{"id":22371,"date":"2010-07-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010"},"modified":"2014-01-18T20:09:05","modified_gmt":"2014-01-18T14:39:05","slug":"padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nSA.No. 759 of 1996()\n\n\n\n1. PADMANABHA PILLAI\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. D.S.SHERLI\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH\n\n                For Respondent  :SMT.M.HEMALATHA\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID\n\n Dated :26\/07\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                      HARUN-UL-RASHID,J.\n              ------------------------------\n                      S.A.NO.759 OF 1996\n             -------------------------------\n             DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2010\n\n                             JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
                 Plaintiff in O.S.No.835\/92 on the file of the<\/p>\n
Principal Munsiff’s Court, Neyyattinkara is the appellant. The<\/p>\n
appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in<\/p>\n
A.S.No.685\/94 of the Sub Court, Neyyattinkara. The plaintiff<\/p>\n
filed the suit seeking declaration of title and possession over the<\/p>\n
plaint schedule property and for consequential injunction<\/p>\n
restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint<\/p>\n
schedule property, from demolishing any portion of the plaint<\/p>\n
schedule property and from causing any obstruction to the<\/p>\n
possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. The<\/p>\n
trial court dismissed the suit. The said judgment and decree were<\/p>\n
confirmed in appeal. The parties hereinafter are referred to as the<\/p>\n
plaintiff and defendants as arrayed in the suit.<\/p>\n
                 2. The plaint schedule property is 56 cents in<\/p>\n
                                    -2-<\/span>
\nS.A.No.759\/96<\/p>\n
Sy.Nos.113\/A\/B 2 and 3 and 112\/10 1 and 2. Plaintiff claims<\/p>\n
title and possession over the plaint schedule property as per<\/p>\n
Ext.A1 partition deed dated 30\/5\/1970. As per Ext.A1 the plaint<\/p>\n
schedule property was allotted to the plaintiff by including it in<\/p>\n
item No.2 of B schedule. In Ext.A1 the property is described as<\/p>\n
56 cents varambu purayidom comprised in Sy.Nos.112\/10 and<\/p>\n
113\/3A\/1.\n<\/p>\n
                3. The defendant       filed a written statement<\/p>\n
denying the averments in the plaint and prayed for dismissal of<\/p>\n
the suit. According to the defendant, she obtained 23 < cents of<\/p>\n
land as per Ext.B1 settlement deed        and Ext.B4 patta.    The<\/p>\n
defendant contended that the plaint description is wrong. The<\/p>\n
trial court held that Ext.A1 partition deed does not convey title,<\/p>\n
that the plaintiff has not produced any tax receipt to show the<\/p>\n
possession of the plaint schedule property and that the suit<\/p>\n
property has not been identified properly. Therefore, the suit was<\/p>\n
dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
                4. The Lower Appellate Court found that as per<\/p>\n
                                   -3-<\/span>
\nS.A.No.759\/96<\/p>\n
Ext.A1 the plaint schedule property was allotted to the plaintiff<\/p>\n
by including it in item No.2 of B schedule and that in Ext.A1 the<\/p>\n
property was described as 56 cents varambu purayidom<\/p>\n
comprised in Sy.Nos.112\/10 and 113\/3A\/1. At the same time, the<\/p>\n
court below held that from the description of B schedule item<\/p>\n
No.2 in Ext.A1, it is seen that the plaint schedule property is<\/p>\n
comprised in Sy.No.112\/10 alone. This finding of the Lower<\/p>\n
Appellate Court is not correct. I have perused Ext.A1 title deed,<\/p>\n
which shows that the property allotted as B schedule item No.2<\/p>\n
of Ext.A1 is 56 cents in Sy.No.113\/3A\/1 and 112\/10 1 and 2.<\/p>\n
Since the property is comprised in two survey numbers as stated<\/p>\n
above, the Lower Appellate Court is not justified in finding that<\/p>\n
the plaint schedule property is comprised in Sy.No.112\/10 alone.<\/p>\n
The Lower Appellate Court held that the plaint schedule<\/p>\n
description does not tally with the description of the property<\/p>\n
given in B schedule item No.2 of Ext.A1 and that the description<\/p>\n
of plaint schedule property is not in accordance with the<\/p>\n
description of B schedule item No.2 of Ext.A1. The Appellate<\/p>\n
                                    -4-<\/span>
\nS.A.No.759\/96<\/p>\n
Court further observed that it is the duty of the plaintiff to<\/p>\n
identify the property by taking out a commission.<\/p>\n
                5. Exts.C1 report and C1(a) plan are submitted by<\/p>\n
the Commissioner. In Ext.C1(a) the plaint schedule property was<\/p>\n
identified by the Commissioner as A B C D E F G H I J K L M N<\/p>\n
O P Q R S having an extent of 35.165 cents comprised in<\/p>\n
Sy.No.113\/AB\/2 and 3 and 112\/10\/1 and 2.              The Lower<\/p>\n
Appellate Court failed to rely on the Commissioner’s report and<\/p>\n
plan stating that Ext.C1(a) plan was not prepared by an<\/p>\n
authenticated surveyor nor it was prepared based on the survey<\/p>\n
plan or resurvey plan.\n<\/p>\n
                6. The identification of the property by the<\/p>\n
