{"id":218907,"date":"2009-01-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009"},"modified":"2016-06-15T09:59:57","modified_gmt":"2016-06-15T04:29:57","slug":"smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Manjula Chellur Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT 0}? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE mm DAY OF' JANUARY,' 3009\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE I-iON\"BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANg}!Ji.;A~CiA*1EI..L\u00a7I_R ~ .. \n\nAND\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE  sREEN:%gA3E\u00ab. \n\nc.<::.c. N9. 61:2i eF 20:3?   3\n\nBetween:\n\n1. 1  '  V  V\nKyvicicw 6:'.   'Sk1\u20ac:tty,\nagsd about y.\u00a2:;_a\u00a7s\u00bb~.*'\n\n2.  ., Dr.  'Shctxy,\n. S,-*9 latti 'B.\u00a7_.__'Sh$tty,\n5\u00bbAgeii. about 63 years\n\n- ' \u00bb7\u00a7'\u00a71\u00a2' Cemplaizmnts No. 1 and 2\nA }XI'e"Ljrc$idh1g at "Vathsalya",\n Kacizi\u00e9i Rama Rae Compound,\n.. Opp: Balia} Garage,\nhsiangalcm 575 062. [}.K.\n\n\u00ab'   Jagaveevan Shetty,\n\nS\/0 I:3.B. Shatty,\n\nHindu, aged 59 y\ufb01azrs,\n\nRfat N{).4---123,\n\n"Vigl\ufb01shwara" Behind: Indravaili\nHigh $511001, Kunjibcttu Post,\nUdupi 576 102.\n\n\n\n4. Dr. Shubhalatha Shatty,\nD\/0 iate BB. Sh;-::tty,    \nW\/0 Dr. Santosh Kumar S}:_11,_._I_.\u00a3tS\u00bb Act prayixag to initiate contempt\n\" \" pr\u20ac:ncac'diI1g:3~_ against thc resmrzdents for having\n ' _{i\u20acii\u00a5:)eram1y_ disobeying the order dated 28.08.2006 passed\n ;x;..Tw;%\u00a7=i%f;~.z\u00a2'. 32861\/.2002 {KLR).\n\nL X 'Tf1i$__\"C..<\u00a7:;C3. earning on far Orders, this day, MANJULA\n CHEL\u00a2L1'_\u00a7R. J. made the foliowingr\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Heard. This cantempt proceedings are iaunchcd,<\/p>\n
V   _u_ f+::omp}ai:1ing that the ac<:u$\u20acf  <\/p>\n
Petition No.37861\/2002 (KLR) ciated 28.a.%;2cio{a.’ 77.] .<\/p>\n
2. Brief facts leading to \ufb01nngjcf   %a:\u00a2T;T;s % <\/p>\n
under:\n<\/p>\n
It is the <":ompia:'inant's   i958 Sy;
\nN0.361, 5, 6, 8 and g   of Nittc
\nVillage 91' Karkaja  lease basis in<\/p>\n
faVOLII'.V1:.(er,V_ to gew cashew crops under
\nRule 2    Sauth Kanara Districzt lease<\/p>\n
of Lsancis fox;  Ci\ufb01ll\ufb01va\ufb01on Rules 1957. The said<\/p>\n
‘V   fa\u00a7i*..\u00a7 period of 30 years subject 1:0 condition that<\/p>\n
  ganmd, one fif::.h of the lands should be<\/p>\n
broi1–ght. i.1::\u00e9iier cashew cultivation within a year and the<\/p>\n
H ” ‘A  . \u00a7I3\u20acj.1ff3  shcuid he brought under cashaw cultivation<\/p>\n
   the next 5 yaars and at least: them should be 50<\/p>\n
T ” ‘7C$.shcw trees ii} {me acre. (311 16.3. 1989 spot iI1Sp\u20ac(:tiOI1 of<\/p>\n
A. the Tahsildar of Karkala, it was found that the entire<\/p>\n
Eands ware not braught ‘\u00a31I”1d\u20acI’ cashew ctiiiivation and a<\/p>\n
repnrt was also sent to the Deputy   f!.\u00a7r<\/p>\n
fuzther action. Thereafter, after notifying __t1;::: ctjn\u00e9emed <\/p>\n
agreement heider, the Tahsildagf  <\/p>\n
impugxed ordar (:ance3ling \u20acI 1e    7’t11c5;’: <\/p>\n
1958.\n<\/p>\n
3. Agg:ri1=.:ve.d by the   and<\/p>\n
others approar3fis:\u00a7i:VI’*2he:=’\u00a7{a:1?\u00a7:\u00e9Lta\u00a3\u00a7:\u00e9 Tribunal (KAT)<\/p>\n
in   24_1f92. The KAT allcwe\u00e9 both
\nthe appe\u00e9a\u00e9s-  by  the impugned orders pa$$(:”:(;i<\/p>\n
by  “B.epu.i;y’= Qgntimxi-ssioner cancelling the agztem\ufb01nt of<\/p>\n
    held that the appeliants are at liberty<\/p>\n
iio_  ::1:1ie Land at the rate \ufb01xed under the<\/p>\n
V . ag\u00e9\u00e9m\u20ac:\ufb01\u00a3.’~ ‘How:-:ver nething saems ts) have been made by<\/p>\n
H K   Re\\.?\u00e9:I:riu<:t Authorities subsequent to the esrdcr 6f the<\/p>\n
-‘   dated 8.3.1993. The complainaiat anti others<\/p>\n
 \u00e9\ufb01preached this Celirt in W. P. N0.37861\/2002. After<\/p>\n
