{"id":217032,"date":"2009-05-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009"},"modified":"2015-06-07T23:40:03","modified_gmt":"2015-06-07T18:10:03","slug":"md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n
Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009<\/div>\n
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI\n                            Cr. Revision No.580 of 2007\n               Md. Ayub Ansari. ...          ...    ...     ... ...Petitioner\n                                  -Versus-\n               1. Aisha Khatoon.\n               2. Shama Perween.\n               3. The State of Jharkhand.       ...     ... ...Opp. Parties\n                                  -------------\n               CORAM:       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K.SINHA\n\n\n               For the Petitioner:          Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate.\n               For the Opp. Parties:        Mr. Rajan Raj, Advocate.\n                                   -------------\n               C.A.V. on 13.04.2009                :     Pronounced on 07.05.2009\n                                   -------------\n\nD.K.Sinha,J.                 The petitioner has preferred this Cr. Revision for setting\n\n               aside the order impugned dated 11.05.2007 passed in Misc. Case No.18\n\n               of 2005 (T.R.No.168 of 2007) whereby the petition filed on behalf of the\n\n               Opposite-Party under Section 3(1) of the Muslim Women ( Protection of\n\n               Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 was allowed directing the petitioner herein\n\n               Md. Ayub Ansari to pay a sum of Rs. 1051\/- as Dain Mehar to the\n\n               Opposite Party No.1 Aisha Khatoon, a sum of Rs. 500\/- per month for\n\n               three months during observation of Iddat period and further a fair\n\n               provision of one time maintenance to the tune of Rs.60,000\/- to lead a\n\n               secured life. It was further directed to the petitioner that since the girl\n\n               child was born from consummation of their marriage, the petitioner Md.\n\n               Ayub Ansari would maintain her by making payment of Rs.500\/- per\n\n               month to the Opposite Party No.2 (Shama Perween) till attainment of her\n\n               majority.\n\n\n               2.            The brief fact of the case for appreciation of the Criminal\n\n               Revision is that the Opposite Party No.1 (Aisha Khatoon) was married to\n\n               the petitioner's elder brother Wafiz Zakir who died later on. Thereafter\n\n               the petitioner married to Aisha Khatoon on 11.12.1994 after death of his\n\n               brother. In due course two sons were born to them who were residing\n\n               with the petitioner father. It was stated that the petitioner was working as\n\n               tailor but according to him he was having a very small tailoring shop in\n                           2\n\n\n\n\nthe interior area of Giridih. Later on, the Opposite Party No.2 (Shama\n\nPerween) was born from them. Certain allegations were made by Aisha\n\nKhatoon that she was physically and mentally tortured by the petitioner\n\nherein and other in-laws to which she had filed a complaint case vide\n\nC.P. Case No.1361 of 2001 before the S.D.J.M., Dhanbad. It was further\n\nalleged that she was driven out from her matrimonial home on\n\n20.05.2001<\/pre>\n
 as she could not be able to satisfy the illegal demand made<\/p>\n
by the petitioner. However, during the pendency of the said complaint<\/p>\n
petition, the petitioner took her back to his home on positive assurance<\/p>\n
but again her misery started. Being fade up she filed a petition for<\/p>\n
maintenance under Section 125 Code of Criminal Procedure before the<\/p>\n
Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad on 05.05.2003 for maintenance<\/p>\n
but again she was persuaded and taken back by the petitioner where he<\/p>\n
finally divorced by pronouncement. Finding no way out, she returned to<\/p>\n
her parental home. The petitioner appeared and admitted that he had<\/p>\n
married to the O.P.No.1 (Aisha Khatoon) on 11.12.1994 after the death<\/p>\n
of her first husband who happened to be his elder brother Wafiz Zakir.<\/p>\n
The petitioner explained that it was quite unusual to demand an amount<\/p>\n
for the reasons that Aisha Khatoon had already lived for seven years<\/p>\n
with his elder brother as married wife till his death. Similarly the<\/p>\n
allegation that a sewing machine, cycle and clothes were given to the<\/p>\n
petitioner on the eve of her remarriage was blatant lie. The petitioner<\/p>\n
admitted that two sons were born to him through his wife Aisha Khatoon<\/p>\n
but at the same time disowned the paternity of O.P.No.2 Shama<\/p>\n
