{"id":222689,"date":"2008-03-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008"},"modified":"2018-06-13T00:18:50","modified_gmt":"2018-06-12T18:48:50","slug":"dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Dayananda S\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Dayananda S\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDated this the 7\"' day o_f1\\\/larch, zoo?' 5 .._j  .\u00bb_. A' \n\nWrit Petition 16430 2220:-;v3 (L3,:   '\n  zap:-:5    \n\nDayananda, 4'2 yafa.~ \n\n1\n9 ?\\\u00a5a1-an nun \u00a341 um\n'CC LVIUIUUJ III-III' 'IT :13\n\n3 SmtKarnaja,   \u00ab\n4~ Ramwsn~s     % \n5 Vighw;'mati\u00a3,_  y:a_j_ _%  \nM % All  of Pa\u00a2idu\"Sher9_gs\u00a7r\n And  xffa *?iriat%1:1ix'3haya' _\n Kuiijllr Dsasicast, P(m_t_Fanizoor\n'-.Udupi'1\"'   __ ' --~ Petitioners\n(By Sri 55: Bhat, Adv. )=,_ A  \n  ~  ..... \n\n'  ' 1.\u00bb . ~  fa. Tribunal, Udupi Taluk\n. '- V' , E-_!'lrV:}n'V\":npVI~7t-nfv\ufb01\ufb02lit\n\u00ab. -. 'xxx' 1h:I s.fBMu1vI.an_y\n_ .-saggieevi G Shetfy \"v'v':'o Iagafmafn sherry-\n\" Panizoor, Udupi Taluk\n\nI \u00a3443\n\n 74 \"  Tara s Shetty D\/o Appi Shedthi\nr  R\/a Panizoor, Udupi Taluk \"Respondents\n\n (By Sri S Prakash Shetty, Adv. for C\/'R2;\n\nSlri Hadion Qhivnnan\ufb02nnna (1-P 'Far I? I 3\nI0'! u...-.5... ....... -----,.r.-, U. -..- ..--,\n\nJV\n\n\n\nThis Writ Petition \"is \ufb01led unde Art.226i227 of the -Constitution\n.r 00\n\nI'\nnravigm \ufb01g nimnh \ufb02u; Md dated ll 1 9,\nI'''''-'''' '9 'I\"\"\"\"\"' \"' \"\"\"\"\"\" \"\"\"\"' \"\"\"\"\"\"\"\"\"\"'\n\nTribunal, Udupi Taluld\n\nthe foiiowing:\n\norznaiepv\n\n-- a!'..'!\u00a7!\u00a7'.!.\"\u00a3'- C by it'ee7I..\u00ab:\u00ab..-id. '\n\nThis Writ petition having been reserved for  \" ._\n\nPetitioners have sought Vfor__.\" the     up\n\nTribunal, Udupi dated 11.3.2003 --  C.  ~\n\nIt is the case of the Narasi Baa had \ufb01led\napplication in to\ufb02thei iei\u00e9tentiiofj_'1.Vl_il_V:acres in Sy.No.l33l5 of\nBelapur   --a__el\u00a7algeni~tenant and was-paylirig R. 10\/-\nas   Though the said land was a\n\nit  it it i. \u00b0 _ y\ufb02igir m-nnrl father and an\n\n-..a..... . n -- w - - - -.....--m\n\nire'-'ore the Land \"\"---ri'Vur1aL spot inspection was conducted and as  the\n\n\u00bb :'rep0it,:Naras:i\"Bai was in possession and cultivation of theland. A\ufb01er\n\n ~. eiiquiry, Tribunal granted occupancy rights in favour of Narasi\n\nIiai. '.I:'hei*e'aiter, matter was challenged by the respondent; in a writ\n\n A. petition; ii Meanwhile, there was establishment of the appellate authority.\n\nit    pendency of the matter before the appellate authority, the appellate\n\n authority came to be abolished and thereafter, civil petition was filed\n\nwhich was later converted into writ petition. By order dated-19.8.1997,\n\nJ?