{"id":223122,"date":"2008-11-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-03-21T12:49:49","modified_gmt":"2018-03-21T07:19:49","slug":"karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, cIRcy:1*:f \n\nAT DHARWAD.\n\nDATED THIS THE 25TH DAY QJFfA,NQVEE\ufb02B\"L?TR:v,. $2503'. { ' x \"\n\nPRESENT,' Q '\nTHE HOBPBLE MR.JUS'i'1 c}3   .\nH   L %  ,\nTHE HQNBLE MR.  GOWDA\nM.F.Av;*E'+$>.::1032.:}:\/\u00a7G(}\u00a7';f\" \n\nBETWEEN _  \n\nKARNATAKA NEE:?3:AVAR'I. NIGA1\\.&\"LTD\nREPREsENTE:1\"JB3\"' 41T\"S.A%M.Ap:AC\u00bb1NG I>mEC:1*oR\n\nN0. 1, COFFEE _BC)fA_F<D VBUEDING,\n\n4TH FLOOR, %DR;B.\u00a7-2;AMssEDKAR\n\nVEEDHI, BANGALORE 0.1  APPELLANT\n\n - .-(By..'S}i.\u00a75RIKAN'i'H;J\u00ab;--BfiAT : V.Y.KUMAR)\n\nA:\u20acD%k?\ufb01%A&%k'% %\n\n1.' . % sR1  SQETYAWAN MAHARUDRA CHOUGULA\nFR\/Ci HEREKUDI, CHIKODI, BELGAUM\n\n% " " 9'  S13-EHAGWAN MAHARUDRA CHOUGULA\n~  _ "39:\/0 HIREKUDI, CHI\u00a7{C}QI,BjElLGAU1\\\/E\n\n"   3."; '}'HE SPECIAL LAND ACQUSITION OFFICER\n\nHZDKAL DAM, HUIGCERL . . . RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
A ‘A (By Sri.S N i+~IA’1’I’i FOR R1 R2)<\/p>\n
(SR1 C.S..PA’I’IL, GGW. AIDV. FOR R3)<\/p>\n
MFA FILED U\/s.s4(1) OF LA ACT AGAINST”
\nJUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19\/11\/200\u00a7””PASS_E’.f;
\nIN LAC No.82\/04 ON THE FILE OF *:%HEA%JVc\u00a7v*:LM”–T
\nPARTLY ALLO~’~\u00a7VIN’G 3735; ” .\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE(SD) – CHHIODI,
\nREFERENCE PE’I’I’i’ION :FOR*. ‘_
\nCOMPENSATION.\n<\/p>\n
This Appeal coming 611.Vfor “~h\u00e9\u00a7atfingV v ‘   <\/p>\n
SREEDHAR RAO, J., delivered ti*1:f;”‘fG1}o$vii1g:a
\n ”\n<\/p>\n
I.A.No.2 is e{1}{f:ved;;A 1;)\u00a7:.fa3::VA6Vi”_:22O \u00abgays in \ufb01mg the
\nSri   \u00abf;5I””‘t}:1e Government.\n<\/p>\n
 land acquired for the<\/p>\n
purpose, of \u00a7foIz su”1ir3tiGn 6uf a 4::-anal. The LAO awarded<\/p>\n
I-‘j’__V.\u00a2e1\ufb011\u00e9:e;.i::is;’~itioi3.\u00abat fI:\u00e9””i\u20ac;1te of Rs.25,()O0\/- per acm. The<\/p>\n
 considered the lands as having NA<\/p>\n
2  _  compensation at the rate cf Rs. 1 1\/ -,<\/p>\n
  12\/;  Rs. 15\/ — per sq.ft Ii\ufb02d\ufb01i’ three categories. The
\n  Nimvari Nigam Ltd. (for short, ‘KNNLU has \ufb01led<\/p>\n
VT :  ” appeal cha\ufb02engng the compensation granted as excessive<\/p>\n
‘ A. and else contend that the land has no NA potential.<\/p>\n
2. The awanfl of the LAO discloses <\/p>\n
opinion of the panchas Show that the va1ue:’_:6f’ ‘the: <\/p>\n
ranges between Rs.25,()0O\/-\n<\/p>\n
The LAO has relied upon the sales  <\/p>\n
soid in the years 1997 to~’1\u00a73-9.9  <\/p>\n
notification. The sales statist_ii:s:__disclese’– ihe lands
\nare sold at Rs.25,O0C)’f;”to”–_Rs;32′;O’\u00a7)(\u00a7)’4:’per acre. The
\nlands are dry leads. ‘1A’i1e’>1i\u00e9”3′.:1i:eA.\u00a7’o:f’ ;r.1i:1e:1:’e\u00a7st1*atio17; of the
\ndry lan\u00e9s   e:sif.;’;1x\u00a2dM%;:t Rs.33,000\/- per
