{"id":219063,"date":"2007-11-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-11-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007"},"modified":"2017-09-04T11:36:46","modified_gmt":"2017-09-04T06:06:46","slug":"suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007","title":{"rendered":"Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\n\nDATED: 26.11.2007\n\nCORAM:\n\nTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN\n\nW.P.No.3428  of  1998 \nand W.P.M.P.No.1581 of 2007\n\nSuyamprakasam\t\t\t\t...  Petitioner\n\nVersus\n1. The District Collector\nThanjavur District, \nThanjavur. \n\n2. The Special  Tahsildar\nAdi Dravidar and  Tribal Welfare\nThanjavur. \t\t\t\t\t... Respondents\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\tPrayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorari as stated therein.\n\n\t\t        For Petitioner        :   Mr.V.K.Vijayaraghavan\n\t\t        For Respondent    :  Mr.P.Subramanian\n\t\t\t\t\t         Government Advocate\n\nO R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>\t The  above writ petition is filed for issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records  of the  first respondent   in Rc.No.594\/98\/M2 dated 9.1.1998 and quash the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t2. The petitioner  is the owner of the  land  measuring an extent  of 0.66.5 hectares comprised in S.No.59 A\/1, situated in Thirumalaisamudhiram Village in Thanjavur Taluk, which    has been under his personal  cultivation  for the past 30 years . The  said  land was acquired for the purpose of providing house sites under the Tamil  Nadu Acquisition  of Land for  Harijan Welfare Schemes as per Act 31 of 1978.  The petitioner  gave representation to the second respondent  on  28.10.1997  objecting the  proposal of the acquisition. The first respondent without  conducting any  enquiry  as contemplated under the  provisions  of the Act has passed the impugned order. The petitioner was neither heard nor  an opportunity was given to  him to make his  submissions, after the second respondent submitted his report.  Without following the principles of natural justice,  which are mandatory  the first respondent has passed the impugned order.  The petitioner&#8217;s land is an agricultural land.  There are other Government poramboke lands available  to the villagers.  A further legal contention  has been raised that the person who  has proceeded with the enquiry is not  authorised to conduct the enquiry under the statutory provisions.  The power vested with the the District   Collector  cannot be delegated to the District Revenue Officer to initiate proceedings under Section 4 of the Act.  In support of his contention learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on the decision of this Court in the case of  ANNAVU CHETTIAR VS. THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER, VILLUPURAM (2004 -1 -L.W.271).\n<\/p>\n<p>\t3. However, learned Government Advocate appearing  for the respondents submitted that  after issuance of Section  4(1) notification, the land has been acquired as early as 1998.  The award has been passed on 9.3.1998. The  petitioner has filed  the present writ petition and it was  admitted only  on  11.9.2001. The Supreme Court in the decision in   MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AHMEDNAGAR VS. SHAH  HYDERBEIG (AIR 2000 SC 671)  has held that  after the award was passed no writ petition could be filed   or maintained challenging    the acquisition proceedings.  This has been consistently followed    and one of the recent cases is C.PADMA VS. DEPUTY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (1997 (2) SCC 627), wherein  the Supreme  Court has observed as follows:-\n<\/p>\n<p> 4 . The admitted position is that pursuant to the notification published under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the Act) in GOR No. 1392 Industries dated 17-10-1962, total extent of 6 acres 41 cents of land in Madhavaram Village, Saidapet Taluk, Chengalpattu District in Tamil Nadu was acquired under Chapter VII of the Act for the manufacture of Synthetic Rasina by Tvl. Reichold Chemicals India Ltd., Madras. The acquisition proceedings had become final and possession of the land was taken on 30-4-1964. Pursuant to the agreement executed by the company, it was handed over to Tvl. Simpson and General Finance Co. which is a subsidiary of Reichold Chemicals India Ltd. It would appear that at a request made by the said company, 66 cents of land out of one acre 37 cents in respect of which the appellants originally had ownership, was transferred in GOMs No. 816 Industries dated 24-3-1971 in favour of another subsidiary company. Shri Rama Vilas Service Ltd., the 5th respondent which is also another subsidiary of the Company had requested for two acres 75 cents of land; the same came to be assigned on leasehold basis by the Government after resumption in terms of the agreement in GOMs No. 439 Industries dated 10-5-1985. In GOMs No. 546 Industries dated 30-3-1986, the same came to be approved of. Then the appellants challenged the original GOMs No. 1392 Industries dated 17-10-1962 contending that since the original purpose for which the land was acquired had ceased to be in operation, the appellants are entitled to restitution of the possession taken from them. The learned Single Judge and the Division Bench have held that the acquired land having already vested in the State, after receipt of the compensation by the predecessor-in-title of the appellants, they have no right to challenge the notification. Thus the writ petition and the writ appeal came to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t4. Admittedly, in this case award has already been passed prior to  the filing of the writ petition.   In view of the above decision of the Supreme Court MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AHMEDNAGAR VS. SHAH  HYDERBEIG (AIR 2000 SC 671),  I am  not able to subscribe my view  to quash the land acquisition proceedings at this point of time. Hence the writ petition is dismissed.   Consequently the connected M.P is closed.  No costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>krr\/<\/p>\n<p>To\t\t<\/p>\n<p>1. The District Collector<br \/>\nThanjavur District,<br \/>\nThanjavur.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The Special  Tahsildar<br \/>\nAdi Dravidar and  Tribal Welfare<br \/>\nThanjavur.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.11.2007 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN W.P.No.3428 of 1998 and W.P.M.P.No.1581 of 2007 Suyamprakasam &#8230; Petitioner Versus 1. The District Collector Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 2. The Special Tahsildar Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-219063","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-04T06:06:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-04T06:06:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007\"},\"wordCount\":793,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007\",\"name\":\"Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-04T06:06:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-04T06:06:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007","datePublished":"2007-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-04T06:06:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007"},"wordCount":793,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007","name":"Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-04T06:06:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suyamprakasam-vs-the-district-collector-on-26-november-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Suyamprakasam vs The District Collector on 26 November, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219063","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219063"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219063\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}