{"id":219163,"date":"2011-09-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011"},"modified":"2017-02-26T07:47:55","modified_gmt":"2017-02-26T02:17:55","slug":"yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Patna High Court &#8211; Orders<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                                     Criminal Miscellaneous No.27009 of 2009\n                                                   Yogendra Sharma\n                                                         Versus\n                                                State Of Bihar &amp; Anr\n                                                     -------------\n<\/pre>\n<p>4   8th September,2011        This petition has been filed under section 482 of the Cr. P.C. for<\/p>\n<p>                         quashing of the order dated 16.12.2008 passed by Sri D.S.Srivastava,<\/p>\n<p>                         Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Gaya in Khizersarai P.S. Case no.<\/p>\n<p>                         19\/2008 corresponding to trial no. 1707\/2008 by which he has rejected<\/p>\n<p>                         the petition for discharge and also for quashing of the order dated<\/p>\n<p>                         31.3.2009 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. IV, Gaya in<\/p>\n<p>                         Cr. Revision no. 3 of 2009\/ 2 of 2009 by which and whereunder he<\/p>\n<p>                         dismissed the revision application filed on behalf of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>                               2. The brief fact which lies to file this petition is that Khizersarai<\/p>\n<p>                         P.S. Case no. 19\/2008 was lodged on the basis of written complaint by<\/p>\n<p>                         the Assistant Mining officer against the petitioner and one Nagina<\/p>\n<p>                         Kumar on the allegation that the petitioner and co-accused Nagina<\/p>\n<p>                         Kumar were illegally mining stones without having any lawful<\/p>\n<p>                         authority. After completion of investigation, charge sheet was<\/p>\n<p>                         submitted and cognizance was taken. A petition for discharge was<\/p>\n<p>                         filed on behalf of the petitioner mentioning therein that no case is<\/p>\n<p>                         made out against the petitioner. The learned trial court rejected the<\/p>\n<p>                         above stated discharge petition passing impugned order dated<\/p>\n<p>                         16.12.2008 against which the petitioner and co-accused Nagina<\/p>\n<p>                         Kumar preferred Cr. Revision no. 3 of 2009\/ 2 of 2009 in the court of<\/p>\n<p>                         learned Sessions Judge, Gaya, who subsequently, transferred the<\/p>\n<p>                         above stated criminal revision to the court of Addl. Sessions Judge<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                          2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>FTC No. IV, Gaya who having heard the parties dismissed the above<\/p>\n<p>stated criminal revision passing impugned order dated 31.3.2009.<\/p>\n<p>      3. Learned senior counsel Sri Yogesh Chandra Verma,<\/p>\n<p>appearing for the petitioner, assailed the impugned order submitting<\/p>\n<p>that the learned trial court has passed the impugned order dated<\/p>\n<p>16.12.2008 in mechanical way and the learned trial court has not<\/p>\n<p>applied his judicial mind while passing impugned order dated<\/p>\n<p>16.12.2008. It is further contended by him that in impugned order<\/p>\n<p>dated 16.12.2008, the learned trial court has not given any reason for<\/p>\n<p>rejecting the discharge petition filed on behalf of the petitioner. It is<\/p>\n<p>further contended by him that the learned trial court was required to,<\/p>\n<p>at least, examine the facts as stated in the application seeking<\/p>\n<p>discharge and also required to briefly mention materials as collected<\/p>\n<p>by the police in course of investigation with reference to the case diary<\/p>\n<p>but having not done so, the learned trial court has committed grave<\/p>\n<p>error of law and similarly, revisional court has also over-looked the<\/p>\n<p>aforesaid defect while passing the impugned order dated 31.3.2009 in<\/p>\n<p>Cr. Revision no. 3 of 2009\/ 2 of 2009. Learned senior counsel Sri<\/p>\n<p>Verma, relied on a decision of this court passed in Manoranjan Singh<\/p>\n<p>&amp; ano vs. State of Bihar and ano. reported in 2008 (I) PLJR paged<\/p>\n<p>734 wherein, it has been held by this court that petition for discharge<\/p>\n<p>should not be simply rejected in a routine and mechanical manner by<\/p>\n<p>stating that since the Magistrate has taken cognizance for the offences<\/p>\n<p>or that in the case diary, there are sufficient evidence for framing of<\/p>\n<p>charge, application seeking discharge can not be rejected.<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                             3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      4. It is further contended on behalf of the petitioner that, as a<\/p>\n<p>matter of fact, the petitioner was valid lease holder and the seized<\/p>\n<p>stones were quarried from his leased area and the Challan was also<\/p>\n<p>issued for transporting the same and, therefore, the impugned orders<\/p>\n<p>are liable to be quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5. Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the State<\/p>\n<p>supported the impugned orders and submitted that it is not necessary<\/p>\n<p>for the trial court to give reason while rejecting the discharge petition.<\/p>\n<p>It is further contended by him that the learned trial court has<\/p>\n<p>specifically mentioned in several paragraphs of the case diary in the<\/p>\n<p>impugned order dated 16.12.2008 and similarly, Addl. Sessions Judge<\/p>\n<p>FTC No. IV, Gaya has dismissed the Cr. Revision no. 3 of 2009\/ 2 of<\/p>\n<p>2009 passing a detailed order and Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. IV,<\/p>\n<p>Gaya has referred materials which have come against the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>course of investigation in the impugned order dated 31.3.2009 passed<\/p>\n<p>in the above stated criminal revision petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6. Having heard the rival contentions of both the parties I have<\/p>\n<p>gone through the record as well as decision cited on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner. It would appear from perusal of the record that tractor<\/p>\n<p>bearing registration no. BR 25\/6936 laden with stones was seized by<\/p>\n<p>the mining officials on 18.3.2008 and subsequently, on the basis of<\/p>\n<p>written complaint the above stated Khizersarai P.S. Case no. 19\/2008<\/p>\n<p>was registered against the petitioner and driver of the aforesaid tractor<\/p>\n<p>under various provisions of Mines Act as well as Indian Penal Code.