\nacre foiijzhe __ — ‘<\/p>\n
3. ‘A   0:1 the other hand, have<\/p>\n
 pr0\u20ac11;1ee{1.the re\u00a2\u00a2:rds’%=:o show that the lands hearing as<\/p>\n
  451\/1, 395\/2, 394\/213, 213\/3, 328\/1 and RS<\/p>\n
  viliage are converted for Non.-\n<\/p>\n
  L’ Ag\ufb02ei}\u00a7tt;efsl’  The said lands adjoin the lands in<\/p>\n
 ” :q2ie’st,i{31i\u00a7” The claimants have also produced evidence to<\/p>\n
–.T.’.~si1p*e*’AAtI1at RS 1570.388 is converted to Nor;-Ag\ufb01culmral<\/p>\n
V.  ‘  “\ufb02pe\ufb01rpose, house sites are formed by one Padaiale, each site<\/p>\n
measurcing 39′ X 40’ is sold for Rs.4’7,{)0O\/-. The sale deed<\/p>\n
_ We,sE\u00a7.V <\/p>\n
of plot No.20 dated 17.2.1999 is marked as  _f1’he<\/p>\n
preliminary noti\ufb01cation in respect of the  <\/p>\n
is issued in the year 200:, S11i}vej,:’1:.4I”4A<;s.'23{)<':)_'.i;~3.:  *<\/p>\n
village limits of Hirekudi viilage,  '\u00a7={\u00a7}\u00a5vev\u20acr,' <\/p>\n
the certi\ufb01ed copy of the  1t:;ap  discloses
\nthat RS No.38-8 is situate1n\u00a7m;:diate1y'\u00aba;i;oming Chikk0di–
\nMiraj road. 'line said"  ' v–i$l_t\u00e9V$ Chikkodi than<\/p>\n
Hirekudi. %r:?;e  .(V'i{2e\u20acdv.\u00a2'31\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:::f\u00a7%ir;:Vi1:i\u00e9\u00a7S" that RS mass is<\/p>\n
situate __  9%.;  Hirekudi village and'<\/p>\n
adgoms  The lands in question are<\/p>\n
situate: Afa:+41'_offfrqxjaAVA'C}\u00a7i1;i:\u00a3\u00a7di — Miraj Road to the North\u00bb-\u00ab<\/p>\n
A      claimants have produced records to Show<\/p>\n
'.t}1V\u00e9E.:.+t29iE:'ai\u00e9:;.if1ti$'\u00e9.djoi11ing the lands in qz_1ests'.e1"1 have been<\/p>\n
  'ti; NoI;\u00abAgicultura1 purpose. The said lamis are<\/p>\n
x V' \u00bbzi1S\u00b0st situate in the micidle between Himkudi village and<\/p>\n
Chikkodi ~– Mira} Road. Coznsideri\ufb01g the lccation of RS<\/p>\n
5<\/span>
\nNo.388 and the lands in question, we \ufb01nd that RS No.1-388<\/p>\n
has no comparison to the lands in question.  The<\/p>\n
claimants have also not preduced any \u00a7Bat\u20acI’ia}..’t\u00a3\u00a7:.”\u00ab5:lihQW<\/p>\n
that in the NA converted lends any plots have.’feeeiA’1i <\/p>\n
and sold. The Reference Court has\u00bb.mainly   V’<\/p>\n
sale deed E3x.P.29 pertainirig to 1:23 eoessltoeeae\u00a3e;mm.g<\/p>\n
the value. If the sale doeeeient   isle<\/p>\n
absolutely no credible material-~te”L_eSee’ss the”;3;1eIl:{et value<\/p>\n
of the lands in questionll’ <\/p>\n
 -j’Phei*ex’*i$*Ijeeiiixateriai either Way to Show<\/p>\n
Whether    lands do really have NA<\/p>\n
 poierniiel  or  conversions are manipulated<\/p>\n
 ;e;e\u00a3ieiApe:.ie\ufb01v pf the acquisition. There is absolutely<\/p>\n
  available on record for this Court<\/p>\n
[to detefmi\ufb01e the just and preper compensa\ufb01on.<\/p>\n
  ‘lela\u00e9.ime.z”1t;s have also net let in convincing evidence he<\/p>\n
