{"id":221447,"date":"2008-09-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2"},"modified":"2018-12-19T22:40:13","modified_gmt":"2018-12-19T17:10:13","slug":"ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2","title":{"rendered":"M\/S The Farmer&#8217;S Co-Op Spinning &#8230; vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S The Farmer&#8217;S Co-Op Spinning &#8230; vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy<\/div>\n<pre>1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nC1RCUI':' BENCH AT DHARWAD\nDATED THIS THE 08TH DAY 01? SEPTEMBER 2008\nBEFORE \"\n\nTHE HOPPBLE MR. JUSTICE (1.12. KUMARASW{3_MY.:44ej'*.:..V\nCRIMINAL PETITION NO.362() 014* 200'? 7   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1 M\/ s The Farmer's Coop Sp1'm.ning'Mil1 Ltd.?,_I1; _ \" \u00b0\nRepresented by Chairman\nSri.R.N.Deshpande\n\ni2 Sri.R.N.Deshpande C.   .\n3\/0 Napappayyeu Chainiletm  ;  '\nAged 54     \nM] s The Far:_f11e.*;'.s'(3oZ9p\u20ac S3j\u00bbiI'z\ufb01i,:1g'iv1i1\u00a7 Ltd. ,\n\n3 SIi.N.:J.Kufahatti\"1.4 , \"  C\nS \/ 0 J 11n1;--xappa,*  \nAged 52 2 \" % '   \nM] s The F'armer's C'o;Spinning Miil Ltd. ,\n\n , A S1fi;'3E.B;ASomareddy___e .\n \" e Basaw\u00e9sre\u00e9idj, Director\n M]  Coop Spinning Mi1iLtd.,\n    PETYPIONERS\n\n(By sziwavind D.Kuikarni. Adv for\n\n  _ Basavaprabhu S Patil 65 Assts.)\n\n. ' T Th'e-Enforcement Of\ufb01C\u20acI'\n4'  .f\u00a7_'I'1e Employees Provident Fund Orgar\ufb01sa\ufb01on\n  IV Floor, Srinatll Complex\n9'  New Cotton Market\n\nHubii. . . . RESPONDENT\n\nThis Criminal Petition is \ufb01led under Section 482 Cr. 1?. C.\npraying to set aside the entire proceedings in CC\n\n52%'\n\n\n\n9-\n\nNo.312\/2004 pending on the file of the II Addl. Civil Judge\n(Jr.Dn.) and JMFC--~Il Court, Gadag.\n\nThis Criminal Petition is coming on for admission before\nthe Court this day, the Court made the following:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>I have heard the learned Counsel for the <\/p>\n<p>material placed before the Court is su\ufb01ieient to  <\/p>\n<p>matter at this stage. I have perused tlie&#8221;i*e&#8217;eo1jd&#8217;s. .;  l.<\/p>\n<p>2. The relevant facts leading to this reiiision petition<\/p>\n<p>is as under:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Fhe complaint is \ufb01led oy&#8221;mtlie; Enforceitienty Officer,<\/p>\n<p>Employees Provident Fund&#8217;  for taking<\/p>\n<p>eogxizaneeivof th_eSe_eti0n 14(1A) and 14A of the<br \/>\nEmployees&#8217;  Miscellaneous Provisions<br \/>\nAct, 1952:.&#8217; &#8221; One   the Inspector appointed under<\/p>\n<p>l\u00e9lectioo  &#8216;&#8230;_the Employees&#8217; Provident Funds and<\/p>\n<p> Misee1la&#8217;rieoiis&#8221;_~v.,\u00a71*oV*isions Act, $952. He is also a public<br \/>\n servant&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;w1t.y11n.&#8217;:&#8217;.-V name meaning of Section 21 of IPC and<\/p>\n<p> as &#8216;Assistant Pu&#8217;biic Prosecutor for the purpose of<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; M.\/X<\/p>\n<p>eor;.d:u.e&#8217;f;iiig the cases arising out of the Employees&#8217; Provident<br \/>\n V   Schemes framed there under. The Farmers&#8217;s Coop<\/p>\n<p> Mill Ltd., Hulko\ufb01 is a establishment within the<\/p>\n<p>meaning of the Employees Provident Funds and<br \/>\nMiscellarieous Provisions Act, 1952. The Employees&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Frovisions Act 1952, the<br \/>\n&#8216;Km&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>4*<\/p>\n<p>I During the relevant pexiod, the accused was incharge of the<\/p>\n<p>said factory and was responsible for the conduct of the<\/p>\n<p>business. But, due to their negligence, they have committed<\/p>\n<p>an offence punishable under Section 14 and 14(1A)<\/p>\n<p>Employees&#8217; Provident Funds and Miseeilaneous  &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>Act, 1952. The reasonable opportunity \\f.:as~\u00a7ven ton  <\/p>\n<p>accused for payment of dues, but the acetised-jt\u00e9ide tfneir-]ette&#8217;s&#8217;*~.r <\/p>\n<p>dated 30.08.2003 pleaded time<br \/>\nThe sanction order dated  .22. 