{"id":216717,"date":"2010-03-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010"},"modified":"2018-09-18T07:35:04","modified_gmt":"2018-09-18T02:05:04","slug":"naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 1060 of 2005()\n\n\n1. NAIZAM, AGED 29 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. P.S. SHAMI, S\/O. SAINALABDEEN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. P.F. JOHN, S\/O. FRANCIS,\n\n3. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED\n\n4. AMBIKA, W\/O. ACHUTHAN NAIR,\n\n5. SHAJU MATHEW, S\/O. MATHAI,\n\n6. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.SUDHISH\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.A.GEORGE\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\n\n Dated :25\/03\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n               A.K. BASHEER & P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n               ------------------------------------------------------\n                      M.A.C.A NO. 1060 OF 2005\n                     -----------------------------------------\n           DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2010\n\n\n                                  JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n
           In this appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles<\/p>\n
Act, the claimant in OP(MV) No. 1378\/96 on the file of Motor<\/p>\n
Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ernakulam challenges the judgment<\/p>\n
and award of the Tribunal dated May 31, 2003 awarding a<\/p>\n
compensation of Rs. 91,550\/- for the loss caused to the claimant<\/p>\n
on account of the injuries sustained in a motor accident.<\/p>\n
     2.    The facts leading to this appeal in brief are these;<\/p>\n
           The appellant\/claimant was aged 20 at the time of<\/p>\n
accident and was employed as Conductor in the bus bearing<\/p>\n
registration No. KL-7\/G 6505 earning Rs. 2500\/- per month,<\/p>\n
according to him. On February 10, 1995 at about 7.30 P.M,<\/p>\n
claimant was travelling as a conductor in the bus bearing<\/p>\n
registration No. KL-7\/ G 6505 along Ernakulam – Palarivattom<\/p>\n
National Highway. When it reached near Kalamassery Premier<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A NO. 1060 OF 2005
\n                                2<\/span><\/p>\n
Ground another bus bearing registration No. KL-7\/ D 6507 came<\/p>\n
at a high speed from the opposite direction and dashed against<\/p>\n
the bus in which the claimant was travelling. The claimant<\/p>\n
sustained serious injuries. According to the claimant, accident<\/p>\n
occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the bus KL-7\/G<\/p>\n
6505 by its driver, the 2nd respondent. The first respondent as<\/p>\n
the owner , the 2nd respondent as the driver, the 3rd respondent<\/p>\n
as the insurer of the offending bus are jointly and severally liable<\/p>\n
to pay compensation to the claimant. The claimant claimed a<\/p>\n
compensation of Rs. 2 lakhs.\n<\/p>\n
     3.   Respondents 1 and 2, the owner and driver of the bus<\/p>\n
bearing registration No. KL-7\/ G 6505 remained absent and was<\/p>\n
set ex-parte by the Tribunal. The 3rd respondent, insurer of the<\/p>\n
said bus filed written statement admitting the policy but<\/p>\n
contending that accident occurred due to the negligence on the<\/p>\n
part of the driver of the other bus.      The owner, driver and<\/p>\n
insurer of the bus bearing registration No. KL-7 D\/ 6507 was<\/p>\n
subsequently impleaded as additional respondents 4 to 6.<\/p>\n
Respondents 4 and 5 remained absent and was set ex-parte by<\/p>\n
the Tribunal. The 6th respondent is the very same Insurance<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A NO. 1060 OF 2005
\n                                3<\/span><\/p>\n
Company. This O.P (MV) was jointly tried along with other OP<\/p>\n
(MV) Nos. 264\/96, 2882\/96 and 3774\/1997 filed by the injured<\/p>\n
persons of the same accident and a common award was passed<\/p>\n
by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n
     4.    PWs 1 to 4 were examined and Exts. A1 to A26 were<\/p>\n
marked on the side of the claimant. No evidence was adduced<\/p>\n
by the contesting respondents. On an appreciation of evidence<\/p>\n
the Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs. 91,550\/-. The<\/p>\n
claimant has now come up in appeal challenging the quantum of<\/p>\n
compensation awarded.\n<\/p>\n
     5.    Heard the counsel for the appellant\/ claimant and the<\/p>\n
counsel for the Insurance Company.\n<\/p>\n
     6.    The accident is not disputed.      The finding of the<\/p>\n
Tribunal that the accident occurred due to the negligence on the<\/p>\n
part of the 2nd respondent, the driver of the offending bus is not<\/p>\n
challenged in this appeal. Therefore, the only question which<\/p>\n
arises for consideration is whether the claimant is entitled to any<\/p>\n
enhanced compensation ?\n<\/p>\n
     7.    The claimant sustained the following injuries as seen<\/p>\n
from Ext. A4, the copy of the wound certificate issued from the<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A NO. 1060 OF 2005
\n                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n
Medical Trust Hospital, Ernakulam.\n<\/p>\n
    (i)Incised wound over (Rt) parietal region.\n<\/p>\n
    (ii)Linear fracture of left parietal bone\n<\/p>\n
    (iii)Extradural haematoma which was evacuvated after
\n       craniotomy.\n<\/p>\n
           Ext. A5 is the       Medical certificate, Ext.A9 is the<\/p>\n
treatment certificate, Ext. A8 series are the photographs<\/p>\n
showing the surgical mark on the head.            Ext. A15 is the<\/p>\n