hearing learned Cmansci for both the parties. this Court<\/p>\n
passii-..d the foiiewing ar\ufb01cr:\n<\/p>\n
‘The writ petition ie allowe\u00e9. The Tahsilda3f,_
\nKarkaimsecond respondent is directed”. .4
\nconsider the representation of the”””\ufb01rst..__
\npetitioner as per Annexure-E to  Writ” ”
\npetitien dated 28.8.2002 and dispmsef{:2f\u00bbt1’1e<~A
\nsame within six m0nths'J\ufb01;or1:g_ti'?;e_;date_ ef A
\nreceipt of this order er pm\ufb01tzc\ufb01exa of eefti\ufb01e-\ufb01e  : VT A
\ncopy, whichever is earlier."    W '~ =  '<\/p>\n
4. The order of this is deted:  sand \u00a313<\/p>\n
per the direction “\u00a3’SZfi1Ii”1iIiVV6 \ufb01mnths from<\/p>\n
the date of receipt ef order the flue T<\/p>\n
respeiidexitgiifi\ufb01e ‘0f”:t11e representaiien dated.<\/p>\n
28.2.\u00a7\u20ac}G’2.. A  n<\/p>\n
5,.\u00bb  .%Keeerdi1’1gte_j;b.e complainant, nething seems to have<\/p>\n
‘ Lbeen \u00bb December, 2087. He approached thie<\/p>\n
   A<\/p>\n
  eentempt proceedings seeking ac\ufb01en against<\/p>\n
  accused Sri. Muraiidher, who was the<\/p>\n
” ATe;i1ei1dar, Taluk Office, Karkale at the time of filing of<\/p>\n
 1:he eentempt preceedings.\n<\/p>\n
Mmaiidhar took charge as Tahsiidar  %  <\/p>\n
Tham1irbavikatti on 8.8.2007′.  1:’. tztxe  pf    <\/p>\n
complainant were to be that, wi1′::Z:1in’_ si:’&  ifhe<\/p>\n
date of receiyt cf the the \u00e9rd\ufb01r  <\/p>\n
WP. No.3786i\/2002 Jtiyszre  on the
\npart of the ‘i’ahsi1da3’   –.\/we dimction, he
\nmight. to hav\u00a2.Vn”-sgxdc   accused as he
\nwas the   .\n<\/p>\n
9. ‘F.1_}e1j1.  second aspect of \ufb02il\ufb01 matter
\nwhethefth\u00e9  xizhe authorised person to grant<\/p>\n
}e3.$\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9i’Eznr f”1xi’ng t’.h\u20ac: V\ufb01aricxe. WE have perused the records<\/p>\n
   us by the present accused i.e. Mr.<\/p>\n
 x%\u00a7}{o states that after he took charge of the<\/p>\n
V –V oi\ufb01\u00e9tz  Taluk o\ufb01ice, Karkala, Whatever he ccmid do,<\/p>\n
V’ V’ \u00bb1’i\u20aci;i”‘.=:T;1SVIZVif0\u00a51(‘3. it is: nnticed frem the rmurd that by the time<\/p>\n
‘    c\u00e9me: to be posted ‘(:0 Karkala there was spat iIC1$p\u20acC’d{3I1<\/p>\n
‘4  which d:i$C10$es the other unauthnrised occupants<\/p>\n
occixpying the Lands in qtzcstiang who had aiready sought<\/p>\n
for mgularisation 0f the lands hc.I~\u00b0:1–.  Xja\ufb01x\u00bb  <\/p>\n
appiica\ufb01ons were pending    A  I<\/p>\n
Committee. Meanwhile  3,0
\nthe Deputy Commissioner, i\u00a7 t\ufb01\u00e9 ‘\u00a2’=h;3{tf.v1.j,1al:Vf\u00a2’:1ut11c:>rit3\u00ab’ to
\nlease: the zands \u00a3o:%%%.%Lg~;ashfcx\u00bb:k%} bringing to the
\nnotice ef the facts  that initially
\nbefore thtj   \u00e9\ufb01iiimissiener concerned
\ni.e.,  Va party. whue \ufb01ling Writ
\npetitg\ufb01jn   Commissions!” concerned,
\nthe  bf   whose limits Nitte Village is<\/p>\n
sittgiated was\ufb02also made as a party. However, there was a<\/p>\n
.A \u00a7:iir\u00a7<:f.ig'31*3.A  __1"3}(": QM respondent in the writ petition<\/p>\n
   then) to consider the representation<\/p>\n
of {hue who was not campetent autharity to<\/p>\n
V' V' ., \u00e9siasid\u00e9r the repnascntatinn, either to gent, lease or<\/p>\n
 the Land ta tha tmauthorised ca-ccupants. Under<\/p>\n
2  Land Grant Ruies, it is the {Deputy Commi$sioncr<\/p>\n
alone who could exercise ihfi power under the respective<\/p>\n
Rules and the Tahsikiar was not an authmfity to pass any<\/p>\n
of the erciers Concerned. Even if he passes <\/p>\n
it would be an order men est; in 1;\u00a71e eye–'0i' =1efw.""w..HQweiIer. <\/p>\n
the materials brought an Ieceijd f3}\u00a7\ufb02\ufb01* .<\/p>\n
preeent accused tried  %am  if:\n<\/p>\n
August, 200? by bri;_:g’ng   Deputy
\nCommissiener, the   s\u00a71<::h er\u00e9lers could
\nnot be made   ef the
\n his eeunter affidavit and
\nthe evV\u00a7cici;ee';*'i:e'   why it was not possible for<\/p>\n
