{"id":218877,"date":"2010-04-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010"},"modified":"2015-02-06T20:16:21","modified_gmt":"2015-02-06T14:46:21","slug":"united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010","title":{"rendered":"United India Insurance Company &#8230; vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Rajasthan High Court &#8211; Jodhpur<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">United India Insurance Company &#8230; vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                                            1\n\n             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN\n                              AT JODHPUR\n\n                                    :JUDGMENT:\n\n\n\n             United India Insurance Company Ltd.\n                         Vs.\n             Bhanwariya &amp; Others\n             (S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.617\/1997)\n\n\n\n             DATE OF JUDGMENT :                   April 12, 2010\n\n                                     PRESENT\n\n                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS\n                __________________________________________\n\n\n             Mr. R.K. Mehta for the appellant.\n             Mr. S. Saruparia for the respondents.\nReportable\n\n             BY THE COURT :<\/pre>\n<p>                   Appellant United India Insurance Company has<\/p>\n<p>             preferred this appeal under Section 30 of the Workman<\/p>\n<p>             Compensation Act against judgment dated 31.03.1997<\/p>\n<p>             passed by the Commissioner, Workman Compensation,<\/p>\n<p>             Udaipur   in   Case    No.44\/93,     whereby,    the    learned<\/p>\n<p>             Commissioner passed award in favour of respondent<\/p>\n<p>             No1 applicant and a sum of Rs.83,515\/- was allowed as<\/p>\n<p>             compensation along with interest at the rate of 6% after<\/p>\n<p>             one   month    from     the   date   of   accident,    which   is<\/p>\n<p>             02.03.1991,     till    payment      of    the   amount        of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>compensation; and, further ordered to pay penalty of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.20,878\/-, 25% of the amount of compensation,<\/p>\n<p>within 60 days.\n<\/p>\n<p>     First of all, with regard to imposition of penalty<\/p>\n<p>upon the insurance company, learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>appellant   invited   attention   of    the   Court   towards<\/p>\n<p>judgment of this Bench rendered in the case of United<\/p>\n<p>India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Kanwari Devi &amp;<\/p>\n<p>Others, reported in MACD 2010 (1) (Raj.) 196, in which,<\/p>\n<p>while following the judgment of Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court,<\/p>\n<p>rendered in Kamla Chaturvedi&#8217;s case, (2009) 1 SCC<\/p>\n<p>487, this Bench has held that liability of penalty against<\/p>\n<p>the insurance company is not justified and it is to be<\/p>\n<p>paid by the employer.       Therefore, while following the<\/p>\n<p>above   judgment,     the   liability   fastened    upon   the<\/p>\n<p>insurance company vide impugned judgment dated<\/p>\n<p>31.03.1997 with regard to penalty is hereby set aside<\/p>\n<p>as against the insurance company and shifted upon the<\/p>\n<p>employer.     If the said amount has been paid to the<\/p>\n<p>claimant the insurance company shall be entitled to<\/p>\n<p>recover the said amount from the employer.<\/p>\n<p>     Learned      counsel   for   the   insurance     company<\/p>\n<p>vehemently argued that the Commissioner, Workman<\/p>\n<p>Compensation has committed an error while awarding<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>compensation in favour of the respondents because<\/p>\n<p>while passing the award the learned Commissioner has<\/p>\n<p>not considered the policy of tractor No.RJB 6360, upon<\/p>\n<p>which, the accident took place.                  The insurance<\/p>\n<p>company has covered the risk of driver only and risk of<\/p>\n<p>cleaner was not covered by the appellant insurance<\/p>\n<p>company, therefore, the award impugned deserves to<\/p>\n<p>be quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      It is submitted in the appeal that the learned<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner has erred in not considering the sitting<\/p>\n<p>capacity of the tractor No.RJB 6360 which is evident<\/p>\n<p>from the registration certificate of the tractor which was<\/p>\n<p>on file, in which, it is clearly mentioned that the sitting<\/p>\n<p>capacity, including the driver, is one; meaning thereby,<\/p>\n<p>the insurance company has insured the driver only and<\/p>\n<p>not other person because it is not permissible by the<\/p>\n<p>registering authority.      