{"id":221639,"date":"2010-11-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010"},"modified":"2014-07-29T23:20:08","modified_gmt":"2014-07-29T17:50:08","slug":"smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<pre> A Smtllzli\ufb01zuh W\/0 Hassan\n\n  Mallikarjun C Basareddy, Adv.)\n\nIN THE }~Il.GH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALvCV)1\u00a7.E\u00bbe.\nDated this the 19\"' day of November,  \u00abl  Al \n\nBefore\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HUL:{JVA;Z)Ifiv G l  l  T, 3\nRegular Second Appeal l)' 20053  2  3\nBetween:   V l l  \n\n1 Smt Imambi, 70 yrs z\nW\/0 late Dastagir Sab V  \n\nl\\)\n\nMastam Sab @ Mastan    l l\n\nEjaj. 52 yxeesll   l      \n   ll\nSaieer\ufb01; .38' yrs'  ll \n\nKhaleem,   _ \n\n---.'|O\\U'1-D-DJ\n\n 2-.7l'a1%ee Vs\/0* late Dasi\u00e9igif Sab\n: '2  4 an: it\/O\"Rampura Village\n \" _TariA1&lt;e&#039;1&#039;e_&amp;&quot;l&quot;0lwn \n* A3.;5.l47 \u00e911&#039;e.&quot;_r.&#039;() Srlriall Mosque Road\n&#039;l7,;_1rikerc~  A\n\nA Rig Chikka Masjid, Tarikere Town\n\n  Tarikere Tq, Ch.ik_m_agalur Dismct Appellants\n\nl)(g,\/\n\n \n\n\n\nEN.)\n\nAnd:\n\nSrrit Khatumbi W\/o Sabju Sab\n\n55 yrs, We 4&quot;&#039; Cross, Anwar Colony\n\nBhadravathi\n\nBy her SPA Holder \u00bb~ Sri Sabu Sat)   \n\nS\/o Dastagir Sab, 70 yrs \n\nR\/o 4&quot;&#039; Cross, Anwar Colony 0 . i _ --. _ _ __ \nBhadravathi, Shimoga District     Respondent<\/pre>\n<p>(By Sri KN Mohan, Adv.)<\/p>\n<p>Appeal is filed under Sf} , of tli.e:tC&#8217;PC&#8221;ipjra3iing to set aside the<br \/>\njudgment and decree in RA 4\/200.1 dated 3i0.6;\u00ab2GO.1j~b_y&#8217;.. the Addl. District<br \/>\nJudg\ufb01, Chikmagalur.    &#8216;  &#8221; .  &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>The -Appeal   day, Court delivered the<br \/>\nfollowing: *   =  A  <\/p>\n<p>Delay of foaur-.years inseekirag for recalling the order of dismissal<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;.for&#8217;iion\u00a5pros&#8217;ect!.tion is recalled. Matter is taken on Board.<\/p>\n<p> .aVg&#8217;a.inst the order for the Addl. District Judge,<\/p>\n<p>  Chikin;iga1ur_ ,i&#8217;1}&#8217;i._r2A 4\/2001 on 30.6.2005. Appellants herein are the<\/p>\n<p>defendants and the respondent is the plaintiff before the trial court in a<\/p>\n<p>  f.il\u00a7)&#8217;tZ41&#8243;A_&#8217;fO1&#8217; declaration and partition. The property in Sy.Nos. 30 and<\/p>\n<p>Al&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>31\/2 totally measuring about 4.22 acres situate at Raruapura &#8216;Sp\/:.li&#8217;il,age,<\/p>\n<p>TE11&#8217;Iil(C1&#8217;\u20ac Taluk, is said to have been purchased during No.ven?1_i3er_i&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>and it is a joint purchase. According to the plai.nt,ivff,._agricu_ltu.ral <\/p>\n<p>operation was jointly carried out and they upsedj.to._sli4are._ <\/p>\n<p>Thereafter, according to the piaintiiiyafter the &#8216;death of  Sab, after.&#8221;r s<\/p>\n<p>4 or 5 years, the defendants have  their alttirudef&#8217;landr,aiso there<br \/>\nused to be frequent quarrel  the defendants.\n<\/p>\n<p>Further. the defendants taking   the plaintiff and<br \/>\nher husband  to part with the<br \/>\ncrops which__wyeres.,grow:n. itoffllnotice, suit was filed for<br \/>\npartition  the &#8211; The suit was contested contending<\/p>\n<p>that there is anoral g&#8217;i&#8211;f.t &#8216;m:a.:1e&#8217;.&#8221;&#8216;*1a\u00a7k&#8217; the plaintiff and thereafter, all the<\/p>\n<p>records are &#8220;entered ii:-.t_hlefnarn.e of the defendants. The trial court, based<\/p>\n<p>i&#8217;~on,the,conten.ti.on*&#8211;..of the parties, has raised as many  six issues<\/p>\n<p>reglardiih:-g,\u00abenti\u00abtlle.rnent&#8217;and mesne profits and also on the aspect whether<\/p>\n<p>V there isle; giftideedl and a declaration made during May 1980 in favour of<\/p>\n<p>defendants by the plaintiff and also whether the plaintiff is entitled<\/p>\n<p> for half share in the property. Initially the trial court decreed the suit.<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; -\u00ab&#8217;fhereafte1&#8242;, the matter was remanded back in the appeal preferred by the<\/p>\n<p>W\/<\/p>\n<p>defendants. However, on dismissal of the suit, the plaintiff approached<\/p>\n<p>the District Court in RA 4\/200l. The District Judge has <\/p>\n<p>the suit in favour of the plaintiff stating that plaintiff_i.s..,en*titled:&#8217;for half,  <\/p>\n<p>share in the suit schedule agricultural landslagainst wliich:,&#8217;_deferidanlts<\/p>\n<p>before this Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>Heard the counsel representing-\u00bb..lthe,parties, howeverglcondoningll&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>the lapses by the appellant inpf-lot being&#8221;dilil,gent&#8221;in. prosecuting&#8217; the matter<\/p>\n<p>due to the fault of the advocate.