him to\u00bb take p'Qsit_i\\re–'ae\ufb01on beeauee of men existence 9:"<\/p>\n
 *  ."%11\u00a717hGI\ufb01trV ef' *-**-Wer vested in him to pass such erder.<\/p>\n
 Ij\ufb01der uitimately the Ceurt has te<\/p>\n
ee:;\u00e9ider.ii?\u00a7\u00a7e3:l1er the present accused has disebeyed the<\/p>\n
"-..direetie;\u00a7~ of the Gouzt willfully in ereier to attract contempt<\/p>\n
4.\/f\ufb01:.:,*:f{:,ie\u00a7i;”;.*3 against him. The fact is, the Tahsildar against<\/p>\n
  __’e5hem such order was passed who was ineharge of<\/p>\n
 Karkala Taluk Office till 7.8.2200′? is net made 3.  and<\/p>\n
the party before us \ufb01as expiained why it was not possible<\/p>\n
fer him tee pass such erciers,<\/p>\n
30. The complainant While t3.k.”iI}g.8    _ <\/p>\n
petition ought to have been mere
\nshould have exercised Eliligefsee.’  {hie bee\ufb01
\nperson to know whether the the writ
\npetitien, i.e., The  to pass any
\norders on   complainant as
\ndirected  wt’-3 Wrong on the part
\nof    ” that it was for the
\n  that he is not the competent<\/p>\n
authqrigy;  was We\ufb02 aware that before the<\/p>\n
 V’  _ A’  Tahsii\u20aci\u00e9r””Was not even \u00a31 party and the orders 01?<\/p>\n
  iihew’ Qgnmmiesiener was set aside. It was the<\/p>\n
Qeputy%~ Genimissiolaer who could pass orders as directed<\/p>\n
  t}i\u20ac’:.R’P1’ibuna1 by \ufb01xing the rate. From Armexure E<\/p>\n
 28.2.2032, \ufb02ew the representatiun of the<\/p>\n
    ..e<3H}p1aiI1ant and ethers we no\ufb01ce that the very request of<\/p>\n
the complainant and others was to eempiy with the orders
\npasse\u00e9 by the KAT by executing necessary deed of<\/p>\n
eenveyanee in favetir ef the eempiainaxzt and others.<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
Wham the Tahsiidar was neat even a party hcfgfe’ <\/p>\n
is bcyend azly ‘bv0dy’s imagination to  b <\/p>\n
who is not a competent a1j%;1’1t>rity3 to ‘ -C\u00e9snsiiiftr $21916 ‘<\/p>\n
representation dated 2062.,  V   \ufb02ies?)<\/p>\n
circumstances we 33: of  them is no
\ndi\ufb01\ufb01b\ufb01di\ufb01fl\ufb01\ufb01, much  of the {)1″d6I’S
\nsf tha Cmlxt ‘giaigcd ;  ‘Jaccuscd herein.
\nAccordhlgly-{E1};\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-3
\nJudge<\/p>\n
Sd\/-V
\nIudge<\/p>\n
Vb\/~<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009 Author: Manjula Chellur Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT 0}? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE mm DAY OF’ JANUARY,’ 3009 PRESENT THE I-iON”BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANg}!Ji.;A~CiA*1EI..L\u00a7I_R ~ .. AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE sREEN:%gA3E\u00ab. c.<::.c. N9. 61:2i eF 20:3? 3 Between: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-218907","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-15T04:29:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-15T04:29:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1188,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-15T04:29:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-15T04:29:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-15T04:29:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009"},"wordCount":1188,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009","name":"Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-15T04:29:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-gulabi-b-shetty-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Gulabi B Shetty vs Sri Muralidhar on 16 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218907","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218907"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218907\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218907"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218907"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218907"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}