\"\n\n\n\nWP 30504\/1992 was allowed and matter was remanded back to :tiie.Land\n\nTribunal. Alter remand, the Land Tribunal did \n\ninspection as directed by this Court but, proceeded to disiniss   K V' \n\nby the petitioners by its order at armeXItre,'C,\"VAeeordiir1g.;to_thepetitioners,\nthey are the original applicants and are in  ofithe 1an(i:i~;eing_\n\nageved -3; the ...der of disrnissai-._of~~thei. appli.Jati_:t, I:!?tey\"'a'_re' bet' e\"\n\nCounsel forth__e respondent  along with some\ndocuments,    petition. It is stated,\npetitioners,vhavefirnade:  In the first place, the\npetitiorrers._..pri-ginal landlord as respondent and by\nshowingilsorneone\"else.,as  owner, obtained an order of grant as\n\nsuch, there was'-no noticelto the respondent. Thereafter, the matter was\n\n ., pcoittestizii. It is also stihniitted the petitioners have not produced any RTC\n\n  iistanding ilileirinarne to the effect they are cultivating the property and\n\nV petitiehei\u00e9s, Narasi nan\n\n.\n<\/pre>\n
also \ufb02G,~g~1}t*.:% recerpts are produced “vet-. as pe. the s.a.erae..t ..t he’
\n‘h_ : . ._.. _. .1-\n<\/p>\n
it V,Shamaraya Shetty ‘but, he is not the owner of the land in question.<\/p>\n
l\u00a7Further_, alter remand by this Court, the Tribunal having recorded the<\/p>\n
statement of both the parties, after considering the RTC and other<\/p>\n
material, following the decision of the Division Bench of this Court, came
\n.i’ It . \/<\/p>\n
to the conclusion that the land in question is not an agricnlntrsl.  as<\/p>\n
the mother of the petitioners, was only a  she:_cet1id nit tie<\/p>\n
granted any occupancy rights. V,E_\\{en    <\/p>\n
speci\ufb01cally stated that the land is a  land and the  owner<\/p>\n
is shown as Nandan Shettyianti  The”1″‘j:fietitioncr was
\nworking in Dubai and ownetivhsetfersi  2″”‘i1eti_tioner also
\nis owning several’      staying in
\nher marital   it{sc.,employed. Likewise, the ‘4’”
\nand 5″?’  in Bonibay and residing sepsratety and<\/p>\n
the records do not’fti’isclesei”the’nsrne of Narasi Bai as the”‘te_:___nant. The<\/p>\n
. ‘ ercier does ncitrequire interference.<\/p>\n
 the counsel for the petitioners, Government P-,_lea\u00a7ier and the<\/p>\n
 A. ‘Counsel-‘representirig the respondent.<\/p>\n
It is the submission of the petitioners’ counsel, tl1ough’.tl1ere was a
\nspeci\ufb01c direction issued by this Court to conduct spot irnsgiection, no such<\/p>\n
inspection was conducted and even as per the earlier sgiot: inspection<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
report, petitioners are cultivating the land and that has not beeneeeneidered<\/p>\n
by the Land Tribunal. The petitioners and their mother were <\/p>\n
since long back as chalgeni tenants and itiiat  <\/p>\n
Land Tribunal ha not applied its niiridwend’ \u00abthel-\u00abiorderliV:peseed’*l)y time i<\/p>\n
Fer contra, eoiineel   reef: “d'”t
\nsubmitted that the Dixrisionllitierichlefytiiiit\u00e9  “er? 99f20\u20acJ1-decided on
\n27.3.2001 has held that pupj5’1as.\u00e9;   a mailer’ of right as
\nit is non-_ag.”icttlttiriIl;’.    the speci\ufb01c case of the
\napplieent_Vhereel:f   is a punja land, question of
\nconsidering-the’e7eme_:ter  does not arise. Further, no iota of evidence
\nis prodticedjlexceiJt’Vthe’:orallevidence and the Form 7 \ufb01led. More over, she<\/p>\n
hag mentioned as ecoolie inzthe Form 7 \ufb01led and that also .disa_tbles her to<\/p>\n
 ” .    referring to the annexures predttced like RTC,<\/p>\n
” .5; it  in Co!<\/p>\n
 I-he V<\/p>\n
V  the petitiuners are not entitied for grant of occupancy rights.<\/p>\n
Having heard the counsel for the respective’ parties, letme consider
