{"id":21987,"date":"2009-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-05-01T11:26:19","modified_gmt":"2017-05-01T05:56:19","slug":"dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
'7\n\nav THE HIGH com? or mmaraggf   \n\ncmcurr BENCH AT nuaawmi ' '  3\n\nnxmn mm THE 713 ms? at-*    V\n\n321'-'oR\"1\"s:,   ' '\n\nTHE HOWBLE MR.JUsTI\u00a2E::A%re:9HAr\u20ac  V T'\n\n_W_,__P.No.6'2-463 n\u00a7*V'f2ao9...LtGr\u00a7i4cg__Q1f\nc:\/w \u00a7fI;3.A 2m_.3::rg_ 93.2003\n\nIN war. No.62463 oF?O0 9    \n\nBETWEEN:   f.'--\n\nDAKSHIN BH.-SEAT;\u00a5AI'T{SA'BHE  \nSE~iREE__KS'Ei.ETf-EA C'C1MMIT\"i'E_E '\nATIKSHMA, ,KSHET'RA'~.\u00a2V\"' M \"   '\nSTAVANDI, ';*'c;*;;: 'a_H1;;GDi,~----I>Is'r: BELGAUM\nREPRE-'\u00bb.SE.NTE--{) BY. 1'f\"S_\u20acEHA~\u00a3RMAN\n\nSR1 RAMGONDA RAfE\"AG{)UDA PATEL\n\nS\/Q RAYAGOUDA P\ufb01._'\u00a7'IL\"\n\nAczggg' 4.5 YEARS '\n\nojcc: ;AGRICUL1'U\u00a7%E'\n\n \u00abR\/G. P.Kf)i'.;_TQ: CHIKQDI\n..a\":5'r:v..gE;;@5i.--r_M  PETITIQNER\n\n\" . '  ( B*{\"Vi\\jr;;; SV.V GQULAY ASSQCIATES, A{)'VS.,}\n\nm.:~% \n\n\" V.  11- si}1R1 BRAHMDEV\n\n SHRI AD.{NATHDEV\n\nSf'-IR'! PARSHWANATHDEV\n\nSI-*IR\u00a5 SHANTENATHDEV\n\nSITUATED AT S'\u00a7'AVAN\u00a7DH\u00a7 &: GAVAN VILLAGE\nTAL: CHIKQDE, DIST: BELGAUM\n\nBY YFS TRUSTEES\n\n\n\nIA\n\n18\n\n1C\n\n19\n\n1E\n\nSHRiKAN'i' UPADHYE\nS\/O DHARANAPPA UPADHYE\u00bb~\u00bbV \nAGE: '72 YEARS I '\n\n000: PRIEST AND TRUSTEE7.'  \u00ab\n\nVARDHAMAN PARIS U':=?\u00a7'9..,HY1\u00e9  V'\n\nS] C) PARIS UPADHYE\nAGE: 78 YEARS\n\n00$: PRIEST AN\"::..frRL:~s*rEi:' 1' \n\nSHRIDHAR UPADQVE   \nS\/O PARK?-.= UPAI:i)\u00a7ki'.'E:=\nAGE: 7:2, VEARS  1\n\n0cQ:4..1=%1\u00a7IE;3*rV_A.N'D  ' \" \n\nRAJEN i'.\u00a7!'~'1*$'%k.A1V'\u00a7:Ei\u20acl:'\\~x?'I.:?9_'\ufb02a \u00a71}PA1:>*_;Hi?E\n\n;s;'o'A.z.u%ENA\u00a5*;?A U95-DHYE~~-- \nIAc3_ps.=: 43fYlE;ARS*._  ~\n\n\"mac; ;>:21r;s;*;%,AN:)--.i;fR1:s*rE:%:\n\nBAHsj BALi AN')iAP.f'A UPADHYE\n\n' \"  O ANNAPPA UPADHYE\nAGE: 43 YEARS\n\n' \"<\u00a7ct(:;pR1E<5r AND TRUSTEE\n\n...iz;\u00a7s\u00e9;1szf;f'.1UPADHYE\n\ns'1f{::--% Exams UPADHYE\nAG_E"}.: 65 YEARS\n\na 'gas; PRIEST ANI) TRUSTEE\nVP;\/0: PATFANKUDI, TQ: cmxcm\n\nDIST: BELGAUM\n\nSURESH UPADHYE\n\nS] O SI-IRIKANT UPADHYE\nAGE; 43 YEARS\n\nOCC: PRIEST AND TRUSTEE\n\n\n\nRESPONDENT NO--1A TO 1G ARE\n\nR\/O STAVANIDHI AND GAVAN VILLAGE\n\nTQ: CHIKODI, DIST: BELGAUIVI  \u00bb _   V " 3\nBELGAUM  RES?O?