{"id":223287,"date":"2009-12-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009"},"modified":"2016-07-01T04:17:24","modified_gmt":"2016-06-30T22:47:24","slug":"mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. &#8230; on 29 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. &#8230; on 29 December, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                        Club Building (Near Post Office),\n                      Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067.\n                             Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                           Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/001396\/4137Adjunct\n                                                         Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/001396\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging from the Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<pre>Appellant                            :      Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma\n                                            S\/o Late Sh. Rizak Ram Sharma,\n                                            6 C.S.C. Vasant Enclave,\n                                            New Delhi-110057.\n\nRespondent                           :      Mr.Satnam Singh\n                                            ADM\/LAC &amp; PIO(SW)\n                                            Municipal Corporation of Delhi\n<\/pre>\n<p>                                            Office of the Addl. Distt. Magistrate\/LAC(SW)<br \/>\n                                            Room No-12, Old Terminal Tax Bldg.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                            Kapashera, New Delhi.\n<\/p>\n<pre>RTI application filed on             :      16\/02\/2009\nPIO replied                          :      26\/03\/2009\nFirst appeal filed on                :      Not enclosed\nFirst Appellate Authority order      :      06\/05\/2009\nSecond Appeal received on            :      06\/06\/2009\n\nSl.          Information sought                               PIO's reply\n1. What was the total area of Khasra         Matter pertains to Halka Patwari, Tehsil\n    No.33 of village Basant Nagar.           Vasant Vihar.\n2. How much land was acquired out of         Khasra NO. 33\/10, as acquired vide Award No.\n    Khasra No. 33 and how much was left      1879 of village Basant Nagar. The total area of\n    un acquired and what is their Khasra     acquired Kh. No. 33\/10 is 136 bigha 14 biswa.\n    No. at present.\n3. Supply four copies of AKS Sirzra and       Copy of Aks Sizra has already supplied to the\n    Titamma field book of Khasra No.          Appellant. The Appellant can see it personally\n<\/pre>\n<p>    33\/1 to 33\/9 and 33\/10.                   in the office, as photocopy of Aks Sizra is not<br \/>\n                                              clear due to its wear and tear condition.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                              Tatima filed book is not attached in the award<br \/>\n                                              file.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.   Clarify that in case of non-availability Matter pertains to Halqua patwari, Tehsil<br \/>\n     of records of Titamma field book and Vasant Vihar.<br \/>\n     AKS Sizra whether it is possible to<br \/>\n     identify or certify that which<br \/>\n     particular portion of land\/house is<br \/>\n     falling in which Khasra No.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                     Page 1 of 3<\/span><br \/>\n Grounds for First Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>Not enclosed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Order of the First Appellate Authority:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The reply to question no. 2 as given by the LAC branch is not specific and complete. As such<br \/>\nPIO(SW) is directed to supply the information within 7 working days.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Grounds for Second Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>Non-compliance of the order of FAA by the PIO.\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n<p>The following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma<br \/>\nRespondent: Mr. Vinod Kumar, Naib Tehsildar (LAC) on behalf of PIO Mr. Satnam Singh<br \/>\nThe Appellant has not got the reply to part of query 2 in which he had asked how much of<br \/>\nKhasra 33 left unacquired and the Khasra nos. He has also not being provided the photocopy of<br \/>\nKhasra nos. 33\/1 to 33\/9 and the Tatima Sizra Field Book. The Respondent states that this<br \/>\ninformation is with PIO, SDM-Vasant Vihar.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision dated 15 July 2009<br \/>\nThe appeal was allowed. The PIO Mr. Satnam Singh was directed to obtain the information<br \/>\ndescribed above from PIO SDM, Vasant Vihar and provide it to the Appellant before 30 July<br \/>\n2009.\n<\/p>\n<p>Facts leading to show cause hearing on 29 December 2009:\n<\/p>\n<p>        On the basis of a letter alleging non-compliance dated 03\/08\/2009 from the Appellant, the<br \/>\nCommission issued a notice dated 09\/09\/2009 directing the PIO &amp; ADM to provide the aforesaid<br \/>\ninformation to the Appellant before 29\/09\/2009. The Commission then received a letter dated<br \/>\n17\/11\/2009 from the Appellant alleging that inspite of the clear directions of the Commission,<br \/>\nthe PIO &amp; ADM had not provided the complete information. On perusal of the reply sent to the<br \/>\nAppellant vide letter dated 14\/09\/2009, it was observed that the PIO &amp; ADM had not provided<br \/>\ninformation as to what were the Khasra Nos. of the unacquired land out of Khasra No.33, further,<br \/>\nthe said photocopy of AKS Sirza &amp; Tatima Field Book of Khasra Nos. 33\/1 to 33\/9 had not been<br \/>\nprovided. The Commission directed the PIO &amp; ADM to provide complete and correct<br \/>\ninformation to the Appellant before 14\/12\/2009. He was further directed to appear before the<br \/>\nCommission on 29\/12\/2009 at 11.00 AM along with his written submissions to show cause why<br \/>\npenalty should not be imposed on him under Section 20 (1) of the RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant facts emerging during the hearing on 29 December 2009:<br \/>\nThe following persons were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Absent<br \/>\nRespondent: Mr. Satnam Singh, Mr. Rajeev Kamra, LAC (SW) office, Mr. BL Meena, DC<br \/>\nOffice (SW)<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Satnam Singh from the ADM&#8217;s office stated that the information pertained to the SDM&#8217;s<br \/>\noffice as it concerned unacquired land. The Naib Tehsildar from the SDM&#8217;s office stated that the<br \/>\narea demarcation had not been done for Khasra Nos. 33\/1 to 33\/9 and therefore they could not<br \/>\nprovide the information to the Appellant. He is directed to inform the Appellant before 31<br \/>\nDecember 2009 that the demarcation of the unacquired land has not taken place. He should also<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                     Page 2 of 3<\/span><br \/>\n send a copy of the Revenue Records where information relating to Khasra Nos. 33\/1 to 33\/09 has<br \/>\nbeen recorded together and not separately. A copy of the information will be submitted to the<br \/>\nCommission before 04 January 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>The PIO has provided most of the information. It appears that there is no mala fide reason in not<br \/>\nproviding the remaining information. The show cause proceedings are hereby dropped.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                       Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                             Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                     29 December 2009<\/p>\n<p>(In any correspondence on this decision, mentioned the complete decision number.)<br \/>\n                                                                                                    (AK)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                            Page 3 of 3<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. &#8230; on 29 December, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office), Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067. Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/001396\/4137Adjunct Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/001396 Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma S\/o Late Sh. Rizak [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-223287","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. ... on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. ... on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-30T22:47:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. &#8230; on 29 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-30T22:47:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":667,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. ... on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-30T22:47:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. &#8230; on 29 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. ... on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. ... on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-30T22:47:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. &#8230; on 29 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-30T22:47:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009"},"wordCount":667,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009","name":"Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. ... on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-30T22:47:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-sharma-vs-office-of-the-addl-distt-on-29-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Radhey Shyam Sharma vs Office Of The Addl. Distt. &#8230; on 29 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223287"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223287\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}