The net argument of learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel     for   the   appellant    is   that    the   learned<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner      has erred       in holding the insurance<\/p>\n<p>company liable for the risk of cleaner            which is not<\/p>\n<p>covered under the policy.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Learned     counsel   for     the   appellant,    for   the<\/p>\n<p>aforesaid    purpose,    invited    my     attention    towards<\/p>\n<p>regulation 28 of the Rules of Road Regulations 1989, in<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>which, it is provided that a driver while driving a tractor<\/p>\n<p>shall not carry or allow any person to be carried on the<\/p>\n<p>tractor and a driver of goods carriage shall not shall not<\/p>\n<p>carry in the driver&#8217;s cabin more number of persons than<\/p>\n<p>that is mentioned in the registration certificate and shall<\/p>\n<p>not carry passengers for hire or reward. While referring<\/p>\n<p>to Regulation 28, learned counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n<p>invited my attention towards judgment reported in 2009<\/p>\n<p>ACJ 1828 of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, rendered in<\/p>\n<p>the case of Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd.<\/p>\n<p>Vs. Eshwar &amp; Others, in which, said regulation was<\/p>\n<p>considered and it has been held that according to<\/p>\n<p>Regulation 28 of the Rules of Road Regulations, the<\/p>\n<p>driver is prohibited to be carried on a tractor.<\/p>\n<p>      Learned      counsel         appearing        on     behalf    of<\/p>\n<p>respondents submits that in this case conduct of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant   is   required     to       be   seen.        Before     the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner,          Workman              Compensation,           no<\/p>\n<p>documentary evidence whatsoever was produced by the<\/p>\n<p>appellant insurance company, so also, no evidence<\/p>\n<p>whatsoever       has   been   produced         by    the    insurance<\/p>\n<p>company and, on the contrary, counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n<p>is misleading this Court that in view of Regulation 28 of<\/p>\n<p>the Rules of Road Regulations, 1989, the driver is<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>prohibited to carry or allow any person to be carried on<\/p>\n<p>a tractor.\n<\/p>\n<p>        While inviting my attention towards judgment<\/p>\n<p>reported in 2006 ACJ 2212, New India Assurance Co.<\/p>\n<p>Ltd. Vs. Sita &amp; Others, it is submitted by learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel appearing on behalf of the workman that as per<\/p>\n<p>the said judgment the plea taken by the petitioner for<\/p>\n<p>the first time before this Court cannot be considered.<\/p>\n<p>        I have considered the rival submissions made by<\/p>\n<p>both the parties and perused the judgments cited by<\/p>\n<p>both the parties and, so also, the facts of the present<\/p>\n<p>case.\n<\/p>\n<p>        Admittedly,   the   insurance   company    is    not<\/p>\n<p>disputing the accident nor it is disputed that the<\/p>\n<p>workman was cleaner upon the tractor in question.         It<\/p>\n<p>is also one of the important aspects of the matter that<\/p>\n<p>no documentary evidence whatsoever was produced by<\/p>\n<p>the insurance company which is evident from the<\/p>\n<p>observation made by the workman in para 5 of the<\/p>\n<p>judgment.        It is also not disputed by the appellant<\/p>\n<p>insurance company that the vehicle in question was<\/p>\n<p>insured with the insurance company.       Further, there is<\/p>\n<p>no   objection    before    the   Commissioner,   Workman<\/p>\n<p>Compensation that the claimant was passenger upon<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                              6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the tractor.   In this view of the matter, if no evidence<\/p>\n<p>was produced by the insurance company before the<\/p>\n<p>Workman Compensation Commissioner, then, in view of<\/p>\n<p>the judgment reported in 2006 ACJ 2212, rendered in<\/p>\n<p>the case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sita &amp;<\/p>\n<p>Others (supra), at this stage, the appellant cannot be<\/p>\n<p>permitted to raise any ground contrary to the plea<\/p>\n<p>taken     before      the     Commissioner,       Workman<\/p>\n<p>Compensation.       Para 21 of the aforesaid judgment<\/p>\n<p>reads as under :\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>        &#8220;21. Therefore, in view of the above legal<br \/>\n        position even if the more number of<br \/>\n        persons were travelling in the truck then it<br \/>\n        has no adverse affect on the claim of the<br \/>\n        claimants and upon the claim of the<br \/>\n        insured to claim reimbursement from the<br \/>\n        insurance company.           