{"id":223576,"date":"2009-12-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-13T20:36:21","modified_gmt":"2017-03-13T15:06:21","slug":"the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Management Shri Shivaji High … vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
The Management Shri Shivaji High … vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009<\/div>\n
Bench: V. A. Naik<\/div>\n
                                           1\n\n             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY:\n                            NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                   \n                         WRIT PETITON NO.3803 OF 2002\nPETITIONERS:\n\n\n\n\n                                                           \n1]  The Management Shri Shivaji High School, Sakharkheda, District : Buldhana,\n      through its Secretary,C\/o Shri Shivaji High School, Sakharkheda, District :\n      Buldhana\n\n\n\n\n                                                          \n2]    The Headmaster Shri Shivaji High School Sakharkheda, district : Buldhana\n                                       VERSUS\nRESPONDENTS:\n\n\n\n                                               \n1]  The Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Amravati.\n2]\n                                \n      Sanjay Ramrao Folaney, aged about 30 years, resident of Ward no.13, Near\n      Adarsha Vidyalaya, Chikhli, district : Buldhana\n                               \n3]    The Education Officer ( Secondary ), Zilla Parishad, Buldhana.\n============================================================\nShri Madhav Lakhe, advocate for the petitioner\n             \n\n\nShri S.D.Desai, h\/o P.B. Patil, advocate for respondent no.1\nShri S.B. Ahirkar, AGP for respondent no.3\n          \n\n\n\n============================================================\nCORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J.\n<\/pre>\n
DATE: DECEMBER 09, 2009<\/p>\n
ORAL JUDGMENT
\n      By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the Presiding<\/p>\n
Officer, School Tribunal, Amravati on 26.3.2002 holding that the respondent no.2<\/p>\n
was entitled for salary from 31.3.1997 till the date of order i.e. 26.3.2002.\n<\/p>\n
2]    The respondent no.2 had filed an appeal before the Presiding Officer, School<\/p>\n
                                                           ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:23:41 :::<\/span>
\n                                           2<\/span><\/p>\n
Tribunal, Amravati under section 9 of the M.E.P.S. Act 1977. It was the case of the<\/p>\n
respondent no.2 that he was appointed as a Assistant Teacher on 8.3.1996 and his<\/p>\n
services were illegally terminated by communication dated 31.3.1997. During the<\/p>\n
pendency of the appeal filed by the respondent no.2 an order was passed by the<\/p>\n
School Tribunal, Amravati staying the effect and operation of the termination order<\/p>\n
dated 31.3.1997. With the result the respondent no.2 continued in services of the<\/p>\n
petitioner during the pendency of the appeal, till the appeal was decided on<\/p>\n
26.3.2002. In such circumstances, the Tribunal held that the respondent no.2 was<\/p>\n
entitled for salary from 31.3.1997 till the date of order i.e. 26.3.2002. The judgment<\/p>\n
dated 26.3.2002 is impugned by the instant petition.\n<\/p>\n
3]    Shri Lakhe, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Tribunal<\/p>\n
was not justified in directing the petitioner to pay the salary of the respondent no.2<\/p>\n
from 31.3.1997 till. 26.3.2002. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that<\/p>\n
the services of the respondent no.2 were continued in terms of the interim order<\/p>\n
passed by the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the petitioner then submitted that the<\/p>\n
respondent no.2 had issued a communication dated 6.1.1997 to the Headmaster of<\/p>\n
the School in which he had categorically stated that he would not claim the salary<\/p>\n
from the management, but they must permit him to sign on the muster roll. It is<\/p>\n
                                                         ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:23:41 :::<\/span>
\n                                            3<\/span><\/p>\n
submitted on behalf of the petitioner that this communication is in the form of an<\/p>\n
undertaking and hence the respondent no.2 is not entitled to the salary from<\/p>\n
31.3.1997 to 26.3.2002.\n<\/p>\n
4]    Shri S.D. Desai, the learned counsel holding for Shri P.B. Patil, the learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the respondent no.2 supported the order passed by the Tribunal and<\/p>\n
submitted that the respondent no.2 had indeed worked as a teacher with the<\/p>\n
petitioner society till 26.3.2002 in view of the interim orders passed by the School<\/p>\n
Tribunal and hence the Tribunal has rightly directed the petitioner to pay the salary<\/p>\n
of the respondent no.2. The learned counsel for the respondent no.2 then submitted<\/p>\n
that the communication dated 6.1.1997 is issued much earlier to the Headmaster<\/p>\n
with a prayer to permit the respondent no.2 to sign on the muster roll, but since this<\/p>\n
was not done, the appeal was filed and hence the communication cannot be<\/p>\n
considered by this court for denying the salary to the respondent no.2. The learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the respondent no.2 sought for the dismissal of the writ petition.\n<\/p>\n
5]    Shri Ahirkar, learned AGP appearing on behalf of respondent no.1 and 3<\/p>\n
supported the order passed by the School Tribunal on 26.3.2002 and sought for the<\/p>\n
dismissal of the writ petition.\n<\/p>\n
                                                          ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:23:41 :::<\/span>
\n                                              4<\/span><\/p>\n
6]     I have considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and have<\/p>\n
perused the impugned order. It is an admitted position that the respondent no.2 was<\/p>\n
working with the petitioner society from 31.3.1997 till 26.3.2002 in view of the<\/p>\n
interim order passed by the School Tribunal. In such circumstances, since the<\/p>\n
respondent no.2 had actually worked as a Teacher with the petitioner during the<\/p>\n
relevant period, no fault can be found with the judgment of the School Tribunal<\/p>\n
directing the petitioner to pay the salary to the respondent no.2. The petitioner<\/p>\n
cannot take advantage of the communication dated 6.1.1997, issued by the<\/p>\n
respondent no.2 to Headmaster of the school. This is              not in the form of an<\/p>\n
undertaking. After filing of an appeal, even if there was such an undertaking, the<\/p>\n
same was against public policy. In such circumstances, the submission made on<\/p>\n
behalf of the petitioner on the basis of communication dated 6.1.1997 is liable to be<\/p>\n
rejected.\n<\/p>\n
7]     In the result the writ petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n
                                                   JUDGE<\/p>\n
smp.\n<\/p>\n
                                                            ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:23:41 :::<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court The Management Shri Shivaji High … vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009 Bench: V. A. Naik 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITON NO.3803 OF 2002 PETITIONERS: 1] The Management Shri Shivaji High School, Sakharkheda, District : Buldhana, through its Secretary,C\/o Shri Shivaji […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-223576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Management Shri Shivaji High ... vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Management Shri Shivaji High ... vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-13T15:06:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Management Shri Shivaji High … vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-13T15:06:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":701,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009\",\"name\":\"The Management Shri Shivaji High ... vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-13T15:06:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Management Shri Shivaji High … vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Management Shri Shivaji High ... vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Management Shri Shivaji High ... vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-13T15:06:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Management Shri Shivaji High … vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-13T15:06:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009"},"wordCount":701,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009","name":"The Management Shri Shivaji High ... vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-13T15:06:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-shri-shivaji-high-vs-the-presiding-officer-on-9-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Management Shri Shivaji High … vs The Presiding Officer on 9 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223576"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223576\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}