{"id":223217,"date":"2009-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009"},"modified":"2014-03-05T05:18:27","modified_gmt":"2014-03-04T23:48:27","slug":"united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HEGH CCIURT {BF \u00a3{ARN\ufb01fi'AKA AT BANGALQRE\nDated the 303: cia}; Gf Nevember 2009  \n: B E F C) R E : '\n\n'THE HQN'BLE: MZ\u20ac.JUS'I'ICE ; V.JA13AN\u00a7%'\u00a7\u00e9:\u00a7'T\u00a7i:\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7'\"'  ' \nMISCELLANEOUS FIRS\"1\" APPEAgg~gq. 5775' 2 f%,;f:;Q\u20acT56 %\u00a7:mf% ' '\n\nM.F'.A.Nc3. snag 1 2Q{):a;mg\u00a7,a;:_g '     '\nBBJTWEEN :\n\nUnited india Insurance: C30. Lt\u00e9; \nDavanagere D0, '.:}r1r0L1$;11.'_its \nRegional Offzce at No.2:\u20ac;  ' _  ,\nShankaxa\ufb02arayaraa Building,  i _\nM.C},Roacl, Banga.i\u00a7};*e~;'3Es0 {i\u20ac}':* E,'  \nRep. by its Dep'uf5;f.'Maf1ag{t:r\"V  A '  V. \nSri       .\n3' =   \u00bb ' ' ...Appe1}amt\nfcolnman)\n\n    Rae, Advocaie' }\n\nA\u00a7\\IE)_;\n\n*' '~  In  E7515 ' ';\"~'2f306:\n\n  :~';:~: {};SI1\u00a7$i\ufb01idfx3I,\n\nf:Zig\",z%;g\u00bb3d abczut 22 years,\nR j 'Q__4H6s31{\u20ac:zj::ATVi}1age, Jagalur District.\n\n M.F';_g;Ne. 5-758 \/ 2006:\n\n \"'-fSr\u00a7_?s\/i';.'KaIisi\u00e9ciaiaE1,\n S5fG'2\u00a7\u00a7:1111gc:1c%raiah,\n   Age\u00e9 abeut 323 yaars,\n\n\" \"E\/5 M.K.\u00a7-latti, Chitradurgaa\n\n. 9,\u00a7Ee$pe:1d\u20acnts\n\n{ 8}: Sri V.P.K\"a1\u00a7{arni\u00a7 girzivaeate, }\n\n\n\nM)\n\nEviisce\ufb02aneous First Appeals \ufb02ied un\u00e9cir Sj\u00e9ction\n381(1) af W13. Act. against tha judg;1:1em: and 0rc\u00a7e'1*-V\n\n30.11.2005<\/pre>\n<p> passed in w&lt;:A:{::R;1&lt;3;_a\u00a3i\u00e9ii)\u00a7;:\u00e9:h&#039;%;&#8212;~<br \/>\nWC2A:C:R: 104\/2004 raspectivaly, on  <\/p>\n<p>Labcrur O\ufb01icer and Coinmist\u00e9io\ufb01\u00e9r&#039; 1 &#039;e:)r-1&quot;\u00a7.&amp;f1o\u00bbriV;:;\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9::;_&#039;S&#039;\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>Cempensatiozz, Chitradurga,  I a T\u00e9ompazzs\ufb01\ufb01a\ufb01i&#039;<br \/>\nof Rs,=.;2,i}1,6(){}j~ 85 Rs.2;&#039;1_Q&#039;;-211\/\u00a5&#039;- :espe\u00a2tiV%\u00a21:,a,.. with&quot; A<\/p>\n<p>interest at 12% p.21. after 3L\u00a73&#039;\u00ab.,\u00a71a3fs f14t);:1 1;heVf%datae of<br \/>\naccident ti\ufb02 deposit  tiV1e:-,_&quot; ;2:.Q;:~e1}a:1t herein to<\/p>\n<p>deposit the sama.\n<\/p>\n<p>These  Ci\u00e9mi\u20acng&#8217;x0I.i&#8217; f\u00a7)1*V.&#8217;i1s3\u00ab:\u00ab:1i:ing this day, the<br \/>\neourt {ie}ivt\u00e9fec_i.&#8221;&#8216;.:\u00a7ji&#8221;e7 &#8216;f\u20ac&gt;1Idia%j-.f1ig :  &#8216;A &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216; =   N T&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>}&#8217;:3ot:h~L:i1&lt;=:se&quot;&#039;a_\u00a7\u00a7;jaai$\u00bbL.a2&#039;ise out of a coxnmon order<\/p>\n<p> passg\u00e9\ufb01i uh};  Commissiarzcr by which the<\/p>\n<p> \u00e9\u00a7;:v.iiuca\u00a7iet}.\u20ac:&#039;VA.iEi\u00a2d by the respective respondexgvciaimagxt<\/p>\n<p>3i:::17t:..Vaii\u00a7\u00a7v&amp;_\u20ac:d &#039;:;=f.1tid compensation was awanzie\ufb01 in a sum<\/p>\n<p>V -V ef  1\/&quot; in respect of apyiicant Karisiddayya<\/p>\n<p>&quot;  a1iA}.