{"id":222587,"date":"2011-11-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011"},"modified":"2018-11-15T16:52:22","modified_gmt":"2018-11-15T11:22:22","slug":"mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                      In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                    at\n                                              New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                        File\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002003\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a09,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a09,\u00a02011\n\n\n\nParties:\u00a0\n\n\u00a0\u00a0\n\nAppellant\n\n\nShri\u00a0Rudra\u00a0Pratap\u00a0Narayan\u00a0Yadav\nMohalla\u00a0Gopalpur\nPost\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0New\u00a0Shivpuri\u00a0Colony,\u00a0\nThana\u00a0Cantt,\u00a0Distt.\u00a0Gorakhpur\nUttarpradesh\n\nThe\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0VC\u00a0facility\u00a0at\u00a0Gorakhpur.\n\nRespondents\u00a0\n\n\n\nNorth\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway\u00a0\nGorakshpur\nUP\n\nRepresented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0Amit\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Dy.\u00a0GM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Dhirendra\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0DCM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0G.N.\u00a0Singh,\u00a0APIO,\u00a0Vig\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0\nAshok\u00a0Srivastva,\u00a0Inspector\u00a0(RTI)\u00a0--\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0VC\u00a0facility\u00a0at\u00a0Gorakhpur\n\n                   Information\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                          at\n                                                  New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                     File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002003\n                                                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>   1. The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 field \u00a0 his \u00a0 RTI\u00adapplication \u00a0 dated \u00a0 18.04.2011 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 North \u00a0 Eastern \u00a0 Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Gorakhpur.\u00a0Through\u00a0this\u00a0application,\u00a0he\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0what\u00a0action\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0authority\u00a0has\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        taken\u00a0on\u00a0his\u00a0complaint\u00a0dated\u00a003.03.2011,\u00a0which\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0filed\u00a0before\u00a0three\u00a0different\u00a0authorities\u00a0(viz.,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        General\u00a0Manager;\u00a0Chief\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Officer;\u00a0Chief\u00a0Commercial\u00a0officer)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0authority\u00a0against\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        one\u00a0Shri\u00a0Shyam\u00a0Narayan\u00a0Singh,\u00a0CTTI,\u00a0Lucknow\u00a0Division.\u00a0This\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0replied\u00a0to\u00a0by\u00a0four\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        different \u00a0 PIOs \u00a0 vide \u00a0 their \u00a0 letters \u00a0 dated \u00a0 21.04.2011, \u00a0 12.05.2011, \u00a0 26.05.2011\u00a0 and \u00a0 06.06.2011. \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Applicant,\u00a0thereafter,\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0(AA)\u00a0on\u00a015.06.2011\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        AA\u00a0decided\u00a0on\u00a015.06.2011,\u00a0holding\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0replies\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIOs\u00a0are\u00a0satisfactory.\u00a0Aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the\u00a0 AA&#8217;s\u00a0 decision,\u00a0 the\u00a0 Appellant\u00a0filed\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0petition\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a006.08.2011\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        requesting\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>   2.   During \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents \u00a0 informed \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 that \u00a0 they \u00a0 on \u00a0 29.06.2011 \u00a0 have\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0complete\u00a0information\u00a0(i.e.\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0enquiry\u00a0report;\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0complete\u00a0file\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        noting\u00a0and\u00a0correspondences)\u00a0corresponding\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0on\u00a0his\u00a0part,\u00a0while\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        acknowledging \u00a0 the \u00a0 receipt \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 from \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 complained \u00a0 that \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Respondents\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0taking\u00a0action\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0mentioned\u00a0person\u00a0(against\u00a0whom\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0filed\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the\u00a0 complaint)\u00a0 despite\u00a0 the\u00a0 adverse\u00a0 findings\u00a0against\u00a0him\u00a0 in\u00a0the\u00a0 enquiry\u00a0 report.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        answered\u00a0that\u00a0since\u00a0they\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0found\u00a0any\u00a0irregularity\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0part\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0person,\u00a0they\u00a0have\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        not\u00a0taken\u00a0any\u00a0action\u00a0against\u00a0him\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0have\u00a0also\u00a0communicated\u00a0this\u00a0fact\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0vide\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        letter\u00a0dated\u00a008.07.2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>       3.   \u00a0On\u00a0examining\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0above,\u00a0I\u00a0find\u00a0nothing\u00a0which\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0withheld\u00a0by\u00a0way\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           from\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0here\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0however,\u00a0appears\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           unhappy \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents \u00a0 for\u00a0 not\u00a0 taking\u00a0 action\u00a0 which\u00a0 he\u00a0 had\u00a0 expected\u00a0 from\u00a0 them,\u00a0 on\u00a0 his\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           complaint\u00a0and,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0now\u00a0wants\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0to\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0such\u00a0action\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           on\u00a0his\u00a0complaint.\u00a0This\u00a0is\u00a0something\u00a0which\u00a0lies\u00a0beyond\u00a0the\u00a0purview\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      4.   In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0above,\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0appeal\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0allowed.\u00a0Rejected.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                    (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                           Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      1.   Shri\u00a0Rudra\u00a0Pratap\u00a0Narayan\u00a0Yadav<br \/>\n           Mohalla\u00a0Gopalpur<br \/>\n           Post\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0New\u00a0Shivpuri\u00a0Colony,\u00a0<br \/>\n           Thana\u00a0Cantt,\u00a0Distt.\u00a0Gorakhpur<br \/>\n           Uttarpradesh<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      2.   Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<br \/>\n           North\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway\u00a0<br \/>\n           Office\u00a0of\u00a0General\u00a0Manager\/Commercial<br \/>\n           Gorakhpur<br \/>\n           UP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      3.   Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\u00a0<br \/>\n           North\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway\u00a0<br \/>\n           Office\u00a0of\u00a0General\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n           Gorakhpur<br \/>\n           UP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      4.   Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<br \/>\n Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0<br \/>\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/\u00a0Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002003 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a09,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a09,\u00a02011 Parties:\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 Appellant Shri\u00a0Rudra\u00a0Pratap\u00a0Narayan\u00a0Yadav Mohalla\u00a0Gopalpur Post\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0New\u00a0Shivpuri\u00a0Colony,\u00a0 Thana\u00a0Cantt,\u00a0Distt.\u00a0Gorakhpur Uttarpradesh The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0VC\u00a0facility\u00a0at\u00a0Gorakhpur. Respondents\u00a0 North\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway\u00a0 Gorakshpur UP Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0Amit\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Dy.\u00a0GM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Dhirendra\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0DCM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0G.N.\u00a0Singh,\u00a0APIO,\u00a0Vig\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0 Ashok\u00a0Srivastva,\u00a0Inspector\u00a0(RTI)\u00a0&#8212;\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0VC\u00a0facility\u00a0at\u00a0Gorakhpur Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002003 ORDER Background 1. The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 field \u00a0 his \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222587","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-15T11:22:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-15T11:22:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011\"},\"wordCount\":510,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-15T11:22:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-15T11:22:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011","datePublished":"2011-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-15T11:22:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011"},"wordCount":510,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011","name":"Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-15T11:22:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rudra-pratap-narayanyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-9-november-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Rudra Pratap Narayanyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 9 November, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222587","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222587"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222587\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222587"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222587"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222587"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}