disability certificate issued by the Medical Board, which shows<\/p>\n
that the claimant is suffering from permanent disability of 20%.<\/p>\n
According to the Medical Board the claimant is now suffering<\/p>\n
from headache, giddiness, sleep disturbance, memory defects<\/p>\n
and convulsions.\n<\/p>\n
     8.    The Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.<\/p>\n
91,550\/-. The break up of the award amount is as under:<\/p>\n
           Transportation to hospital        Rs. 500\/-\n           Damage to clothings               Rs. 250\/-\n           Extra nourishment                 Rs. 500\/-\n           Attended expense                  Rs.1000\/-\n           Loss of earnings                  Rs.8000\/- ( 4 months\n                                  at the rate of 2000\/- per month)\n\n           Treatment expense                 Rs.22,500\/-\n           Pain and suffering                Rs.12,000\/-\n           Loss of amenities and )           Rs. 6,000\/-\n           enjoyment of life        )\n\n           For the disability caused         Rs.40,800\/-\n\nM.A.C.A NO. 1060 OF 2005\n                                  5<\/span>\n\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
     9.    The counsel for the claimant sought enhancement of<\/p>\n
the compensation for the disability caused, for pain and suffering<\/p>\n
endured and loss of amenities and enjoyment of life.<\/p>\n
     10. The Tribunal took the monthly income of the claimant<\/p>\n
as Rs. 2,000\/- and assessed his disability as 10% and adopted a<\/p>\n
multiplier of 17 and awarded a compensation of Rs. 40,800\/- for<\/p>\n
the disability caused. The Counsel for the appellant argued that<\/p>\n
the Tribunal should have taken disability as 20% as shown in<\/p>\n
Ext. A15 disability certificate issued by the Medical Board. We<\/p>\n
are unable to agree. Taking into consideration of the disability<\/p>\n
mentioned in Ext. A15 we feel that the percentage of disability<\/p>\n
taken as 10% by the Tribunal appears to be reasonable.<\/p>\n
Therefore on this count the claimant is not entitled to any<\/p>\n
enhanced compensation.\n<\/p>\n
     11. For the Pain and suffering, the Tribunal awarded Rs.<\/p>\n
12,000\/- which appears to be very low. Taking into consideration<\/p>\n
of the nature of the injuries sustained, we feel that a<\/p>\n
compensation of Rs. 15,000\/- would be reasonable on this count.<\/p>\n
Thus the claimant is entitled to an additional compensation of Rs.<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A NO. 1060 OF 2005
\n                                6<\/span><\/p>\n
3,000\/- on this count.\n<\/p>\n
     12. For the Loss of amenities and enjoyment of life, the<\/p>\n
Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs. 6,000\/- which appears<\/p>\n
to be inadequate. Having regard to the nature of injuries<\/p>\n
sustained, we feel that a compensation of Rs. 10,000\/- would be<\/p>\n
reasonable on this count. Thus the claimant is entitled to an<\/p>\n
additional compensation of Rs. 4,000\/- on this count.<\/p>\n
     13. There is another aspect in this case. Ext.A8 series of<\/p>\n
photographs shows that claimant has some disfigurement on the<\/p>\n
face, for which we feel that a compensation of Rs. 5,000\/- would<\/p>\n
be reasonable. As regards the compensation awarded under<\/p>\n
other heads, we find the same to be reasonable. Therefore, we<\/p>\n
are not disturbing the same.\n<\/p>\n
     14. Thus the claimant is entitled to an additional<\/p>\n
compensation of Rs. 12,000\/-. He is entitled to interest @ 9%<\/p>\n
per annum from the date of petition till realization and<\/p>\n
appropriate cost. The 3rd respondent, being the insurer of the<\/p>\n
offending vehicle shall deposit the amount before the Tribunal<\/p>\n
within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this<\/p>\n
judgment. The award of the Tribunal is modified to the above<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A NO. 1060 OF 2005
\n                               7<\/span><\/p>\n
extent.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     The Appeal is disposed of as found above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                      A.K. BASHEER (JUDGE)<\/p>\n
                                   P.Q. BARKATH ALI (JUDGE)<\/p>\n
pkk<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 1060 of 2005() 1. NAIZAM, AGED 29 YEARS, … Petitioner Vs 1. P.S. SHAMI, S\/O. SAINALABDEEN, … Respondent 2. P.F. JOHN, S\/O. FRANCIS, 3. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED 4. AMBIKA, W\/O. ACHUTHAN NAIR, 5. SHAJU […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-216717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNaizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-18T02:05:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-18T02:05:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1046,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010\",\"name\":\"Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-18T02:05:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-18T02:05:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-18T02:05:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010"},"wordCount":1046,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010","name":"Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-18T02:05:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naizam-vs-p-s-shami-on-25-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Naizam vs P.S. Shami on 25 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216717"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216717\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}