{"id":222671,"date":"2008-07-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008"},"modified":"2014-04-09T10:03:18","modified_gmt":"2014-04-09T04:33:18","slug":"smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: H N Das<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH csum or KARHATAKA, BANGAI{QE'2\"Ef:A. k\nHATED ms um cam my or JULY m:     '   K\n\nBEFORE\n\nnm H-\u00a3>1~rBLE nmwsncs Igixnge\ufb01momn ms    V\n\n \n\n1 SMT    \nw\/EN%    %\nsammAn\u00ab3nmn\u00a3.e;2!Ac%A1%   'H\n\n2 SIv1'!\u00a7'JAYAL\ufb02\ufb02.t\u00a7 *  \n   -   mm  mmrcmxwappa\n % aeE3:gfa\u00abarT49Y3ARs\n   Rift.-\"1* T\ufb01\ufb01m,  CROSS.\n ;<:1~ARDE1i\nsammammmsnem\n -- 560 0:27\n\n  % sg<:3\u00a3g?PA GARDEN\n  O O    sayzmmmamaxaean\n   - 560 027\n\n APPELLANTS\n\n O  .- RUPERT M ROSARIO, amwocxmy\n\n\ufb01w\n\n\n\n'VII:-l'I\\i VII I\\l'|l\\I'nl'II-l'II\\l'l I\n\nIna! I uuunu  Iu-|I\\|1r|u-u\\.r\\ nlwn \\..\\JI.ll\\I VT AMHIVHEHAH l'1E\\.7l'! \\..|JUKl U!' RHKNAEAKA HIGH COURT OF   \n\n\u00a7_':_11._.13=-\n\nmsnomhm, W10 BAIEAIAH\nAGED 5.33.1'? 59 YEARS\n\nRIC} Rf} 111212, 5?\" A CROSS\nmzvssz m3m:,YEsI~IwAHT1-11==!JxAw\nammmzzsanm-560322. \" \n\n{BY SR1 : <3 BALAKRISI-BIA  C312'  \n\nam\u00bb EPA \ufb01led u; s.95<$\u00a3 \u00a2m%Lki.w:j'%m\u00a2 guamn;\nand decree dt.22.3.\u20ac36  Q.$;2i%G1';'9?-'on the \ufb01le\n\ncf the XIV \ufb01\u00e9d1.{Iity'  (SCH-28],\n\npartly    ""c1e,;':1a;.raa'tix1-:3, possession,\n\nm  this day, the\nCaurt  " . _'\n\n \n\n   appellants have called in\n and dacrw date\ufb01 22.G3.% in\n\n by than 14%: Ac1d1.<::ity cm\n  City damaging the suit daeclarirlg the\n  owner: :21' the suit prmrty and that she is\n\n   gr panasaeaainn {sf the win pmpmy. Further, the\n  warm the aerenaam to ham mm t}:1\u00a2\n\n " pas3a,s5%31'1 05 the suit p1-apm't}r within: a period of six\n\nmcnths. .:v\n\n63"\n\n\n\n\n\nOURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR'|i.0F'_;KARNATAKA HIGH COUR? OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH. COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT\n\n2. Appenanm are the defendanm     T & \nrenpmxleerlt is the plmmsa be\ufb01me the  \nsales cf ennveniencac, the  \n\nra\ufb01arred 'bu their sum heme  cm-a,  \n\n3. The pmw   agent" 1:\nthe defmdw    of\n\n'rm \u00a2]aim__  an that undexr a\nRapltezweci  1953, she acquizrad the\nagzhcdukg   of the acheduie prropcrty\n  has paid up to clans urea.\n\n   mama to be in possession of\n\n  as mm ta}-m. any the amen of\n\n   the dermam cm are: his legal\n\n"  are wn\ufb01r::::.1im_ in poasess\ufb01on. Despite\n O  mquasm and mm, the de\ufb01mdanta refused\n \ufb01umte the schedule property and thweafom the plain'd\ufb01'\n\n\ufb01hd\ufb02:1ea:uitbefh1*etIt1e'I'1'ial{3o11rt.\n\n6\/,Lk-J\\'\n\n\n\nOURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT _O'Fv-KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT op KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT\n\n4. The defendants mtmd   ' \nma: Ccurt \ufb01lad writrtsm mmnm    \ntitle of am plenum. 