{"id":222430,"date":"2009-07-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-02-15T04:43:26","modified_gmt":"2017-02-14T23:13:26","slug":"jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nBail Appl..No. 3609 of 2009()\n\n\n1. JALEEL, AGED 43 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.SHAIJAN C.GEORGE\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :03\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                           K.T.SANKARAN, J.\n              ------------------------------------------------------\n                       B.A. NO. 3609 OF 2009\n              ------------------------------------------------------\n                    Dated this the 3rd July, 2009\n\n\n                                O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>      This is an application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of<\/p>\n<p>Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.190<\/p>\n<p>of 2009 of Kasaragod Police Station.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.  The offences alleged against the petitioner are under<\/p>\n<p>Sections   255, 260 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.<\/p>\n<p>      3. The Assistant Superintendent of Post Office, Kasaragod<\/p>\n<p>submitted a petition to the Sub Inspector of Police, Kasaragod<\/p>\n<p>stating that out of the 73 articles presented by the Regional<\/p>\n<p>Transport Officer, Kasaragod for booking as speed post articles on<\/p>\n<p>16.3.2009, four articles were found to bear postage stamps of the<\/p>\n<p>denomination of Rs.20\/-, which were suspected to be fake. On the<\/p>\n<p>basis of this petition, a crime was registered.              On investigation, it<\/p>\n<p>was revealed that the fake stamps were affixed on envelops<\/p>\n<p>submitted to the RTO for the purpose of sending driving licence to<\/p>\n<p>the addressees by post. For getting a driving licence, the applicant<\/p>\n<p>B.A. NO. 3609 OF 2009<\/p>\n<p>                                    :: 2 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>has to present a self addressed envelop with the required postage<\/p>\n<p>stamps to the RTO. It is alleged that the petitioner, who is running a<\/p>\n<p>driving school, has submitted these envelops on which fake postage<\/p>\n<p>stamps were seen affixed. The petitioner could not be arrested as<\/p>\n<p>he was absconding.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       4. The petitioner filed an application for anticipatory bail before<\/p>\n<p>this Court as B.A.No.1699 of 2009, which was disposed of as per the<\/p>\n<p>order dated 3.4.2009.       The petitioner was directed to surrender<\/p>\n<p>before the investigating officer for the purpose of interrogation on<\/p>\n<p>13.4.2009. A direction was issued to the investigating officer to<\/p>\n<p>produce the petitioner on the same day before the Magistrate and<\/p>\n<p>the learned Magistrate was also directed to consider and dispose of<\/p>\n<p>the application for regular bail preferably on the same date. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner did not surrender as directed. Later, he filed B.A.No.2364<\/p>\n<p>of 2009 under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. That<\/p>\n<p>application was dismissed by me on 28.5.2009.            Thereafter, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner surrendered before Court on 8.6.2009 and he was<\/p>\n<p>remanded to judicial custody.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       5. Grave offences have been alleged against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>B.A. NO. 3609 OF 2009<\/p>\n<p>                                   :: 3 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>Counterfeiting government stamps is a very serious offence.       It is<\/p>\n<p>punishable with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment by other<\/p>\n<p>description for the term which may extend to ten years and with fine.<\/p>\n<p>The investigating agency filed an application before the learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate for getting custody of the petitioner for interrogation.<\/p>\n<p>When the petitioner was produced before Court on 11.6.2009, he<\/p>\n<p>stated before Court that he was not physically and mentally fit. The<\/p>\n<p>learned Magistrate directed the petitioner to be subjected to<\/p>\n<p>examination by the Superintendent of General Hospital, Kasaragod.<\/p>\n<p>The Superintendent of the General Hospital issued a certificate<\/p>\n<p>stating that the accused was physically and mentally fit. It is stated<\/p>\n<p>that thereafter, the petitioner was interrogated by the investigating<\/p>\n<p>officer.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       6. According to the prosecution, one fake stamp was seized<\/p>\n<p>on a search conducted in the house of the petitioner. The envelops<\/p>\n<p>containing fake stamps were seen forwarded to the India Security<\/p>\n<p>Press through messenger. The covers were received by the India<\/p>\n<p>Security Press only on 25.6.2009. It would appear that the envelops<\/p>\n<p>containing fake stamps were sent to the India Security Press only<\/p>\n<p>during last week of June, 2009. The examination of the stamps<\/p>\n<p>B.A. NO. 3609 OF 2009<\/p>\n<p>                                    :: 4 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>could not be conducted by the India Security Press as they<\/p>\n<p>demanded a sum of Rs.1,800\/- as the examination fee. It is stated<\/p>\n<p>that a charge of Rs.100\/- is to be paid for examination of each<\/p>\n<p>document. The Assistant Sub Inspector of Police and the police<\/p>\n<p>constable who went from Kerala to the India Security Press have<\/p>\n<p>come back.      