{"id":220310,"date":"2010-06-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010"},"modified":"2018-11-25T04:47:07","modified_gmt":"2018-11-24T23:17:07","slug":"mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                              Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                             CIC\/OP\/C\/2009\/000006\u00adAD\n                                                                                                      Dated\u00a0June\u00a08,\u00a02010\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                                     :    Shri\u00a0Sanjay\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Singh\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                              :    East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Hajipur\n\n\n\n                        Adjunct\u00a0to\u00a0CIC\u00a0Order\u00a0\u00a0No.CIC\/OK\/A\/2008\/00502\u00a0dt.24.10.08\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.26.2.09\u00a0before\u00a0CIC\u00a0regarding\u00a0non\u00adcompliance\u00a0of\u00a0decision\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        complaint,\u00a0he\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0by\u00a0CIC\u00a0on\u00a022.10.08\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0 \u00a0Commission\u00a0had\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        decided\u00a0as\u00a0follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>        i)        Regarding\u00a0Seniority\u00a0List\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0post\u00a0of\u00a0Publicity\u00a0Inspector,\u00a0Complainant\u00a0wanted\u00a0the\u00a0revised \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        seniority\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0basis\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0representations\u00a0submitted\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Department.\u00a0\u00a0Hon&#8217;ble\u00a0CIC\u00a0directed\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        department\u00a0to\u00a0examine\u00a0the\u00a0issue\u00a0and\u00a0give\u00a0a\u00a0reply\u00a0accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>        ii)       The \u00a0 Complainant \u00a0 had \u00a0 asked \u00a0 for \u00a0 marks \u00a0 obtained \u00a0 by \u00a0 different \u00a0 candidates \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 written \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        examination\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0post\u00a0held\u00a0on\u00a016.12.04\u00a0and\u00a020.2.06.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0CIC\u00a0directed\u00a0the\u00a0department\u00a0to \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        provide\u00a0such\u00a0information\u00a0by\u00a014.11.08.\n<\/p>\n<p>        iii)      The \u00a0 Complainant \u00a0 had \u00a0 asked \u00a0 for \u00a0 specific \u00a0 rule \u00a0 according \u00a0 to \u00a0 which \u00a0 his \u00a0 case \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        considered.\u00a0\u00a0Hon&#8217;ble\u00a0CIC\u00a0directed\u00a0the\u00a0department\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0such\u00a0information\u00a0by\u00a014.11.08.<\/p>\n<p>2.      The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0June\u00a08,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        2010.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      Shri\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0J.S.P.Singh,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.<\/p>\n<p>4.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0through\u00a0audio\u00a0conferencing.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>5.      The \u00a0 Respondent \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 revised \u00a0 seniority \u00a0 list, \u00a0 as \u00a0 directed \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 \u00a0 was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant.\u00a0\u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0difference\u00a0in\u00a0marks\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0another\u00a0candidate\u00a0<br \/>\n               and\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0examination,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0 \u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0was\u00a0no\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              discrepancy\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0difference\u00a0in\u00a0marks\u00a0\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0explained.\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0difference\u00a0was\u00a0due\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              to\u00a0two\u00a0reasons\u00a0i)\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Complainant\u00a0had\u00a0asked\u00a0for\u00a0marks\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0written\u00a0examination\u00a0whereas\u00a0the\u00a0other\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              candidate \u00a0 \u00a0 had \u00a0 asked \u00a0 for \u00a0 aggregate \u00a0 marks \u00a0 (the \u00a0 aggregate \u00a0 marks \u00a0 is \u00a0 the \u00a0 total \u00a0 of \u00a0 marks\u00a0 given\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              separately\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0written\u00a0exam,\u00a0\u00a0viva\u00a0voce\u00a0and\u00a0service\u00a0record\u00a0\u00a0and\u00a0ii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0written\u00a0exam\u00a0when\u00a0conducted,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              is\u00a0initially\u00a0for\u00a0\u00a0100\u00a0marks\u00a0but\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0reduced\u00a0by\u00a050%\u00a0in\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0give\u00a0weightage\u00a0of\u00a030%\u00a0to\u00a0viva\u00a0voce\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              20%\u00a0to\u00a0service\u00a0record\u00a0thereby\u00a0making\u00a0the\u00a0total\u00a0100.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0complaint\u00a0that\u00a0two\u00a0\u00a0different\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              rules \u00a0 had \u00a0 been \u00a0 furnished \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 against \u00a0 the \u00a0 same \u00a0 point \u00a0 in \u00a0 two \u00a0 different \u00a0 responses, \u00a0 \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0 \u00a0first\u00a0time\u00a0relevant\u00a0extract\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0IREM\u00a0was\u00a0provided.