\u00a7.DEN'?:_~3..A  '\n\n{BY SR1 B s KAMTE, A[)V., FOR cgzm A \u00bbc:.*&.' SQ-j'I.\u00ab::1:\"ARI'I--QLE;:'s._:225\"';sa I\n\n227 012' CONSTITUTIGN OF INDIA=.PR;}\u00a7YIING'?0 .QIIAsI:.'1*}IE\n\nORDER DATED 13.3.2009 PZ%SSED'}3Y=THE 1LEx',~.RVN.ED:';CI'JILx.\n\nJUDGE (JR.\u00a7N) NIP'ANNI (}I<s--'.,__fL'A_. NOV;3__ATvVN'\u00a3P}\u00a7N'N'I"LIN O.S;'\nN015\/2007' AS PER ANNEXURE :3' AND ;::<)Ns::\u00ab;QUENTLY\nTO DIRECI' THE LEAI?1.~IED'.I::m:;\u00abJs;I1;)GII; "\u00a3"(}~AvCCEPI' THE\nWRITTEN sTATEMEN'm%:)_ ESE I\u00a7"ILE:1I}\u00bb.B'YITI~:E PETITIONER.\n\nIII MBA mxago or geeg j; 'V\n\n{)AKSI~IlN BEIAR-XI" JAIN'--- SABHE\n\nSHREE \u00a7{SHETRA--_ COMEJIITTEE ATIKSHAYA KSHETRA\nmavamnl, 'I'Q:_ <::I~m<s:)m\n\nI)fIs+r.; BEIIGAUM'  -------- M =\n\n'V " \u00abI2EI='R}3SI3:r~I1igD BY ITS CHAIRMAN\n\n ' .-SR3 _\u00a7A RAYAGOUDA PATEL\n . $10 RA\"'{A(2~CiiI'DA PATEL\n'AGE; 46\"E'E_?A'RS, occ: AGRICULTURE\n\nRm A,KoL;'TQ: CHIKODI\nDIST; BELGAUM  APPELLANT\n\n\"  i(f\u00a33\"'I'._S\u00a7I N.D.GUNDE FOR GOULAY ASSOCIATES, ADVSII)\n\nIND\n\n 1. Sim! BRAHMSEV\n\nSHRZ ADINATHDEEV\nSHRE PAFESHWANATHDEV\n\n\n\n1A\n\n1B\n\n1C\n\n13:)\n\nSHRI SHANTINATHDEV\n\nSITUATEB AT SI'AVANI9H\u00a7 3:. GAVAN VILLACEE:\nTAL: C}~\u00a3fK(}i)\u00a5, DIST: BELGAUM  4' .  ' T.  ~\n\nBY ITS TRUSTEES\n\nSHRIKANT UPADHYE \nS\/O DHARANAPPA {IPAEDHYE\n\nAGE: 72 YEARS   A \nace: PRIEST AND TRUSFEE  \n\nVARDHAMAN PARIS UPADHYE\nS[0 PARIS UPADHYE ' '\n\nAGE: :23 YEARS  V. --.  \nocc; PRIEST AN:)\"*;*Ru's*r;\u20ac.E\"   \n\nSHRIDHAR UPAB;1yJEV_VV  '\n3\/0 i9'ARIS'1.IPA[;T!}-IYE'~\u00a2: \" _ V_ \nAGE:      'V  \n\n;:;>\"c\"':::'A  mu} fnzu\n\nf?g%L\u00a71\"iNDRQ\u00a7';AB\u00a7}\\i23\u00a7PA:\";JPADHYE\ns\/<2: ANNAPPAUPAQHYE\nAGE:"43"YEA_RS-. " ~'\n\n ' DQC: PRIEST AND TRUSTEE\n\n. ri&;i$I~\u00a7iJa3AL1 A\u00a73\u00a7\u00a7APPA UPABHYE\n\n"   ANEEAPPA UPADHYE\n\nT'  43- YEARS\n\n. "  O{3C--?fPfE'IEST ADN TRU$'I'\ufb01E\n\nm\n\n.VA.S\u00e9j~xT UPADHYE\n\nSgi) paws UPADHYE\nAGE: 55 YEARS\n\n om: PRIEST AND TRUSTEE\n\nIf}\n\nR\/O PA'\u00a7"\u00a5'ANKUD\u00a5, TQ: CHIKODI\nDIST: BELGAUM\n\nSURESH UPADHYE\nS] C} SHRIKANT UPADHYE\nAGE: 43 YEARS\n\n\n\nQCC: PRIEST AND TRUSTEE\n\nm\u00e9: RESPONDENT N{).1A GO 1G ARE \nR\/0 STAVANIDHI AND GAVAN VILLAGE \nTQ: CHIKODI, DIST: BELGAUM \n\n2. SHRIACHARYA DESHBHUSHAN"J\u00a7'DYAP\u00a7i'I:\u00a7H_   \nSTAVANIDHE     .  \n\n3. THE STATE 01:' KARNA1'A\u00a7<A  '\n\n(Rasponmm NOS. 2 AND :3. A.R E DELEYED' Vujgb,\ncoum ORDER 131*. 25.3.2099} .  %   \nV ,  5 " -\u00ab._v_;,,"i*?E)SPON\u00a7ENTS\n\n{BY SR1 B.s.KAMA3*E,'VA_1j'.I,, .1ifb:=f%x C;.\u00a7\u00e91}x5.-_:--G)\n\n:sz1_sA"v.1S---I4?\u00a7_;\u00a3,E:: _'{;!_I (;")' 43_ :R\u00a5J_%:.,E 1(u) OF CFC AGAINST\nTHE :JU{\u00a7GMfi?:_NT";-\ufb02ux}'\u00a3;E<:Ie\u00a7:1=:'"1)ATE9; 4\/9\/08 PASSED IN\nRA 216.\/07'0N'}%H-E'P1LE_<:3--\u00a7 CWIL JUDGE (SRDN) CHIKODI,\nALLOWING THE'A\u00a75PEA;_;"FILED AGAINST THE ORDER AND\nDEGREE DA5\u00a5'Eif}.:4f4'i.2i.?(}7 IN OS.15]20\u20ac}7 on THE FiLE\nGB', (1.1%, J'UI){.%E7(JR-.[)N) NIPANI.\n\n 3-.'I'\u00bbHESE=  PE'I'\u00a5'I'ION AN\ufb01 MISCELLANEOUS\n\n \u00bb j3.\u00a5~:,c<),N'\u00a3)--..egPPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS mxs DAY,\nA "1jH;::-- <:'3::.\u00bb,1_3:2v'1\u00a7. M3313 ma FOLLOWENG;\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
VVMSA 3243\/08 is \ufb01leti by me defendant Fig.1 in 0.3.<\/p>\n
‘ “‘V. i\\i’-::;:1:’3\/2907 cha\ufb01enging the ordttr emf mmand pa\ufb01se\u00e9 by the<\/p>\n
‘ \ufb01rst appellate Court in RA, No.26\/U7.<\/p>\n
, ya
\n\/V ,2<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
2. wnp. NO62463\/{)9 is \ufb01led by the mg} de_fs_ndant<\/p>\n
challenging the order passed by the ma} Court a\ufb01fsi’ <\/p>\n
permitting the piajnti\ufb01s to amend the prayer..jt:o11;J’1{.\u00a7:\u00a7i:Eo:’o;!’<\/p>\n
plaint.  1 H\n<\/p>\n
3. The records reveal tliat this ?mspo1ide\ufb01’ts:’V-1__1e\u00a7:\u00a7ii1<\/p>\n
\ufb01led suit for declaration that ‘Nos. Eso\ufb01stgg Vt3:2t_.: ‘ L.<\/p>\n
trustees of plaintiff No.1  havo’   lawfully
\nadminister the trust’  oft1q1′:Av”co;1s\u00e9t’;11cn1ia’i ‘oencfits are
\nalso sought for, Defen\u00a7\u00a7a\ufb01t_VNoV,_3   suit is the State<\/p>\n
of  of notice on dcfenant No.1, he
\n\ufb01led   Section 21 of CPC praying for<\/p>\n
 of nthsz\ufb01suit\u00e9ion the ground of want of jurisdiction.<\/p>\n
.’ “I’11:ot1gi1i,. v\u00e9rious contentions were raised before the trial<\/p>\n
 ._  of hearing the app\ufb01cation under Section 21<\/p>\n
of  ttial Court mtgativod such contentions, except<\/p>\n
 V. (roe i.’e.; the Triai Court has prac\ufb01cally held that the suit is<\/p>\n
