{"id":219751,"date":"2007-12-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007"},"modified":"2016-05-29T22:23:57","modified_gmt":"2016-05-29T16:53:57","slug":"the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007","title":{"rendered":"The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nLA App No. 1098 of 2002()\n\n\n1. THE SECRETARY, THRISSUR CORPORATION,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. JOSE, S\/O. KURIAKOSE,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A),\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATIO\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.N.P.SAMUEL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID\n\n Dated :12\/12\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n            KURIAN JOSEPH &amp; HARUN-UL-RASHID,JJ.\n           ----------------------------------------------------------------\n              L.A.A. NOS.1098 OF 2002 &amp; 1432 OF 2007\n           ----------------------------------------------------------------\n\n                 Dated this the 12th day of December, 2007\n\n                                  JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Kurian Joseph, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>      These are appeals filed by the Requisitioning Authority and the<\/p>\n<p>claimant respectively.      Acquisition was for the purpose of widening of<\/p>\n<p>Pattalam road.      The Land Acquisition Officer fixed land value at<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,45,400\/- per Are. Section 4(1) notification is dated 6.2.1996. The<\/p>\n<p>reference court on the basis of the undisputed importance of the acquired<\/p>\n<p>property and the commercial importance of the area, as referred to in<\/p>\n<p>paragraph 8 of the judgment, and the further finding that the land value<\/p>\n<p>given to the neighbouring property covered by L.A.R. 11 of 2000 can be<\/p>\n<p>given for the instant case, fixed land value at Rs.1,71,170\/- per Are.       It is<\/p>\n<p>brought to our notice that the land value fixed in L.A.R. 11 of 2000 has<\/p>\n<p>become final. In that view of the matter, there is no merit in the appeal<\/p>\n<p>filed by the Requisitioning Authority so far as fixation of market value is<\/p>\n<p>concerned.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. As far as the case of the claimant is concerned, he mainly relied<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">LAA NOS.1098\/02 &amp; 1432\/07             2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>on Ext.A1 document which pertains to a transaction whereby 19 cents of<\/p>\n<p>property was conveyed for an amount of Rs.80 lakhs. That transaction<\/p>\n<p>was prior to Section 4(1) notification.        The reference court, while<\/p>\n<p>discussing the acceptance of the evidence tendered on the basis of Ext.A1<\/p>\n<p>document and by the Advocate Commissioner who reported about the<\/p>\n<p>similarity of Ext.A1 with that of the acquired property, observed that the<\/p>\n<p>Advocate Commissioner in L.A.R. No.11 of 2000 had reported that the<\/p>\n<p>property   covered by Ext.A1 document was not comparable with the<\/p>\n<p>acquired land in that case. The acquired property in L.A.R. 11 of 2000,<\/p>\n<p>according to the reference court, lies near to the acquired property in this<\/p>\n<p>case. Therefore, on the basis of the report of the Advocates Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>in L.A.R. 11 of 2000, the reference court declined to consider the evidence<\/p>\n<p>of the claimant in this case.     We are afraid, the stand taken by the<\/p>\n<p>reference court cannot be justified.      The Advocate Commissioner in<\/p>\n<p>L.A.R. No.11 of 2000 was not examined in this case. That report also was<\/p>\n<p>not before the court. There is no evidence on the part of the respondents to<\/p>\n<p>show that the acquired property is not similar or comparable with that of<\/p>\n<p>the property covered by Ext.A1 whereas the claimant has tendered<\/p>\n<p>evidence regarding the similarity and comparability of Ext.A1 property<\/p>\n<p>with the acquired property. There is also Ext.X1 commission report.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">LAA NOS.1098\/02 &amp; 1432\/07            3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      3. Learned counsel appearing for the Municipality submits that<\/p>\n<p>Ext.A1 property lies on the side of the Post Office road whereas the<\/p>\n<p>acquired property is on the Pattalam road and there is vast difference in<\/p>\n<p>the importance of the locality. This aspect is disputed by counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>claimant. Be that as it may, since there is no basis for rejecting the<\/p>\n<p>evidence of the claimant in this case, the claim of the appellant for<\/p>\n<p>enhancement of compensation has to be considered afresh.<\/p>\n<p>         Accordingly, we set aside the judgment and decree in L.A.R.<\/p>\n<p>No.13 of 2000 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Thrissur and<\/p>\n<p>remand the matter to the reference court. The parties shall appear before<\/p>\n<p>the reference court on 14.1.2008. It will also be open to the parties to<\/p>\n<p>adduce fresh evidence. The reference shall be answered within another<\/p>\n<p>four months. In view of the remand as above, the appellant in L.A.A.<\/p>\n<p>No.1432 of 2007 will be entitled to refund of the court fee.<\/p>\n<p>                                       (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)<\/p>\n<p>                                     (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE)<\/p>\n<p>sp\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">LAA NOS.1098\/02 &amp; 1432\/07    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                                KURIAN JOSEPH &amp;<br \/>\n                                HAURN-UL-RASHID, JJ.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                L.A.A.NOS.1098\/02 &amp;<br \/>\n                                    1432\/2007<\/p>\n<p>                                    JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>                                12TH DECEMBER, 2007<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM LA App No. 1098 of 2002() 1. THE SECRETARY, THRISSUR CORPORATION, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. JOSE, S\/O. KURIAKOSE, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A), For Petitioner :SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATIO For Respondent :SRI.N.P.SAMUEL The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-219751","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-12-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-29T16:53:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-29T16:53:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007\"},\"wordCount\":615,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007\",\"name\":\"The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-29T16:53:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-12-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-29T16:53:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007","datePublished":"2007-12-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-29T16:53:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007"},"wordCount":615,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007","name":"The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-12-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-29T16:53:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-vs-jose-on-12-december-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Secretary vs Jose on 12 December, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219751","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219751"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219751\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219751"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}