{"id":219165,"date":"2011-04-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-04-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011"},"modified":"2017-06-19T08:48:13","modified_gmt":"2017-06-19T03:18:13","slug":"mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011<\/div>\n
                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                                New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                     File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000296\n                                                                            CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000297\n                                                                            CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000298\n                                                                            CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000299\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0April\u00a029,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0April\u00a029,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Nandkishor\u00a0Gupta\n           S\/o\u00a0Late\u00a0Shri\u00a0G.D.Khandelwal\n           H.No.1\/756\n           Malviya\u00a0Nagar\n           Jaipur\u00a0302\u00a0017\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n\n           Respondents\n\n           The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n           North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\n           Headquarter\u00a0Office\n           Hasanpura\u00a0Road\n           Jaipur\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Subash\u00a0Rawat,\u00a0PIO\n                                    Shri\u00a0M.K.Sharma,\u00a0APIO\n                                    Shri\u00a0Dilip\u00a0Viyas,\u00a0Dy.CPO(IR)\n                                    Shri\u00a0Suresh\u00a0Chandra,\u00a0Dy.CVO(S)\n\n\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                               Decision\u00a0Notice\n As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\n                             In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                  at\n                                                          New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                               File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000296\n                                                                                                          CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000297\n                                                                                                          CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000298\n                                                                                                          CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000299\n                                                               ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
     Background<\/p>\n
     1.      The\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0 4 \u00a0 RTI\u00a0 applications\u00a0 with\u00a0 the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0 North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0 HQ,\u00a0 Jaipur\u00a0 seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
             information\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0service\u00a0matters\u00a0such\u00a0as\u00a0promotion,\u00a0seniority,\u00a0leave\u00a0etc.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
             details\u00a0 of\u00a0 AIRTEL\u00a0 calls\u00a0 made\u00a0 by\u00a0him\u00a0on\u00a01.5.10\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0the\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0attendance\u00a0register\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
             Gazetted \u00a0 officials, \u00a0 list \u00a0 of \u00a0 officials \u00a0 to \u00a0 whom \u00a0 major \u00a0 penalty \u00a0 charge \u00a0 sheets \u00a0 had \u00a0 been \u00a0 issued \u00a0 etc.\u00a0<\/p>\n
             Dissatisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0replies\u00a0provided,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0second\u00a0appeals\u00a0before\u00a0<\/p>\n
             the\u00a0Commission.\n<\/p>\n
\n     S.No.      Case\u00a0No.                            RTI\u00a0                  PIO\u00a0Reply             First\u00a0Appeal         AA\u00a0Reply
\n                                                    Application<\/p>\n
     1          CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000296                16.8.10               9.9.10                17.9.10              6.10.10<\/p>\n
     2          CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000297                17.6.10               16.8.10               30.8.10              23.9.10<\/p>\n
     3          CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000298                5.7.10                17.8.10               30.8.10              1.10.10<\/p>\n
     4          CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000299                30.7.10               17.8.10               25.8.10              14.10.10<\/p>\n
     Decision<\/p>\n
2.           Based\u00a0on\u00a0discussions\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0who\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0over\u00a0the\u00a0phone\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0decided\u00a0as\u00a0<\/p>\n
     given\u00a0below:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
             With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0details\u00a0of\u00a0calls\u00a0made\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0on\u00a01.5.10,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n
             an\u00a0Airtel\u00a0Number\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0AIRTEL\u00a0not\u00a0being\u00a0a\u00a0\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0possible\u00a0to\u00a0collect\u00a0the\u00a0details\u00a0<\/p>\n
             of\u00a0calls\u00a0made\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0(Appellant).\u00a0They\u00a0however\u00a0did\u00a0manage\u00a0to\u00a0get\u00a0the\u00a0information,\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0same,\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
             that\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0calls\u00a0were\u00a0made\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0on\u00a01.5.10\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0It\u00a0was\u00a0then\u00a0agreed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
             PIO \u00a0 will \u00a0 provide \u00a0 the \u00a0 call \u00a0 details \u00a0 statement \u00a0 already \u00a0 obtained \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents \u00a0 from \u00a0 AIRTEL\u00a0<\/p>\n
             indicating\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0calls\u00a0were\u00a0made\u00a0on\u00a01.5.10.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
 3.   With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0attendance\u00a0register\u00a0of\u00a0Gazetted\u00a0officials,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0this\u00a0kind\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
     information\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0maintained\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0required\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0maintained\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0Gazette\u00a0<\/p>\n
     notification\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0connection.\u00a0This\u00a0information\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0formally\u00a0in\u00a0writing\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n
     in\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0employees\u00a0issued\u00a0with\u00a0major\u00a0<\/p>\n
