{"id":217717,"date":"2010-09-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010"},"modified":"2018-12-17T06:21:58","modified_gmt":"2018-12-17T00:51:58","slug":"maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.MC.No. 64 of 2010()\n\n\n1. MANEESH KUMAR V.S., S\/O. SOMANATHAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. K. SOMANATHAN, S\/O. KUNJU PILLAI,\n3. K. KRISHNAN, S\/O.MADHAVAN,\n4. LAKSHMIKUTTY,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SUB\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. M\/S BELL LEASING AND HIRE PURCHASE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :16\/09\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n          M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n\n           ---------------------------------------------\n               CRL.M.C.NO.64 OF 2010\n           ---------------------------------------------\n           Dated 16th          September, 2010\n\n\n                          O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>           Petitioners are the accused in<\/p>\n<p>C.C.216\/2009 on the file of Chief Judicial<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate&#8217;s        Court,              Ernakulam,           taken<\/p>\n<p>cognizance for the offence                         under Section<\/p>\n<p>420 of Indian Penal Code on Annexure-A5<\/p>\n<p>private  complaint                     filed            by  second<\/p>\n<p>respondent. Petition is filed under Section<\/p>\n<p>482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash<\/p>\n<p>the cognizance taken on Annexure-A7 final<\/p>\n<p>report for the offence under Section 420 of<\/p>\n<p>Indian Penal Code as well as Annexure-A8<\/p>\n<p>order passed by the             learned Magistrate, in<\/p>\n<p>a petition filed by the second respondent<\/p>\n<p>under  Section       451        of       Code        of   Criminal<\/p>\n<p>Procedure.       Second                respondent            filed<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crmc 64\/10               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Annexure-A5 complaint before the Chief Judicial<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate, Ernakulam against the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>alleging     that they  committed  offence  under<\/p>\n<p>Section 420 of Indian Penal Code.         Learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate sent the complaint for investigation<\/p>\n<p>under     Section 156(3)   of  Code  of  Criminal<\/p>\n<p>Procedure, based on which Annexure-A6 FIR was<\/p>\n<p>prepared and crime No.1666\/2009 of Ernakulam<\/p>\n<p>Central Police Station was      registered. After<\/p>\n<p>investigation    Annexure-A7  final   report  was<\/p>\n<p>filed     which  was  taken  cognizance   by  the<\/p>\n<p>learned     Magistrate.  When   JCB,  which   was<\/p>\n<p>purchased     by the   first  petitioner  on  the<\/p>\n<p>financial assistance of the second respondent<\/p>\n<p>was seized, both     the first petitioner and the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent sought interim custody of the<\/p>\n<p>JCB     under Section  451  of Code  of  Criminal<\/p>\n<p>Procedure. By Annexure-A8 order interim custody<\/p>\n<p>was granted to the second respondent. Case of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crmc 64\/10                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the      petitioners is that even if the entire<\/p>\n<p>allegations in      Annexure-A5 complaint as well<\/p>\n<p>as the     case in Annexure-A7   final report are<\/p>\n<p>accepted,      an offence under Section 420 of<\/p>\n<p>Indian     Penal   Code  is   not  attracted   and<\/p>\n<p>therefore, continuation of the proceedings is<\/p>\n<p>only an abuse of process of the Court.<\/p>\n<p>          2.   Learned  counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners and    second respondent were heard.<\/p>\n<p>          3. Annexure-A5 complaint discloses the<\/p>\n<p>case      of the second respondent. According to<\/p>\n<p>the second respondent company, first petitioner<\/p>\n<p>approached the company to purchase a JCB on<\/p>\n<p>hire purchase agreement and second respondent<\/p>\n<p>agreed to     give financial assistance and first<\/p>\n<p>petitioner as principal loanee and petitioners<\/p>\n<p>2 to 4 as guarantors     executed a hire purchase<\/p>\n<p>agreement agreeing to pay the value of JCB in<\/p>\n<p>36 equal     monthly   installments of Rs.41,560\/-<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crmc 64\/10                4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>each     and  the  JCB  was  purchased  and  last<\/p>\n<p>installment      is  to   be paid  on  or  before<\/p>\n<p>28\/2\/2011.    It  is  alleged  that though  first<\/p>\n<p>petitioner paid four monthly installments, he<\/p>\n<p>defaulted subsequent monthly installments and<\/p>\n<p>when     second  respondent contacted  the  first<\/p>\n<p>petitioner on 7\/2\/2009 at his residence, he<\/p>\n<p>agreed to settle the over dues on or before<\/p>\n<p>15\/3\/2009. It is alleged that after 31\/3\/2008<\/p>\n<p>no      vehicle tax was paid   and   RC book was<\/p>\n<p>surrendered before the company      and insurance<\/p>\n<p>taken on 5\/11\/2007 expired on 4\/11\/2008 and<\/p>\n<p>insurance policy was not renewed and when the<\/p>\n<p>representative    of  the  company contacted  the<\/p>\n<p>first     petitioner,  he  agreed  to  renew  the<\/p>\n<p>insurance policy and agreed to pay vehicle tax<\/p>\n<p>and still it was not     done. On 6\/2\/2009 second<\/p>\n<p>respondent company sent a notice to the first<\/p>\n<p>petitioner to pay installment dues amounting to<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crmc 64\/10                5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Rs.3,03,793.72, namely the amount payable       in<\/p>\n<p>seven     defaulted  installments.  