{"id":221550,"date":"2008-08-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008"},"modified":"2018-09-10T23:30:07","modified_gmt":"2018-09-10T18:00:07","slug":"ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n
1N *1m~; HIGH (.'.()L\u00a5R'1'0F KARNATAKA A1' BANGALO1\u00a7E.\n\nDated this the 12\"' day of August, 2008  _     L:   \" \nms: HOMBLE MR 11131101: H::L\u00a3IVA.!)1' G\u00bb;    \n\nWrit mam ' 10939 \/     (BoA';f  - . \u00ab. \" \n\nMfs Star Advmtising \n\n1110, 11* Floor, Barton Canim _\n\nBy its Proprietor-- M Mani  _  t  \" V  _ Petitimaa\n\nvishwajimsheuy,,%Aa:g;4)_M% ., a V   \n\n1      .\u00ab .,ty\n'1'  K-If was\n 20 -  its \n\n 2 \n\n. ' \" 'N?-R Square, \n* .. _ By in:  Recpondenzs\n\nE\"   Adv. fer R};\n\nSt!  N Pmzg\u00e9g\u00e9w\u00e9a, A\u00e9v, for R2)\n\nmi Wm Peiition is \ufb01lcd under ArL226!227 of the Constitutkm\n\nVA  to direct 2\"' respondent and his staifto  tht: petitioner to\n'_'-displaythcadvenisemmlson\ufb02wkms\ufb01tboxemaulglowsignbumdseauned\n dkg\ufb02wmimdaale\ufb01yowrgem.\n\nT1mWntPetinon wmmgmfm\ufb01\ufb02mmmy\ufb02eaung iimda\"y,&|e\n\n Courtmzde the folIow'mg:\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Petitioner has sought for directing the 2″   <\/p>\n
pcmemner to display adve11isement on the   <\/p>\n
erectcd on the \ufb02y avers; eiimct tin: 2″‘  <\/p>\n
adverusm” ‘ 2 bonds and slow sign     By an}<\/p>\n
pet1ta”oncr on the same on     . of
\ncompemu’mx (images to the  ”  sa\ufb01emd by him in
\nrww\u00b0*’\ufb01~=mes=1m\u20ac=m-ht’    <\/p>\n
 be a.   agency having emoim
\nitself on   $0 cazry out me buaincss of<\/p>\n
aavemsmg,   Jbe paymg’ aiva\ufb01sernmt tax to the<\/p>\n
_   mxayea by it and me pamom is neat
\n     2″‘ mspondcm towards a  taxes. Th: 1′<\/p>\n
 dewkrp and nmfmtain me bmtiscayc below the fly<\/p>\n
  over: and gg;v\u00a7:\u00a2a;um\u00a2m’T tn: the same on me ham’ cannula,’ await: and<\/p>\n
   respect of\ufb01w \ufb02y (was. As per the agccmem, wocesdul<\/p>\n
  provided by the am for a pmod of \ufb01ve years and the<\/p>\n
ufhiddcrrwasallowedttxinstall 4×6\ufb01a6wr&ing hoanitimm\ufb02tboxns); 2:4<\/p>\n
\ufb01advcrtiscmentso1z&lecu’icalpolea{g\u00a39wsignbo@8)3!K1li30<\/p>\n
W,<\/p>\n
advertisement with BDAQ logo can me rear side of  ‘ BIV5_jA<\/p>\n
and aim altar having paid tax to the tune 0i;A:i?.$.\ufb01;+fi36$?#v_.._ \u00a7Iltd. ‘V<\/p>\n
obtained’ pesmm ion,hadimtalledth;V-.s\u00a7\u00a7ii~~,boatxis_ <\/p>\n
Petitioner is also said to havcv  the’ taxti”oi*v 3211:. 2007-08
\nand also the demand draft was  fame  for the yam”<\/p>\n
\n2\u00b008-09\u00bb mwa-am aw   \u00abmm by me\nCmpo1atmn'    \"  as per aamxum F,\n  Cospomm hm removed the\niranslit     causing damagc to me pdititmcr.\n<\/pre>\n
Further  mkm-.&   demand ma sent by them 113:” renewal
\nfor    back on rectmeamy mung ma: they<\/p>\n
“rm f   the  “”” “imam mm’ the BDA as me \ufb02y overs are being<\/p>\n
 Lmam-    and aim there is no licanse obtained’ tmm’ the<\/p>\n
  stated mat the act of the respondent is with malafides<\/p>\n
 \u00a7eai:\u00e9on\u00abhaapa:dasumot’Rs.1 cm maktwto the am andspunt<\/p>\n
 [ – gs,1,'{(: ma\ufb01a: the purpose ofadvertising and maintaining the landscape,<\/p>\n
   to the unilaterai ac: ofthe Cotposztion, is has mm heavy toss and the<\/p>\n