&lt;:1L-;&#039;F&#039;;:$\u00a7iV;?2;&#039;,if)}.,6OG\/~\u00ab was awar\u00e9ed in resms;-1: of aypiimnt<\/p>\n<p> Sgiit\ufb01sfiidhar. The \ufb01ndizlg on the percentaga of less &lt;31&#039;<\/p>\n<p>&quot; \u00e9arnir1g capacity; taker: by the Cfemmissiener is gaiied in<\/p>\n<p>quesizgian in these appeals an the gonad that the said<\/p>\n<p>fmdmg is p\u20ac\u00a7Y\u20acI&#039;$\u20ac:\u00a7, 1%<\/p>\n<p>*2<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>2. T335 learned counsei far the appeila;1t~i1:1su:%a1:c&lt;:<\/p>\n<p>Cfmmpany argued that while the accident havtir1gV&#8211;&#039;taken<\/p>\n<p>place on 13.1.2034 is 1101: in dispute, yet,  <\/p>\n<p>sustaineti by the respectiva applicants are   V&#039; <\/p>\n<p>duster has opined before the CC&quot;10i:1}_::.is*sio:1&#039;1e1}&quot; &#039;a;i1 d&#039;,&#039; &#039; as<\/p>\n<p>such, a careftii exaxnirlatien. of th{:..g:i\u20ac;cu111\u00a2:1:fist pI*0c1&#039;?:3.\u00a2&lt;:(i <\/p>\n<p>would go to show that thougi1.V:ihe res&quot;pe,\u00a2&#039;t;iv\u00e9 \ufb01pp\ufb01cants<br \/>\nsuffered certain i:&quot;;,_i13j:&#039;j&quot;&#039;\u20ac5,    not  injurias<br \/>\nwhich were re\ufb01epted h1_x%%\u00a7)1inc\u00a3&#039;~-de\ufb01iii\ufb01itates issued ta<\/p>\n<p>them: and &#039;%.}$v1&quot;i(: 1i&#039;\u00e9}S viss\ufb01ued the disabi\ufb01ty<\/p>\n<p>&lt;:e1*ti3&#039;:i\\i:_a*I;r::_:.~;;, xx2*as&#039;:&lt;1i3\u00a7. tioctm&#039; who; had irlitia\ufb02y treated<br \/>\n\u00a3116: 8._\u00a7)p\u00a7{&#039;,;_&#039;;l1ZI.v\u00a7\u00a7. &#039;  \u00a7e:{f&#039;&lt;:.&lt;jvt:r, no medical record was<\/p>\n<p>prqrig\u00e9\u00e9ec\ufb01 by   who had issue\u00e9 the disabiiity<\/p>\n<p> Ceri:i\ufb01cat\u00ab::s.4f1\u00a33Ij any x-&#039;ray W83 preciuced to canfmn the<\/p>\n<p>&#039;.1;\ufb01t:;:,1&#039;\u20acV    injuries suffered by the respective<\/p>\n<p>-V app\u00a7i::ait\u00a7cs..&#8217; &#8221; Fer all these reasons, the assessment af<\/p>\n<p> ~.,::;-;ss._  eazfning capacity at 5\u20aci% by &#8216;\u00a3316 Will<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  Cpm\ufb02iissianer is amntrazjv &#8216;:0 the \u20acE?i\u00a7\u20ac\ufb02Cf3 911 recerd and<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; is p\u20ac\u00a7I&#8221;\u00a7J'(&#8217;31&#8243;$(3 \u00a31116, tlzerafere, {he matter be reman\u00e9e\u00e9 to<\/p>\n<p>th\ufb01 Ciommissioner for fresh CG1{1Sid\u20ac3I&#8217;a'{i0}1.<\/p>\n<p>}<\/p>\n<p>?\u00a5<\/p>\n<p>3, in the Eight of the Stlbstantiai question Qf iaw<\/p>\n<p>raised in these two appeals and the &lt;:0nt&lt;;:11ti:\u00a7;::\u00a75*\u00a7&#039;&#8211;\u00ab_;&#039;31;:<\/p>\n<p>fem-&#039;a1&#039;d as above by the a,ppe1lanI:&#039;s counse\ufb01}   &#039;<\/p>\n<p>for c0nsi.d+:51&#039;atio:1 is whether; \u00bb~&#039;33\u00bb]_(&#039;::&#039; &quot; (:55 V<\/p>\n<p>CGIIi1I&quot;iiSSiO11&lt;3I&#039; as regards the I0s$.Voi*._&lt;\u00e9&#039;=;\u00e9.rr1j\ufb01&#039;g3:%&#039;&lt;;a;3.aCi$f ._<\/p>\n<p>509.&#8217;\/he can be said to be in a{,&#8211;*q6r.dan5e.}x?it1j &#8220;\u00a7I1V\u00e9. Vii1atk:I*iaI &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>011 record.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4. In the light &#8221; i:na{ie by the<br \/>\nappel1a_m:&#8217;s   recerd of this<br \/>\ncase and     t.11e accident which<br \/>\noccurxi\u00e9fzl  __ fha iI1j1ire~:i (i1&#8243;i&#8217;S\/&#8217;61&#8217; and the<br \/>\ncleaner  :&#8211;41&#8243;;&#8217;\u00a7E1::%44LV.