It  is  alleged<\/p>\n<p>that     first  petitioner  did  not  turn  up  and<\/p>\n<p>therefore, on 17\/3\/2009 company sent a notice<\/p>\n<p>recalling the entire loan amount advanced       as<\/p>\n<p>the     first  petitioner     failed  to  pay  the<\/p>\n<p>installments      and      clause   4(a)   of   the<\/p>\n<p>hypothecation Agreement     enables the company to<\/p>\n<p>take steps to recall the loan      and forfeit the<\/p>\n<p>vehicle     and  it  was  intimated  to  the  first<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.      It   is   also   contended   that<\/p>\n<p>meanwhile, the       first petitioner     issued a<\/p>\n<p>cheque dated 13\/4\/2009 for Rs.12,90,000\/- and<\/p>\n<p>when it was presented, the same was dishonoured<\/p>\n<p>for want of sufficient funds and in spite of<\/p>\n<p>notice, the amount was not paid and therefore,<\/p>\n<p>proceedings under Section 138 of         Negotiable<\/p>\n<p>Instruments Act is initiated as S.T.1978\/2009.<\/p>\n<p>It    is   claimed  that    the  intention  of  the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crmc 64\/10               6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petitioners is to dismantle      the vehicle and<\/p>\n<p>thereby cheat the company and therefore, an<\/p>\n<p>offence under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code<\/p>\n<p>is    attracted.  Annexure-A7  final  report also<\/p>\n<p>shows that an offence under Section 420 of<\/p>\n<p>Indian Penal Code is alleged contending that<\/p>\n<p>though four installments were paid, subsequent<\/p>\n<p>installments were not paid and first petitioner<\/p>\n<p>did not return the JCB to the company and<\/p>\n<p>thereby they committed the offence.<\/p>\n<p>          5. As   rightly  pointed   out  by the<\/p>\n<p>learned    counsel appearing for the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>even if, the entire allegations in Annexure-A5<\/p>\n<p>as such are accepted, so also the allegations<\/p>\n<p>in    Annexure-A7  final  report,  offence  under<\/p>\n<p>Section    420  of  Indian  Penal  Code    is not<\/p>\n<p>attracted. What is alleged in the complaint is<\/p>\n<p>that first petitioner as the principal debtor<\/p>\n<p>and petitioners 2 to 4 as guarantors obtained<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crmc 64\/10               7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>loan for purchasing JCB on hire purchase    and<\/p>\n<p>the first petitioner agreed to pay the value of<\/p>\n<p>JCB      in 36 equal monthly installments at the<\/p>\n<p>rate      of Rs.41,560\/-  and defaulted  to  pay<\/p>\n<p>subsequent       installments    after    fourth<\/p>\n<p>installment and in spite of notice the    amount<\/p>\n<p>was not paid and even insurance policy was not<\/p>\n<p>renewed and the vehicle tax was not paid. None<\/p>\n<p>of these      aspects would attract an offence<\/p>\n<p>under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code. When<\/p>\n<p>there is no case for the second respondent that<\/p>\n<p>either when the loan was applied for or granted<\/p>\n<p>or    availed,   the  first  petitioner  or  his<\/p>\n<p>guarantors, petitioners 2 to 4 had a dishonest<\/p>\n<p>intention to cheat or not to pay the value of<\/p>\n<p>JCB to be purchased on hire purchase. At best<\/p>\n<p>it    could   be  said  that  subsequently  they<\/p>\n<p>defaulted to pay the installments due under the<\/p>\n<p>hire purchase agreement. That will not attract<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crmc 64\/10               8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>an offence under Section 420 of Indian Penal<\/p>\n<p>Code. Hence cognizance taken for the offence<\/p>\n<p>under     Section 420  of  Indian  Penal  Code  on<\/p>\n<p>Annexure-A7 final report can only be quashed.<\/p>\n<p>When cognizance taken is quashed, Annexure-A8<\/p>\n<p>order granting interim custody of the vehicle<\/p>\n<p>to    the   second respondent  would  lapse    by<\/p>\n<p>itself.\n<\/p>\n<p>          Petition is allowed. C.C.216\/2009 on the<\/p>\n<p>file     of  Chief Judicial  Magistrate&#8217;s   Court,<\/p>\n<p>Ernakulam is quashed. Annexure-A8 order passed<\/p>\n<p>by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam is also<\/p>\n<p>quashed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                             M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,<br \/>\n                                        JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nuj.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.MC.No. 64 of 2010() 1. MANEESH KUMAR V.S., S\/O. SOMANATHAN, &#8230; Petitioner 2. K. SOMANATHAN, S\/O. KUNJU PILLAI, 3. K. KRISHNAN, S\/O.MADHAVAN, 4. LAKSHMIKUTTY, Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SUB &#8230; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-217717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-17T00:51:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-17T00:51:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":991,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-17T00:51:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-17T00:51:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-17T00:51:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010"},"wordCount":991,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010","name":"Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-17T00:51:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maneesh-kumar-v-s-vs-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Maneesh Kumar V.S. vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217717"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217717\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}