 displaynudeby\ufb01mpe\ufb01tionerisaihrduepeunissim1of\ufb02:eCoa)oratkmmd<\/p>\n
aboa\ufb01erhav’mg\u00a2ntered’mtoag’eemcmwiti2\ufb01neBBAtmderBOTsys\u00a3an<\/p>\n
andalsoaiierkxavingpaid1iw\u00a7_:3otmtfnrape:iedot’\ufb01v:yczs.<\/p>\n
Sri Puitegowda appeuing far the Cotpotatim has \ufb01led statement of
\nobjections along with amexure R1 — application and  –<\/p>\n
acknowiedgcment for havmg rammed the amount which ;was’ we<\/p>\n
Corpotation. It is stated that the petitioner ought to have  b * <\/p>\n
for obtaining Iiccme for such display of   7<\/p>\n
perxnission from the EDA for fur\u00a3her>    A  it<\/p>\n
is submitted” that since’ the     of
\nKamataka Municipality Act itsfiae     been taken<\/p>\n
by the mspondem agams’ tthe  ‘ ” =  i\ufb02ggaiity.<\/p>\n
A,\u00bb\u00b0\u00b00rd1ns  %%%%       submitted on par with the<\/p>\n
avexment$’m\u00e9ds: h   statement of objecnamm .<\/p>\n
..    respomient BDA submimd that petitioner has<\/p>\n
 b\u00a2:\u00a7\ufb01Tavqai’d\u00a7citlxe::\u00a7c*nuactaper\ufb02aeEOTatadalsocoiiectedlxc amoxmtfora<\/p>\n
pe\ufb01 ‘. ” ‘V6t’t\u00a7\u00e9ci.{\u00e9\u00a2_  The tender is for \ufb01ve years and it is mnewed every<\/p>\n
‘  year   <\/p>\n
A.  Itisseenonthegxnmdofteclmicalitythatnoiicemeisobtaixxedand<\/p>\n
  is produced by the petitioner for having chained pezmission<\/p>\n
 .1ir$n:\ufb02wBDAmmmaemralot’meaywmcm, Iherespondentau\ufb02sorityhaa<\/p>\n
,5?”\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7<\/p>\n
5<\/span>
\ntaken action and accondingto the rewondent Corporation, the removed ofthc<\/p>\n
Bonds was due to non-compliance; It is seen as on  the<\/p>\n
Corporation hm taken action to remow the Boards wizie\ufb01z.<\/p>\n
displayed as a matter d’ t which the    <\/p>\n
vnme” ofthc agreement with th\u00e9 -mm on \u20aci:e$JE\u00a3:Vsi\u00a7’e$:E’:0T-;’ Lft ‘czsu5d  %  b@=.’   <\/p>\n
respoadent EDA as weli as the C0,,\u00bb  h+,,,,,\u00bbJ :5  ‘    1: a s <\/p>\n
subatantial compliance,    well in
\nadvance before the expiry oi'”a’:\u00a2_’    _ muwxme F is the<\/p>\n
permission gI*antedvby ih\u00a2’   ”    accepted the amount<\/p>\n
of Rs.2,4:?;3\u00a7\u00a7sz;T.1\u00a7jgr,r;etz${aa~:ea”* .j;9.20\u00a77″aen& there was a ren-ma: of license
\nfor the p\u00e9r\u00e9od of ‘mn\u00e9’y\u00a7a::;%  letter and 7.9.2007 my all<\/p>\n
   givenbythcCm’poration, ‘sto eyqzaire on<\/p>\n
 . 9.; bgxaee A6]V9.:;oos. ” objection raised by the counsel for tin:<\/p>\n
 is, al\ufb02xough the concurrence was given by \ufb02ue<\/p>\n
cc’.  –   \u00a7g.si\u00a7s$ii’Vappnca::on’ is tiled in me fauna: to mam’ ‘ me licmse.<\/p>\n
–V  has paid the amount to the saahfaction of the<\/p>\n
K ” ‘   ‘ it was for the respondent Corporanon’ to chm’ the peminner ta<\/p>\n
.’   ifso necessary, or to issue a notice \u00a33: this regani. However, it<\/p>\n
T  kthecaseoftite respondentCorporau’onthatithas notcomentedtbrthcact<\/p>\n
” eftiue petitioner which is unticttaken by the petitioner as per the agrecment<\/p>\n
:${\\2\/<\/p>\n
witiz the BDA. Nomhenm the respondent Authority new<\/p>\n
notice tmilaterallyg without noticing the date of   <\/p>\n
glow sign boards md translit boxes which <\/p>\n
to the petitioner. Even the anwm~:–eo_};\u00aba:ch  god’ to \ufb01e
\nCorporation by way of   2003-09 is
\nshown to be well in advmce.    did not \ufb01le me name