&#8221;&#8221;:.:~;&#8221;;s.\u00ab*e3:z1z:c1e:1t Eiospital at Sim<\/p>\n<p>fan&#8217; &#8216;:;&#8217;ie&#8221;a.:;1:1aar;:;&#8221; A. .__ E&#8221;Jei?t;1f1er in 1:216 svidence before the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;\u00a7:&#8217;~\u20ac}\u00a3I1II;iSS3:.{)I7\u00a7\u00e9f\u00a3&#8217;~.V zmz&#8217; in ifzeir claim applications, the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; \u00e9t.ate&lt;:i 1:0 the effect that th\ufb01y had hater:<\/p>\n<p>V . g&#039;Ve\ufb01&quot;t1\u20ac\u00a7at\ufb011$r1: at the Gaverrmaent Hospital at Sim. 1530<\/p>\n<p>V:1e&#039;\u00e9&lt;:L1:;1ei1ft, parijcuiarly the wound certi\ufb01cate, is<\/p>\n<p>-AT\u00ab&#8217;.&#8211;fc&#8217;}:*};&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;1c\u00a7fQmir3g from the Government Hosgaitai, Sim. What<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; i\u00e9 produced bafora the Ctommissiener is the wound<\/p>\n<p>certi\ufb01cate issued by the Gs::ve:&#8217;nme:1t Hospitai at Hix\u00e9yuz&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>Ever: if the Saici Wmmci cartiiicates am taken as izaving<\/p>\n<p>}<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;vi<\/p>\n<p>been issusd by {ha Hospital at Himyur, the :injuries<br \/>\nnomad in the Waund certificates do not talk? with the<\/p>\n<p>injuries mtzntioned in the F&#8217;.I.R. by the: dxiver hiiil\ufb01i\ufb01if,<\/p>\n<p>paruicuiarly in the case of appiicam: Sh3Shi{T1,\u00a71;&#8217;\u00a7;i:<\/p>\n<p>accarding to the complainant, &#8216;had suI_&#8217;f1\u00a7;i\u00a7m\u00a7:* ii;&#8217;1ji,1ri%:s?  &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>over the right eye&#8211;brow, whereas tl&#8221;\u00a7\u00e9&#8217;:\u00a7&gt;t;u1:{i* <\/p>\n<p>issued in respect of Shashidh\u00e9x\ufb01 is-&#8216;svealsv iiu\ufb01f\ufb02jer <\/p>\n<p>ixajuries and even fractures.\n<\/p>\n<p>E3. E\u00a7eccmdl3:*, me de\u00e9gfar, vj\u00e9ha  before the<br \/>\nCommissianer and ujh\ufb01i   ir:s:1e\u00a3i . the disability<\/p>\n<p>certi\ufb01cgates _A and P4?&#8217; respectiveiy, was<br \/>\nnot the&#8217;  r::xamiz1ed the respective<\/p>\n<p>appljpa\ufb02ts,  tfie {ioctor Wm Heated the appiiwnts<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\u00e9gvasvwizaf s\u00a7;j;;a mine&lt;:i befora tbs Commissioner.<\/p>\n<p>61.} Elefect to ba naticed in the impugned arcier<\/p>\n<p> ._af the Csmmissioner is that, though th\ufb01 Insurance<\/p>\n<p> smight permissian to examine th\u00e9 itwo<\/p>\n<p>K :V&#8221;.&#8217;a;ipiicants by angther docter, ftha said appiication was<\/p>\n<p> rejecte\u00e9 by the Commissioner 02:: 23.11.2805.<\/p>\n<p>}\/<\/p>\n<p>1 9&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>7&#8243; For the aforesaid reasons, I dc: \ufb01nd enmzgh fofce in<\/p>\n<p>the Submissians made by &#8216;\u20ac116 iearned counse1&#8243;*fL\u00e9i*._jt\u00a31e<\/p>\n<p>appellant that the firming 01&#8243; the   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>regards the loss of eaxni\ufb02g \u00a2a\u00a7aacity_&#8221;   V<\/p>\n<p>C()I1C\u20ac:I&#8217;1&#8243;i\u20acd is perverse and con\ufb01\u00e9gsfy  &#8220;tI1e:&#8221;t*\u00e9\u00a7ijas .v&lt;:{..):&#039;1t%:Ii3.t&#039;:&#039;t~:~ ._<\/p>\n<p>cf