\nwhether the impugned order requires interference and whetlierany error as<\/p>\n
h’ \u00b0ttedb th T1) I.\n<\/p>\n
sue iscommi y e nmtin\/e<\/p>\n
‘3\u00bb<\/p>\n
At the outset, it is seen though there was a direction by  Court<\/p>\n
to hold spot inspection on the ground that no spot  Isms<\/p>\n
conducted, the Land Tribunal proceeded on the htlteselvl <\/p>\n
was a spot inspection conducted as suohlllllno’ further -:spot” inspection is<\/p>\n
as per the averments madetn ‘the,  ‘such; tiuestion of
\nconducting a spot inspection onoelegeilnsdoeslvnot Lai\u00e9se as is l.ightly noted
\nby the Ttibunslalso’.   ” A   l ‘A N     h<\/p>\n
   counsel for the respondent, the
\npetitiozters.?    Bat has paid gent to one Shatnaraya Shetty
\nwho is not    in question. In that case; necessarily,<\/p>\n
dtege is no payl\/mentot” rental to the real land owner. Futtltergmore, what is<\/p>\n
 ., Ahveintg izlnoticedjut sense; of the Tribunal is, for the yeat’_1968 at an<\/p>\n
:1.-tdispoted<\/p>\n
._. pint ,1″ time, ..s .13– he R-C p…..!.-t’;’.., .21.: !.an.. is shown as
\n6 all-‘ n’II”:1rnLtI’-1.7!–eon, ‘l’.’n.4’l..:.. 01…; ‘I and “‘l”..: “an! 1…… \u00abI-..Iu… ‘uu’.e-.. ml? 61… -l3’…\u00ab.+
\n H”! ‘1. I” I u .I’UuIInII.UI., I-II La\ufb02llll LIIU I II I I\\ II II-I-H-9 :Ul. IIIU 1. I<\/p>\n
 that itnf\ufb01onn 7 filed, the applicant has mentioned her avocatioti as Coolie<\/p>\n
3 ll  supports the case of the respondent to the effect that  could not<\/p>\n
be treated as a tenant in respect of the land in question. More over, the<\/p>\n
land is noted as a punja land as is also mentioned in Form 7 :itsej:l1’. If at all<\/p>\n
1l’t.._1*'”\n<\/p>\n
she has cultivated the land in question and if as stated by_her, she had<\/p>\n
‘ ‘K,’<\/p>\n
Admittedly, it is her case that the gutta of Rs.it)\/’- was paid to   ‘V’ V
\nShamaraya Shetty who is not the owner and even’ as a rruatte\ufb01of fast * _<\/p>\n
\ufb01nding, throughout as observed by the Tribunal;.:’thereeis7′  at<\/p>\n
the land in question as a tenanted land. In such circurristance,”th’e  <\/p>\n
Tribunal has come to the conclusion the question is  iptilnjaiiland
\nwhich was never in cultivation of petitioners :\u00ab or ,.V_the_applicant,”i their
\nmother. The Land Tribunal has also’i’seme” the documents<\/p>\n
produced by the petitioneijsiiihon the ‘those are subsequent<\/p>\n
1:.\n<\/p>\n
I2
\n3<\/span>
\n‘9.\n<\/p>\n
in
\nS
\n3<\/span>
\n1D
\n‘3-\n<\/p>\n
“3
\n‘3
\n.3
\n’15’
\nla”\n<\/p>\n
.”.”‘ i
\n.\n<\/p>\n
.. as
\n\u00bb an
\n\u20ac1.-\n<\/p>\n
==_+~
\nO .\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
\n%
\nE
\nor
\nW
\n=
\nG’
\ns
\n3;\n<\/p>\n
nor Nandan Shettyit-(ere the-__iansilo;rt’ts of the land in question as ueh,<\/p>\n
question off them gt-;’ni..b}_a’._.t.1se applicant was not justified and it does<\/p>\n
niot_1amour.t to givin’g..g_i,e’ni_ to the land in question. ‘<\/p>\n
 thathasi per the earlier spot inspection report it is noted that<\/p>\n
  portion of the land was under cultivation, the fact remains, when<\/p>\n
   ‘was not given to real landlord and also there were<\/p>\n
it Hisloeurnents produced to show that the land in question’
\n, (kt; we\/$4\u00bb-‘–\u00a2L4 -\/c~-o-~\/~ A W”<\/p>\n