<\/p>\n<p>      7. The stand of the petitioner is that he was granted lease for<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                          4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>mining on 12.12.2004 for a period of five years relating to plot no.<\/p>\n<p>176 area one acre situated in village Sahwazpur Police station<\/p>\n<p>Khizersarai district Gaya but the Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. IV,<\/p>\n<p>Gaya has observed in Cr. Revision no. 3 of 2009\/ 2 of 2009 that the<\/p>\n<p>driver of the above stated tractor had disclosed to the informant that he<\/p>\n<p>had brought mining stones from Chotiya Pahar and he had regularly<\/p>\n<p>been transporting stones from the aforesaid area.\n<\/p>\n<p>      8. Admittedly, the petitioner was granted lease for mining<\/p>\n<p>relating to plot no. 176 situated in village Sahwazpur Police station<\/p>\n<p>Khizersarai district Gaya whereas the seized stones were mined out<\/p>\n<p>from Chhotiya Pahar and the aforesaid area of Chhotiya Pahar was<\/p>\n<p>never leased out in favour of the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>      9. No doubt, the learned trial court has only referred some<\/p>\n<p>paragraphs of the case diary and came to the conclusion that there<\/p>\n<p>were sufficient materials to frame charge against the petitioner and he<\/p>\n<p>has not given details of the materials, which have come in paragraphs<\/p>\n<p>as referred by the learned trial court but admittedly, revisional court in<\/p>\n<p>its order dated 31.3.2009 has specifically mentioned the materials<\/p>\n<p>which have come against the petitioner. So, even if the learned trial<\/p>\n<p>court has failed to mention the materials available on the case diary<\/p>\n<p>against the petitioner in the impugned order dated 16.12.2008, then<\/p>\n<p>also, the aforesaid irregularity does not make any difference because<\/p>\n<p>the learned revisional court has already mentioned materials which are<\/p>\n<p>available on the case diary to frame charge against the petitioner and,<\/p>\n<p>therefore, in my view, the decision reported in 2008(I) PLJR 734 is<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                          5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>not applicable in the present case because in that case the matter was<\/p>\n<p>returned to the court below for passing reasoned order in accordance<\/p>\n<p>with law as this court felt some inconvenience and the court was not<\/p>\n<p>in a position to judge the correctness of the order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>learned trial court in absence of the materials collected by the<\/p>\n<p>Investigating officer in course of investigation. So far as the present<\/p>\n<p>case is concerned, the order dated 31.3.2009 passed by the revisional<\/p>\n<p>court clearly speaks the materials available against the petitioner for<\/p>\n<p>framing charge and, therefore, there is no necessity to remit back the<\/p>\n<p>present matter to the court below for passing afresh and reasoned<\/p>\n<p>order.\n<\/p>\n<p>      10. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner also<\/p>\n<p>relied upon decision reported in (1977) 2 Supreme Court Cases page<\/p>\n<p>699 (State of Karnataka &amp; ano vs Muniswamy &amp; others wherein it has<\/p>\n<p>been held by the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme court that the High court can in its<\/p>\n<p>inherent power quash proceeding on account of insufficiency of<\/p>\n<p>evidence as well as to prevent abuse of the process of the court.<\/p>\n<p>      11. No doubt, the court can quash a proceeding to prevent the<\/p>\n<p>abuse of the process of law or to meet the ends of justice but in the<\/p>\n<p>present case, prima facie, there is nothing on record to show that<\/p>\n<p>continence of the present proceeding against the petitioner is amount<\/p>\n<p>to abuse of the process of law and, therefore, in my view, the decision<\/p>\n<p>cited above is not applicable in the facts of the present case.<\/p>\n<p>      12. On the basis of the above stated discussions, in my view, this<\/p>\n<p>petition does not have any force. Accordingly, this petition stands<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>         dismissed on admission stage itself.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>Shahid                                  ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court &#8211; Orders Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27009 of 2009 Yogendra Sharma Versus State Of Bihar &amp; Anr &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- 4 8th September,2011 This petition has been filed under section 482 of the Cr. P.C. for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-219163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court-orders"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-26T02:17:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-26T02:17:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1329,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court - Orders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-26T02:17:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-26T02:17:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-26T02:17:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011"},"wordCount":1329,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court - Orders"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011","name":"Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-26T02:17:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogendra-sharma-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-on-8-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yogendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar &amp; Anr on 8 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219163","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219163"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219163\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219163"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219163"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219163"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}