\ni:1ti1efin’mat,itwf\u00a7raotnot_  yogi’  amoamt. Ifreally
\nme  aim  for the cmpesmm
\nto call    form in an founat. The
\n   have been appmpriaied to the
\naccount of:  ofzhny and sheer negligence, the<\/p>\n
o\ufb02iei_{a i\u00a7 of the  have played nfmehief and returned<\/p>\n
1′  wi\ufb01mgu application of mind, on technicaiities. The wise mason<\/p>\n
 taken by the respondent Corporation in stead of<\/p>\n
A – ._ – ceiiei
\nrettn~ning*Iise  draii to the petitioner, would have been 9.43% the<\/p>\n
 pl Tmf  submit me Qplication ‘m the fm-mat prescribed. In stead, this<\/p>\n
, 5-\u00a7\u20acM_,…g <\/p>\n
  power has caused loss to the peiitioner by way  seaming the<\/p>\n
     material which were fixed, \ufb01nat too without proper notice and<\/p>\n
without intimating the petitioner properly. This act of the odeni<\/p>\n
Cmpmatiotxo\ufb01icmisnmmlycmweddmmgem\ufb02mpe\ufb02tbnerbxmreilmm
\nWW’<\/p>\n
        % Sd\/’P<\/p>\n
upenthemzmner\ufb02recezporationo\ufb01icialsare\ufb01xnciiming. Itishightimethe
\nofficials are properly waned ibr negligence on their part. Further, the
\nai\ufb01ciais concemed for  of me sig boards, without prior. noticc to<\/p>\n
me petm’ ‘om, have to shell awn Rs.l0,()0()!– tram’ their salary”<\/p>\n
amount shall be remitted to the account of the High  4_<\/p>\n
Authority, Bangalum.\n<\/p>\n
Fuxthar. it is for the peuuoner’\u00a7\u00a7 Ezghnait’ amxcatiossi  3′ 41:. ”<\/p>\n
is \ufb01zsisted by the respondent  :9    a matter at’<\/p>\n
Q\/\u00a32-\\.,-Z’ ;m:i:,\u00bbm.  gm i\u00e9\ufb01ri.\/9\u00e9__\u20ac”s:\/”-.””#”””‘V”‘.:f: Ev
\nformality. It 13 also for the rasgiognd’-:_mt  Eo restore all the<\/p>\n
removals;  to  or due to hadvatawe.\n<\/p>\n
With   petition is allowed.\n<\/p>\n
Iudg\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh 1N *1m~; HIGH (.’.()L\u00a5R’1’0F KARNATAKA A1′ BANGALO1\u00a7E. Dated this the 12″‘ day of August, 2008 _ L: ” ms: HOMBLE MR 11131101: H::L\u00a3IVA.!)1’ G\u00bb; Writ mam ‘ 10939 \/ (BoA’;f – . \u00ab. ” Mfs Star Advmtising 1110, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-221550","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-10T18:00:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-10T18:00:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":970,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-10T18:00:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-10T18:00:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-10T18:00:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008"},"wordCount":970,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008","name":"M\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-10T18:00:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-star-advertising-vs-bangalore-developemnt-authority-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Star Advertising vs Bangalore Developemnt Authority on 22 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221550","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221550"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221550\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221550"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221550"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221550"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}