{"id":221069,"date":"2009-11-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009"},"modified":"2019-03-03T18:23:19","modified_gmt":"2019-03-03T12:53:19","slug":"sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE) HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 13\"\" DAY OF NOVEMBER'\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONTBLE MR.JUS'I'ICE.A.S._'I%\u00a7O'P2if\u20acI\u00a7%P.,'_'_A.V \n\nWRIT PE'E'ITION NO. 33512w3:%=52T_%O%\/20091   %\n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1\n\nSR}; SRIDHAR s\/'O CI*Ti1I).,A-MBARAM \"\nAGED ABOUT 5'5_Y-EARS _  .. \n\nR\/O NO. G 102 \"  E. j.\n\nVIJAYA KERAN APARTMENT\n\nATR PORT'RC_)AD;' _   . T,\nBANGALO}3i3'~\u00ab58O   \nSRE     \ns1\/_O LTATE-AR vEN,KA'1'A_I3AMAAN\n\nAGED..ABOLTTfr'75'~Y.\u00a7ARs_ \n\nSI\\\/IT. v1D1lT\"fA. SR1_:NiVuA.SA.N'\nw\/O V sr{1.NI'vfAsAA; '\n\n_ AGED. AE3OLf_T 65 YEARS\n\n RET1,T1O'NERs.._NO.2 AND 3 ARE\n\nR:\/'O $10,176, 1 Tim CROSS\n'\u00a3,1VEAEA\n\n\" AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS\n\nSTHUNUR VII',I,AGE. JAL\/\\ HOBLI\n\n BANGALORE NOR\"I'H ADDL TALUK\n\nBAN GALO RE\n\n\\i\n\n'-\n-N\n\n\n\n\")\n\n5 SMT. T LALETHAMMA W\/O 1\\\/IAI\\\u00a7JU\u00a7\\'ATII\nAGED ABOUT 59 YEARS\nR\/O 39, KARNIK ROAD\nSI\"IANKARAPURAE\\\/I\nBANGALORE \u00abw 560 004\n\n6 SR1 S A MANJUNATH S\/O LATE ANJA.NA;I>;jAf T   ~.\n\nAGED ABOUT 65 YEARS\nR\/O 39, RARNIK ROAD\nSHANKARAPURAM\nBANGALORE 560 004   ~\n\n7 SMT. UNO PINTO W\/O LA'rE\";:f. %\u20ac1NTO[J\"-  \u00bb H.\nAGED ABOUT 75  \"  '\n\n8 JOHN ADIL KAMAHATR\nS\/O LATEJ PENTO  _ \nAGED ABOUT .A9__Y-EAE:S _ V  ..\n\nPE'm'1ONERS NO] 'RN15-8'   '\n\nR\/ O GA13EMARANA1\u00bbiA1,1;1_._\nJALA1m:OE~;1.' \"   \n\n,'t3ANG;<$i,ORf:"NOR;T1~1 A1551; TALUK\nBAN GALORE uRE.A*N._E1S'r.,\n\n9 RATHNA PE.TYiAD\/O".LATE UMIRAM\n_ AGEDV _A501;<"I' 65 YEARS\n R\/O NO; -361, NATIONAL GAMES COMPLEX\n i_\u00a7QRAMANG"~x'L' '\n_13AN.GA:,ORE\n\n .   E.L:.jABET1\u00bb1 D\/O SANGLIANA\n\nAQED_ ABOUT 43 YEARS\n- R\/O. NO. 261, NATIONAL GAMES COMIEEX\n~. KQRANLANGALA\nBANGALORE  PEE'E'I'}'IONERS\n\n  'AAV_{B-ESI21; M R RAJAGOPAL & SR1: H N 1-BASAVARAJU, ADVS}\n\n\u00e9\n\n\n\nAND:\n\n1 THE 1')EPU'I'Y COMMESSIOENR\nBANGALORE URBAN DIST.\nBANGALORE\n\n2 THE -'I:AIISIIII.DAR ,\nBANGALROE NORTH A1){)I,"'I'}'5\\LU}{ \nYELAHANKA   'L\nBANGALORE URBAN DIST. "\n\n3 THE ASSISTANT DIREc*If_OF:\n\nOF LAND RECORDS '  ' _\n\nYELAHANKA ADDL TALEF; ..  "\n\nC\/O TALUK OFFICE, ' V  \n\nYELAHANKA 'IALU'\u00a3<_, * AI)._E)I'FIONA_L. I \n\nBANGALORE URBAN DIS_'_Ii;   .,\n .   -  I  RESi~'ONDENTS\n\n(BY SRFR\u00a7\u00a7I\u00a3?{IAR,,HCGiI?'] 3.] \n\n,TIIES"I\u00ab::,~ SVWFJII _ PE'F1'I'iONS ARE FILED UNDER\nARTICLES'Z26*&;'-.227"OF'--..TlLfE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA\nWITH A PRAYERAf'fQ"D1'i?IECT THE RESPONDENTS No.2\nAND 3, TC) EONIPI;E'I'E "AND FINALIZE THE SURVEY AND\nSE'I*I5LEMF:'N'I"AN1:a DLIF<AS'I'I PROCESS OF THE LANDS OF\nTHE\u00a7\u00a7SE;z PI\u00a3'I'I'"i7\u00a7_C)NI:"3\u00a7ZE3. COMPRISING IN SY.NO.22 OF\n\n  GAI;5~E1\u00a7IIAII.ALLI W1-.