{"id":217726,"date":"2010-09-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010"},"modified":"2016-09-08T03:45:29","modified_gmt":"2016-09-07T22:15:29","slug":"j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"J E George S\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">J E George S\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 6\"\" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 20 1 \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J.GU1\\\u00a7g;aLVr%ee.: ' O  \n\nWRIT PETITION NOS.25276w-1'77 \n\nBETVVEEN :\n\nJ.E.George,\n\nS\/o.Late George Joseph,\n\nAged about 70 years, \n\nResiding at No.382,\n\n100 feet Road,\n\nHAL II Stage, &amp; _ , _ _ V_ .\nIndiranagar,   'O    4'    \n\nBangalore -- .f'36O_\u00abQIf$O8-.':'~_V_&lt; &quot;  _    ...PE&#039;I&#039;I&#039;I&#039;IONER\n\n(Byt Sr_i.N\u00e9\ufb01*ke$t1._A.dX&#039;. for\n\/S.Na1&#039;1c1&quot;1=.Law &#039;Chambers, Advs.)\n\nAND V:_ _\n\nO  George, E  &quot;&quot;&quot; &quot; &#039;V\n&#039;-.W\/o.Sri.J.E.GVeorge,\n\nAgeti _zii3oV1.&quot;1t_ 63&quot; ;re&#039;:;:rs,\nResiding at C] &quot;\n\n  Dr. Srnriti,Geo,1&#039;ge,\n --UnitN&#039;o.2&quot;;_N.o.22~A\n\u00ab. _. f &#039;&lt;_(3-ross Road, Myrtle Bank,\n Adelai-&lt;;1e,SA--5064 ...RESPONDENT\n\n(Ey Sri.N.Nataraj, Adv.)\n\nThese writ petitions are filed under Articles 226\n\nand 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to\n\n\n\nset--aside and quash the common order dated\n03.08.2009, (Annexure-A) passed on interim\n\nappiications, dated 15.12.2007 vide Annexures \n&#039;D&#039; by the IIIrd Addl. Principal Judge, Family .C;0I;l&#039;I___&quot;23Vi \n\nBangalore in M.C.No.692\/99.\n\nThese Writ petitions coming on~fo_rA \n\nthis day, the Court made the fol1ou;jing;_oA? 3 &#039;\nORDER  \n<\/pre>\n<p>Both the petitioner-husha,:nd,_and&#8221; the :e:spon:d&#8217;e&#8217;r1t:.o<br \/>\nwife are in the evening&#8230; of their}-i&#8217;.fe-;r.&#8217;TheAwifevogseeks<br \/>\ndissolution of the marriage-_e_in&#8221;1\\xi\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;C&#8217;.Ni\u00a7;e9.2\/&#8217;1999 on the<\/p>\n<p>ground of  It appears<\/p>\n<p>during. {them   the. firooeedings, the wife<br \/>\nmaintainedan applicfatio&#8217;n\u00e9_isee&#8217;king interim maintenance.<\/p>\n<p>The app.1ication_:V for&#8221; maintenance is made nearly two<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217;y&#8217;esr_s&#8217;*&#8212; {latter  misting&#8217; the proceedings. The said<\/p>\n<p> on today is pending. The petitioner&#8211;<\/p>\n<p> husband V__v&#8217;n2ai&#8217;ntained two applications, one under<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8221;-:i.&#8221;i&#8221;&#8221;&#8211;Sjec.tion  of the Code of Civil Procedure and another<\/p>\n<p> Crder 6 Rule 16 read with Section 151 of the<\/p>\n<p>it  of Civil Procedure for expunging the averments<\/p>\n<p> insofar as the adultery and bestiality are concerned.<\/p>\n<p>I<\/p>\n<p>The said application would stem from an order passed<\/p>\n<p>by this Court in the earlier proceedings. Suffice it<br \/>\nthat the learned \u00a7&#8217;amily tludge has  &#8216;<br \/>\nconsideration of the said applications<br \/>\nhusband on 17.12.2007 on the<br \/>\ndisposal of I.A.6 for maintenaneep:;&#8217;&gt;.\/t.he of&#8221;the<br \/>\npetitioner for expunging  d it considered.<br \/>\nAggrieved by the said  before this<\/p>\n<p>Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. I   counsel appearing for<br \/>\nthe petitioner-  as the respondent&#8211;wife.<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner   that on the face of it,<\/p>\n<p>__the aiiegations regarding adultery as well as bestiality<\/p>\n<p>Vcariiriot be &#8216;sus_tai_ned inasmuch as the provisions of the<\/p>\n<p>  would contemplate that adulteresses<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;should bernade a party to the proceedings inasmuch as<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;is\u00ab.._reduired to defend that such an act has not<\/p>\n<p> ___&#8221;&#8216;happened. Insofar as bestiality is concerned. he submits<\/p>\n<p>ullthat no material is forthcoming in support of such a<\/p>\n<p>plea. \/\ufb02<\/p>\n<p>4.\/:,&#8221;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>00044?