&#8217; if<\/p>\n<p>As  noticed,*f_,hae_p&#8217;contention -of the plaintiff is that it is a joint<\/p>\n<p>purchase and being venjoyaed bifthelljoint family, both the parties being<\/p>\n<p> relativesji.e.,*sister in and brother in law. Thereafter, the defendants<\/p>\n<p> of Dastgir Sab who is the brother in law of the<\/p>\n<p>plair2tiff,,lhavefvlftaketihVavvdifferent stand and started disputing the right and<\/p>\n<p>agitatedfthte &#8220;matter and also the defendants have set up a claim that there<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217; xan~oral&#8221;gift in their favour as such, title is conferred on them and<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;-\u00abp&#8217;lair;,tiff is not entitled for any share and also tried to produce certain<\/p>\n<p>ldocuments and evidence was let in. The lower appellate court has noted<\/p>\n<p>35%&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>that the property was jointly purchased by the plaintiff and the deceased<br \/>\nDastgir Sab, is not in dispute. Noting the contention of the defendants<br \/>\nthat there was an oral gift in favour of the defendants on 9.5.l980.._hy the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff, referring to the RTC extract, the appellate court has the<\/p>\n<p>conclusion that the names of Dastgir Sab and Plaintiff   i&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>mentioned as owners as well as possessors.&#8221;i&#8221;&#8221;i&#8217;aking, into jcerisideration<\/p>\n<p>Ex.i&gt;3 &#8212; Rasidhi Patta and Ex.P8 and 109 &#8211;iA:i\u00abndexfgo&#8217;f lanai, &#8216;~and aigo<\/p>\n<p>revenue receipts since 1986-87 produ&#8217;c.g;d&#8217;..depicts&#8217;thejointnarnes, thus, if<\/p>\n<p>taking into consideration the&#8217; abundant&#8217; &#8216;evid.ence prodiicechf the lower<\/p>\n<p>appellate court ha&#8217;s.h&#8217;eld,;_i.hat  is not a ease of gift rather, it is a case<br \/>\nof joint purchase arid~posses&#8217;sion.._being continued based on revenue<\/p>\n<p>records as wel:l_as other &#8216;\u00b0doc1.1rnents. The contention upon which the<\/p>\n<p>Vdefendaritslf tried to&#8221;  upon that there is a oral gift and also the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;vgvideiice letin,  dislodged by the lower appellate court.<\/p>\n<p> if__The_:specifie__ground on which the lower appellate court has<\/p>\n<p>  rejected__the_conte.ntion of the defendants is that, if at all as contended by<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  defendants the gift was made in the year 1980, how the records stood<\/p>\n<p> in &#8211;the.n_anie of the plaintiff as well as in the name of defendant even<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, appeai is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>An   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh A Smtllzli\ufb01zuh W\/0 Hassan Mallikarjun C Basareddy, Adv.) IN THE }~Il.GH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALvCV)1\u00a7.E\u00bbe. Dated this the 19&#8243;&#8216; day of November, \u00abl Al Before THE HON&#8217;BLE MR JUSTICE HUL:{JVA;Z)Ifiv G l l T, 3 Regular Second Appeal l)&#8217; 20053 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-221639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-29T17:50:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-29T17:50:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":787,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-29T17:50:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-29T17:50:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-29T17:50:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010"},"wordCount":787,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010","name":"Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-29T17:50:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-imambi-vs-khatumbi-on-19-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Imambi vs Khatumbi on 19 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221639"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221639\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}