\u00a0\u00a0Later\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              Railway\u00a0Board\u00a0Circular\u00a0No.RBE272\/1999\u00a0indicating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0names\u00a0of\u00a0all\u00a0candidates\u00a0who\u00a0acquired\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              60%\u00a0qualification\u00a0marks\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0placed\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0panel\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0original\u00a0seniority\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0feeder\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              grade \u00a0 and \u00a0 not \u00a0 on \u00a0 the \u00a0 basis \u00a0 of \u00a0 merit \u00a0 list, \u00a0 was \u00a0 furnished \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Complainant. \u00a0 According \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              Respondent\u00a0both\u00a0rules\u00a0were\u00a0relevant\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0being\u00a0sought.\u00a0 \u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              supply\u00a0of\u00a0information,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0on\u00a022.10.08\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              Commission\u00a0\u00a0they\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0\u00a0receive\u00a0the\u00a0Order\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0\u00a0through\u00a0the\u00a0normal\u00a0channel\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              therefore\u00a0the\u00a0Order\u00a0had\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0collected\u00a0personally\u00a0on\u00a019.11.08\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a017.12.08.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0explained\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0order\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              was\u00a0given\u00a03\u00a0weeks\u00a0to\u00a0furnish\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0but\u00a0they\u00a0had\u00a0taken\u00a04\u00a0weeks\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0same,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              additional\u00a0one\u00a0week\u00a0 \u00a0delay\u00a0caused\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0travel\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0back\u00a0to\u00a0 \u00a0Hazipur\u00a0 \u00a0from\u00a0Delhi\u00a0before\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              furnishing\u00a0the\u00a0reply.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Complainant\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0clarification\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO.<\/p>\n<p>6.            The \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 after \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 both\u00a0 sides\u00a0 holds\u00a0 that\u00a0 the\u00a0 decision\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 Commission\u00a0 had\u00a0 been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     complied\u00a0with\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0was\u00a0no\u00a0significant\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0furnishing\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     7.       The\u00a0case\u00a0is\u00a0therefore\u00a0closed\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0end.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                                                         \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                                  (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                         Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>     Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n<p> (G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.      Shri\u00a0Sanjay\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Singh<br \/>\n        H.No.24,\u00a0LIC\u00a0Colony<br \/>\n        PO\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Chitragupta\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n        PS\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Patrakar\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n        Kankerbagh<br \/>\n        Patna\u00a0800\u00a0020<\/p>\n<p>2.      The\u00a0PIO<br \/>\n        East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n        O\/o\u00a0General\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n        Hajipur\u00a0844\u00a0101<br \/>\n        Bihar<\/p>\n<p>3.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n        East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n        O\/o\u00a0General\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n        Hajipur\u00a0844\u00a0101<br \/>\n        Bihar<\/p>\n<p>4.      Officer\u00a0incharge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n<p>5.      Press\u00a0E\u00a0Group,\u00a0CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/OP\/C\/2009\/000006\u00adAD Dated\u00a0June\u00a08,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Shri\u00a0Sanjay\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Singh Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Hajipur Adjunct\u00a0to\u00a0CIC\u00a0Order\u00a0\u00a0No.CIC\/OK\/A\/2008\/00502\u00a0dt.24.10.08 Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.26.2.09\u00a0before\u00a0CIC\u00a0regarding\u00a0non\u00adcompliance\u00a0of\u00a0decision\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0his\u00a0 complaint,\u00a0he\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0by\u00a0CIC\u00a0on\u00a022.10.08\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0 \u00a0Commission\u00a0had\u00a0 decided\u00a0as\u00a0follows: i) Regarding\u00a0Seniority\u00a0List\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0post\u00a0of\u00a0Publicity\u00a0Inspector,\u00a0Complainant\u00a0wanted\u00a0the\u00a0revised \u00a0 seniority\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0basis\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0representations\u00a0submitted\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Department.\u00a0\u00a0Hon&#8217;ble\u00a0CIC\u00a0directed\u00a0the \u00a0 department\u00a0to\u00a0examine\u00a0the\u00a0issue\u00a0and\u00a0give\u00a0a\u00a0reply\u00a0accordingly. ii) The \u00a0 Complainant \u00a0 had \u00a0 asked \u00a0 for \u00a0 marks \u00a0 obtained \u00a0 by \u00a0 different [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-220310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-24T23:17:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-24T23:17:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":641,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-24T23:17:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-24T23:17:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-24T23:17:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010"},"wordCount":641,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010","name":"Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-24T23:17:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sanjay-kymar-singh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Shri Sanjay Kymar Singh vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220310"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220310\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}