{"id":217994,"date":"2011-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011"},"modified":"2015-07-30T15:11:42","modified_gmt":"2015-07-30T09:41:42","slug":"mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 7 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 7 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                          In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                  at\n                                                         New\u00a0Delhi\n\n             \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2009\/001238\n                                                                                            \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0        \u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a07,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a07,\u00a02011\n\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n\n                    Shri\u00a0Bal\u00a0Krishan\u00a0Sharma\n                    H.No.173\u00a0-\u00a0A\n                    Surya\u00a0Nagar\n                    Tarron\u00a0Ki\u00a0Koot\n                    Tonk\u00a0Road\n                    Jaipur\u00a0-\u00a0302011\n\n                    Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present.\n\n           Respondent(s)\n\n                    Prasar\u00a0Bharati\n                    O\/o\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Station\u00a0Director\n                    All\u00a0India\u00a0\u00a0Radio\n                    Jaipur.\n\n\n\n                    Represented\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0: Shri\u00a0\u00a0Atul\u00a0Gupta,\u00a0AIR,\u00a0Jaipur\n                                                Shri\u00a0\u00a0Ram\u00a0Avatar\u00a0Meena\n                                                Shri\u00a0\u00a0Gokul\u00a0Goswami,\u00a0Asst.Station\u00a0Director\n                                                Shri\u00a0Ram\u00a0Karan\u00a0Meena\n\n\n\n       Information\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                             at\n                                                    New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                  \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2009\/001238\n\n\n                           Adjunct\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0captioned\u00a0\u00a0CIC\u00a0Order\u00a0dated\u00a01.10.2009.\n\n\n\n                                                         ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>\u00a01.   The\u00a0decision\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0abovementioned\u00a0Order\u00a0is\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0below:\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0request\u00a0(without\u00a0any\u00a0date)\u00a0\u00a0was\u00a0received\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      CPIO\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a028.7.08.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a026.8.08,\u00a0\u00a0within\u00a0one\u00a0month\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0request,\u00a0after\u00a0assessing\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      volume\u00a0 of\u00a0 information\u00a0 to \u00a0 be\u00a0 provided\u00a0to\u00a0 the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0the\u00a0 CPIO\u00a0 \u00a0 requested\u00a0for\u00a0Rs\u00a028\/\u00ad\u00a0 \u00a0 to\u00a0be \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      deposited \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 information. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 stated \u00a0 that \u00a0 he \u00a0 has \u00a0 not \u00a0 received \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0dated\u00a026.8.08\u00a0asking\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0furnish\u00a0Rs\u00a028\/\u00ad\u00a0 \u00a0towards\u00a0photocopying \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      charges\u00a0and\u00a0tht\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0accordingly \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      directs\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0proof\u00a0of\u00a0dispatch\u00a0of\u00a0reply\u00a0on\u00a0\u00a026.8.08\u00a0\u00a0including\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0page \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      of \u00a0 dispatch\u00a0 register,\u00a0 and\u00a0 any\u00a0 other\u00a0 document\u00a0 in\u00a0 this\u00a0 connection,\u00a0 falling\u00a0 which\u00a0 information\u00a0 to\u00a0 be \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      provided\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0showcause\u00a0why\u00a0penalty\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0on\u00a0him\u00a0for\u00a0the \u00a0<br \/>\n                                                                                                                               th\u00a0<br \/>\n      delay\u00a0in\u00a0furnishing\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0explanation\u00a0to\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a0 \u00a05<\/p>\n<p>      November, \u00a0 2009. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellant,\u00a0 on\u00a0 receipt\u00a0 of\u00a0 proof\u00a0 received\u00a0 by\u00a0 him,\u00a0 to\u00a0 deposit \u00a0 Rs\u00a0 28\/\u00ad\u00a0 \u00a0 (as \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      assessed\/informed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0\u00a0within\u00a0one\u00a0month\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application)\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0\u00a0to \u00a0<br \/>\n                                            th<br \/>\n      furnish\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0before\u00a05 \u00a0November,\u00a02009.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 2.         The\u00a0Commission\u00a0received\u00a0a\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a017.11.09\u00a0 \u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0complaining\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0are\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           some\u00a0discrepancies\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0regarding\u00a0 \u00a0dispatch\u00a0of\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           Application\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0seeking\u00a0a\u00a0re\u00adhearing.