{"id":222309,"date":"2008-08-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008"},"modified":"2014-06-11T13:14:54","modified_gmt":"2014-06-11T07:44:54","slug":"mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: R.B.Naik<\/div>\n<pre> \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF \" \nCIRCUIT BENCH AT1\u00a7HARW.A.:$'pfe:et.\u00a7p   If u 'A  '\n\nDATED THIS THE 28th DA'\u00a7f T \nTHE HON'BLE MR.Jtie'ncE  V   \n\nCRIMINAL }PdpE\u00a7*r_;m:(%;_1p~I\"t 5 39412003\nBetween     ~   \"\nMr.  \nS\/o. M1; Fandtxranga   '\nAged a1_)out~.2(}--  \nPost Ijiangne-1.,:ii3isti%ict.  : Petitioner\n\n(By Sri. v.sJa:}unje1 :5;  Advocates)\n\n\"The 'sweet? \n\n'l'in'eugh Station,\nHaveritdisuict, Represented by\n\n  The Statefubiic Prosecutor,\n g  Bench, Dhaxwad. 2 Respondent\n\n Anand K. Navaligmath, Advocate)\n\n  This Criminal petition is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.,\n\n  _ fby the Advocate for peti\ufb01oner praying to enlarge the petitioner\non bail in crime No. 199\/ 2007 of Hangal Police station registered\nfor offences punishable under sections 323, 307 IPC\n\nRA!-4.\/\\_m.'IJ_\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n(s.o.No.2o\/2003) pending on the \ufb01le of the..'Dis\u00bbi_:riot and\nSessions Judge, Haveri.  f  , \" ..\n\nThis petition coming on for orders.  \n\nthe following: - '\nORDER   \n<\/pre>\n<p>A case in Crime l&#8217;~&#8217;3.\u00a7:;&#8217;f_20l)7i-_iAS  511% 13.1 1.2007 in<br \/>\nHangal Police station   herein for o\ufb02enoes<\/p>\n<p>punishable    on the ooxnplajnt of<\/p>\n<p>one    oi&#8217; B.B. Hajeera. After<br \/>\ncompletion of sheet came to be \ufb01led again&#8217; st<br \/>\nthe   aforesaid oifenoes.\n<\/p>\n<p>   &#8221; in her complaint has alleged that<\/p>\n<p>V     wife are Iesidentf of Hangal and in the same<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; ~  liislbrotlier Abdul Majeed Hajaresab resides along with<\/p>\n<p>A   and children, he has two daughters and two sons; that<\/p>\n<p>  regularly going to Goa to eke out his livelihood and in<\/p>\n<p>VA    his wife and children of his brother were residing; that<\/p>\n<p>52a-\u00bb\u00bbi.a<\/p>\n<p>the Wife of his brother had gone to    mid <\/p>\n<p>to bring money; that on 13. 1 1,2907<br \/>\nnear Lakshmeswara clinic, a   him that<br \/>\naccused&#8211;pe-titioner h\u20acI&#8217;BiI\u00a3t_.&#8217;i:}.ad  his brother&#8217;s<br \/>\ndaughter Beebi Hajeera    &#8216;Aii?esidents of the locality<br \/>\nhad ex\ufb01llguishod     to the hospital, the<br \/>\ncomplainants&#8217;  to   hospital, he saw the<br \/>\ninjured with  of her hands, face, chest and<\/p>\n<p>stomach; he made,  with her, she stated that it was the<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; who came to the house and stated<\/p>\n<p>  love with her and she should reciprocate for<\/p>\n<p>i V&#8217;   the she: to do so, he threatened saying that either<\/p>\n<p>.    alive or she should be alive and that he would not<\/p>\n<p>  he went inside the house brought kerosene can<\/p>\n<p>.   on her and lit \ufb01re. The injured started wailing out, the<\/p>\n<p> iieighbours got attracted, came to the scene, poured water and<\/p>\n<p>extinguished \ufb01re and took her to the hospital; the incident had<\/p>\n<p>occurred at 8.00 p.m. ,E_g&#8230;..\u00a2uL~L.<\/p>\n<p>3. The hospital authoritries forwarded to the<\/p>\n<p>police, the complainant, after ascertaining&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>to the police station and lodged &#8220;on,  ii.e.,x <\/p>\n<p>on 13.11.2007 within two hours  dateor i11cident;,Vt11ei<\/p>\n<p>police authorities, after  &#8216;of &#8220;the   a<br \/>\nrequisition to the   record the<br \/>\nstatement of Beehi    Magistrate,<br \/>\nwithout loss of    and recorded the<br \/>\nstatement of?