{"id":217785,"date":"2010-05-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010"},"modified":"2019-03-15T07:38:53","modified_gmt":"2019-03-15T02:08:53","slug":"chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 1561 of 2010()\n\n\n1. CHANDRASHEKHARA HOLLA, ART MASTER,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. UNNIKRISHNA, S\/O.LATE NARAYANAN NAIR,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN\n\n Dated :20\/05\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                      V.K.MOHANAN, J.\n            ---------------------------------------------\n                 Crl.R.P.No. 1561 of 2010\n            ---------------------------------------------\n             Dated this the 20th day of May, 2010\n\n                           O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>          This Criminal Revision Petition is preferred by the<\/p>\n<p>accused in a prosecution for the offence punishable under<\/p>\n<p>Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for<\/p>\n<p>short &#8216;the N.I.Act&#8217;) as he is aggrieved by the conviction and<\/p>\n<p>sentence imposed against him, both by the trial court as<\/p>\n<p>well as the lower appellate court.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2.   The case of the complainant is that the revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner\/accused borrowed a sum of Rs.75,000\/- and<\/p>\n<p>towards the discharge of the said liability, the revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner\/accused issued a cheque dated 30.9.2007 for the<\/p>\n<p>said amount. According to the first respondent\/complainant,<\/p>\n<p>when the said cheque was presented for encashment, it was<\/p>\n<p>dishonoured for want of sufficient fund and accordingly, he<\/p>\n<p>approached the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II<\/p>\n<p>(Additional Munsiff), Kasaragod, by filing a complaint upon<\/p>\n<p>which cognisance was taken and C.C.No.307 of 2008 was<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.NO.1561 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                              :-2-:\n<\/p>\n<p>instituted.    During the trial of the case, the complainant<\/p>\n<p>himself adduced oral evidence as PW1 and Exts.P1 to P8<\/p>\n<p>were produced. No evidence either oral or documentary<\/p>\n<p>was produced from the side of the defence. Based upon the<\/p>\n<p>materials and evidence, the trial court found that the<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner\/accused is guilty and accordingly, he is<\/p>\n<p>sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months<\/p>\n<p>and further directed to pay a sum of Rs.75,000\/- as<\/p>\n<p>compensation to the complainant under Section 357(3) of<\/p>\n<p>the Cr.P.C. and the default sentence is fixed as one month<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.   Challenging the above conviction and sentence,<\/p>\n<p>though the revision petitioner had approached the Sessions<\/p>\n<p>Court, Kasaragod by filing Crl.A.No.345 of 2008, by<\/p>\n<p>judgment dated 11.2.2010, the learned Sessions Judge<\/p>\n<p>allowed the appeal only in part and while confirming the<\/p>\n<p>conviction, the sentence was modified and reduced to one<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.NO.1561 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                              :-3-:\n<\/p>\n<p>day till rising of court and while maintaining the amount of<\/p>\n<p>compensation ordered by the trial court, default sentence is<\/p>\n<p>enhanced      to     two months    simple imprisonment   and<\/p>\n<p>accordingly, the revision petitioner was directed to appear<\/p>\n<p>before the trial court on 17.3.2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4. It is the above finding and order of conviction and<\/p>\n<p>sentence of the court below challenged in this revision<\/p>\n<p>petition.    Going by the impugned judgments of the trial<\/p>\n<p>court as well as the lower appellate court, it can be seen<\/p>\n<p>that both the courts have concurrently found that the<\/p>\n<p>complainant has established his case against the accused<\/p>\n<p>and the courts have accepted the evidence and materials<\/p>\n<p>produced by the complainant. From the discussions and the<\/p>\n<p>materials relied on by the courts below, it can be seen that<\/p>\n<p>the accused has not disputed the signature in Ext.P1 cheque<\/p>\n<p>and the execution of the cheque. According to the revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner\/accused, the cheque in question is the one which<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.NO.1561 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                              :-4-:\n<\/p>\n<p>he entrusted with one Ramakrishna as a security when the<\/p>\n<p>accused obtained loan from the said Ramakrishna. So the<\/p>\n<p>signature as well as the execution of cheque are admitted by<\/p>\n<p>the accused. Therefore, the question to be considered is<\/p>\n<p>how far the accused succeeded in establishing his version<\/p>\n<p>especially, as to how the cheque reached in the hands of the<\/p>\n<p>complainant. Regarding this aspect, absolutely there is no<\/p>\n<p>evidence     adduced by the accused except his own<\/p>\n<p>explanation. It was under the above factual circumstances,<\/p>\n<p>the trial court as well as the lower appellate court repelled<\/p>\n<p>the plea raised by the defence and found against him and<\/p>\n<p>accordingly, came into a conclusion that the complainant<\/p>\n<p>has succeeded in establishing his case against the accused.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, I find no merit in the revision petition.<\/p>\n<p>      5.     