     penalty\u00a0charge\u00a0sheets\u00a0over\u00a0the\u00a0last\u00a03\u00a0years\u00a0even\u00a0though\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0specified\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
     his\u00a0 RTI\u00a0 application,\u00a0 had\u00a0 already\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0.\u00a0<\/p>\n
     However,\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0denied\u00a0having\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0same,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0may\u00a0provide\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
     the\u00a0said\u00a0list\u00a0once\u00a0again.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.   The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0at\u00a0this\u00a0stage\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0already\u00a0inspected\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n
     files\u00a0\u00a0a\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0times\u00a0.\u00a0However,\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0either\u00a0\u00a0refused\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0or\u00a0had\u00a0complained\u00a0<\/p>\n
     that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0sought\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0files.\u00a0\u00a0It\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0brought\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0attention\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
     the \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant\u00a0 \u00a0 had\u00a0 filed\u00a0 nearly\u00a0 50\u00ad60\u00a0 RTI\u00a0 applications\u00a0 \u00a0 seeking\u00a0 the\u00a0 same\u00a0<\/p>\n
     information\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0service\u00a0matters\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0with\u00a0information\u00a0each\u00a0time.\u00a0<\/p>\n
5.   After\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0and\u00a0having\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0applications\u00a0reflect\u00a0the\u00a0grievances\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
     the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 \u00a0 with \u00a0 regard \u00a0 to \u00a0 his \u00a0 service \u00a0 matters \u00a0 such \u00a0 as \u00a0 promotion, \u00a0 seniority, \u00a0 leave, \u00a0 transfer,\u00a0<\/p>\n
     punishment,\u00a0pay\u00a0fixation,\u00a0benefits\u00a0under\u00a0MACPS\u00a0etc,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0<\/p>\n
     directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0allow\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0all \u00a0the\u00a0files\u00a0dealing\u00a0with\u00a0his\u00a0service\u00a0matters\u00a0as\u00a0sought\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
     above\u00a04\u00a0cases\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0once\u00a0again\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0mutually\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\u00a0and\u00a0time\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0<\/p>\n
     the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0with\u00a0attested\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0documents\u00a0required\u00a0by\u00a0him,\u00a0\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0\u00a0may\u00a0also\u00a0<\/p>\n
     hold\u00a0a\u00a0personal\u00a0hearing\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0Sr.DPO\u00a0and\u00a0SPO(HQ)\u00a0to\u00a0clarify\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n
     issue\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0service\u00a0matter.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0is\u00a0hereby\u00a0informed\u00a0that\u00a0once\u00a0he\u00a0has\u00a0inspected\u00a0<\/p>\n
     all\u00a0his\u00a0files\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0service\u00a0matters\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0has\u00a0attended\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0held\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0no\u00a0further\u00a0<\/p>\n
     appeal\u00a0\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0subject\u00a0matter\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0mentioned\u00a0RTI\u00a0applications\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0entertained\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
     Commission\u00a0in\u00a0future.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6.   The\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a030.6.10\u00a0\u00a0including\u00a0information\u00a0after\u00a0completion\u00a0of\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0files<\/p>\n
7.   The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                                          \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                            Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.       Shri\u00a0Nandkishor\u00a0Gupta
\n         S\/o\u00a0Late\u00a0Shri\u00a0G.D.Khandelwal
\n         H.No.1\/756
\n         Malviya\u00a0Nagar
\n         Jaipur\u00a0302\u00a0017<\/p>\n
2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\u00a0
\n         North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway
\n         Headquarter\u00a0Office
\n         Hasanpura\u00a0Road
\n         Jaipur<\/p>\n
3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0
\n         North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway
\n         Headquarter\u00a0Office
\n         Hasanpura\u00a0Road
\n         Jaipur<\/p>\n
4.       Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000296 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000297 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000298 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000299 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0April\u00a029,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0April\u00a029,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Nandkishor\u00a0Gupta S\/o\u00a0Late\u00a0Shri\u00a0G.D.Khandelwal H.No.1\/756 Malviya\u00a0Nagar Jaipur\u00a0302\u00a0017 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Respondents The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway Headquarter\u00a0Office Hasanpura\u00a0Road Jaipur Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Subash\u00a0Rawat,\u00a0PIO Shri\u00a0M.K.Sharma,\u00a0APIO Shri\u00a0Dilip\u00a0Viyas,\u00a0Dy.CPO(IR) Shri\u00a0Suresh\u00a0Chandra,\u00a0Dy.CVO(S) Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000296 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000297 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000298 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-219165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-04-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-19T03:18:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-19T03:18:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011\"},\"wordCount\":683,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-19T03:18:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-04-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-19T03:18:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011","datePublished":"2011-04-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-19T03:18:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011"},"wordCount":683,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011","name":"Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-04-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-19T03:18:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nand-kishore-gupta-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-29-april-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Nand Kishore Gupta vs Ministry Of Railways on 29 April, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219165\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}