 __’*pregve the market value. Oniy one witness is examined<\/p>\n
‘V V    heavy reliance is placed on Ex.P.29, the sale deed<\/p>\n
of a plot in RS Ne.388. In View of the paucity of evidence,<\/p>\n
we do not feel that it is just and proper to <\/p>\n
\ufb01xing the market value of the lands in  T’ <\/p>\n
interests of justice anti interests  ‘-  it<\/p>\n
and necessary that the order of the Refe1*e1\u00a7;Ce is  L’<\/p>\n
be set aside, the matter to itemandedi. -xizhezi\ufb01efereneei
\nCourt for \ufb02esh eoI1side1″atio_tim;at;ti:.  eecordance
\nwith law. The  paI*t;iesV_  adduce further<\/p>\n
6.    that a considerable
\ntime  theWt)a1*ties are denied of the
\ncompenisatien, ‘wee  as an interim measure,<\/p>\n
KNNE,’ ”   eompensatien at the rate of<\/p>\n
  per acre inclusive of the award made by the<\/p>\n
 The deposit to be made Within four<\/p>\n
V V’ _ weeks.  are permitted to withdraw the amount<\/p>\n
 .ede}t:Qsited: It is directed that the Reference Couxt shall<\/p>\n
   of the ease within three months.\n<\/p>\n
it is clari\ufb01ed that the Reference Court need not be<\/p>\n
in\ufb02uenced by any of the factual observations made<\/p>\n
regardizlg the location. of the lands and  <\/p>\n
petential. Al} the contentions are kept open: __    ‘  <\/p>\n
it is further clari\ufb01czd that in; f\u00e9S1jt;:;t”.Qf-: <\/p>\n
KNNL has already dep0sit;ed_3._’Su\ufb01:-c;f=Rs. <\/p>\n
acre, no further deposit be
\nRefund of Court   <\/p>\n
3%.?\n<\/p>\n
iu\u00e9ge<\/p>\n
nvb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, cIRcy:1*:f AT DHARWAD. DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY QJFfA,NQVEE\ufb02B”L?TR:v,. $2503′. { ‘ x ” PRESENT,’ Q ‘ THE HOBPBLE MR.JUS’i’1 c}3 . H L % , THE HQNBLE MR. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-223122","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKarnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-21T07:19:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-21T07:19:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":955,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-21T07:19:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-21T07:19:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-21T07:19:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008"},"wordCount":955,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008","name":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-21T07:19:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-satyawan-maharudra-chougula-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Satyawan Maharudra Chougula on 25 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223122","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223122"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223122\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223122"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223122"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}