1 for  &#8216;above<br \/>\nprosecution has been wanted    Fund<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner, Hubii,   eontiplaint was<\/p>\n<p>case against thewaccufsed&#8221;1:and4&#8243;&#8216;As_sued process. Hence, the<\/p>\n<p>case was registered. ~<\/p>\n<p>3, Aggreived   , same, the petitioners have<\/p>\n<p>preferrediithisijp  &#8220;before this Court.<\/p>\n<p>  for the petitioners submit that<\/p>\n<p>the.i.i\u00a7}i;rector caiinot be made as a party for these proceedings,<\/p>\n<p>   .._en&#8217;*e not dealing with the business. The<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;*~:._&#8217;.__cont1t.i&#8217;i3nn_&#8217;Mon amount has not been recovered from the<\/p>\n<p> Therefore, the question of depositing the amount<\/p>\n<p>before the Insurance Organisation does not arise. He further<\/p>\n<p>contended that the ad:ministrative charges have been paid for<br \/>\n(Edi.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;33<br \/>\nthe relevant period. Objection \ufb01led by the accused has not<\/p>\n<p>been considered.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. It is the contention of the learned Counsel forthe<\/p>\n<p>petitioner that the accused are Chairman, Vice <\/p>\n<p>Director of the company and therefore, they  V_I_:1\u20ac)lZ}\\&#8217;l7.)V:6 held&#8217;  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>responsible for commission of this o\ufb01&#8217;e&#8221;_r1C\u20acg_,,4ni j; <\/p>\n<p>6. Section MAG) of meVEn1p_loyeesf_ Prot.rident&#8221;&#8217;F:inds &#8221; i<\/p>\n<p>and Misceklaneous Provisions Act,V.tE-\u20ac332.  as <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If the person.  ievoifefice under<\/p>\n<p>this Act, tine schemeiior &#8216;tl.,;{e_  scheme<\/p>\n<p>or the  company, every<\/p>\n<p>lmrsdn, :;&#8217;$&#8221;?l6&#8243;:&#8221;-at  offence was<\/p>\n<p>   of, and was<br \/>\nresponsiVbie:&#8217;:&#8217;to&#8217;,i  for the conduct<\/p>\n<p>of  bnsiziess  company, as well as<\/p>\n<p>the CdlI1\ufb01aIi3i;  be deemed to be gtlilty of<\/p>\n<p> o\ufb01ence  shall be liabie to be<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; ~ .c  and punished accordingly;\n<\/p>\n<p>V.  that nothing contained in this<\/p>\n<p>. it stfofsection shall render any such person<br \/>\nit * : liable to any punishment, if he proves that<br \/>\nV&#8217; = -the offence was committed without his<br \/>\nknowledge or that he exercised all due<br \/>\ndiligence to prevent the commission of such<\/p>\n<p>offence. &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>7. In View of this Section, the submission of the<\/p>\n<p>learned Counsel for the petitioner that the Chairman, Vice<\/p>\n<p>s&#8230;\u00ab~&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Chairman aud Director were not responsible for conduct of<\/p>\n<p>the business of the company cannot be accepted.<\/p>\n<p>8. i have carefully persued the COlI3t]L)1.?3*.i;11Vt:L&#8221;:&#8230;u;T:1.V&#8217;}!3<\/p>\n<p>complainant discloses that in spite of several 2  M<\/p>\n<p>._ accused have not deposited the EFF icohtrichu-.tiop&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>to the mouth of January, February,   <\/p>\n<p>of quashing a criminal proceedihgirjlciishould be  livery it<\/p>\n<p>sparingly and with   too  rarest<br \/>\nof rare cases. Further,   be justi\ufb01ed in<br \/>\nembarking upon    tjo..  reliability or<br \/>\ngenuineness or   made in the FIR<br \/>\nor the complaiht;   caserreasonable opporutnicty<br \/>\nwas also given to  taayment of the said dues,<br \/>\nbut the accused dated 30.08.2003, pleaded for<br \/>\ntigrim, __ sspite  this,&#8221;&#8221;Cont1ibution amount was not paid.