{"id":220970,"date":"2008-05-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008"},"modified":"2018-07-12T19:17:54","modified_gmt":"2018-07-12T13:47:54","slug":"maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
W.P.1543i.O7\n\nIN THE HIGH cotmrr or KARHATAKA AT  ._\n\nmrrsn 1*:-as THE 26TH DAY or MAY. zoos     \"\n\nTHE HOIPBLE MKJUSTIZCE :\u00a7;sjPA*r1_r.    \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nMaatha Vidya Samsthe  _ 7\nRepresented by its Socretary, \n\nWRIT psrrrzox no. gsqs-3.'; 2oo_:';*_,_,-:g_'_:;;:\u00a7_z;g'iis'r;ja=s-.oVV  \n\nSmt. Nagarathna, Wfo Do\u00a7ldavtit':rap\u00a7a_, \" \n\nAged about 50   \n\nResiding at Oba.1\u00e91p:_1i\u00e9i, . '  _   V\nShivapura Posit,  \" V. K\nGubbiTa1uk,  Di:3_t1*_i.<:t'i;.' ~ \n\n(By 3:1. A2V.Gs.s1\u00e9\ufb02d'i;a;oppa',.._\u00a7u!\u00a7;.3. _'\n\nAND:\n\n1. Sri; 'Madakuari Viag\u00e9a Samsme {Regd),\n\n R\u00e9\ufb01ireisorztcd by Sm1:,.,_;5udha Devi,\n"  0 Dhalza-3_1;'aya, Aged about 40 ycam,\nV   its Secretary,\n Obalapiiara, Shrlvapura. Post,\n" ff\u00e9gaiava\u00e9ii B\ufb01obli, G11bbi'I'a1uk,\nTumklir' District.\n\n" " --: AA The  missioner of Education,\n\n V. Deparmcnt of i'ublio Iiistzuctions,\n'  "N_m~pathu,nga Road,\n" New Public Office Building,\n\n\u00ab __;K.R.Circ}c, Bangalore \u00bb-- 560 001.\n\n    Govemment of Kamataka\n\n:35 Appellate Authority,\n\nSecretary to Govemment~2,\n(P\ufb01maly 85 Secondary E\u00e9ucation)\nEducation Department,\n\n PETITIOi'IER\n\n\n\nW\u00b0.P.15431.0'?\n\nMultistotied Building, \nBangalore M 560 003.  RE8PO!i_Dm\\I_1'$_\n\n{By Sri. M.V.Hiremath, Adv. for C] R- 1;\nSri.B.1V\u00a3anohar, AGA for R-2 & R-3}\n\nThis petition is med under Aniexes. e226 5:. :22? o\u00a3i'ih"'e.\nConstitution of India praying to quashi  "C.3rdei'V. 'vvz:1atg:d.'\n02.04.2007 passe\u00e9 by the 2nd respondent _V  _ Agipe\u00e9lt.<\/pre>\n
No.152] 1999 proeiueed as Annex’u:je–F’ \u00e911_owi11g the Aapplio\u00e9gtion  L.<\/p>\n
in question and etc.  <\/p>\n
This petition comingon  Piearitnggithis day,
\nthe Court made the fol1oWi3:;g”:~.. f  . V <\/p>\n
_.o_5i.;.$___Iiaf.i\n<\/p>\n
1. In this__.   f\ufb01eif vnetitioner-institu\ufb01on is
\nchailenging ….   ”  passed by the
\nCommissioner’ of of ?ub1ic Instructions,<\/p>\n
Bangalore, ‘iii. Apvpe’-alt vicle Annexu1″e–F. The<\/p>\n
_Vpetitione\u00a7:iV has aIso_i_Vieiha]iienged the ottier dated 21.08.2007<\/p>\n
in “.pa:’s3.=;dx” 3;,”  “3\u00a7d respondent-Govemzaaent of Karnataka vide<\/p>\n
A1:i12.\u00a2::i;;\u00e9\u00bb’o;j\\t\\i f{i.i’Vv’C\u20ac3I3.Sequentia1 relief is also sought by the<\/p>\n
i it petitioner seeking a direction to the 2nd reoponcient to aiiow’ the<\/p>\n
it it ” anplieations “\ufb01led by the petitioner vide Az:1::1exures–D and E.<\/p>\n
   The dispute between the petitioner and the 15*’ respondent<\/p>\n
”  _ ‘t”is.i\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7i:11 regartl to the question of alleged transfer of Sri.Madakari<\/p>\n
High School, Nidavanda, situated in Nelamangala taiuk, in<\/p>\n
@*<\/p>\n
W.P,1543l.0’7<\/p>\n
favour of the petitiozler-i1:1stit1.1tio1:1. The assertion: <\/p>\n
petitioner is that by a resolution dated 09.03.19\u20ac}’4:”   0′<\/p>\n
the 18* I’\u20ac’,’S\u00a7)OZ1(Zl8I1t-Il3.S’\u00a3it11ti0{1 the mailagem\u00e9entfdot;   0 0<\/p>\n
School was txansferied in favour of <\/p>\n
the purpose of running the   the * 0′<\/p>\n
petitioner-I11stitutio13, had also passet1._a”..0. tesovliztion on
\n09.03.1994 accepting and  f\u00e9tflhshehsilhahsfer. The 013?:
\nhad passed an orde:’–dated:A’22’.:02A.  the transfer.
