 4 to afford adequate<\/p>\n<p>       and effective police protection to the petitioners and<\/p>\n<p>       the persons engaged by them for surveying the<\/p>\n<p>       properties to conduct survey and measurement of the<\/p>\n<p>       properties covered by Exts.P1 to P6 without being<\/p>\n<p>       obstructed in any fashion either by respondents 5 to<\/p>\n<p>       10 or any others under them in any fashion.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.  The case of the petitioners     is briefly as follows.     The<\/p>\n<p>petitioners offered the properties belonging to them and covered by<\/p>\n<p>Exts.P1 to P6 for sale as it was found difficult for them to attend to the<\/p>\n<p>properties situated far away from their respective residences. They<\/p>\n<p>also entered into an agreement for sale dated 28.10.2009, as per which,<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No. 14039 of 2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the sale has to be completed on or before 30.5.2010 on convincing the<\/p>\n<p>purchasers regarding actual extent of the properties.<\/p>\n<p>      3. Respondents 5 to 10, who are engaged in real estate business,<\/p>\n<p>being dissatisfied by the agreement for sale arranged without their<\/p>\n<p>intervention, wanted to frustrate the sale somehow or other. They also<\/p>\n<p>started to threaten the purchasers with dire consequences.          On<\/p>\n<p>13.3.2010, when the survey of the property was arranged, respondents<\/p>\n<p>5 to 10, with the support of their henchmen, physically attacked the<\/p>\n<p>husbands of the elder sisters of   petitioners 1 to 4, who were present<\/p>\n<p>there, and also insulted the petitioners with abusive words and<\/p>\n<p>obstructed the survey of the properties.       Subsequent attempts to<\/p>\n<p>measure the properties were also defeated by threatening            the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners, the purchasers and the surveyors.<\/p>\n<p>      4.    Therefore Ext P7 representation was made to the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent seeking police protection to life and liberty and also for<\/p>\n<p>completing the measurements. Similar petitions were made to<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No. 14039 of 2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>respondents 3 and 4. No steps have been taken by the said respondents<\/p>\n<p>on account of the influence of the respondents. All steps to pacify the<\/p>\n<p>respondents have also failed. None of the respondents have any sort of<\/p>\n<p>right over the properties covered by the sale agreement; still they are<\/p>\n<p>offering threat to the life, liberty and freedom of the petitioners to<\/p>\n<p>survey the property and complete the sale. None of the respondents<\/p>\n<p>have property in the locality to share any common boundary with the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners&#8217; property. The petitioners seek appropriate direction to<\/p>\n<p>respondents 2 to 4 to render adequate police protection.<\/p>\n<p>      5. Respondents 5 to 10 filed counter affidavit, to which the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners filed reply affidavit.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>for the contesting party respondents and the learned Government<\/p>\n<p>Pleader.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7. In the counter affidavit filed by the party respondents it is<\/p>\n<p>stated that the 5th respondent is the brother of petitioners 1 to 4 and<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No. 14039 of 2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the uncle of 5th petitioner. Respondents 6 to 10 have nothing to do<\/p>\n<p>with the disputes between the petitioners and the 5th respondent and<\/p>\n<p>that they have not done anything adverse to the petitioners. It is further<\/p>\n<p>stated that the properties mentioned in the Writ Petition and another 8<\/p>\n<p>acres of property situated west of this property are in the possession of<\/p>\n<p>the 5th respondent and that the petitioners have absolutely no right over<\/p>\n<p>the property mentioned in the Writ Petition. It is stated in the counter<\/p>\n<p>that there is no physical threat against the petitioners by any of the<\/p>\n<p>respondents. If at all the petitioners have any right over the property,<\/p>\n<p>such rights are lost by adverse possession. It is stated that the 5th<\/p>\n<p>respondent is filing a suit for injunction restraining the petitioners from<\/p>\n<p>encroaching upon the property before the Civil Court immediately after<\/p>\n<p>the reopening of the court.\n<\/p>\n<p>      8. The remedy available to an aggrieved party under Article 226<\/p>\n<p>of the Constitution is an extra ordinary remedy and it is not intended to<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No. 14039 of 2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>be used for the purpose of declaring the private rights of the parties. In<\/p>\n<p>the case of enforcement of constitutional rights and liabilities, the<\/p>\n<p>normal remedy of filing a civil suit is available to the aggrieved party<\/p>\n<p>and the High Court will not exercise its prerogative writ jurisdiction<\/p>\n<p>to enforce such contractual obligations. Since the proceedings under<\/p>\n<p>Article 226 of the Constitution are       of summary nature, disputed<\/p>\n<p>questions of facts should not normally be allowed to be agitated and<\/p>\n<p>the High Court should not proceed to determine such questions.<\/p>\n<p>      9.   In view of the fact that there are disputes raised relating to<\/p>\n<p>the property, we do not think it appropriate for us to interfere in the<\/p>\n<p>matter. Hence we decline jurisdiction and relegate the petitioners to<\/p>\n<p>approach the competent civil court seeking appropriate reliefs. We<\/p>\n<p>further direct that in case any cognizable offence is committed by the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No. 14039 of 2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                             7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>party respondents, the fourth respondent shall take action in<\/p>\n<p>accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                  (K. M. JOSEPH)<br \/>\n                                        Judge<\/p>\n<p>                             (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS)<br \/>\n                                       Judge<br \/>\ntm<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 14039 of 2010(D) 1. ALEYAMMA CYRIL, W\/O. CYRIL PAAREKKATIL, &#8230; Petitioner 2. ROSILY JOSEPH, W\/O. JOYICHAN, 3. ALPHONSA AJI, W\/O. AJI JOSEPH, 4. JOSE KURIAN, S\/O. P.A.JOSEPH, 5. ANIL ABEY JOSE, S\/O. ABRAHAM [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-216202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-27T06:36:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-27T06:36:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":928,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-27T06:36:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-27T06:36:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-27T06:36:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010"},"wordCount":928,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010","name":"Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-27T06:36:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aleyamma-cyril-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Aleyamma Cyril vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216202"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216202\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}