Commissioner through Ext.C1(a) plan was not accepted by the<\/p>\n
Lower Appellate Court stating that the plaint schedule property is<\/p>\n
having an extent of 56 cents, whereas the property measured and<\/p>\n
identified is only 35.165 cents. The plaintiff claims title and<\/p>\n
possession over the property described in the schedule. The<\/p>\n
property is lying within the four boundaries. Though in ExtA1 it<\/p>\n
                                     -5-<\/span>
\nS.A.No.759\/96<\/p>\n
is stated that the property is having an extent of 56 cents, on<\/p>\n
measurement it was found that the property is only 35.165 cents.<\/p>\n
If it is found that the extent of the property is lesser than what is<\/p>\n
stated in Ext.A1, that is not a reason for denying the relief to the<\/p>\n
plaintiff. If the extent is less, the court can limit the relief and<\/p>\n
declare title to the plaint schedule property having lesser extent.<\/p>\n
The property is comprised in two survey numbers. Ext.A2 is the<\/p>\n
judgment and decree in O.S.No.175\/83 filed by the very same<\/p>\n
plaintiff against the Panchayat. The subject matter of the suit is<\/p>\n
same.      In that suit the plaintiff produced 1107 document<\/p>\n
mentioned in Ext.A1, which is the prior document conferring title<\/p>\n
to the plaintiff’s family. The appellant produced the partition<\/p>\n
deed No.2453\/1107 M.E. along with I.A.No.1861\/2010 filed<\/p>\n
before this Court and prayed to accept the partition deed as<\/p>\n
additional evidence in the appeal.\n<\/p>\n
                7. The suit was dismissed by the trial court and<\/p>\n
confirmed by the Appellate Court mainly for the reason that the<\/p>\n
plaint schedule property was not properly identified by the<\/p>\n
                                     -6-<\/span>
\nS.A.No.759\/96<\/p>\n
Commissioner with the authenticated survey records. The Lower<\/p>\n
Appellate Court held that the identification was not done by an<\/p>\n
authenticated Surveyor and not based on the survey plan or<\/p>\n
resurvey plan. Another reason stated by the Lower Appellate<\/p>\n
Court is that the plaintiff is in possession of lesser extent than<\/p>\n
what is stated in the plaint schedule. That is also not a reason for<\/p>\n
examining the case set up by the plaintiff . The Lower Appellate<\/p>\n
Court should have remanded the case for fresh consideration<\/p>\n
after affording an opportunity to the plaintiff to identify the<\/p>\n
property to the satisfaction of the court below. The finding of the<\/p>\n
courts below that the plaint schedule property is comprised in<\/p>\n
Sy.No.112\/10 alone is also wrong, as I said earlier. Therefore,<\/p>\n
this Court is of the view that the matter requires re-consideration.<\/p>\n
The plaintiff is at liberty to take out a commission for identifying<\/p>\n
the plaint schedule property with the assistance of a Taluk<\/p>\n
Surveyor and to produce the document now produced along with<\/p>\n
I.A.No.1861\/2010, before the trial court. The document produced<\/p>\n
along with I.A.No.1861\/2010 shall be returned to the<\/p>\n
                                   -7-<\/span>
\nS.A.No.759\/96<\/p>\n
appellant\/plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n
               In the result, the appeal is allowed. The case is<\/p>\n
remanded for de novo trial. The trial court shall consider the case<\/p>\n
on merits and dispose of the same in accordance with law within<\/p>\n
a period of nine months from the date of appearance of the<\/p>\n
parties. The parties shall appear before the court below on 18th<\/p>\n
August, 2010.\n<\/p>\n
                                                   Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                                            HARUN-UL-RASHID,
\n                                                   JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
kcv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM SA.No. 759 of 1996() 1. PADMANABHA PILLAI … Petitioner Vs 1. D.S.SHERLI … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH For Respondent :SMT.M.HEMALATHA The Hon’ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID Dated :26\/07\/2010 O R D E R HARUN-UL-RASHID,J. —————————— S.A.NO.759 OF […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22371","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPadmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-01-18T14:39:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-18T14:39:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1172,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-18T14:39:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-01-18T14:39:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-18T14:39:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010"},"wordCount":1172,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010","name":"Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-18T14:39:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmanabha-pillai-vs-d-s-sherli-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Padmanabha Pillai vs D.S.Sherli on 26 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22371","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22371"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22371\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}