{"id":220765,"date":"2010-09-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010"},"modified":"2016-09-22T20:43:47","modified_gmt":"2016-09-22T15:13:47","slug":"theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H.K.Rathod,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/10013\/2009\t 5\/ 5\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 10013 of 2009\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nTHEOLIA\nWIND POWER PRIVATE LTD &amp; 1 - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nGETCO\nKNOWN AS GUJARAT ENERGY TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD &amp; 2 -\nRespondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nBK DAMANI for\nPetitioner(s) : 1 - 2. \nNOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1 - 3. \nMR\nPREMAL R JOSHI for Respondent(s) : 1, \nMS SANGITA VISHEN AGP for\nRespondent(s) : 2, \nMR BD KARIA for Respondent(s) :\n3, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 29\/09\/2010 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>Heard<br \/>\n\tlearned senior advocate Mr. Mihir Joshi with learned advocate Mr. BK<br \/>\n\tDamani on behalf of petitioner, learned Advocate General Mr. Kamal<br \/>\n\tTrivedi with learned AGP Ms. Sangita Vishen on behalf of respondent<br \/>\n\tno. 2, learned advocate Mr. PR Joshi for respondent no. 1 and<br \/>\n\tlearned advocate Mr. BD Karia on behalf of respondent no. 3.\n<\/p>\n<p>This<br \/>\n\tCourt has passed an order on 15\/9\/2010, which is quoted as under:\n<\/p>\n<p> Heard<br \/>\nlearned Senior Advocate Mr.Mihir Joshi with learned advocate<br \/>\nMr.Damani on behalf of petitioners, learned advocate Mr.Premal Joshi<br \/>\nfor respondent No.1, learned<br \/>\nAdvocate General Mr.Kamal Trivedi with learned AGP Ms.Sangeeta Vishen<br \/>\non behalf of respondent No.2 and learned advocate Mr.B.D.Karia for<br \/>\nrespondent No.3.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tToday, when the<br \/>\nmatter is taken up for hearing, learned Senior Advocate Mr.Mihir<br \/>\nJoshi made a voluntary statement without prejudice to the rights and<br \/>\ncontentions of petitioners that petitioners are prepared to furnish<br \/>\nbank guarantee for a period of one year as per the requirement of<br \/>\nrespondent No.1   GETCO.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tLearned advocate<br \/>\nMr.Premal Joshi appearing for respondent No.1 requests for some tome<br \/>\nto have the instructions on this statement from respondent No.1.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tAccordingly, the<br \/>\nmatter is adjourned to 23.9.2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>Today,<br \/>\n\tlearned advocate Mr. Damani placed on record affidavit in response<br \/>\n\tto letter dated 21\/9\/2010 issued by GETCO.  Copy thereof is served<br \/>\n\tto other side, therefore, same is taken on record.  The averment<br \/>\n\tmade in aforesaid affidavit in para 1 and 2 which are quoted as<br \/>\n\tunder:\n<\/p>\n<p>\t 1.\tI say that<br \/>\n\tthe petitioner has stated that without prejudice to its rights and<br \/>\n\tcontentions it was willing to furnish a bank guarantee as per<br \/>\n\tformate accepted by the respondent from other units\/companies. This<br \/>\n\twas recorded in an order dated 15\/9\/2010 and also reiterated in its<br \/>\n\tletter dated 15\/9\/2010 written by the petitioner company to the<br \/>\n\tGETCO.  Annexed hereto and marked as Annexure I is the copy of the<br \/>\n\tletter dated 15\/9\/2010 issued by the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tI<br \/>\n\tsay and submit that the petitioner has now received a letter from<br \/>\n\tthe respondent dated 21\/9\/2010 which imposes additional conditions<br \/>\n\ton the petitioner.  I state that the issue can not be kept for<br \/>\n\tre-adjudication by the GERC as observed by the respondent and the<br \/>\n\tterm of the bank guarantee should be as accepted by the respondent<br \/>\n\tfrom other units\/companies, as per their normal format which has<br \/>\n\tbeen annexed along with the letter dated 15\/9\/2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>\n\tformate which has been annexed to aforesaid affidavit page 320 Item<br \/>\n\tno. 2 where Bank Guarantee is required to be given by petitioner to<br \/>\n\tGETCO for a period of one year from date on which it having<br \/>\n\teffective and within one year period petitioner has to complete work<br \/>\n\tand to generate power.  