Praveen who was born after an year of pronouncement of “Talak” and at<\/p>\n
the relevant time Aisha Khatoon was not bearing pregnancy. The<\/p>\n
petitioner further explained that soon after pronouncement of “Talak” on<\/p>\n
29.04.2003, in presence of witnesses, he had immediately paid total sum<\/p>\n
of Rs.2551\/- being the amount of Dain Mehar and Rs.1500\/- for the<\/p>\n
observation period of Iddat and in that manner all the dues were paid to
\n                              3<\/span><\/p>\n
her by the petitioner. The petitioner finally declined to pay any kind of<\/p>\n
maintenance to the O.P.No.2 Shama Praveen for the reasons stated that<\/p>\n
he disowned her paternity.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.            Learned C.J.M. by a detailed discussions on the basis of<\/p>\n
materials on the record and arguments advanced on behalf of parties<\/p>\n
held that there was no documentary proof that the petitioner had given<\/p>\n
the amount of Dain Mehar to the tune of Rs.1051\/- and Rs.1500\/- for the<\/p>\n
observation period of Iddat. It was further held that the petitioner Md.<\/p>\n
Ayub Ansari failed to discharge his onus that O.P.No.2 Shama Perween<\/p>\n
was not his daughter as the Opposite Party No.1 had shifted her burden<\/p>\n
by saying that the O.P.No.2 was the legitimate daughter of the petitioner.<\/p>\n
In such situation, the burden was upon the petitioner to maintain his<\/p>\n
female child till the attainment of her majority.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.            While discussing issue No.5 the court held that the<\/p>\n
petitioner was a tailor at Giridih having his earning for livelihood and that<\/p>\n
his father did not come forward to adduce that the petitioner was<\/p>\n
dependant upon him as he was a helping hand in the tailoring business<\/p>\n
of his father. It was rightly held that the petitioner failed to adduce any<\/p>\n
evidence that the O.P.No.1 (Aisha Khatoon) was capable to earn and<\/p>\n
maintain herself and her female child hence a sum of Rs. 60,000\/- was<\/p>\n
directed to be paid by the petitioner to the O.P.No.1 (Aisha Khatoon) for<\/p>\n
the protection of her body and soul and in my view the amount was a<\/p>\n
meagre amount for maintenance for rest of her life. However, since the<\/p>\n
O.P.No.1 has not preferred any revision either on her behalf or on behalf<\/p>\n
of her minor daughter O.P.No.2 aged about 3 years, I have reason to<\/p>\n
hold that one time maintenance to the tune of Rs. 60,000\/- to the<\/p>\n
O.P.No.1 (Aisha Khatoon) would meet the ends of justice. Similarly, I do<\/p>\n
not find any reason to interfere with the finding of the learned C.J.M.<\/p>\n
while awarding Rs. 500\/- per month to the O.P.No.2 being her
\n                            4<\/span><\/p>\n
maintenance till attainment of her majority besides, an amount to the<\/p>\n
tune of Rs. 1051\/- being the amount of Dain Mehar (dower debt) to the<\/p>\n
O.P.No.1(Aisha Khatoon). Learned Counsel for the petitioner failed to<\/p>\n
show any convincing ground to call for interference in the order<\/p>\n
impugned passed by the learned C.J.M. in Misc. Case No. 18 of 2005 on<\/p>\n
11.05.2007 and hence the same is upheld with an observation for<\/p>\n
compliance.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5.              This Criminal Revision is dismissed for the reasons as<\/p>\n
aforesaid.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                     [D.K.Sinha,J.]<\/p>\n
P.K.S.\/A.F.R.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Jharkhand High Court Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.580 of 2007 Md. Ayub Ansari. … … … … …Petitioner -Versus- 1. Aisha Khatoon. 2. Shama Perween. 3. The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Parties ————- CORAM: THE HON’BLE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-217032","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMd.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-07T18:10:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-07T18:10:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":764,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-07T18:10:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-07T18:10:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-07T18:10:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009"},"wordCount":764,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009","name":"Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-07T18:10:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-ayub-ansari-vs-aisha-khatoon-ors-on-7-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Md.Ayub Ansari vs Aisha Khatoon & Ors on 7 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217032"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217032\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}