&#8217; V.   day wherein she has<br \/>\nstated  it  who came to her house at about<\/p>\n<p>8.00 p.111    fallen in love with her and she<\/p>\n<p>..,sho111d\u00a7l: the same; as Hajeera &#8220;refused for the<\/p>\n<p>kerosene, stating that he would not spare her<\/p>\n<p>and  came to the scene extinguished fre<\/p>\n<p> and  to the hospital and adnntted.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there<\/p>\n<p> it no eyewitness to the incident in question; petitioner, While<\/p>\n<p>trying to extinguish the sustained injuries to his hand and he<\/p>\n<p>offence, he would have run away ftjznii the  it&#8221; <\/p>\n<pre>is not that he has eloped from     5\n\nman of 31 years and the    and as\nsuch, the material on      facie case.\n<\/pre>\n<p>5. &#8216;I&#8217;imei..   Vxvsupreme Court has<br \/>\nrepeatedly   if  if found reliable that<br \/>\nalone   of the accused. In the<\/p>\n<p>instant  ,_  Magistrate, recorded the dying<\/p>\n<p>   dying declaration was also made<\/p>\n<p>  1&#8242;  __to h\u00a2r&#8217;imc1e the com&#8217;plaJnan&#8217; t, on the basis of<\/p>\n<p> :lodVgwed:.1complamt As regards the treatment taken by<\/p>\n<p> the  simple injuries sustained by him, the records<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; it  that&#8217;:&#8217;on1y after his arrest after two days from the date of<\/p>\n<p> it is the police who took him to the hospital for<\/p>\n<p>it  &#8220;1:I&#8217;::=.-&#8216;a:1l:1:t1ent, that itself shows that he was absconding till he was<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;anested. As the material collected during investigation and<\/p>\n<p>other circumstances clearly go to establish not only prima facie<br \/>\nre.-Ilbvuulug<\/p>\n<p>case but there is a strong prima facie case against the accused-<br \/>\npetitioner of he having involved in commission of <\/p>\n<p>oifence, without expressing any opinion on    I<\/p>\n<p>hold that petitioner is not enti\ufb02ed&#8217;*~ so: if <\/p>\n<p>consequently, the petition is liable   _  J<\/p>\n<p>is devoid of merits. Howe1ier;j&#8221;~it is    &#8216; fhe<br \/>\nobservations made above  &#8216;fora  of the<br \/>\npresent bail petition   ii   shall not be<br \/>\ninfluenced by aI_oy&#8217;:of&#8217;  above at the time of<\/p>\n<p>the trlai of  .\n<\/p>\n<p>  a petition is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008 Author: R.B.Naik IN THE HIGH COURT OF &#8221; CIRCUIT BENCH AT1\u00a7HARW.A.:$&#8217;pfe:et.\u00a7p If u &#8216;A &#8216; DATED THIS THE 28th DA&#8217;\u00a7f T THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.Jtie&#8217;ncE V CRIMINAL }PdpE\u00a7*r_;m:(%;_1p~I&#8221;t 5 39412003 Between ~ &#8221; Mr. S\/o. M1; Fandtxranga &#8216; Aged a1_)out~.2(}&#8211; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-11T07:44:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-11T07:44:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":631,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-11T07:44:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-11T07:44:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-11T07:44:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008"},"wordCount":631,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008","name":"Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-11T07:44:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raghavendra-pandurang-raikar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr Raghavendra Pandurang Raikar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222309"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222309\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}