The judgments<br \/>\n        relied upon by learned counsel for the<br \/>\n        appellant which was delivered in the cases<br \/>\n        of <a href=\"\/doc\/1761200\/\">New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Asha<br \/>\n        Rani,<\/a> 2003 ACJ 1 (SC) and Oriental<br \/>\n        Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Devireddy Konada<br \/>\n        Reddy, 2003 ACJ 468 (SC), have no<br \/>\n        application to the facts of this case in view<br \/>\n        of the fact that the insurance company<br \/>\n        itself specifically undertook liability of the<br \/>\n        persons engaged in the work of unloading<br \/>\n        of the fodder in this case, I do not find any<br \/>\n        force in the submission of the learned<br \/>\n        counsel for the appellant that the<br \/>\n        appellant can take plea of limit of liability<br \/>\n        at this stage on the plea that the<br \/>\n        insurance company can be directed to pay<br \/>\n        the compensation to the claimants only up<br \/>\n        to the extent of the amount which can be<br \/>\n        awarded to the employees under the<br \/>\n        provisions        of     the      Workmen&#8217;s<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>           Compensation Act, 1923. Neither it was<br \/>\n           pleaded by the insurance company in the<br \/>\n           reply nor it was argued before the<br \/>\n           Tribunal and nor it has been raised as<br \/>\n           ground in the memo of appeal.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      As a result of the foregoing, this appeal is partly<\/p>\n<p>allowed.      While upholding the award passed in favour<\/p>\n<p>of   the    workman    by   the   Commissioner,   Workman<\/p>\n<p>Compensation, impugned award is modified to the<\/p>\n<p>extent that the liability fastened upon the insurance<\/p>\n<p>company vide impugned judgment dated 31.03.1997<\/p>\n<p>with regard to penalty is hereby set aside as against the<\/p>\n<p>insurance company and shifted upon the employer.       If<\/p>\n<p>the said amount has been paid to the claimant the<\/p>\n<p>insurance company shall be entitled to recover the said<\/p>\n<p>amount from the employer.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                             (Gopal Krishan Vyas) J.\n<\/p>\n<p>Ojha, a.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court &#8211; Jodhpur United India Insurance Company &#8230; vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Bhanwariya &amp; Others (S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.617\/1997) DATE OF JUDGMENT : April 12, 2010 PRESENT HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-218877","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court-jodhpur"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>United India Insurance Company ... vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"United India Insurance Company ... vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-04-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-06T14:46:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"United India Insurance Company &#8230; vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-06T14:46:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1260,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010\",\"name\":\"United India Insurance Company ... vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-06T14:46:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"United India Insurance Company &#8230; vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"United India Insurance Company ... vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"United India Insurance Company ... vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-04-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-06T14:46:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"United India Insurance Company &#8230; vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010","datePublished":"2010-04-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-06T14:46:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010"},"wordCount":1260,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010","name":"United India Insurance Company ... vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-04-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-06T14:46:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-company-vs-bhanwariya-ors-on-12-april-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"United India Insurance Company &#8230; vs Bhanwariya &amp; Ors on 12 April, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218877","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218877"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218877\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218877"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218877"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218877"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}