--LAGE. BANGALORE, AIDDL. NOR'I'H.\nI TALUK, AS PER THE NOTICE IN FORM NO.3 BEARING NO.\n\nTQEN"{a_)'I:)FF' 3\/200506, DT. NIL. IN VIEW OF THE ORDER\n\n .FASSED"~~I3YfI*I-IE ASSITANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE\n\nNORTH S*Uj_B.'1)IVISION. BANGALORE DT. 12.4.2005 VIDE\nAN:X~J,.._\u00b0' . \n\nWJHESE VVRET PETI'l'IONS COMING ON FOR\n\n  IIREIIIMINARY IIEA_RINc;, THIS DAY. THE COURT IVIADE\n*IjI~IE FOLLOWING:\n\nA\n\nfl'\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Sri R. Kumar. leameci Gm-‘er1m1e1’1t Ac1V.()e\u00bbe;1″i’e_V to<\/p>\n
accept: notice for respondentis N0. 1 to 3 2111:} \u00a7”iief jr::1_ei.=1_(3’ _<\/p>\n
of appearamre within a period of fgL1.r  QT ,  _\n<\/p>\n
2. The etitioners are before ‘this Cs1,iVr’.’–._ see’kir17′<\/p>\n
for issue of writ of mandamus\ufb01e”idirect:I’:;iesp’ontie’i1ts*..L<\/p>\n
N0. 2 and 3 to eonlplete \u00e9ii1e:1″i\u00bbfii1alise._   and
\nsei’t1en’1eni: and ditrasifs-pr0\u00ab;\u00a5essA t.H(e–iaridsuibevioiiging to
\nthe petitioners in  i0i”‘~..vCs;dief1aha11i village,<\/p>\n
Bangs10re- Nd:’i'{h__v’i”a1u1{}’pursuant, to the notice already
\nissued i13_s413’0rri’i  the direetioia issued by the<\/p>\n
Assjisitaent C\u00e9mniissiv-Jner as per Annexu’rewJ. T he<\/p>\n
. petitio\ufb01ei’s:h.erein claim right in respect of an extent of 2<\/p>\n
H ‘?1EE.i7.\u00a73S Sy.N0.22 of Gadeiiahalli vii1ag,ge.. With<\/p>\n
reEs_.\u00a7a1fd”*V.’vt’su’~1.j”\u00a7’\u00a7’) Vii:_..3_1A4e-is<\/p>\n
Assisiiant Direci’or of Land Recorcls to..c:.o’1*i’ipic\u00a7te. {lie<\/p>\n
survey set.t1en.1<~:nt in 1'especi' ()i't1_ie i3i.f\u00a7)i_v)e';:ijk'.ii'i–.q1,;:t:siio}1.'<\/p>\n
The order dated 12.04.2'OO__5 'f3&I'1l1t',.'iLi"i'A,V(":_'.v-::'_;_L v\u00a7\u00a7V”C()}7IV11I1iSSiQ1:iC1′ has also
\npassed an order in T.hiS _reg21ij(E. “=._”Pi1r._5suz1;iii i:h<-zreio. a<\/p>\n
notice as at _An:1exurve~\u00bb"Kv.is'Vissue:-_d' iiidiitvaiiiig the parties<\/p>\n
to apVp\u00e9\u00e9i1""diiif, th\u00e9f "s3Li:*.{\u00e9y p19_or}t\u00e9ediiigs to be taken on
\n22.02.200.53  in the present. petition is<\/p>\n
that pvL1rsL1danf tc1"the'v_s2i'id notice, no further p1'0(:eeding;s<\/p>\n
haif\u00e9' b_Cwf3I]<.n}1E'.1d 'ai'i'd"i:heref()re, the I'\u20acSp()I"1d(?1'11iS shouid<\/p>\n
  br;Ai,dire_V(_:\u00a3.V:%c{ v"i.o_ it',-:)mp1ei.e the prmtess.<\/p>\n
  1(3E1I'I1E?d Gcweriinieiii. Advocate would<\/p>\n
staI;e ih\u00e9it as per the d winieiiits prodiiced E:1}(,)I'"ig with<\/p>\n
,4…\n<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
(w<\/p>\n
the writ petition, the notice issued no doubt i’1.’1di(:ates<\/p>\n
that the parties were notified to appear in the st1′;fxrey’.<\/p>\n
The resp01’1dent.s would now verify the rL?C()’I’C}*.s-.\u00a3i_1′}d’_\u00e9ift\u00e9\u00e9re<\/p>\n
taking note of the fact. would Complete the.,:;\u00a7_rt)gies’s if ‘t11’e.._ ‘<\/p>\n
same has not yet been eompietetti.\n<\/p>\n
