{"id":21949,"date":"2008-01-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-01-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008"},"modified":"2014-06-14T09:38:13","modified_gmt":"2014-06-14T04:08:13","slug":"jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008","title":{"rendered":"Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl Rev Pet No. 54 of 2008()\n\n\n1. JOSE, AGED 45 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.DILEEP P.PILLAI\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n Dated :17\/01\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                          R. BASANT, J.\n\n           ````````````````````````````````````````````````````\n                   Crl. R.P. No. 54 OF 2008\n           ````````````````````````````````````````````````````\n           Dated this the 17th day of January, 2008\n\n                             O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>           This revision petition is directed against a<\/p>\n<p>concurrent verdict of guilty, conviction and sentence in a<\/p>\n<p>prosecution under Section 20(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner now faces a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for<\/p>\n<p>a period of six months for the offence punishable under<\/p>\n<p>Section 20(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.   The crux of the allegations against the petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>that on 23.8.03 when the police party consisting of PWs 3 to<\/p>\n<p>5, on receipt of prior information that sale of ganja was taking<\/p>\n<p>place in the shop of the petitioner, reached the shop of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, on search of the premises, 18 small packets of<\/p>\n<p>ganja in a plastic cover was recovered by him. 10 gm were<\/p>\n<p>taken for sampling. Mahazar Ext.P1 was prepared. PWs 1<\/p>\n<p>and 2 are allegedly independent witnesses who had signed in<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.54\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                : 2 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the mahazar. The petitioner was arrested.<\/p>\n<p>      3.      After completing the investigation, final report was<\/p>\n<p>filed and cognizance was taken by the learned Magistrate.<\/p>\n<p>The accused appeared before the learned Magistrate. He<\/p>\n<p>denied the offences alleged against him whereupon PWs 1 to<\/p>\n<p>8 were examined and Exts.P1 to P5 were marked by the<\/p>\n<p>prosecution.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.     PWs 1 and 2, as stated earlier, are the<\/p>\n<p>independent attestors to Ext.P1 seizure mahazar. Both of<\/p>\n<p>them admitted their signatures in Ext.P1 but denied having<\/p>\n<p>seen the seizure. PWs 3 to 5 are the police officials who<\/p>\n<p>constituted the party, PW5 being the senior most officer.<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1 is the seizure mahazar prepared by PW5. Ext.P2 is<\/p>\n<p>the search list and Ext.P3 is the search memo. Ext.P4 FIR<\/p>\n<p>was promptly registered.       Investigation was conducted by<\/p>\n<p>PW7 who got the sample forwarded to PW6 who issued<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P5 certificate to confirm that the article seized was ganja.<\/p>\n<p>PW8 is a person who allegedly weighed ganja.              He also<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.54\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               : 3 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>turned hostile to the prosecution.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5.     The accused took up a defence of total denial.<\/p>\n<p>According to him, there was no recovery effected from his<\/p>\n<p>premises. No defence evidence was adduced.<\/p>\n<p>      6.     The   learned   Magistrate  on   an   anxious<\/p>\n<p>consideration of all the relevant inputs, came to the<\/p>\n<p>conclusion that the oral evidence of PWs 3 to 5 which is<\/p>\n<p>supported by the contents of the contemporaneous Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>seizure mahazar as also Exts.P2 to P4 can be safely<\/p>\n<p>accepted and that such evidence when accepted clearly<\/p>\n<p>reveals the complicity of the petitioner.  Accordingly, the<\/p>\n<p>learned Magistrate       proceeded to pass the impugned<\/p>\n<p>judgment.       The learned Sessions Judge in appeal re-<\/p>\n<p>appreciated and evaluated the entire materials and came to<\/p>\n<p>the conclusion that the verdict of guilty, conviction and<\/p>\n<p>sentence do not warrant any interference.<\/p>\n<p>      7.     The petitioner claims to be aggrieved by the<\/p>\n<p>impugned concurrent judgments. Called upon to explain the<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.54\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                : 4 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>nature of challenge, which the petitioner wants to mount<\/p>\n<p>against the impugned concurrent judgments,        the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the petitioner submits that the courts below erred<\/p>\n<p>in accepting and acting upon the oral evidence of PWs 3, 4<\/p>\n<p>and 5. In view of the hostility of PWs 1, 2 and 8 alleged<\/p>\n<p>independent witnesses, the courts below should not have<\/p>\n<p>accepted the oral evidence of PWs 3 to 5, it is contended.<\/p>\n<p>      8.     I find absolutely no merit in these contentions.<\/p>\n<p>PWs 3 to 5 are police officials charged with a responsibility of<\/p>\n<p>detecting offences and bringing the offenders to book. They<\/p>\n<p>cannot be reckoned as interested witnesses whose testimony<\/p>\n<p>deserves to be approached with doubt, suspicion and<\/p>\n<p>reservation. It is to note that no case has been advanced that<\/p>\n<p>PWs 3 to 5 have any animus against the petitioner and are in<\/p>\n<p>any way interested in foisting a false case against the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner. The evidence of PWs 1 and 2, though hostile,<\/p>\n<p>gives respectability to Ext.P1 seizure mahazar, signature in<\/p>\n<p>which is admitted by them.             The contents of the<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.54\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               : 5 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>contemporaneous Ext.P1 seizure mahazar supports the oral<\/p>\n<p>evidence of PWs 3 to 5.\n<\/p>\n<p>      9.     No other contentions are raised on merits. I have<\/p>\n<p>gone through the impugned judgments. I am satisfied that the<\/p>\n<p>verdict of guilty and conviction and absolutely justified and are<\/p>\n<p>unexceptionable. In the absence of challenge on any specific<\/p>\n<p>grounds, it is not necessary for me to advert to facts in any<\/p>\n<p>greater detail.\n<\/p>\n<p>      10. The learned counsel for the petitioner finally prays<\/p>\n<p>that leniency may be shown on the question of sentence. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner faces rigorous imprisonment for a period of six<\/p>\n<p>months under Section 20(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act. When small<\/p>\n<p>quantity of ganja alone is involved, the maximum sentence<\/p>\n<p>that can be imposed is imprisonment for six months or fine or<\/p>\n<p>both. The learned Magistrate has saved the petitioner of the<\/p>\n<p>obligation to pay any fine but has imposed the maximum<\/p>\n<p>sentence of imprisonment permissible under law. It is prayed<\/p>\n<p>that leniency may be shown on the question of sentence. The<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.54\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               : 6 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petitioner has already undergone imprisonment for a period<\/p>\n<p>exceeding four months, it is submitted.       In the facts and<\/p>\n<p>circumstances of this case, I find absolutely no reason to take<\/p>\n<p>any lenient view in the matter. The ganja was stored for sale<\/p>\n<p>in a shop. I am satisfied, in these circumstances, that no<\/p>\n<p>further leniency also deserves to be shown.<\/p>\n<p>      11. This Crl.R.P. is, in these circumstances, dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>                                            (R.BASANT, JUDGE)<br \/>\naks<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl Rev Pet No. 54 of 2008() 1. JOSE, AGED 45 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.DILEEP P.PILLAI For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21949","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-01-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-14T04:08:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-01-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-14T04:08:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008\"},\"wordCount\":877,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008\",\"name\":\"Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-01-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-14T04:08:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-01-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-14T04:08:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008","datePublished":"2008-01-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-14T04:08:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008"},"wordCount":877,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008","name":"Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-01-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-14T04:08:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-january-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jose vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21949","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21949"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21949\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}