no material<\/p>\n
A.,_ALJlcJ’01\u00bb~–l’r7{o
\n alsoason<\/p>\n
In  JP’<\/p>\n
ewe<\/p>\n
uuuuauu – —51-.-\n<\/p>\n
&E..”‘\ufb02..,<\/p>\n
\u00abI<\/p>\n
M
\nIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
_-‘\\g
\n\u00a5Mf%””\n<\/p>\n
JILT<\/p>\n
J
\nI<\/p>\n
i “iaxdisrniesexii t i  to<\/p>\n
1.3.1974 the \ufb01nding of the Land Tribunal on merit, cannot b\u00a2.je\u00a7siiy,T<\/p>\n
interfered with.\n<\/p>\n
1.3.1974 W”en — “‘””””\u00b0”te ate pt-nduced te__ei:o\\n’ that tiie~3.la:jd” <\/p>\n
an -.-.–.–._ _ ..\n<\/p>\n
question was brought under c”iti”-ten ‘ct: apgilieont ,_a.,g-.13 of<\/p>\n
documentary evidence, the \ufb01nding of  as;-{a%.tAoar.::et’ <\/p>\n
by another \ufb01nding. Further_, thet.o,t.m.st.;ttnge\u00a2;;os;;g:t the
\nTribunal even in spite. of    be i’jo1i_nti’fa ‘ft
\nwith as there was  gm  ietfeiiable and ae  was
\nnot noticede.b3r.thie’    that there was-no_ each
\nspot inspei:tion– L’ such spot inspection was’ <\/p>\n
and the report”-ayailahlie;  .wiriia+_”noi reason once again to  such<\/p>\n
 of the view;-Jitlxe-order<\/p>\n
 ._   ‘viewVof.i\ufb01e*’t’aiseuseio:: ::-.e.de a-..,.v-,-I<\/p>\n
of the  does not requir’ iwterference.  -itetition<\/p>\n
set!-*
\n‘judge<\/p>\n
‘ ediv t!~.e land in question \ufb01e inhpttrt\u00e9at  to} <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Dayananda S\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT Dated this the 7″‘ day o_f1\\\/larch, zoo?’ 5 .._j .\u00bb_. A’ Writ Petition 16430 2220:-;v3 (L3,: ‘ zap:-:5 Dayananda, 4’2 yafa.~ 1 9 ?\\\u00a5a1-an nun \u00a341 um ‘CC […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222689","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDayananda S\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dayananda S\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-12T18:48:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dayananda S\\\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-12T18:48:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1084,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Dayananda S\\\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-12T18:48:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dayananda S\\\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dayananda S\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dayananda S\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-12T18:48:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dayananda S\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-12T18:48:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008"},"wordCount":1084,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008","name":"Dayananda S\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-12T18:48:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-so-paddu-sheregar-vs-the-land-tribunal-udupi-taluk-on-7-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dayananda S\/O Paddu Sheregar vs The Land Tribunal Udupi Taluk on 7 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222689"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222689\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222689"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}