A’ Vnyoomaintainable on the ground that the plaizati\ufb01s have not<\/p>\n
.–[taken requisite permission \ufb01om the authorities conccmod<\/p>\n
under Section Si) and 51 of Bombay Public Trust Act. The<\/p>\n
fl.\/3\u00bb<\/p>\n
that the ::>rder of remand passed by the appc1}ats ‘_’is<\/p>\n
not improper, this court refuses to interfsit V   <\/p>\n
impugned order. As the matter is   u ‘ <\/p>\n
will have one. more chance to  T 611 ith\u00e9’ <\/p>\n
maintainability also. Aocoz\ufb01isglg, {gm-.ng _oi%i\u00e9i<:._isv ma-51\u00a2:\n<\/p>\n
MSA 910.320 of    Q
\nSince thesuit is..at:’t\u00a7\u00a73.e’s.ta.ge, issues are
\nnot yet      that interest of
\njustice    of the plaintiffs for
\namcn\u00a2\u00a7sss1V:1 t;A “V   This course avoids
\n sf  Themfots, the trial Court has<\/p>\n
r.Lg’ htky  tbs’ afip\ufb01ss\ufb01on for amendment. Hence, the<\/p>\n
 ‘-  _ 3\u00a2’3i’1’%1.kC3IE\u00a5Ci~5\u00b0-I’ ‘@150 ca” 11’ “3:1″o”1\u00ab:V be intezfered with. Acconiingly, Writ<\/p>\n
   of 2999 stands dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n
%  ..s.::;ss<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar ‘7 av THE HIGH com? or mmaraggf cmcurr BENCH AT nuaawmi ‘ ‘ 3 nxmn mm THE 713 ms? at-* V 321’-‘oR”1″s:, ‘ ‘ THE HOWBLE MR.JUsTI\u00a2E::A%re:9HAr\u20ac V T’ _W_,__P.No.6’2-463 n\u00a7*V’f2ao9…LtGr\u00a7i4cg__Q1f c:\/w \u00a7fI;3.A 2m_.3::rg_ 93.2003 IN war. No.62463 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-01T05:56:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-01T05:56:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":357,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-01T05:56:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-01T05:56:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-01T05:56:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009"},"wordCount":357,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009","name":"Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-01T05:56:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dakshin-bharat-jain-sabhe-vs-shri-brahmdev-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dakshin Bharat Jain Sabhe vs Shri Brahmdev on 7 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21987"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21987\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}