\nAgg1’i3V\u20acd by   litflfespondent had \ufb01led
\nan appealv’_h_eto’r\u00a7;”::-  Public Instructions,
\nBangaloresz   Commissioner set aside the<\/p>\n
order passed the   by the same, the petitioner<\/p>\n
herein    Vheforefthe Government. The said appeal<\/p>\n
  16.052005 and the matter came to be<\/p>\n
 \u00bbt.o~..theIbmmissioner for a fresh enquiry. A copy of<\/p>\n
Z  the  isprodueed at A11nex13.Ie~A. At paragraph 9 of<\/p>\n
 oxiderz the Government has found that in. the xerox<\/p>\n
A jlthe resolution produced by the petitioner herein (before<\/p>\n
  the Government} in pages 5 and 6 the resolutions stated to have<\/p>\n
 heel} passed in the meeting held on 16.02.1994 was available<\/p>\n
and in pages 7 to 9 the tesolution stated to have been passed on<\/p>\n
09.03.1994 which related to the alleged transfer of the school of<\/p>\n
\ufb01r<\/p>\n
W.P.},S431.0′?\n<\/p>\n
4\u00bb<\/p>\n
the \u00a35″ respo1:1dent–m3nagement in favour of the petitioner<\/p>\n
herein was avaiiabie. The Government also found 3<\/p>\n
resolution book containing the resolution dateci {}9.”Q;:’_’3. 1:9′???   <\/p>\n
not taken on record before the Commiseionet at t11eVit1″zn_e When’.<\/p>\n
the matter was heard. It is further seei1__fi*oii1 paiegfapfi  <\/p>\n
the 15* respondent hexein had alsov-eoioduced-.aV it<\/p>\n
the State Government corlfendittgiii it Wae i  resolution
\nbook pertaining to the  contained
\nIesolutions passed..:tiuxing;’Aitj:i\u00a2 on 06.02.1994,
\n06.04.1994,  i:F.J9\u00a7?r;iiiiiiBased on the said
\ndocument,.—-it-     .iGovernment by the 13′
\nrespondetit ho; ouch Iesolution passed on<\/p>\n
09.03.1994    aiieged transfer of the school.<\/p>\n
_.TI,’he petitioiier Iierein contended that the resolution book<\/p>\n
A”pro\u20aciVu<_3ed  respondent herein was a concocted one as<\/p>\n
sig\ufb02n~ato.resVV~i?"'n1embers under the aileged resolution dated.<\/p>\n
V 16.O2.i\ufb01(}O\u20aci<V:\\.a7ei'e in the hand–wri\ufb0131g of a single person. The<\/p>\n
.,',A"';_\u00a7};W;i\u00a7\u00a5JC'I7i1_II1\u20acfIV1"{' has referred to this aspect of the matter and has<\/p>\n
" "that the matter required serious and detailed<\/p>\n
\ufb01onsideration particularly as to whether the documents<\/p>\n
 jmoduceci by the 15' respondent were genuine one or not. 111 this<\/p>\n
b md, the matter was remitted back to the Commissioner<\/p>\n
w;p.15431.o7'
\n.3<\/p>\n
with a directzion to issne notice to the parties and"-.pe:ss<\/p>\n
appropriate orders after hearing the matter afresh.   i<\/p>\n
3. When the matter was pending before the K”<\/p>\n
the petitioner herein made an applieatien ;\u00e9ee\u00a7\u00a7;izig._a’~di1ee”tien’iii:<\/p>\n
the 1″ respondent to produce the’ies91u\ufb01ei3   by  L’<\/p>\n
them arid thereafter to send the  -fer  of the
\nsignatures to the hand~wiiting_e}rpe:g\u00a7i’%”‘~ ~ -l’3),4y’vi:=l.A1:”1′”{“.1’t1CI’ direction was
\nalso sought to the Chief   Panchayat, to
\nproduce the ippstateei:e”iee\u00a7;e.:e’eee’–s’ebm1tted by the 1%:
\nrespondent   aitieeediy contained the
\nphotogmpitts   the members of the
\nManaging  has by his order<\/p>\n
dated  titre appiicatioa holding that there<\/p>\n
 ad”n:eed’Afoi*..refen’iri\u00a7tbe matter for the expert opinion. The<\/p>\n
 ‘_.t1:a.e View that no further reference for the<\/p>\n
   was requixe\u00e9. at that moment as there was<\/p>\n
_,  ‘eicteugh niaterial on record to hear the case on merits. it is<\/p>\n
  by the ieemed Additional Govemment Advocate that<\/p>\n
it –\ufb01iereiafter the matter has been adjourned for being heard. It is<\/p>\n
  at the bar that the matter is still pending<\/p>\n
 em\ufb01on on merits by the Commissioner.\n<\/p>\n
  @;\/same for handwvriting expert,<\/p>\n
W.P.15431.()7
\n7<\/span><\/p>\n
6. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties arrtl.To11
\ncareful perusal of the materials on record, it is
\nspeci\ufb01c stand taken by the 1″ respondent in   K V’
\nobiections \ufb01led to the writ petition is
\nthe resolu\ufb01on book containing the lirest\u00a711:l?.io;;~.