the F.I.R. and, in   &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>certi\ufb01cates fmm the atv&#8211;$ir%;~ having<br \/>\nbeen produced. there    fares: in Lh\ufb01<br \/>\nsubmission &#8216;by  &#8220;f:V\u00a7&#8217;3.1nsei that the<br \/>\nrespective   ::&#8217;\u00a7\u00a7p\u00a7:\u20acar to have been<br \/>\nn1anipL13at\u20acciT;    erder t0 get higlier<\/p>\n<p>campezzisatiozx. _ V&#8217; V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>8. fifsdg\ufb01r &#8216;?t11:e&#8217; above&#8217; circumstances, I am of the View<\/p>\n<p> 2 V &#8216;*:};a.i:_ L&#8221;i;\u00a7: \u00e9\u00abcC0r&lt;iiI}g3y, bath the appeais are aiicwad anti the<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;. im\u00a7;ug1e&lt;_\u00b0\u00a3 erder of the \u00a3f2en1missim3e1&#039; is set aside and<\/p>\n<p> ~ 41.315: Inattar is remanded to the {&quot;;ommissi.r3ne:r for fresh<\/p>\n<p>corzsiderajicm anzi fresh asseasmem of the 10:35 af<\/p>\n<p>:\n<\/p>\n<p>s<br \/>\nL<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;a<\/p>\n<p>eamling capacitf,\u00bb-2 Both parties are at liberty to agi\u00e9uce<\/p>\n<p> fu\ufb02her evidence in their supper: and thereaft:%\u00a3:*;_:t;&#8217;)e<\/p>\n<p>Qammissioner shall dispose of the matter   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>months from the date: of receipt of~thisA {)I.&#8221;f.&#8217;Ci.gV(.&#8221;&#8216;,&#8221;iv&#8217;V&#8217;,&#8221;  &#8221;  4<\/p>\n<p>The amount in deposit?i9\u00a7\u00e9f1&#8217;it:ri\u20acd.\u00bbV <\/p>\n<p>appeliant.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009 Author: V.Jagannathan IN THE HEGH CCIURT {BF \u00a3{ARN\ufb01fi&#8217;AKA AT BANGALQRE Dated the 303: cia}; Gf Nevember 2009 : B E F C) R E : &#8216; &#8216;THE HQN&#8217;BLE: MZ\u20ac.JUS&#8217;I&#8217;ICE ; V.JA13AN\u00a7%&#8217;\u00a7\u00e9:\u00a7&#8217;T\u00a7i:\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7'&#8221;&#8216; &#8216; MISCELLANEOUS FIRS&#8221;1&#8243; APPEAgg~gq. 5775&#8217; 2 f%,;f:;Q\u20acT56 %\u00a7:mf% [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-223217","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-04T23:48:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-04T23:48:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1103,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009\",\"name\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-04T23:48:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-04T23:48:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-04T23:48:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009"},"wordCount":1103,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009","name":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-04T23:48:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-g-shashidhar-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri G Shashidhar on 30 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223217","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223217"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223217\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223217"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223217"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223217"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}