{"id":219047,"date":"2010-07-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2"},"modified":"2018-09-02T09:58:31","modified_gmt":"2018-09-02T04:28:31","slug":"valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 805 of 2004()\n\n\n1. VALSALA, D\/O.DEVAKI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. SURESH.S., SARITHA BHAVAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. BOBY, S\/O.SETHU, BOBY VILASOM,\n\n3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.KURIAKOSE PETER\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :30\/07\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n             A.K.BASHEER &amp; P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                        M.A.C.A.No.805 OF 2004\n                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                    Dated this the 30th day of July, 2010\n\n                                JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Appellant is the claimant in O.P.(MV)No.1579\/99 on the file of<\/p>\n<p>Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Punalur. She sustained a fracture<\/p>\n<p>dislocation of right shoulder, fracture neck of humerus and fracture<\/p>\n<p>greater tuberosity in a motor accident that occurred on November 4,<\/p>\n<p>1999 at about 10 a.m. when the bus bearing Reg.No.KRN\/3681 in<\/p>\n<p>which he was travelling         along Chadayamangalam-Pallickal public<\/p>\n<p>road, toppled and fell down in to the canal below at Kallladathanny.<\/p>\n<p>Alleging negligence against the second respondent, the driver of the<\/p>\n<p>bus, the claimant filed the O.P. under Section 166 of the Motor<\/p>\n<p>Vehicles Act before the Tribunal claiming a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,50,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2.    Respondents 1 and 2, the owner and the driver of the bus<\/p>\n<p>respectively, remained absent before the Tribunal.                      The third<\/p>\n<p>respondent, Insurance Company of the offending bus, filed a written<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.805\/2004                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>statement admitting the policy of the bus.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.    This O.P. was jointly tried along with several other O.Ps.<\/p>\n<p>filed by the other injured persons in the accident and a common award<\/p>\n<p>was passed. The first claimant was examined as PW17 and Exts.A72<\/p>\n<p>and A73 series were marked on the side of the claimants. On the side<\/p>\n<p>of the contesting third respondent Ext.B1 was marked.           On an<\/p>\n<p>appreciation of evidence, the Tribunal awarded a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 31,468\/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of petition till<\/p>\n<p>realisation. The claimant has now come up in appeal challenging the<\/p>\n<p>quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p>      4.    Heard the counsel for the appellant\/claimant and the<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the Insurance Company.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5.    The accident is not disputed. The finding of the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>that the accident occurred due to the negligence on the part of the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent is not challenged in this appeal. Therefore, the only<\/p>\n<p>question which arises for consideration is whether the claimants are<\/p>\n<p>entitled to any enhanced compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.    The break up of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.805\/2004                      3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>is as under :\n<\/p>\n<pre>      Loss of earning                 - Rs. 3,000\/-\n      Transportation expenses         - Rs. 1,000\/-\n      Extra nourishment               - Rs. 1,000\/-\n      Bystander expenses              - Rs. 1,000\/-\n      Medical expenses                - Rs. 308\/-\n      Pain and suffering              - Rs. 5,000\/-\n      Disability                      - Rs.20,160\/-\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>      7.    Counsel for the claimant sought enhancement of the<\/p>\n<p>compensation for the disability caused and for medical expenses.<\/p>\n<p>      8.    The Tribunal took the monthly income of the claimant as<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 1500\/- and took the percentage of disability as 7% and adopted a<\/p>\n<p>multiplier of 17 and awarded Rs.20,160\/- for the disability caused. The<\/p>\n<p>claimant was aged 36 at the time of the accident. As a tailor, she used<\/p>\n<p>to earn Rs.3,000\/- per month, according to her. Therefore, we feel that<\/p>\n<p>her monthly income can be reasonably fixed at Rs. 1,750\/-.               In<\/p>\n<p>Ext.A72, certificate of disability, it is noted that claimant has suffered a<\/p>\n<p>disability of 12% which appears to be reasonable in the light of the fact<\/p>\n<p>that she has undergone 41 days inpatient treatment for post traumatic<\/p>\n<p>stiffness of right shoulder in the Centre for Rehabilitation Care and<\/p>\n<p>Research, Thiruvananthapuram. The multiplier of 17 adopted by the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.805\/2004                     4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Tribunal is not seriously challenged. Thus calculated for the disability<\/p>\n<p>caused, the claimant is entitled to a compensation of Rs. 42,840\/- ( 12%<\/p>\n<p>x 1750 x 12 x 17). Thus on this count, the claimant is entitled to an<\/p>\n<p>additional compensation of Rs. 22,680\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>      9.     Towards     medical    expenses,   the  Tribunal  awarded<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 308\/-. The Tribunal has discarded Ext.A73 series bills as there was<\/p>\n<p>no office seal on the same. Taking into consideration the nature of the<\/p>\n<p>injury sustained by the claimant and the period of treatment undergone<\/p>\n<p>by her, we feel that a compensation of Rs. 10,000\/- would be<\/p>\n<p>reasonable for the medical expenses incurred by her. Thus on this<\/p>\n<p>count, the claimant is entitled to an additional compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.9692\/-. As regards the compensation awarded under other heads,<\/p>\n<p>we find the same to be reasonable and therefore are not disturbing the<\/p>\n<p>same.\n<\/p>\n<p>      10.    There is another aspect in this case. The Tribunal awarded<\/p>\n<p>interest only @ 6% per annum which appears to be very low. The<\/p>\n<p>claimants are entitled to interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of<\/p>\n<p>petition till realisation for the compensation already awarded and also<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.805\/2004                   5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>for the enhanced compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>      11.  In the result, the claimant is found entitled to an additional<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs. 32,372\/-. She is entitled to interest @ 7.5% per<\/p>\n<p>annum from the date of petition till realisation for the compensation<\/p>\n<p>already awarded and also for the enhanced compensation and<\/p>\n<p>proportionate cost.  The third respondent being the insurer of the<\/p>\n<p>offending vehicle shall deposit the amount before the Tribunal within<\/p>\n<p>two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The<\/p>\n<p>award of the Tribunal is modified to the above extent.<\/p>\n<p>      The Appeal is disposed of as found above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                          A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                       P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sv.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.805\/2004    6<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.805\/2004    7<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.805\/2004    8<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 805 of 2004() 1. VALSALA, D\/O.DEVAKI, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. SURESH.S., SARITHA BHAVAN, &#8230; Respondent 2. BOBY, S\/O.SETHU, BOBY VILASOM, 3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, For Petitioner :SRI.T.KURIAKOSE PETER For Respondent :SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL The Hon&#8217;ble MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-219047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-02T04:28:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-02T04:28:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":781,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2\",\"name\":\"Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-02T04:28:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-02T04:28:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-02T04:28:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2"},"wordCount":781,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2","name":"Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-02T04:28:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/valsala-vs-suresh-s-on-30-july-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Valsala vs Suresh.S. on 30 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219047"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219047\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}