<\/p>\n<p>met-ass  was filed.\n<\/p>\n<p>V it . 9. is hot the case that; the complamt \ufb01led by the<\/p>\n<p> frivilous, vexatious and oppressive. Normally,<\/p>\n<p>  exercise the power to quash proceedings only in<\/p>\n<p>  V  casewhere the complaint is vexatious or irivilous and it does<\/p>\n<p> make out any offence alleged against him. Taking into<\/p>\n<p>account of all the aspects of the case and also material placed<\/p>\n<p>on record, in my view, this Criminal Petition is devoid of<\/p>\n<p>a-v&#8221;&#8216;\/<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;%<\/p>\n<p>merits and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly,<\/p>\n<p>this Criminal Petition is dimissed.<\/p>\n<p>10. At this stage, iearned Counsel fer the <\/p>\n<p>submits that ax} opportunity may be given   H<\/p>\n<p>petition for discharge. In case, if the &#8220;petii:io&#8217;if1eijV.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>petition for discharge, the same  cs-;_1Aside.reVd;&#8217;i.&#8221;in&#8217;~.<\/p>\n<p>accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<p>1 1. The observation &#8212;-.I._iii&#8217;3=._c1&lt;~:i-._  not irl\ufb02uence<br \/>\nthe Trial Court in any 111aIi:3.e:i._a\ufb021iie\u00a7 the main case<br \/>\nand the same    with law.\n<\/p>\n<p>With these  Criminal Petition is<\/p>\n<p>disposed off.&#8217; i  i  <\/p>\n<p>Sd\/&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M\/S The Farmer&#8217;S Co-Op Spinning &#8230; vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008 Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA C1RCUI&#8217;:&#8217; BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY 01? SEPTEMBER 2008 BEFORE &#8221; THE HOPPBLE MR. JUSTICE (1.12. KUMARASW{3_MY.:44ej&#8217;*.:..V CRIMINAL PETITION NO.362() 014* 200&#8242;? 7 BETWEEN: 1 M\/ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-221447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S The Farmer&#039;S Co-Op Spinning ... vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S The Farmer&#039;S Co-Op Spinning ... vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-19T17:10:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\/S The Farmer&#8217;S Co-Op Spinning &#8230; vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-19T17:10:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2\"},\"wordCount\":841,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2\",\"name\":\"M\/S The Farmer'S Co-Op Spinning ... vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-19T17:10:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\/S The Farmer&#8217;S Co-Op Spinning &#8230; vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S The Farmer'S Co-Op Spinning ... vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S The Farmer'S Co-Op Spinning ... vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-19T17:10:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S The Farmer&#8217;S Co-Op Spinning &#8230; vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-19T17:10:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2"},"wordCount":841,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2","name":"M\/S The Farmer'S Co-Op Spinning ... vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-19T17:10:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-the-farmers-co-op-spinning-vs-the-enforcement-officer-on-8-september-2008-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S The Farmer&#8217;S Co-Op Spinning &#8230; vs The Enforcement Officer on 8 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221447"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221447\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}