It is not clear whether the required amount was<\/p>\n<p>deposited.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      7. As stated earlier, the petitioner is running a driving school.<\/p>\n<p>On 19.3.2009, search was conducted in the driving school. It is<\/p>\n<p>stated that computer, scanner, printer etc. were seized from the<\/p>\n<p>driving school.     These articles were sent to the C-DAC for<\/p>\n<p>examination and verification. Learned Public Prosecutor states that<\/p>\n<p>the report from C-DAC is not received so far.<\/p>\n<p>      8. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that<\/p>\n<p>Section 255 was sought to be added only to see that the petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>not granted bail. He also submitted that the court must take serious<\/p>\n<p>note of such steps on the part of the investigating agency as the<\/p>\n<p>freedom of the citizen is the most important aspect. I do not agree<\/p>\n<p>with the learned counsel for the petitioner. If Section 255 was added<\/p>\n<p>B.A. NO. 3609 OF 2009<\/p>\n<p>                                    :: 5 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>originally, anybody could say that the investigating agency was<\/p>\n<p>wrong. Even if a person produces an article on which a fake or<\/p>\n<p>counterfeit stamp is affixed, it cannot be assumed that he has done<\/p>\n<p>the counterfeiting. That is why, probably, Section 260 was shown as<\/p>\n<p>the Section under which the offence was committed.          Later, the<\/p>\n<p>investigating agency came to the conclusion that the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>himself is the person who has counterfeited the stamps and<\/p>\n<p>accordingly, Section 255 was added.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      9. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 8.6.2009. In the<\/p>\n<p>nature of the allegations levelled against him and in view of the<\/p>\n<p>nature and character of the offence, I do not think that it is safe to<\/p>\n<p>release the petitioner on bail at this stage.     If the petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>released on bail at this stage, there is every likelihood of the<\/p>\n<p>evidence being tampered or the witnesses being intimidated or<\/p>\n<p>influenced by him. From the sequence of events, it can be seen that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner was not co-operating with the investigating agency and<\/p>\n<p>he has not even complied with the direction issued by this Court.<\/p>\n<p>The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>involved in CR.No.130 of 2005 of Badiadka Police Station where the<\/p>\n<p>allegation was that the petitioner forged a driving licence. He is<\/p>\n<p>B.A. NO. 3609 OF 2009<\/p>\n<p>                                      :: 6 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>involved in other offences as well. If bail is granted to the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>at this point of time, there is also a likelihood of the petitioner making<\/p>\n<p>himself scarce.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       10. In the facts and circumstances mentioned in paragraph 6<\/p>\n<p>above, the investigating agency shall take prompt steps to expedite<\/p>\n<p>the further investigation of the case.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       For the aforesaid reasons, the Bail Application is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>                                                       (K.T.SANKARAN)<br \/>\n                                                               Judge<br \/>\nahz\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Bail Appl..No. 3609 of 2009() 1. JALEEL, AGED 43 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.SHAIJAN C.GEORGE For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN Dated [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222430","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-14T23:13:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-14T23:13:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1036,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-14T23:13:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-14T23:13:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-14T23:13:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009"},"wordCount":1036,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009","name":"Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-14T23:13:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jaleel-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jaleel vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222430","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222430"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222430\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222430"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222430"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222430"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}