'rm defe2;dg;:tov'fa;ftk\u00a7er \u00a7o:an\u00a2na\u00a2dj%'%% \n\nthat they are ?m. possession  \nschsdule gnropezrty in   of\nSale dated 13.05.1963   af the\n\nmhedule pa;'op-crgf:   *  derenam\n\ndarned." the mm  pV}FIxrn'.I\ufb01" ' % %  1 'a  '\n\n5.\n\n the Trial Court\n\nframed tin:    '1ss11:e:-43:\u00bb\n\naw  % j\u00e9i=\u00bb'fF'\u00abi13t?'prv\nhushaasdhadwaynightmthesadtschedule\n\nuwrharthaselfmldher\n\n ]%  . ra pam\ufb02 pa the husband\n of d\u20acf-mama No.1 and \ufb01.:\u00a3her' ofdegvmdam\n\n7tvputupwnstmdienI'n\ufb02w.su\ufb01\n\n \ufb01ww?\n\n3% pk\ufb01nnj\ufb01pmvm that Murziehixmqppa\n\n \ufb01zmad houae eonsisfring mof of asbwms\nin the suit praperg mad cantirmed in\n\npermimiue pass\ufb01hz cf the suit schedule\npmpem?\n\nWhather plcdttti\ufb02' prams that suit is\nmca%1tumab\u00a3e\ufb01':\ufb02iepr'ase71t_fbnn?\n\nOw...\n\n\n\nOURT OF KARNATAKA I"-HGH COURT A.0F"_KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 3-HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF XARNATAKA H!GH COURT\n\nW)\n\nWherhw plain\ufb01\ufb01 is entitled \ufb01n" ~ \n\nthesuitpmperly?\n\nHO piafr\ufb01fpmvw       'V\nRs.800J'- per month \ufb01cm  (if A'\n\nP*'0:J'&d5'\n\n3% degfwadzaxtpx\u00e9gm-:  foi-\n\nmisjoinda-' and  hf friaawsgwy\n\n \n\n  $,: f A\n\n is the aumer\n\n p!mnh"  mat Court fa:-2 pad is\n\n V\n\n v  Trial Cleurt, pzainmmaumaa her\n am husband an P'W--~1 and got\n\nX    Em;-; ;'i-=1 to P25. On beha\ufb01" of defendants,\nO'  was mused' as aw-1 ard gut marked\nO OO3.,~.-%.:O.iOm1 a:e D18. Am warm mm the mm mm on\n\n aw the  , am]. and dacunlentary\n the Trial Ceurt passed the impugned judgnmxt\n\naw"\n\n\n\nuvvnl vr n.r~mnHIHI\\I-\\ Hlu\ufb02 LUUR? OE\n\nAKARNATAKA HIGH COUR1 or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGHCOURT or KARNATAKA HIGH couar\n\nand deems \u00a2iex:ree:ing the suit of the plaintiif. " \n\nappml.\n\n5. M-.Rupert M Roaariq, the    \n\nthe appenam; amuzanm  tug \nPW-1 in m\ufb02y 3 hear my  \nhnwladge gum: thg    property.\nIn the abaencse cf  can be\nplaced on the   I-{cider Fwd.\nThe    whcthcazr there are\nother LR;    than Eeramma and\n\n  are mt ao=mpet\u00a211t to wecute. the\n\n' "  in the mm are amugh to rim: the question\n ma adverse pmmsan and the um Court\n Mraizaa to: give a Ending on the same. He rm-um\n that the Trial Court mmmed an mmr in mt\n\nm\ufb01ng intn cmmideratian tk entire  aaan\ufb02able on\n\nW"\n\n\n\nBURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURTA.\u00a7)\u00a7'_;KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT\n\nrecord. The Trial Ctmrtlaaa. faiiedtn  a clear  V.\nas to th\u00bb: nature am-.1~m paamaion es" the   \n\ndecree of the Trial com is 1immOmOm a\u00a2:%O a\u00a7ide; \n\n:1} \n\nfxi) AIR    \nAdvomte fozi plahz\ufb01\ufb01 supp-arm the\n decree af the Triai Court. He\n oral evidi of PW--1 and the\n\n  by tha pmnm' am \u00e9onaideresd by\n  He cantomda that in the facm and\n\n   cf this mm, there '3 nu ma \ufb01at the\n'V   examine hm-wlfas a w\ufb01xtma before the Trial\n\n V:~uCaurt arni !m* man-exza\ufb02natiaxx is not \ufb01atal 1:: the mag.