\n09.03.1994. ‘\u00a7’herefoIe as nghey  by   fer V
\nthe 1″ respondent, a direction tile reseiution book
\ncontaining the resolution    be issued.\n<\/p>\n
However, if the    by the 15*
\nrespondent~Ins;itatiQn:li:- 7:i;s     the purpose of
\nenabling to l  photo copies of the
\n ‘allegedly part of the original
\nresolution book’ not then it is open for the
\npetitione.r;toi’insist inference shall be drawn against
\n  for not producing the original of the
\nresolution  of which they have produced before
\nivtire Gorremsrrenvillwhen the matter was in appeal. it is perhaps
\n aeontexrt that the Commissioner has observed that on the
\n   ‘available materials, the matter could be disposed of and<\/p>\n
:\u00a3her’eilwas no need for calling for any documents or for referring<\/p>\n
W,P.1S43I.()’?\n<\/p>\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
7. It cannot be forgotten that the proceedings  the<\/p>\n
Commissioner are not pmceedings before a Civil Cenrt:’vf\u00a73ei’e<\/p>\n
such procedure to have the matter referred. for    V’ <\/p>\n
the ha11d-writing experts can be r’esc\u00a3rted”i;o,_ \ufb01lng <\/p>\n
e\ufb01ort has been already made once <\/p>\n
the stand of the 1*” respondent ‘i”that   reskoil\ufb01tion is it<\/p>\n
passed by it and the same is eoritradieted  “ti1e’ip-etitioner
\nstating that a resolution  fact passed on
\n09.03.1994, on i:::asi2f.;iioit”g  iproduced by the
\nrespective   and on the
\nbasis of other.AeAvideiii1ee\u00a2.  has to record necessary
\n\ufb01ndings.    for the petitioner to invoke
\nthe jurisdietionof  Article 226 to challenge an
\n  passed.i:’o;,_f__tii.e Commissioner, particularly when he
\nin  materials available were su\ufb01eient for him to<\/p>\n
  merits. After the matter is decided on<\/p>\n
V .mer’its.;”if  petitioner is aggrieved by the findings recorded and<\/p>\n
it it  ‘\u00abf}?.E’;;iCI’ fjassed, it is open to him to take up all the CO1’\ufb02\u20ac1’l.tiOI1S<\/p>\n
  avaiiabie to him including the ones that are being<\/p>\n
 against the impugned interim order gassed. I do not \ufb01nd<\/p>\n
it need to interfere with the interim order passed by the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008 Author: B.S.Patil W.P.1543i.O7 IN THE HIGH cotmrr or KARHATAKA AT ._ mrrsn 1*:-as THE 26TH DAY or MAY. zoos ” THE HOIPBLE MKJUSTIZCE :\u00a7;sjPA*r1_r. BETWEEN: Maatha Vidya Samsthe _ 7 Represented by its Socretary, WRIT psrrrzox no. gsqs-3.’; […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-220970","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMaatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-12T13:47:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-12T13:47:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1152,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008\",\"name\":\"Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-12T13:47:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-12T13:47:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-12T13:47:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008"},"wordCount":1152,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008","name":"Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-12T13:47:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maatha-vidya-samsthe-regd-vs-sri-madakari-vidya-samsthe-regd-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Maatha Vidya Samsthe (Regd) vs Sri Madakari Vidya Samsthe (Regd) on 26 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220970","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220970"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220970\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220970"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220970"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220970"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}