{"id":21649,"date":"2008-09-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008"},"modified":"2015-08-12T19:00:52","modified_gmt":"2015-08-12T13:30:52","slug":"the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n
.1-\n\nin THE HIGH comm' or KARNATAKA,  \n\nDATED THIS THE saw DAY OF '$EP'FEMB\u00a33;~2,: '\u00e9oea J ' x \n\nBEFORE'   A ' %\nTHE HON'13LE MR.JUS?1C\u00a7  \nWRIT PETITION \nBETWEEN V %  'V  % \n\nTHE DIViSlO1\\EAL. CON'I'R{}\u00a3.I;.ER _ \nKARNATAKA _S'I'AfI'_E RQAB   \"  V:\nTRANSPORT e:;0r\u00a7\u00a7>Eom*10N   \nKOLAR DI'JIs1QN;'-:<Q_mRj}--~~.__   ' _  \nREP. BY 1'r9.,.c:mmr LMV GFFICER\nc:EN'rRAL~QTFi?ICE'.i;:.; :<..s<..12;*:".c.' Ki-1;" ROAD\nDOUBLE Roma, SHANTHENAGAR\nBANGFaLGRE~56Q'O2?. _   _\n\n" " ' .      PEPITIONER\n\n(By. M\/Ls \\}i':.-:\\\u00a7;(A;~:}xT1\u00a5x A\u00e9socurras )\n\n  e:~*.\u00a7:\u00a7_:';\u00bb; }mJA'NAEiPA\nS\/'Q % \u00abHA?! 1;? MANTHAPPA\n\nAGED A130m* 48 YEAS\nR\/C' K\u20ac)LA'FHUR AT R0.\n\n HOSAKCBTE TALUK\n\n   BA\u00a7\\\ufb02':rALORE RURAL DISTRICT\n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
   ;\u00a7By Sri: H ANJANAPPA – RESPDT SD )<\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER AR”I’i(3LES 226
\nAND 227 OF’ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
\nQUASH THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT. 20.7.2006
\nPASSED BY THE SECOND ADDITIONAL LABOUR COURT,<\/p>\n
.2-\n<\/p>\n
BANGALORE IN I.D.NO.45\/2001 UNDER ANN\u00a3aXLi’f\u20acE”‘\u00bbD
\nALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION I4’1LED;~’~~’–B3*1’I_am<\/p>\n
RESPONDENT THEREBY DIRECTED THE .-A4″F*ET\u00a3fVI’i(3’PEfEf\u20ac
\neoapommon TO REINSTATE THE RESPQNIK?-.NT..TO :~ne._ <\/p>\n
ORIGINAL mgr WYFH C.ONTIN{_1ITY_ OF’ SERVfCE,_’_:AN’I_)
\namaze CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFETS.  ‘ 3     \u00ab<\/p>\n
‘1’HiS WRIT PETITION e::)_M1N\u20ac;\u00ab. cm FeR,r\u00e9R’ELiMINA’.Rf”VV _
\nHEARING (I-3~(3~ROUP) THISDAY, ‘me comm’ THE’-<\/p>\n
FOLLOWING: ‘ &<\/p>\n
The petitioner   .AA_’.:V;ee;3ondent as a
\nconductor  governed by the
\nKarnataka;  Corporation Service
\n[Condtvzvct __ __ –Regu1atio:;1s 1.971, for short
\n‘\ufb02eguiatiutts’,  dsdbmission of a return of assete<\/p>\n
andgeiizebi\ufb01ties   members of his family, in the<\/p>\n
t  foitndddpteaeviibed, ftittxishing full particulars, in compliance<\/p>\n
   It appears that the petfdoner received a<\/p>\n
centplamt   the non-disclosure of the movable and<\/p>\n
 immo$*a}\u00a7ie properties acquired by the respondent and his<\/p>\n
 members, leading to the issue of an Articles of<\/p>\n
V’  e\ufb01harges. AI1nex’Lu”e~A., charging the respondent for the act of<\/p>\n
misconduct of nozbooysapliaxxce of Regulation. 14{1){c). In the<\/p>\n
disciplinary proceedings, the respondent admitted the fact of<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
..3..\n<\/p>\n
having not oouaplied with the Regulation 14_{ <\/p>\n
submitolng a return of the assets of  * it<\/p>\n
meznhers, on the premise  the.u_mova.b1eS- <\/p>\n
refrigerator, a mixi, and the.e’i;o::moVabie   ><\/p>\n
site were gifts which his Wife  from   at the
\ntime of marina’ ge and thewaa ootieware that
\nhe was required to submit  o\ufb01ieer, on
\nthe basis of    the change
\nproved.  ihaving regard to the
\nmaterial on “the of the respondent, held
\nthe   and by onder dt. 5.1.2001<\/p>\n
dismissed  –  from service. The respondent<\/p>\n
 A_ raisea  2;;1duis”e;a:i_i;i:spu:e by \ufb01ling a claim petition under<\/p>\n
 ~Seo~ti.on.V_v1Q(4-{A} of the industrial Disputes Act 1947, for short<\/p>\n
..  Presiding O\ufb01cer, II Add1.La’\u00a33oour Court,<\/p>\n
— Bauigaioife, for short ‘Labour Court’, which was numbered as<\/p>\n
it it   .i:i:[‘,.e\u00bb.e1’4~_io.4ii1\u00a5S\/()1, whence the petitioner arraigned as the second<\/p>\n
   xesistecl the claim by \ufb01ling oounter. The Labour<\/p>\n
  in the premise of the pleadings of charges, framed<\/p>\n
three issues, recor\ufb02ecl the depositions of MW–1 the witness<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
for the petitioner, marked documents M1 to M15. <\/p>\n
respondent did not enter the Witness box. The  _<\/p>\n
by order (it. 20.7.2006 answered in the  ‘V <\/p>\n
issue regarding the validity of the  <\/p>\n
thereafter having regard to t3;v.e_ mate–rie1.on  held:  ~’<\/p>\n
the petitioner having not issuetie\u00bbe:i”;’::;xoi:iceto_the~Vree:gonc1ent to