\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The learned counsel appearing for the<br \/>\nrespondent submits that before the applications of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is taken up for consideration, the appliclatio-nj  <\/p>\n<p>for maintenance is required to be considered_&#8221;{irstl;&#8221;He it  <\/p>\n<p>would press into service the order   g_<br \/>\non an earlier occasion. \u00e9  l V V p A<\/p>\n<p>4. Indeed the proceediiags have-~.V_<br \/>\ncareer inasmuch as  iivsraslivvbefore<br \/>\nthis Court in W.P.l\\_Io.   the order<\/p>\n<p>on I.A.Nos.&#8221;Ii&#8217;   said&#8221;applications were \ufb01led<\/p>\n<p>for deletion of the  of adultery contained in<\/p>\n<p>paras _5_ to   dismiss the main petition as<\/p>\n<p> adult&#8217;erCes5ses&#8221;are not&#8221;ti&#8217;1&#8217;ade as co-respondents. The said<\/p>\n<p> disposed of by this Court on 22376&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>  Nov\u00e9lnber\u00bb  con\ufb01rming the order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>id&#8221;3:\u00a7&#8221;.&#8221;&#8221;learned ll  Judge regecting the application for<\/p>\n<p>A  udlcleticin of paras 5 to 19 regarding adultery.<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; &#8220;petition, an application was \ufb01led seeking modi\ufb01cation of X?<\/p>\n<p>5. It appears after the disposal of the writ<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>.3,\/.7&#8243;\n<\/p>\n<p>the order. The said application was dismissed for non-<\/p>\n<p>prosecution. Thereafter, another application is <\/p>\n<p>recall the order of dismissal of the   _<\/p>\n<p>modification. The said recalling app1ication&#8221;&#8216; in <\/p>\n<p>dismissed on the ground that the  <\/p>\n<p>support of the application  the not<br \/>\nby the party. The said;__rejectip0nV:A&#8217;sf the  for<br \/>\nrecailing was Carried in  The<br \/>\nApex Court has_::set&#8211;as&#8217;iVde &#8216;    the<br \/>\napplication for&#8221;    application for<br \/>\nmodificatio\ufb01;  tirodght to the notice of<br \/>\nthe  Judge has recalled the<\/p>\n<p>entire order    on 22nd November 2007,<\/p>\n<p>Twhipchns. &#8216;produpced\ufb02alonng with the synopsis at Annexure<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7}_.  has observed thus:\n<\/p>\n<p>A  nothing to be reviewed since all the<br \/>\norders passed in W.P.No.18822\/2005 have<\/p>\n<p>_  &#8216;T been set~aside by the Apex Court in its order<br \/>\n Tdated 13~04~2oo9 Annexures &#8216;D&#8217; restoring<br \/>\nE the writ petition in its original number &#8221; or<br \/>\ndisposal on merits&#8221;. In that view of the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">42<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\/\/&#8217;6&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>matter, no review lies and is accordingly,<\/p>\n<p>rejected. &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>6. The learned Judge was of the View that  *<\/p>\n<p>orders passed by this Court in the<br \/>\nincluding the order dated 22,11.2tt0o7?At i&#8217;s<br \/>\nstatus now would be W.wli&#8217;;1:\\:&#8217;\u00a7;o~..1p8E5A.22\/.Z{)V(V}\u00bbf:*3_:A<br \/>\npending adjudication vbefore hit&#8221;-is~&#8217;:\u00a7to be<br \/>\nnoticed that the subject&#8221;rnatter.dtrth:atV:vrrit&#8217;petition and<br \/>\nthe present   inasmuch<br \/>\nas they are  in respect of<\/p>\n<p> C ind&#8217;eed the subject matter<br \/>\nof that   adultery whereas in the<\/p>\n<p>present. writpctition,  &#8216;adultery as Well as bestiality.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;reason givenhvbyhthe learned Family Judge for<\/p>\n<p>reiectiVon.,_VTofh.  application is, on the basis of a<\/p>\n<p>  directi_onV_ by this Court inasmuch as this Court<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  directed that the application for maintenance by the<\/p>\n<p> e.1*~*tV_V&#8217;1*espondent is required to be considered. Indeed<\/p>\n<p>  regard to the order passed by this Court in the<\/p>\n<p>it &#8221; &#8221; review petition. which is referred to above, I am of the<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>I-\/\/-\/.&#8217;\ufb02<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-7-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>View that there is no order. of which benefit can be<\/p>\n<p>extended either to the petitioner or to the responderit._::&#8221;.__<\/p>\n<p>7. Be that as it may, the fact remains   .