The relevant Item no. 2 is quoted as under:\n<\/p>\n<p>\t Whereas the<br \/>\n\tVendor has assured the GETCO that the arrangement would be made at<br \/>\n\tthe site for completing the work of laying the &#8212;- Kms lines, Byas<br \/>\n\tand all other work approved vide GETCO&#8217;s letter dated &#8212;-. For<br \/>\n\twhich the estimate has been paid and work will be completed within<br \/>\n\tone year from the date on which Bank Guarantee is given by<br \/>\n\tpetitioner.  If the work is delayed beyond date on which Bank<br \/>\n\tGuarantee is given on completion of one year, from that date, Bank<br \/>\n\tGuarantee is valid for encashing by GETCO.\n<\/p>\n<p>After<br \/>\n\tdiscussing item no. 2 as referred above, it is made clear between<br \/>\n\tall parties that work will be completed within one year period from<br \/>\n\tthe date of giving Bank Guarantee.  Meaning thereby that during this<br \/>\n\tone year period after completing work, petitioner must have to<br \/>\n\tgenerate power and inject within a period of one year from the date<br \/>\n\ton which Bank Guarantee is given.\n<\/p>\n<p>Learned<br \/>\n\tadvocate Mr. Karia submitted that let petitioner may approach to<br \/>\n\trespondent no. 3 Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission for<br \/>\n\taccepting Bank Guarantee by GETCO.  After receiving such application<br \/>\n\tfrom petitioner, respondent no. 3 Gujarat Electricity Regulatory<br \/>\n\tCommission will pass necessary order after receiving No Objection<br \/>\n\tfrom GETCO.\n<\/p>\n<p>In<br \/>\n\tlight of aforesaid submission made by all learned advocates<br \/>\n\tappearing on behalf of respective parties and whatever arrangement<br \/>\n\tmade as referred above, it is directed to each respective party to<br \/>\n\tabide it and this exercise is required to be completed by parties<br \/>\n\twithin a period of two months from date of receiving copy of present<br \/>\n\torder.  It is made clear by this Court that aforesaid arrangement<br \/>\n\tand order passed by this Court is without prejudice to rights and<br \/>\n\tcontention of each respective party with a direction to petitioner<br \/>\n\tto give Bank Guarantee within a period of two months to GETCO.\n<\/p>\n<p>In<br \/>\n\tlight of this back ground, whatever earlier adverse order is passed<br \/>\n\tby GETCO against present petitioner, will not come in way of<br \/>\n\tpetitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>In<br \/>\n\tview of above observation and direction, present petition is<br \/>\n\tdisposed of by this Court without expressing any opinion on merits<br \/>\n\twith a liberty to approach by concern party to this Court in case of<br \/>\n\tany difficulty.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t(H.K.RATHOD,<br \/>\nJ)<\/p>\n<p>asma<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010 Author: H.K.Rathod,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/10013\/2009 5\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10013 of 2009 ========================================================= THEOLIA WIND POWER PRIVATE LTD &amp; 1 &#8211; Petitioner(s) Versus GETCO KNOWN AS GUJARAT ENERGY TRANSMISSION [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-220765","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-22T15:13:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-22T15:13:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":835,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-22T15:13:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-22T15:13:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-22T15:13:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010"},"wordCount":835,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010","name":"Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-22T15:13:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/theolia-vs-getco-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Theolia vs Getco on 29 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220765","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220765"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220765\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220765"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220765"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220765"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}