\nsubmit the retum. as.  the mere
\nzxon-ciiselosure of the it i:;si,\u00a7IIt_\u20aci_aIabie properbiee<\/p>\n
beloitging to  members, ciid not<\/p>\n
warrar1tt'”a’A;}tzr1isVi’1:fiiieIit~.of  from eerviee, in other
\nwordeat’   shockingly disproportionate to<\/p>\n
the  of mieetorzttiuet and accordingly by award cit.<\/p>\n
 V. \u00ab_   Ar\ufb01extlrcrv\ufb02, allowed the reference in part<\/p>\n
‘ d1’r::etedK  ._ petitioner to reinstate the workman with<\/p>\n
H oiA’tr:=.eVervice but however impose the penalty of<\/p>\n
 two annuai increments and denied baekwages,<\/p>\n
  iieztce this writ petition.\n<\/p>\n
12. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently<\/p>\n
contends that that in the light of the admiasion on the part<\/p>\n
of the respondent that he did not disclose the particulars of<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
the movable and immovable properties acq1\ufb02md\u00a7’_:i5\u00a7f  <\/p>\n
his family members, there was no  we r <\/p>\n
court to interfere with the quantum}; of:p1t1\u00a7tieh1rrei1t.”    At<\/p>\n
3. Having heard the leamtt    V<\/p>\n
perused the pleadinge end exae1i:1ei;l.,_tI1\\:~?1*der,irnpugned,
\nwhat is discernable  against the
\nrespondent-workzeerr \u00a7vaS’.–ti%tev”ae:t__ot;’.Irort\u00a5et.ieeiosure of the
\nparticulare   properties held by
\nhim  Ellie    Vrequired by Regulation
\n14(i)(et of __ Though this lapse was admitted
\nby the  the absence of a charge that<\/p>\n
the \u00bbs3;eqt1isit:\u00a7o:1Aof inovables anti immovable properties, were<\/p>\n
. V.    known. eource of income, and faiiuze<\/p>\n
  to,   material constituting subetantial iegel<\/p>\n
evigtence .ot”:t1ie fact of acquisition of the said properties from<\/p>\n
 out ofvtthe revenues of the Corporation, justi\ufb01ably, the<\/p>\n
A C”  court considered the question of proportionality of<\/p>\n
the pmrishreent. It. is not in dispute that the Labour court,<\/p>\n
‘in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 11-A of the Act, ie<\/p>\n
empowered to interfere with the quantum of punishment it is<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
..6..\n<\/p>\n
is shockingly dispmportionatc to the proxif\u00e9\u00e9i ‘  ._<;\u00a7fi'<\/p>\n
misconduct held proved.\n<\/p>\n
4. Having regard to the natizre  <\/p>\n
supra, in my opinion, no t,9x_\u00e9’c’:;ption”‘can’ b\u00e9~.:\u00e9tk\u00e9\ufb01”‘tb the”<\/p>\n
interference by the Labour  ‘with .’thcv..Aq3,1$:ntum of<\/p>\n
punishment.\n<\/p>\n
The writ pm’_tion.i;s;”‘w~\u00a3\u00a7h\u00a2ut:JV%\u00bbx:;ezit.\u00abV\u00a7\u00a71d is, accordingly<\/p>\n
zejected.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy .1- in THE HIGH comm’ or KARNATAKA, DATED THIS THE saw DAY OF ‘$EP’FEMB\u00a33;~2,: ‘\u00e9oea J ‘ x BEFORE’ A ‘ % THE HON’13LE MR.JUS?1C\u00a7 WRIT PETITION BETWEEN V % ‘V % THE DIViSlO1\\EAL. CON’I’R{}\u00a3.I;.ER […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21649","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-12T13:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\\\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-12T13:30:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":833,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008\",\"name\":\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\\\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-12T13:30:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\\\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-12T13:30:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-12T13:30:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008"},"wordCount":833,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008","name":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-12T13:30:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-h-anjanappa-so-hanumanthappa-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri H Anjanappa S\/O Hanumanthappa on 5 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21649","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21649"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21649\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21649"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21649"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21649"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}