\n\n7L \\\/Va'\n\n\n\n'URT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT  i(;_.ARNATAi(A HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT E\n\n13 R.I\u00a3'A...l%\n\n8. Heard arguxnenw on both the \n\nperused the emit: moorda.\n\n9. Defendanes mnmndwrhgt * \n\nthe owner of the schedule  \nan agrwt of salsa  1s.d6%.19a3\n   wjoyment of\nthe     Sale Daed\ndated  pxamzm specmaa that\nztmmdm    are the mother\nmg    Sale Deed mam speci\ufb01cs\n  Yellappa and 11': mother\n\n   the schaiule property mm: the\n\nM    an zmmgso. in am writim1\n\n% 1  the 'Trial Court, the deramm have not\n  \ufb01hat atbm-* than Emamma and aalzawathamma,\nV  am nthaer legal r%\u00a2=,:.z:3.tat:i'sa'es af dew\ufb01 Ye\ufb01appa\n Ofwho have not jainad m the. mccution or am Sale: Deed an\n\n24.09.1963<\/pre>\n
. In this regard,  is su\ufb01md in the<\/p>\n
dry<\/p>\n
LR!’ OF KAIUNIATAKA HGH COURT O_F’Kzf\\RNA’fAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
11 R.E.A..l.%?ze’..Q5<\/p>\n
crmrexan\ufb01ng\ufb01nn nf I-“W4. Further, DW-1  ”
\navidmoe has mt stated arxythm with regard  I I
\nLegal nalprmenmtive ofYe]1appa.   ‘ _ <\/p>\n
rawrd wtabl\u00e9ahtx the hat   <\/p>\n
mgismedsasa Deedintheyaar
\nin the name. at the pzajm\ufb01\ufb01rn    the
\nBangalore Chy  mm ‘3
\ndelay. in trarmfgr.   the plain\ufb01\ufb01
\nand   cannot be :1
\nground m  has nan title war the
\nschedule :3 a mgsmma Sale Deed
\nI’\u00abc\u00bbm1fE’ct$_4:  and payment oftsanea by
\n  the fact that pramuw in the<\/p>\n
   property. ‘l’h1’a evidenca on record
\nV _\u00bb  \ufb01at, plain\ufb01\ufb02 has proved that aha ‘8 the ewzwr
\n  I  I I  with the Isarm.\n<\/p>\n
10. It is not in dispum that pl.a1:1t1\ufb01’a husband
\nandPUrwerof}!:ttm’m3rI-ioldaaa-Byraiahwaamz\ufb01zunedas<\/p>\n
<&_~.;-'\\\/'<\/p>\n
URT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KAKNI-\\!l-\\l\\.H nlun uwunl<\/p>\n
12 mmmm<\/p>\n
PW-1. Araading of am] evidence of FW'-1 with  2
\nthe salsa Deed, Ex.P1"r khatha cndoramni;   u
\n'no P12 and P1'? 1:: P21, the tn  <\/p>\n
eamhlishw the amuxce of  gf   <\/p>\n
pmparty. The mum
\nMuxtick\ufb01maappa mmed   of  am
\n15.05.1953 w-\u00a3th Yellgappag.   pzmuztr
\nand      scheduh
\nye\ufb01appa,   Eeramma and
\n Dead in know: of the
\n   af apeci\ufb01c plea and evidence
\n $1 repreamatives of Ye\ufb01appa, the<\/p>\n
 13\u00a2 * 1%     mncluding that p1eLinti\ufb01'has proved
\n_   title over the schedule property. In
\n  cirmmmtancaa of this casc, the non-\n<\/p>\n
   per-soazfn nnt\ufb01atalbo the mm.\n<\/p>\n
11. The learned manual for the appellants}
\n%x:lamvs c:u:sn’bm:i that even in the absmme of upeci\ufb01:\n<\/p>\n
dc.\n<\/p>\n
URT OF KARNATAKA HKGH COURT O?-OKARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CUUKI Ur KAKNAIARA ruun uuuru<\/p>\n
 13 mmlmm<\/p>\n
 m&n and achqausaasion, the<\/p>\n
admitted facm in the case mmwaws the Tx~ia1.\u00a7j<:\ufb01rt     '
\nmmidm the sang. I decline to accept  V'   <\/p>\n
the iearnead caramel for the  <\/p>\n
poai\ufb01uen 91' my that the plea