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0therefore\u00a0decided\u00a0to\u00a0hold\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0hearing\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           on\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0and\u00a0accordingly\u00a0issued\u00a0notices\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0parties\u00a0on\u00a013.6.2011\u00a0directing\u00a0them\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           be\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0hearing\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0\u00a0held\u00a0on\u00a07.7.2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>3.         \u00a0 During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0maintained\u00a0his\u00a0position\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0the\u00a0additional\u00a0fee\u00a0was\u00a0requested\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           from\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a026.8.08\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0paid\u00a0\u00a0Rs\u00a028\/\u00ad\u00a0only\u00a0on\u00a03.11.2010\u00a0after\u00a0which\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           the\u00a0\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0on\u00a04.11.2010.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0\u00a0Commission\u00a0\u00a0accordingly\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0affirming\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           information \u00a0 \u00a0 as \u00a0 available \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 records \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0 provided \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 . \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 complete\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           information\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0included\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Affidavit.\u00a0The\u00a0\u00a0Affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a010\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           August,\u00a02011.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>4.         In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0furnishing\u00a0of\u00a0information,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0return\u00a0Rs\u00a028\/\u00ad\u00a0which\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0collected\u00a0as\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           photocopying\u00a0charges,\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0also\u00a0to\u00a0furnish\u00a0an\u00a0\u00a0Affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0affirming\u00a0the\u00a0fact.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                            \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                    Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>1.         Shri\u00a0Bal\u00a0Krishan\u00a0Sharma<br \/>\n           H.No.173\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0A<br \/>\n           Surya\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n           Tarron\u00a0Ki\u00a0Koot<br \/>\n           Tonk\u00a0Road<br \/>\n          Jaipur\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0302011<\/p>\n<p>2.        The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n          Prasar\u00a0Bharat<br \/>\n          O\/o\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Station\u00a0Director<br \/>\n          All\u00a0India\u00a0\u00a0Radio<br \/>\n          Jaipur.\n<\/p>\n<pre>3.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0     The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0\n          Prasar\u00a0Bharati\n          O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Director\u00a0General\u00a0(WR)\n          AIR,\u00a0Broadcasting\u00a0\u00a0House\n          Backbay\u00a0Reclaim\n          Mumbai\u00a0-\u00a0400\u00a0020.\u00a0\n\n4.        Officer\u00a0incharge\u00a0NIC.\n\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act,\u00a0giving\u00a0<br \/>\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00a0application,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0complaint.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 7 July, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2009\/001238 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a07,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a07,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Bal\u00a0Krishan\u00a0Sharma H.No.173\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0A Surya\u00a0Nagar Tarron\u00a0Ki\u00a0Koot Tonk\u00a0Road Jaipur\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0302011 Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present. Respondent(s) Prasar\u00a0Bharati O\/o\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Station\u00a0Director All\u00a0India\u00a0\u00a0Radio Jaipur. Represented\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0: Shri\u00a0\u00a0Atul\u00a0Gupta,\u00a0AIR,\u00a0Jaipur Shri\u00a0\u00a0Ram\u00a0Avatar\u00a0Meena Shri\u00a0\u00a0Gokul\u00a0Goswami,\u00a0Asst.Station\u00a0Director Shri\u00a0Ram\u00a0Karan\u00a0Meena Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2009\/001238 Adjunct\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0captioned\u00a0\u00a0CIC\u00a0Order\u00a0dated\u00a01.10.2009. ORDER Background \u00a01. The\u00a0decision\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0abovementioned\u00a0Order\u00a0is\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0below:\u00a0 The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0request\u00a0(without\u00a0any\u00a0date)\u00a0\u00a0was\u00a0received\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-217994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-30T09:41:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 7 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-30T09:41:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":571,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-30T09:41:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 7 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-30T09:41:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 7 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-30T09:41:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011"},"wordCount":571,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011","name":"Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-30T09:41:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-bal-krishanasharma-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Bal Krishanasharma vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 7 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217994\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}