-41-. In the Eight ofthVe’.Etb()\\}e’,._t:1*1e 0r:~.ijf ‘g1iree!:i_tL)1iAt<1:";<\/p>\n
be issued in the present \u00bbpet4it.iV()1'1 .i's._t() djgrect the
\nrespondents No. 2 and  to'._ta_:'g<e f'v.1*'ther action pursuant<\/p>\n
to the notice as atv.-A'nneXu1fee;K"t.Q"t,T1'e petititm and<\/p>\n
complete'  surjxieytt"sett,le:n'e'nt process for which the<\/p>\n
proeeeelnrgsr  tbe\u00e9enr-~initiated by forwarding the<\/p>\n
d0eumer'It.__4tO_the.third:hijesp()nde11t.. In this regard, the<\/p>\n
thir;d"resp0I1\u00bbde1'1t shall issue a fresh notice to t.he<\/p>\n
 j;)etitid\u00bbr1"ers..Aand \u00e9i\ufb02tttteoneerned and thereafter complete<\/p>\n
   In order to hasten the process, the<\/p>\n
.'pe'titi0'nAers'I_shall fiie a certified Copy of this order with<\/p>\n
 the respondents N0. 2 and 3 within 21 period of four<\/p>\n
35<\/span><\/p>\n
.4-\n<\/p>\n
‘t<\/p>\n
*4<\/p>\n
weeks from the date 0f1’e(7eipt_ of a copy of 1.1118 0:’c,1e1*<\/p>\n
and fL1E’t,1’1f3I’ before the lap:-3:3 of one rilcmih 1:}1\u00a21′;::;ifu?r,<\/p>\n
appropriate r10t,ices shall be issued to i.he__j1562?.-.i1_~i–Q:1″1{‘:;rs’\u00ab<\/p>\n
and the parties concemed. ‘I’here2a.-z\ufb01htr,if.t.11e: 1.hi1j_d <\/p>\n
respondent shall take expedit’.i0L1s 5″;”t’\u20ac.}3S \u00a7fQV1’=.C5E)lT’I’f\ufb02\u00a331.i’ia3VIl<\/p>\n
ofthe entire process but in a11.y <–:.ve1:..t.  the [a-%v:1'it5i\u00a2f1*<:.V_pr<33ccss,'L<\/p>\n
shall be comphated within aV1_i1_L VC:L:;t.e.1j_ 11'n.1.i1:–  months
\nfrom the date of receipt  of this order.\n<\/p>\n
In t<:rm's,__0f_%\u00a31f2e';1b.QV::, t:hefpeti.i,io11s stand disposed<\/p>\n
of with '$16 '0r\u00a7.i.e1*  to"  H<\/p>\n
Sd\/ –\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n
h1;”p._\/_b11’1s  V’ <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE) HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13″” DAY OF NOVEMBER’ BEFORE THE HONTBLE MR.JUS’I’ICE.A.S._’I%\u00a7O’P2if\u20acI\u00a7%P.,’_’_A.V WRIT PE’E’ITION NO. 33512w3:%=52T_%O%\/20091 % BETWEEN : 1 SR}; SRIDHAR s\/’O CI*Ti1I).,A-MBARAM ” AGED ABOUT 5’5_Y-EARS _ .. R\/O NO. G 102 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-221069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-03T12:53:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-03T12:53:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":745,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-03T12:53:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-03T12:53:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-03T12:53:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009"},"wordCount":745,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009","name":"Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-03T12:53:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sridhar-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sridhar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221069"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221069\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}