\nposaeaaiwn ought 2:: be
\nm be framed and capyzaorulnmww   m the
\npartim. In the   it in
\nwt "pm     that the Trial
\nCourt oug11\u00a3._\u00a7:–_ am gueatinn of adverse
\nposaasskinn.    evidence an
\n gaggbaianag mg that in the year 1968, the
\n m …We Wm, under a<\/p>\n
  The tax paid meipu prcducecl by
\n  that from the year 1973, the<\/p>\n
A 3   the rm Furtrm, Ex.I36 produoud by<\/p>\n
 _  as. representation dated 25.01.1979 tn the.
\n  Cammkainner, Banmabre, ' 312%: that
\n 'V=vp]aimm's husband Bymppa is wing ms' the schedule<\/p>\n
pzupertyazzdclnimingasawmramuuub\ufb01zag<\/p>\n
WW<\/p>\n
IURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF' i\u20ac_ARNATAKA HIGH COUR1' OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
1-!\u00bb R.E.\u00a3s…1.33LD\u00a7<\/p>\n
Iiuiurlisl\ufb01gapaand\ufb01fnmilymmhezwsarni<\/p>\n
tn vacaba me achcadule property. Ex.P1\u00a7 is  I  "  I
\ndatnad 13.c3.197=9 wherein n
\nvacaba the schedule pmpcny   I<\/p>\n
a mmamm of Ra.1,mc;-.\n<\/p>\n
mmhlkhm the fact that   pnamm is
\nnot hit by \u00a7in:itatinnI.’Qn
\nat the lcamed  is
\n  relied on by the
\nleamad   to above: do not
\nIt-.-.:::d an;.-    urged by the
\n the raw stated above, I
\n an m intaar\ufb01ere with the smpupad<\/p>\n
 of the Trial Cceurt. On an other<\/p>\n
    ca’ the ‘h-321 Court is supporhad by
\nV K   and tha name is in accordance with
\n  masons sated above, the appeal in haneby<\/p>\n
  at .\n<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
corzsmcdion of my type an the   *\n<\/p>\n
6) T0 was eavezx, the Wdants, %   saW i:\u00a7\ufb013v
\ndhi<\/p>\n
\u00a333.. :2: \u00a7E<zx<.. ".0 E80 :9: <xS.<zm5_ aopunou $0.: \u00a7E.<_…&\u00a7 mo .E.:.ou x.o_…., \u00a7<\u00bb<zx$._.. ..\u00bbc..\u00bbm:ou $9…. $_<\u00bb<z~_<x mo En.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008 Author: H N Das IN THE HIGH csum or KARHATAKA, BANGAI{QE’2″Ef:A. k HATED ms um cam my or JULY m: ‘ K BEFORE nm H-\u00a3>1~rBLE nmwsncs Igixnge\ufb01momn ms V 1 SMT w\/EN% % sammAn\u00ab3nmn\u00a3.e;2!Ac%A1% ‘H 2 SIv1’!\u00a7’JAYAL\ufb02\ufb02.t\u00a7 * – mm mmrcmxwappa % aeE3:gfa\u00abarT49Y3ARs Rift.-“1* […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-09T04:33:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-09T04:33:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":628,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-09T04:33:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-09T04:33:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-09T04:33:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008"},"wordCount":628,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008","name":"Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-09T04:33:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatalakshmamma-vs-yeshodamma-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Venkatalakshmamma vs Yeshodamma on 9 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222671"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222671\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}