Learned counsel for the revision petitioner<\/p>\n<p>submitted that if this Court is not inclined to interfere with<\/p>\n<p>the order of conviction, some breathing time may be<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.NO.1561 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                             :-5-:\n<\/p>\n<p>granted to the revision petitioner to pay the amount and to<\/p>\n<p>receive the sentence. This Court cannot ignore the fact that<\/p>\n<p>the cheque is dated 30.9.2007 for a substantial amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.75,000\/-. Though the trial court imposed the sentence of<\/p>\n<p>three months simple imprisonment while ordering the<\/p>\n<p>payment of Rs.75,000\/- as compensation, the lower<\/p>\n<p>appellate court reduced the substantial sentence to one day<\/p>\n<p>and directed the revision petitioner to pay the amount. So<\/p>\n<p>far, no amount is paid to the complainant and therefore,<\/p>\n<p>while granting some time to the revision petitioner to make<\/p>\n<p>the payment, the amount of compensation can be enhanced<\/p>\n<p>to Rs.80,000\/- (Rupees Eighty Thousand only) which will be<\/p>\n<p>sufficient to meet the ends of justice, especially in the light<\/p>\n<p>of the decision reported in <a href=\"\/doc\/1594211\/\">Damodar.S.Prabhu v. Sayed<\/p>\n<p>Babalal.H.<\/a> [JT 2010(4) SC 457] wherein it was held that in<\/p>\n<p>the case of dishonour of cheques, the compensatory aspect<\/p>\n<p>of the remedy should be given priority over the punitive<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.NO.1561 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                               :-6-:\n<\/p>\n<p>aspects.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.   In the result, this Criminal Revision Petition is<\/p>\n<p>disposed of confirming the conviction of the revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner under Section 138 of the N.I.Act as recorded by<\/p>\n<p>the trial court as well as the lower appellate court.<\/p>\n<p>Regarding the sentence, the sentence modified and refixed<\/p>\n<p>by the lower appellate court         is maintained, but the<\/p>\n<p>compensation amount is enhanced to Rs.80,000\/- (Rupees<\/p>\n<p>Eighty Thousand only) which shall be paid by the revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner to the complainant, and in case of default in<\/p>\n<p>making the payment, the revision petitioner is directed to<\/p>\n<p>undergo       simple    imprisonment   for  three   months.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, the revision petitioner is directed to appear<\/p>\n<p>before the trial court on 20.8.2010 to receive the sentence<\/p>\n<p>and to make the payment of compensation as revised and<\/p>\n<p>refixed by this court. In case of any failure on the part of<\/p>\n<p>the revision petitioner in appearing before the court below<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.NO.1561 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                              :-7-:\n<\/p>\n<p>as directed above, the trial court is free to take coercive<\/p>\n<p>steps to procure the presence of the revision petitioner and<\/p>\n<p>to execute the sentence and to realise the compensation<\/p>\n<p>amount.     The coercive steps, if any, pending against the<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner shall be deferred till 20.8.2010.<\/p>\n<p>                                           V.K.Mohanan,<br \/>\n                                                Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>MBS\/<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.NO.1561 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                           :-8-:\n<\/p>\n<p>                                       V.K.MOHANAN, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                              &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        Crl.A.NO. OF 200<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                                     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                                           J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>                                           DATED: -2-2010<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.NO.1561 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                           :-9-:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1561 of 2010() 1. CHANDRASHEKHARA HOLLA, ART MASTER, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. UNNIKRISHNA, S\/O.LATE NARAYANAN NAIR, &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE For Petitioner :SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-217785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-15T02:08:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-15T02:08:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1053,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010\",\"name\":\"Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-15T02:08:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-15T02:08:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-15T02:08:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010"},"wordCount":1053,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010","name":"Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-15T02:08:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekhara-holla-vs-unnikrishna-on-20-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chandrashekhara Holla vs Unnikrishna on 20 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217785"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217785\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}