{"id":221060,"date":"2009-07-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-11-08T10:50:47","modified_gmt":"2016-11-08T05:20:47","slug":"satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009<\/div>\n
CWP No.3212 of 2009                               1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH\n\n                                     CWP No.3212 of 2009\n                                     Date of decision July 17, 2009\n\nSatya Pal                                               .......   Petitioner\n                               Versus\n\nThe Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ambala and others\n\n                                                  ........ Respondents\n\nCORAM:            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN\n\nPresent:-         Mr. J. S. Bedi, Advocate\n                  for the petitioner.\n\n                  Mr. D. S. Nalwa, Additional Advocate\n                  General, Haryana for respondent Nos. 2 to 4.\n\n                         ****\n<\/pre>\n
                  1.     Whether reporters of local newspapers may be
\n                         allowed to see the judgment ?\n<\/p>\n
                  2.     To be referred to the reporters or not?\n<\/p>\n
                  3.     Whether the judgment should be reported in the
\n                         digest?\n<\/p>\n
K. Kannan, J(oral).\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                         1.    The writ petition challenges the award<\/p>\n
passed by the Labour Court, Ambla dismissing the reference sought at the<\/p>\n
instance of the workman claiming that he had been illegally terminated.<\/p>\n
According to him the was working as a daily wager as a Mali-cum-<\/p>\n
Chowkidar from 6.6.2000 and he had been in continuous service till he was<\/p>\n
lawfully terminated on 8.1.2004. On behalf of the respondent-Management<\/p>\n
a plea was taken that he had voluntarily abandoned service on 8.1.2004<\/p>\n
and he had not joined subsequently.        The Labour Court rejected the<\/p>\n
contention of the Management and found on weighty evidence placed on<\/p>\n
behalf of the workman of WW-1 and WW-50 that the workman was in<\/p>\n
employment till 8.1.2004 and he had established that he had worked for<\/p>\n
240 days continuously before the termination. The Labour Court, however<\/p>\n
still did not grant relief sought for on the ground that his engagement could<\/p>\n
qualify for exception to the term retrenchment under Section 2 (oo) (bb)
\n CWP No.3212 of 2009                                2<\/span><\/p>\n
and denied to him any relief.\n<\/p>\n
                   2.    Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner<\/p>\n
argued that the decisions relied on by the Labour Court applied to cases<\/p>\n
where engagement had been on a specific contract for a specified period<\/p>\n
and again the decisions that took the guidance from Secretary, State of<\/p>\n
Karnatka and others Vs. Umadevi and others 2006 (4) SCC 1 ought to<\/p>\n
understood as applicable only to civil services and the service with<\/p>\n
respondent-Management could not be likened to civil services.<\/p>\n
                   3.    Although, the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme<\/p>\n
Court in Uma Devi’s case (supra) was with reference to a civil service and<\/p>\n
the effect of illegal appointments the principle enunciated in the said<\/p>\n
judgment clearly held down that in respect of any public appointment which<\/p>\n
are governed by statutory rules and regulations if there is any violation,<\/p>\n
mere length of service would not afford to a workman any right to seek for<\/p>\n
either regularization or reinstatement. This principle has been followed in<\/p>\n
several decisions and applied in Labour Jurisprudence also in cases where<\/p>\n
violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution is made out.           The<\/p>\n
respondent-Management is a department of the Government and no<\/p>\n
recruitment rule could provide for employment without the normal process<\/p>\n
of selection through advertisement or sponsorship through employment<\/p>\n
exchange. If the award of the Labour Court would fail in any way, it was its<\/p>\n
assumption that the termination of services did not fall within the definition<\/p>\n
of retrenchment.    Even for applying Section 2 (oo) (bb) there shall be<\/p>\n
specific contractual terms that sets out the actual tenure of employment. An<\/p>\n
ad hoc employment or       employment as a daily wager ought not to be<\/p>\n
always understood as a contractual employment that would fall within the<\/p>\n
excepted categories of retrenchment. Having regard to the finding that the<\/p>\n
workman had put in 240 days before his termination and having further<\/p>\n
regard to the fact that the Labour Court was rejecting the plea on behalf of
\n CWP No.3212 of 2009                               3<\/span><\/p>\n
State that he had been employed only in a spell of three months in the<\/p>\n
previous years, I accept the contention of the workman that he had been<\/p>\n
engaged from 6.6.2002. By such reckoning, the workman would have put<\/p>\n
in about 3 years and 7 months of employment. Having regard to the fact<\/p>\n
that his services were terminated in 2004 and he has been fighting for<\/p>\n
justice for more than 5 years, the workman shall be entitled to<\/p>\n
compensation that would fit with the status of his employment and length<\/p>\n
of service.\n<\/p>\n
                   4.    Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit<\/p>\n
that in the event of compensation he shall be granted at least 20,000\/- per<\/p>\n
year of service. There is no hard and fast rule relating to compensation<\/p>\n
and it is not possible to discern from any judgment of this Hon’ble Court or<\/p>\n
from the Hon’ble Supreme Court that there should be a particular sum of<\/p>\n
over 20,000\/-. The guidance that has come through pronouncements of<\/p>\n
the Hon’ble Supreme Court have been that the Court shall have due regard<\/p>\n
to the hard realities of life of a workman losing his job who had been<\/p>\n
engaged as a daily wager. Committing the state or its functionaries to<\/p>\n
large fiscal burden would    equally be inappropriate without diluting the<\/p>\n
effect of violation of Article 14 and 16 that the new dispensation in Uma<\/p>\n
Devi’s case (supra) and other decisions have laid down, in my view, the<\/p>\n
appropriate compensation would be Rs.35,000\/- which is payable within a<\/p>\n
period of 2 months and if there is any default, the amount shall bear simple<\/p>\n
interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum. The order of the Labour Court is<\/p>\n
set aside. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.<\/p>\n
                                                         (K. KANNAN)
\n                                                           JUDGE
\nJuly 17, 2009
\narchana\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009 CWP No.3212 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.3212 of 2009 Date of decision July 17, 2009 Satya Pal ……. Petitioner Versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ambala and others …….. Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-221060","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSatya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-08T05:20:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-08T05:20:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":827,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-08T05:20:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-08T05:20:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-08T05:20:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009"},"wordCount":827,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009","name":"Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-08T05:20:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satya-pal-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Satya Pal vs The Presiding Officer on 17 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221060","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221060"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221060\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221060"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221060"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221060"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}