<\/p>\n<p>the husband and wife are in the evening of _-their:iives.V&#8221;It  if <\/p>\n<p>is time that they are required to knew   if<\/p>\n<p>earliest point of time. W_ithout&#8230;tlie<br \/>\nmaintainability of the applications for&#8217; &#8211;.eXpnnginAg_c\u00a7ertain<br \/>\naverments insofar as V  bestiality is<br \/>\nconcerned andgvdeletionfofi&#8217;   adultery, if a<br \/>\ndirection is    Judge to<br \/>\nconc1ude__th_e&#8217;  itself, that would meet<br \/>\nthe ends jti&#8217;s&#8217;tice:&#8217;   l if if<\/p>\n<p> it Since llthevapplication seeking maintenance is<\/p>\n<p>iperiding .adjuc;licvati0n for a period of eight years, at this<\/p>\n<p>poii&#8217;i&#8217;\\\u00a7&#8217;~..oAf directing the learned Family Judge to<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; &#8216;oonsidler 4&#8217; said application before considering the<\/p>\n<p>   of the petitioner on merits would be wholly<\/p>\n<p> ____&#8221;&#8221;i1nn.ecessary. Hence, the following order:<\/p>\n<p>7%<\/p>\n<p>..\/\/5&#8243;.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>(a)<\/p>\n<p>(bl<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">(0)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>(dl<\/p>\n<p> rnaii1tainabi1AityV&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;of the applications.<\/p>\n<p> i\ufb01guestioii \u00ab<\/p>\n<p> _-fsxis A <\/p>\n<p>The learned Family Judge to dispose of the<\/p>\n<p>main petition itself seeking dissolution of<\/p>\n<p>marriage within a period of two months]  <\/p>\n<p>the date of receipt of this order.<\/p>\n<p>Both the counsel assuresfl t_ <\/p>\n<p>will (:o~operate with the  Co1.,&gt;iV1_*_!&#8221;.A to <\/p>\n<p>an early disposal ._neeeVssa1y_s&#8217;iia&#8217;i~lvl on<\/p>\n<p>with the matter on day basis.__ <\/p>\n<p>With this obsefvatiori.;:&#8217; th&#8217;e&#8217;l:f_petitions stand<\/p>\n<p>disposed,_pfac&#8217;eoi'&lt;iingiy}.__V I  <\/p>\n<p> for the husband to<\/p>\n<p>:&#039;s:iieh-\u00bb.,\u00a7rovuhds.which are available to<\/p>\n<p> him.  to refute the ailegations<\/p>\n<p>of &#039; aauiteiyi  &#039;\ufb01bestiality including the<br \/>\nThe<\/p>\n<p>maintainability shall be<\/p>\n<p>H: considered along with the main petition.<\/p>\n<p>safii<\/p>\n<p>J\ufb01d\ufb01<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court J E George S\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010 Author: Ajit J Gunjal IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 6&#8243;&#8221; DAY OF SEPTEMBER 20 1 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J.GU1\\\u00a7g;aLVr%ee.: &#8216; O WRIT PETITION NOS.25276w-1&#8217;77 BETVVEEN [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-217726","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>J E George S\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J E George S\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-07T22:15:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"J E George S\\\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\\\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-07T22:15:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1026,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010\",\"name\":\"J E George S\\\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\\\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-07T22:15:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J E George S\\\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\\\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J E George S\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J E George S\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-07T22:15:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"J E George S\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-07T22:15:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010"},"wordCount":1026,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010","name":"J E George S\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-07T22:15:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-e-george-so-late-george-joseph-vs-smt-sheila-george-wo-j-e-george-on-6-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J E George S\/O Late George Joseph vs Smt Sheila George W\/O J.E George, on 6 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217726","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217726"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217726\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217726"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217726"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217726"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}